Evergreen ILS Website

IRC log for #evergreen, 2019-11-04

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat

All times shown according to the server's local time.

Time Nick Message
01:27 sandbergja_ joined #evergreen
07:24 rfrasur joined #evergreen
08:25 Dyrcona joined #evergreen
08:28 Dyrcona csharp: So, it took longer with the triggers disabled. I guess less of this database was in memory at the time. I will try yet again, since the database were reloaded yesterday.
08:28 Dyrcona "It" being the database upgrade with the updates to action.circulation and action.aged_circulation.
08:43 mmorgan joined #evergreen
09:10 jvwoolf joined #evergreen
09:11 dbwells joined #evergreen
09:11 jvwoolf left #evergreen
09:33 yboston joined #evergreen
09:55 sandbergja_ joined #evergreen
10:15 cmalm joined #evergreen
10:30 alynn26 joined #evergreen
10:37 sandbergja_ joined #evergreen
10:44 jvwoolf joined #evergreen
11:02 pinesol News from qatests: Failed Installing Angular web client <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~li​ve/test.29.html#2019-11-04T11:00:49,172469610-0500 -0>
11:18 Christineb joined #evergreen
11:46 devted berick: Looking at your new "Angular staff catalog 3.4 project docs update" wiki  page:
11:46 devted https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?i​d=dev:browser_staff:angular_staff_catalog
11:47 berick howdy devted
11:51 devted Hiya berick! You were asking for comments on what was missing from the page, and I was wondering about the status of aqcuistions in the new Angular Cataloging -> MARC Batch Import/Export page? I was told by jihpringle on Friday that "If staff want to create a purchase order or selection list from the MARC file it needs to be loaded via the Acquisitions -> Load MARC Order Records interface."
11:51 devted I see the old interface is still available at /eg/staff/cat/catalog/vandelay
11:53 berick devted: that's right, as it stands, the ACQ record import is still using the older Vandelay UI.  migrating the ACQ bits to use the new Vandelay UI will presumably be part of some pending ACQ development work.
11:54 berick didn't make much sense to integrate the Angular Vandelay stuff into the Dojo ACQ UI's...
11:56 devted berick:  Thank you.  Do you know when that will be part of the officially scheduled "pending development"?  I guess Sitka's docs will document changes
11:58 devted I mean, to deprecate that part of Dojo ACQ UI, since work is to move off of Dojo
11:58 berick hm, I guess I'm thinking more about the embedded Vandelay UI that appears when you chose Load Bibs and Items from an existing purchase order.
11:59 berick devted: have you tried loading ACQ records from the newer MARC Import/Export interface?  I can't think of any reason off the top of my head that wouldn't work.
11:59 berick jihpringle would know better than me, though
12:01 berick oh wait
12:01 berick i see, there's no provider field
12:01 berick for starters
12:01 berick or picklist selector
12:01 berick and other options..
12:02 berick i see, OK, well adding those options to a acq-flavored version of the new marc import/export could be done in advance of the full ACQ overhaul.
12:03 berick devted: no, I don't know when it will be queued for development
12:04 devted berick: Thanks; I haven't tried it myself yet. The purchase order has already been added and activated (they like to do that because the MARC batch import supports more options for holdings.  I will refer people to the Dojo ACQ UI for now, but was wondering what might be unofficially/officially pending for later
12:04 devted berick: Thank you... will relay the possibility of an acq-flavored version
12:05 devted Do you know if there's a page discussing items for the future ACQ overhaul?
12:05 berick devted: it's certainly on the general list of things that need doing.  no one's run with it just yet, though.
12:06 jihpringle joined #evergreen
12:06 berick and by "general list of things" i just mean the dojo/etc to angular migration.
12:08 devted Thank you, if you build it they will come!   :-) Will pass on the info
12:52 khuckins joined #evergreen
13:56 cmalm_ joined #evergreen
14:39 rlefaive joined #evergreen
14:58 jvwoolf joined #evergreen
14:59 jonadab joined #evergreen
15:00 khuckins joined #evergreen
15:16 rfrasur joined #evergreen
15:57 jihpringle joined #evergreen
16:23 jvwoolf left #evergreen
16:53 jeffdavis When retrieving an invoice via EDI, does the invoice file (acq.edi_message.remote_file) exist on the local filesystem at all?
16:54 jeffdavis I need to re-retrieve an invoice, and not sure if it's just a question of deleting the previous retrieval attempt from acq.edi_message or if I also need to delete a local copy of the file somewhere too.
16:56 berick jeffdavis: you should not have to delete a local copy
16:58 berick if the previous iteration successfully created the invoice, then re-processing it will fail (duplicate inv_ident values)
16:58 jeffdavis great, thanks berick
16:59 jeffdavis In this case it looks like the invoice was not created, so just need to delete from acq.edi_message and hopefully it will work this time.
17:07 mmorgan left #evergreen
17:17 cesardv_ joined #evergreen
18:45 sandbergja_ joined #evergreen
19:05 sandbergja joined #evergreen
21:02 sandbergja joined #evergreen
23:02 pinesol News from qatests: Failed Installing Angular web client <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~li​ve/test.29.html#2019-11-04T23:01:04,280402285-0500 -0>

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat