| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 05:43 |
|
adam_reid joined #evergreen |
| 07:34 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 08:04 |
|
BDorsey joined #evergreen |
| 08:14 |
|
cbrown joined #evergreen |
| 08:23 |
|
redavis joined #evergreen |
| 08:36 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:38 |
|
dguarrac joined #evergreen |
| 08:51 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:40 |
phasefx |
berick: hey Bill, for KCLS and Quipu, the verification bit is entirely a KCLS concept and not Quipu? What is setting up the verification code in the ident column, an A/T event? Quipu? |
| 09:45 |
berick |
phasefx: right, it's entirely on the KCLS side. we generate the code when the actor.usr is created. |
| 09:45 |
berick |
https://github.com/kcls/evergreen-pub/blob/release/3.11/Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/WWW/EGCatLoader/Ecard.pm#L64 |
| 09:45 |
phasefx |
@berick++ |
| 09:45 |
pinesol |
phasefx: IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! |
| 09:45 |
* phasefx |
looks askance at pinesol |
| 09:46 |
phasefx |
and man you're up early |
| 09:46 |
phasefx |
brain fart, had it in my head for a moment you were actually living in seattle :D |
| 09:48 |
berick |
heh, yeah i'm only partly adjusted to west coast time |
| 09:50 |
phasefx |
:D What do you have actually calling that generate function, an A/T? a trigger on actor.usr? |
| 09:51 |
berick |
phasefx: line 336 |
| 09:52 |
phasefx |
ah, that's a cgi param in the version I was looking at. Thanks again! |
| 09:53 |
phasefx |
or not even that, just pruned |
| 10:04 |
Dyrcona |
phasefx: If you're adding that mainline Evergreen, it should he controlled by YAOUS. I don't think anyone outside of KCLS uses that, and there at least 3 other sites using Quipu. |
| 10:04 |
phasefx |
Dyrcona++ yeap |
| 10:05 |
phasefx |
so far we're getting a generic way to handle surveys, and a security token using a shared secret in a YAOUS |
| 10:06 |
Dyrcona |
phasefx++ |
| 10:06 |
phasefx |
and stat cats likely to follow in the same vein as surveys |
| 10:06 |
Dyrcona |
I like the security token idea, and I've not spent time trying to figure out a generic way to handle surveys. |
| 10:06 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, I think everyone hard codes the stat cats for now. |
| 10:07 |
phasefx |
just a naming convention for the cgi params quipu agreed to. surveyid:questionid:answerid |
| 10:13 |
phasefx |
or rather, asvr as the param, and what I said as the value |
| 10:13 |
phasefx |
repeatabld |
| 10:13 |
phasefx |
for some spelling thereof |
| 11:27 |
|
adam_reid joined #evergreen |
| 11:33 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:53 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 13:43 |
Dyrcona |
I'm tempted to remove milestones from a couple of bugs because we originally said we wouldn't add milestones to bugs unless there was a branch or it was in progress and the person working on it was committed to getting it done. |
| 13:44 |
Dyrcona |
The milestones also provide a way for the bugs not getting lost in the sea of other Lp bugs, so it's a toss up. |
| 13:50 |
redavis |
++ |
| 14:40 |
abneiman |
I find milestones to be helpful in the doesn't-get-lost sense, personally. If it's pullrequested, and applicable to a target(s), I will usually add them. IMO, if a committer disagrees (or the PR doesn't backport cleanly) they can certainly remove the milestone. |
| 14:40 |
abneiman |
target=milestone |
| 15:07 |
|
adam_reid joined #evergreen |
| 15:18 |
|
redavis joined #evergreen |
| 15:41 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 17:05 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:18 |
|
adam_reid joined #evergreen |
| 18:25 |
pinesol |
News from commits: Forward-port 3.12.5-3.12.6 upgrade script <https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec61542bfc9ad7f35876abc7fc6fa13be1a0a9a0> |
| 19:31 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
