| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 07:13 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:15 |
|
kworstell_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:31 |
|
BDorsey joined #evergreen |
| 07:46 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 08:02 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 08:18 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
| 08:40 |
|
dguarrac joined #evergreen |
| 08:43 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 09:27 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:46 |
|
mantis1 joined #evergreen |
| 09:53 |
mantis1 |
for those who use geo prox and Google Maps specifically, does your API key only work for one server or can you use it for mutliple? |
| 10:00 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:07 |
* Dyrcona |
has been swimming in the wrong channel asking questions about indexing.... I'm just gonna do a full pingest and see what happens. |
| 10:18 |
Dyrcona |
This one doesn't have a 024, either..... |
| 10:18 |
Dyrcona |
The bad examples of having "multiple" 024s on display don't actually have 024s. |
| 10:20 |
Dyrcona |
We should be consistent with record/source in the database, but I guess that bird has flown... |
| 10:22 |
|
sleary joined #evergreen |
| 10:23 |
Dyrcona |
xmllint and namespaces..... :( |
| 10:25 |
Dyrcona |
Remove the namespace and I still get XPath set is empty.... |
| 10:27 |
Dyrcona |
Can I pick records to test, or what? <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="">660355362927</subfield></datafield> |
| 10:27 |
Dyrcona |
No subfield code..... |
| 10:27 |
Dyrcona |
How's that even possible? |
| 10:30 |
Dyrcona |
And, another one with a blank subfield code. |
| 10:30 |
Dyrcona |
Maybe we don't have any valid 024s in the database that's why the attempt was made to expand the code? |
| 10:31 |
Dyrcona |
But, I've only looked at 2 records out of a sample of the first 10 that came back in a query. |
| 10:34 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:57 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:51 |
Dyrcona |
OK. I got back to messing with my UPCs and I've verified that the XPath should work. Guess I'll have to wait for the full ingest to finish. One of the options that I used yesterday must have prevented the identifiers from being handled. |
| 12:55 |
Dyrcona |
Oof! |
| 12:55 |
Dyrcona |
I see I still have a problem and the XPath that I updated won't work.... |
| 12:58 |
Dyrcona |
I had to modify it slightly for the test script, and I assumed it was equivalent to what was in the database. It was not. |
| 12:59 |
Dyrcona |
OK! Now, it works with the same syntax. |
| 13:00 |
Dyrcona |
Too many different domain specific languages to try and keep straight.... "Says you..." "Says who?" "Says you, the Lisp guy." |
| 13:00 |
Dyrcona |
There's a joke in there. I promise. :) |
| 13:07 |
Dyrcona |
It's quiet. Either everyone else is working or they've all ducked out to the market before the snow hits.... :) |
| 13:14 |
* mmorgan |
would think all the bread, eggs and milk were already gone from the last storm :) |
| 13:15 |
berick |
just cold rain here :( |
| 13:21 |
Dyrcona |
I went out before work to grab a few things. |
| 13:22 |
Dyrcona |
And, here come the "closing early" emails on the directors' list... :) |
| 13:54 |
jeff |
just perpetually overcast and gray skies here: https://youtu.be/FDvImJ_6HYw |
| 15:12 |
Dyrcona |
Looks like I finally fixed the XPath. I've got 106 entries in identifier_field_entry and they all look like UPCs. The ingest hasn't finished, yet. |
| 15:44 |
jeffdavis |
I've got a 3.9.1 test server where I've generated search suggestions (ran the sideloader steps and populated search.symspell_dictionary with >6M rows) and have the org settings/internal flags set to default values, the but I'm not seeing any suggestions on my test searches. Are there other steps I need to take to make this work? |
| 15:58 |
Dyrcona |
jeffdavis: Are you doing single word searches? |
| 16:00 |
jeffdavis |
good question - I am, I'll double check with other testers |
| 16:05 |
jihpringle |
jeffdavis: I just tried a single word and then a multiple word search on our testing server and I don't see anything new whether I get results or not |
| 16:49 |
Dyrcona |
Sorry, got distracted by some work. :) |
| 16:50 |
Dyrcona |
It has been a while since I looked at it. I'll have to do some code diving tomorrow. |
| 16:50 |
Dyrcona |
Cheers! |
| 17:06 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:16 |
|
jvwoolf left #evergreen |
| 17:25 |
|
dmoore_ left #evergreen |
| 18:30 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
