Time |
Nick |
Message |
08:32 |
|
BDorsey joined #evergreen |
08:42 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
08:45 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
08:48 |
|
tsadok joined #evergreen |
10:26 |
Dyrcona |
miker: ping |
11:29 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
12:31 |
|
BDorsey joined #evergreen |
12:41 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt: ping |
13:00 |
Dyrcona |
If anyone sees a message from the working repository about "too many unreachable loose objects" and needing to remove gc.log, I did a remote prune, but I can't get in to remove gc.log, so I think the issue is resolved, but the log is hanging around. |
13:14 |
berick |
thanks Dyrcona |
13:45 |
pinesol |
News from commits: LP#1908455 - Prevent multiple server processes <https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9d445a511b59cbae88bd9a28dd253cd68e49840> |
14:09 |
JBoyer |
I suspect we should also remove some of the more ancient working branches. They're not necessarily large individually, but they do add up. |
14:11 |
Dyrcona |
Yeahp. For those who don't know, you can delete your own branches by pushing an empty branch git push working :user/yourname/remotebranchname. Where user could also be "collab." |
14:19 |
|
BDorsey_ joined #evergreen |
14:19 |
|
BDorsey_ joined #evergreen |
14:24 |
berick |
or create a new working-v2 repo and keep the old one, maybe read-only |
14:24 |
Dyrcona |
And move to Github or GitLab at the same time? |
14:32 |
Dyrcona |
If we move to Github or to GitLab, we wouldn't need the working repo. |
14:35 |
Dyrcona |
We could eventually replace Lp bugs with issues and pull requests. |
14:44 |
JBoyer |
True. I think there's enough support (or rather, not enough resistance) to make that move. |
14:44 |
JBoyer |
It needs a champion though, someone who can put a schedule together, execute it - including the cat-herding of the rest of us that would be required - and I don't know who has that time. |
14:45 |
Dyrcona |
Maybe in a few months.... |
14:45 |
Dyrcona |
I'm leaning towards Github. |
14:45 |
JBoyer |
Same. |
14:49 |
Dyrcona |
We've only been talking about it for 6 or 7 years.... :) |
14:50 |
JBoyer |
Yup. Because of the above. :-/ |
14:51 |
JBoyer |
And I'm noticing that my bouncer doesn't correctly keep my messages, so this is quite an interesting monologue on my other devices. |
14:51 |
Dyrcona |
Heh. |
14:52 |
Dyrcona |
One of the big sticking points is moving away from Lp and all of the bugs with references to the working repo, but I think we can work something out. |
14:52 |
Dyrcona |
#action Dyrcona to work out a migration plan to move to Github. |
14:52 |
Dyrcona |
:) |
14:53 |
JBoyer |
Even just forcing the working repos to RO and pushing new things to GH would work, (might make some collab/ stuff annoying I suppose, but that doesn't seem very common) |
14:54 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, very few collab branches are actually collab. It's possible to share repos/branches with others on Github, too. |
14:59 |
jeff |
github parsing imported issues for username mentions and not having a way to specify issue numbers for imported issues are both annoying quirks/limitations. |
14:59 |
jeff |
(not saying that either is insurmountable) |
15:00 |
jeff |
re-evaluating how we merge/cherry-pick things would be good also. |
15:01 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: Are you suggesting that we switch to merge? I'm not against it, just curious if that's what you mean. |
15:01 |
* jeff |
prepares to place his tuit order |
15:01 |
JBoyer |
GH seems to very strongly lean that way. (At least that seems to be all the various buttons want to do) |
15:01 |
|
kworstell_isl joined #evergreen |
15:02 |
JBoyer |
"Update this branch?" Sure, it could stand a rebase "Ok! Merged with upstream!" :-( |
15:02 |
Dyrcona |
TBH I don't use the GUI much. I mostly do stuff locally and push. |
15:03 |
JBoyer |
Unless we forbid use of the UI it's going to happen, so we may as well be amenable to the results. |
15:03 |
JBoyer |
(whatever those may be) |
15:03 |
Dyrcona |
I'm cool with merges. I use them on one of my local and some other projects that I dabble on. |
15:06 |
* Dyrcona |
makes note: Add bit about working with merge commits to git presentation. |
15:09 |
jeff |
Dyrcona: I'm not suggesting anything yet, other than noting that GitHub has opinions (and options for us to choose as default) and if the way we're doing things right now clashes somewhat, we might consider the options and reach some concensus/etc. |
15:10 |
jeff |
i.e., do we want to use GitHub's idea of pull requests, do we want to default to merge/squash/rebase for those pull requests, do we want to discourage the use of the UI for marging/accepting said pull requests because of the side effects, etc. |
15:11 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah. Wonder if we should start that conversation on the list and then have a vote on moving to Github during the conference? |
15:25 |
JBoyer |
+1 to list leading into in-person. |
15:28 |
Dyrcona |
I'll see if I can get the conversation started next week. |
15:29 |
JBoyer |
Dyrcona++ |
15:35 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
16:04 |
|
JBoyer joined #evergreen |
16:05 |
JBoyer |
testing |
16:05 |
berick |
ack: testing |
16:05 |
JBoyer |
But not from my bouncer. :( |
16:06 |
JBoyer |
A mystery for another year I suppose |
16:10 |
JBoyer |
Speaking of, whoever is around today (Dycona++, berick++, jeff++) have a happy new year. |
16:10 |
JBoyer |
Alas, typos. Dyrcona++ |
16:10 |
Dyrcona |
Happy New Year to you also, JBoyer++ |
16:11 |
Dyrcona |
berick++ jeff++ |
16:11 |
Dyrcona |
I'll be here tomorrow, too. |
16:38 |
* Dyrcona |
starts winding down the day. |
16:38 |
Dyrcona |
If I don't "see" you tomorrow, have a Happy New Year! |
16:45 |
pinesol |
News from commits: LP1999954 Modal header color contrast fixes <https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=e91f2837865f1f22363c49acb40f241b2d589ed0> |
17:15 |
pinesol |
News from commits: LP1995418 Shelving location selector won't dropdown <https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=142a51bb71a8ff922943be79fae3cc57ebe9d1ad> |