| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 06:01 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 07:15 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 08:45 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 09:00 |
|
stephengwills joined #evergreen |
| 09:06 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 09:06 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:14 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 11:37 |
|
nfBurton joined #evergreen |
| 11:42 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Garry Collum] LP1809157 SMS Carriers display not in alphabetical order - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=dc243b4> |
| 12:08 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:29 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 12:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Mike Rylander] LP#1823983: repeat_delay check removes event definition id filter - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=36cc5ef> |
| 13:20 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
| 13:20 |
|
miker joined #evergreen |
| 13:20 |
|
phasefx joined #evergreen |
| 13:20 |
|
rhamby joined #evergreen |
| 13:20 |
|
abneiman joined #evergreen |
| 13:20 |
|
jweston joined #evergreen |
| 13:38 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 14:47 |
Dyrcona |
Does anyone use the MARC stream importer with OCLC? |
| 14:47 |
Dyrcona |
I have questions. |
| 14:51 |
berick |
Dyrcona: affirmative |
| 14:52 |
JBoyer |
claiming 1284 for (void *) |
| 14:53 |
Dyrcona |
Can other staff see the queue used by the importer, i.e. can catalogers use their regular login to access it? |
| 14:54 |
berick |
Dyrcona: it's the same as any other bib queue |
| 14:55 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 14:55 |
Dyrcona |
So, yes? |
| 14:57 |
* berick |
doublechecks the view perms.. |
| 14:58 |
berick |
yes, assuming the right perms |
| 14:58 |
Dyrcona |
Here's the thing: We have 3 catalogers that are going to load records via the stream importer from OCLC, and we'll want them to all be able to process it, etc. |
| 14:59 |
Dyrcona |
Also, I've never used Vandelay. Can you reuse a queue? That is, can you add some records, process them, then add more later and just process those? |
| 14:59 |
Dyrcona |
Well, "never' means once or twice for one time tests. |
| 15:00 |
berick |
yes you can reuse queues. |
| 15:01 |
Dyrcona |
I thought so, but I've never done it. |
| 15:01 |
Dyrcona |
Thanks, berick++ |
| 15:01 |
Dyrcona |
We're going to set up a test on our training server, and I think I know what I need to do to set it up, despite my seemingly ignorant questions. :) |
| 15:02 |
berick |
Dyrcona: you can also tell the stream importer to import the records as they arrive so staff don't have to interract with vandelay |
| 15:02 |
Dyrcona |
berick: Yeah. I think they want them in the queue and then they import/overlay later. |
| 15:02 |
berick |
*nod* |
| 15:02 |
berick |
that works too |
| 15:02 |
Dyrcona |
Right now, they're all updating a file on a server that one of them imports later. |
| 15:04 |
* Dyrcona |
seems to be having difficulty with task switching today. |
| 15:12 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
Showing latest 5 of 6 commits to Evergreen... |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Boyer] LP1170795: Void deposits on checkin - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=640006e> |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Boyer] LP1170795 Stamp Database Update - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0597103> |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Mike Risher] LP1752356 Offline block list date addition - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=dc28297> |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP1752356 Offline expired patrons download date additions - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=53fd947> |
| 15:55 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Terran McCanna] LP1752356 Offline Block List Download Date - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=44c4511> |
| 16:05 |
|
ddale joined #evergreen |
| 16:06 |
ddale |
Can anyone tell me how to get a report of the bookings scheduled through the booking module? |
| 16:07 |
ddale |
Not the pull list but an annual report |
| 16:15 |
jihpringle |
ddale: we have a report template that gives a list by barcode if total reservations |
| 16:16 |
jihpringle |
we have it set up to be monthly |
| 16:16 |
jihpringle |
it's based on the request_time column in the booking.reservation table |
| 16:16 |
jihpringle |
does that sound like what you're looking for? |
| 16:17 |
ddale |
Yes, that does sound right. |
| 16:19 |
jihpringle |
ddale if you message me your email I can send you screen shots of the Display Fields and Filters in the template editor |
| 16:19 |
ddale |
@jihpringle, thanks! It is ddale georgialibraries.org |
| 16:19 |
pinesol |
ddale: <shaggy>We're, like, doomed.</shaggy> |
| 16:20 |
ddale |
:) |
| 16:22 |
jihpringle |
ddale: screenshots sent |
| 16:23 |
jihpringle |
we have several booking templates so let me know if there's anything else you're looking for |
| 16:23 |
mmorgan |
jihpringle++ |
| 16:23 |
ddale |
jihpringle Thanks! |
| 16:23 |
jihpringle |
np :) |
| 16:27 |
Bmagic |
forgive my lack of cataloging expierence. But I've just manually linked a 650 to an authority record, and Evergreen plopped this little nugget into the MARC $0(Set cat.marc_control_number_identifier in Library Settings)2 |
| 16:28 |
Bmagic |
I went and found the code that created that. It's a result of that setting being null. OK, then, I'll set that setting. The setting description is a bit vegue |
| 16:28 |
Bmagic |
vague |
| 16:28 |
Bmagic |
"Defines the control number identifier used in 003 and 035 fields." |
| 16:31 |
Bmagic |
and now, I assume that without this library setting, the bib link does nothing. I need to set it to be equal to the Authority record's field? Like "150" ? |
| 17:11 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:22 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 17:25 |
jeff |
Bmagic: the value of the setting in question is often a MARC organization code. More information on those here: https://www.loc.gov/marc/organizations/ and also mentioned by the 003 and 035 field defs, i.e. https://loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd003.html |
| 17:26 |
Bmagic |
jeff: sweet! In other words, it's nothing functional for Evergreen? |
| 17:26 |
jeff |
Bmagic: for example, I believe PINES has theirs set to GaAaGPL |
| 17:30 |
jeff |
I don't know offhand what the impact is if you have it unset. I think it's recommended to have it set to something if you have maintain_control_numbers enabled, but it might be required/preferred even with that off. |
| 17:35 |
Bmagic |
I'm still chasing down the code that should* be giving me authority search results when the search term from the authority record tag 550 is searched for. I think I'm really close |
| 17:36 |
Bmagic |
This table: authority.control_set_authority_field contains the glue. select * from authority.control_set_authority_field where tag in('550','450') |
| 17:37 |
Bmagic |
(I'm sure this is all stock default) - shows me that my database is configured to "consume" the 450 and the 550. The search is working when I use anything from the 450 (working in this context means that Evergreen gives me the "see also" stuff) |
| 17:38 |
Bmagic |
I think where it breaks down is authority.simple_heading |
| 17:38 |
Bmagic |
That table is not* receiving rows from the authority record's 550 field |
| 17:50 |
Bmagic |
I'm mistaken on that, the 550 is in the authority.simple_heading, somewhere along the search, my 550 stuff is getting omitted |
| 17:51 |
Bmagic |
I'm currently disecting FUNCTION metabib.browse |
| 18:01 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 18:25 |
Bmagic |
I think it's this hardcoded string in the function: AND ahf.heading_purpose IN (' || $$'variant'$$ || ') |
| 18:27 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 21:20 |
|
stephengwills left #evergreen |
