| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:06 |
|
JBoyer joined #evergreen |
| 01:49 |
|
JBoyer joined #evergreen |
| 04:22 |
|
dbwells joined #evergreen |
| 06:01 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 06:21 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 06:25 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 07:12 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 07:18 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 07:40 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 07:49 |
Dyrcona |
OMG! The update that is taking 6 minutes in production on Pg 9.6 just ran in 6 seconds on Pg11 with default settings. |
| 07:50 |
Dyrcona |
Unless..... |
| 07:50 |
Dyrcona |
I think I found something that needs changing for Pg 11.... |
| 07:54 |
Dyrcona |
No. It just runs really fast. I don't see any errors in the profile output or just doing the update. |
| 07:55 |
Dyrcona |
This is very promising! |
| 07:59 |
Dyrcona |
Pg11++ which is Pg12 and I'm trying that next. :) |
| 08:01 |
JBoyer |
Dyrcona++ |
| 08:01 |
JBoyer |
That sounds great |
| 08:04 |
Dyrcona |
I don't know what other surprises may await us in Pg12 or Pg11, but I think I'm going to switch my main development VM to used the Pg12 database if this test goes well. |
| 08:08 |
|
alynn26 joined #evergreen |
| 08:15 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 08:22 |
|
mantis2 joined #evergreen |
| 08:36 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:47 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 08:54 |
|
jvwoolf1 joined #evergreen |
| 10:19 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:44 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 11:09 |
|
alynn26_away joined #evergreen |
| 11:50 |
jeff |
neat. we have an open circulation with a null due_date. |
| 11:55 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 12:05 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:15 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: Well, that's interesting. |
| 12:17 |
jeff |
ah, and closed circs with null due date also. looks like legacy migrated data. |
| 12:19 |
jeff |
the open circ is not migrated data, but the xact_finish is a date that i know well as a Big Change day, so I suspect I'll find something related when I look into it later. |
| 12:31 |
alynn26 |
does anyone have a suggestion as to why our hold notification action triggers are not honoring the Holds shelf delay? |
| 12:39 |
jeff |
alynn26: do you mean the "Hold Shelf Status Delay" org unit setting, circ.hold_shelf_status_delay? |
| 12:40 |
alynn26 |
yes |
| 12:41 |
alynn26 |
Or am I thinking of the wrong setting. We are trying to set it up so that Holds notificaiton are delayed. Every library wants a different delay. |
| 12:42 |
jeff |
I don't think that the HoldIsAvailable validator respects that setting. |
| 12:44 |
jeff |
If I'm right, short of teaching the validator about that setting, I think you'd want to adjust the delay field on the A/T event definition. |
| 12:44 |
jeff |
That won't scale well if you have one A/T event definition used across many libraries that all want a different delay. |
| 12:46 |
alynn26 |
With all this curbside pickup, that was not the answer I was wanting. |
| 12:52 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 12:56 |
jeffdavis |
Seems like it would be easy to take circ.hold_shelf_status_delay into account in the validator though. |
| 12:58 |
alynn26 |
Well, I may just try to code this in. And see if i can get it to work. |
| 13:08 |
|
mantis2 left #evergreen |
| 13:11 |
|
mantis2 joined #evergreen |
| 13:21 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 13:34 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 13:42 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 14:03 |
jeff |
we're starting with appointment slots for pickup. |
| 14:03 |
jeff |
holds ready? call to schedule a time to get them. |
| 14:04 |
jeff |
we may drop that requirement after a time based on usage/demand, but it's hard to add it later. |
| 14:45 |
mmorgan |
Regarding the hold shelf status delay, we were thinking of adjusting the delay field for the notification action trigger, We have one that serves for all libraries right now, but were thinking of cloning it as necessary. |
| 14:45 |
mmorgan |
Not sure yet if any of our libraries are going to use the status delay, though. We're recommending capturing local holds as transits. |
| 14:47 |
Dyrcona |
We've suggested the local holds as transits. We currently have set the email and SMS notifications to active = false. Some of our members say they want the notification enabled again and some don't. For that I'm considering a filter on hold.available. |
| 14:48 |
Dyrcona |
We've also had requests for some kind of local holds only functionality, for whatever local means. |
| 15:15 |
|
jvwoolf1 joined #evergreen |
| 15:52 |
|
mantis2 left #evergreen |
| 16:48 |
* miker |
reads up ... csharp, from yesterday, yes. soft boundary restricts selection_ou to the deepest part of the tree that has an eligible copy. (hard boundary is the highest up the tree it will ever look) |
| 17:01 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 17:12 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:33 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 18:01 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 18:17 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 18:52 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
