Time |
Nick |
Message |
05:56 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
06:02 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
07:24 |
|
Nidheesh joined #evergreen |
07:24 |
Nidheesh |
hi |
07:24 |
Nidheesh |
i need a help in SIP2 configuration |
07:26 |
Nidheesh |
i configured SIP2 in evergreen ils 2.11.8 version with RAW port for bibliotheca kiosk integration. configuration is done successfully but got two issues in the connectivity |
07:26 |
Nidheesh |
one: kiosk goes offline when a patron enters wrong credentials and it takes exactly 60 seconds to come back |
07:28 |
Nidheesh |
two: i have integrated security gate also with ILS via SIP2, kiosk goes offline if gate connectivity is on. both are not working simultaniously. (created another SIP user account for gate with telnet port but result is negative |
07:32 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
07:55 |
Nidheesh |
hi |
08:16 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
09:20 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
09:21 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
09:31 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
09:54 |
gmcharlt |
berick: you might find 1729610 of interest |
09:55 |
gmcharlt |
er, bug 1729610 |
09:55 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1729610 in OpenSRF "allow requests to be queued if max_children limit is hit" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1729610 |
10:03 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
10:18 |
berick |
gmcharlt: *nod* good idea |
10:27 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
10:59 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
12:07 |
dbs |
Ah, vandelay upload error "nginx: 2017/11/02 09:04:53 [error] 3693#3693: *76600 client intended to send too large body: 2121251 bytes", to be solved by bumping client_max_body_size in nginx conf |
12:08 |
berick |
dbs++ |
12:13 |
rhamby |
ericar: can you poke Cherokee on those bibs IDs. I really don't want to create 60K pre-cats. |
12:13 |
rhamby |
ignore me, irc is freezing up on me |
12:17 |
|
collum_ joined #evergreen |
12:20 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
12:37 |
berick |
@quote random |
12:37 |
pinesol_green |
berick: Quote #142: "csharp: do you want to be a sys admin or a fireman?" (added by mrpeters at 08:41 PM, March 03, 2016) |
12:40 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
12:40 |
berick |
I'll go with fire admin |
12:53 |
bshum |
Bmagic: Hmm... that sample oils_sip.xml.example from Evergreen repo is a bad one if I recall right. That's part of this old LP bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1399790 |
12:53 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1399790 in Evergreen "deprecate oils_sip.xml.example" [Wishlist,Triaged] |
12:53 |
bshum |
Though at this point, who knows |
12:53 |
Bmagic |
oh? |
12:53 |
Bmagic |
We are using some sort of a hybrid |
12:53 |
Bmagic |
seems* to be working |
12:54 |
bshum |
Yeah, probably that's the right answer, almost 3 years after I filed that bug :) |
12:54 |
bshum |
As I'm sure there's been changes in both places since |
13:00 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
13:02 |
csharp |
ours is still *named* oils_sip.xml, but incorporates sipconfig.xml |
13:03 |
bshum |
csharp: Well looking for my bug, I found your bug idea to move it all to DB side |
13:03 |
bshum |
So yeah, lots of room to improve :) |
13:03 |
csharp |
yeah we shouldn't have to edit hundreds of lines of XML to add/remove/change accounts (IMHO) |
13:04 |
csharp |
you can script it of course, but better if it can all just be in the db |
13:11 |
|
hbrennan joined #evergreen |
13:13 |
* Bmagic |
waves at hbrennan |
13:13 |
hbrennan |
Bmagic: Hi! I know, it's really me! |
13:14 |
Bmagic |
hbrennan: going to make the trip from Alaska next week? |
13:14 |
hbrennan |
Bmagic: No sir. :( |
13:14 |
Bmagic |
There is always "next time" |
13:15 |
hbrennan |
Bmagic: Always a next time. And a year goes by awfully fast |
13:16 |
Bmagic |
That is what I have come to realize as well! |
13:16 |
hbrennan |
Bmagic: Got my own little hackfest going at home since we upgraded to 3.0 :) |
13:16 |
Bmagic |
yeah! You might* be the first |
13:16 |
Bmagic |
We are not far behind |
13:16 |
Bmagic |
December 11th is our go-live with 3.0.[12] |
13:18 |
hbrennan |
Bmagic: Nice! |
13:18 |
bshum |
"Meet me in St. Louis" |
13:36 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
13:43 |
|
ohiojoe joined #evergreen |
13:48 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
13:54 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
14:01 |
ohiojoe |
#startmeeting 2017-11-02 Documentation Interest Group Meeting |
14:01 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting started Thu Nov 2 14:01:04 2017 US/Eastern. The chair is ohiojoe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
14:01 |
pinesol_green |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
14:01 |
pinesol_green |
The meeting name has been set to '2017_11_02_documentation_interest_group_meeting' |
14:01 |
ohiojoe |
Introductions: paste "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent |
14:02 |
sandbergja |
#info sandbergja is Jane Sandberg, Linn-Benton Community College |
14:02 |
hbrennan |
#info Holly Brennan, Homer Public Library (lurking) |
14:02 |
ohiojoe |
#info ohiojoe is Joe Knueven, Germantown Public Library, Consortium of Ohio Libraries |
14:03 |
abneiman |
#info abneiman is Andrea Neiman, EOLI |
14:04 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Ongoing Business |
14:04 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Progress on documenting new features in Evergreen 3.0 (and previous) |
14:06 |
|
alynn26_ joined #evergreen |
14:07 |
ohiojoe |
welcome, if you're here for the DIG meeting, please identify yourself with "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent |
14:07 |
alynn26_ |
#info alynn26_ is Lynn Floyd, Anderson County Library, SCLENDS |
14:07 |
ohiojoe |
and then, progress on documenting new features in EG 3.0. Does anyone have any updates here? |
14:08 |
alynn26_ |
I'm working on the library settings editor today. |
14:08 |
abneiman |
ohiojoe: I would like to ask that someone merge my pullrequest for Web Client Offline Circ |
14:09 |
alynn26_ |
Then I goung to tackle Spine labels |
14:10 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: thanks for the pullrequest! Could you send a link to your documentation to the documentation list, and somebody should be able to review/merge it |
14:11 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: will do |
14:12 |
ohiojoe |
Thank you Jane. I was thinking "I know there are people in DIG who can do that, and at this point, I'm not yet one of them.." |
14:12 |
ohiojoe |
ok, anything else? |
14:13 |
ohiojoe |
alright, moving along |
14:13 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Progress on reorg clean up |
14:13 |
ohiojoe |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg:clean_up |
14:14 |
sandbergja |
For this topic, I'm curious how much more review/assessment of the reorganized documentation we need to do |
14:14 |
ohiojoe |
Which reminds me, I should have put this out here too |
14:14 |
ohiojoe |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:dig_meeting_20171102-agenda |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
We created a set of requirements for the reorg project way back when |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:requirements |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
I don't know if we met all of the requirements. Particularly the requirement that says: "We need to identify a group of beta testers for each book that will test out each book in their day-to-day operations." |
14:15 |
alynn26_ |
I like the new organization. |
14:16 |
sandbergja |
alynn26_: oh great! That's good to hear. :-) |
14:16 |
ohiojoe |
even looking at the cleanup list, it looks like good progress is being made wittling down the identified needs.. |
14:16 |
alynn26_ |
We may need to make a call to the General list for help with that. |
14:18 |
sandbergja |
I'm also not sure how many folks feel comfortable with the nitty-gritty of the new, reorganized root_*.adoc files |
14:18 |
sandbergja |
i.e. folks who can actually get these issues cleaned up |
14:20 |
sandbergja |
(I wouldn't be totally surprised if that's just me) |
14:21 |
alynn26_ |
I am thinking give them what we have, and let them tell us what is missing. I can run through the docs, but that's not going to tell us that. I am thinking of actually taking the docs as is and giving it to one of our catalogers and have her go through them. |
14:22 |
alynn26_ |
Especially someone who has not seen the web client at all. |
14:23 |
sandbergja |
If you and your cataloger could do that, that'd be awesome! |
14:24 |
sandbergja |
So, I maybe have 3 action items in mind: |
14:24 |
sandbergja |
1) send out a call to the general list to help generate some feedback |
14:24 |
alynn26_ |
I'll let you know how it goes. |
14:24 |
ohiojoe |
Actually, now that I read what Lynn is describing, I'm sure I could probably make an assignment or two along the same lines, either in my library or by asking for a volunteer among the other Ohio libraries to do the same.. |
14:25 |
sandbergja |
2) follow alynn26_'s example and get some folks at our own libraries to test drive the new manuals |
14:26 |
sandbergja |
3) this one would be for me, but share knowledge of how to work with the new manuals on an asciidoc level (and I would appreciate guidance from this group on how the best way for me to share that knowledge might be) |
14:26 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
14:26 |
sandbergja |
thoughts? |
14:26 |
ohiojoe |
I think those sound like good action items. Would the call just be for other folks outside of DIG to do what Lynn described? I could write up that appeal.. |
14:29 |
alynn26_ |
Yea, we look at the docs but don't see the holes, we need to find the holes. |
14:30 |
ohiojoe |
ok, this sounds like a plan to me. any objections? |
14:30 |
sandbergja |
none from me |
14:30 |
abneiman |
nope |
14:30 |
ohiojoe |
#action ohiojoe will make a call out to the general list for help generating feedback to the current state of the reorganized documentation |
14:30 |
ohiojoe |
#action everyone will find volunteers at their libraries to test drive the new manuals |
14:31 |
ohiojoe |
#action sandbergja will share asciidoc level knowledge of how to work with the new manuals |
14:31 |
ohiojoe |
although, now that I think about it, we didn't give you any feedback on how best to go about doing that.. |
14:32 |
alynn26_ |
I've not looked at it, so I've got no idea yet. |
14:33 |
ohiojoe |
and I'm still at the "reread resources and learn asciidoc" stage.. I know it's not hard, I just need to carve out the time to do it.. |
14:35 |
alynn26_ |
Time, i wish i had more of it. |
14:37 |
ohiojoe |
hmm.. I don't like to leave an action item like that hanging, but lacking any good suggestions.. perhaps we try to discuss this on the DIG list? |
14:38 |
alynn26_ |
I think that would be wise |
14:38 |
sandbergja |
I could always just connect with the folks who have been pushing to the git repo lately and make sure they are feeling comfortable |
14:38 |
ohiojoe |
that sounds like a plan |
14:39 |
alynn26_ |
Sansbergja +1 |
14:39 |
ohiojoe |
ok, moving along then |
14:39 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Progress on documentation launchpad bugs |
14:39 |
ohiojoe |
#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bugs?field.tag=documentation |
14:39 |
ohiojoe |
sandbergja +1 |
14:39 |
ohiojoe |
any discussion here? |
14:43 |
alynn26_ |
I think I need to commit to tackling at least one bug a week. I also now tgere are several we can mark as fixed. |
14:44 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
14:47 |
ohiojoe |
it looks like some of them already are.. |
14:48 |
ohiojoe |
or at least there's notation that a fix has been pushed and they've been assigned back to nobody.. should we leave this on our agenda as a useful reminder to keep an eye on it? |
14:48 |
alynn26_ |
Yes |
14:50 |
ohiojoe |
ok, sounds good, moving along, lets jump down to action items |
14:50 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Old Business |
14:50 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Previous action items |
14:50 |
ohiojoe |
at first glance, it looks like some of these can be taken off.. |
14:52 |
abneiman |
I followed up with Angela. She is working on doc pieces related to work we have been contracted to do (i.e. chapter 82, Overlay Existing Catalog Records), but had not intended to rewrite all of Cataloging. |
14:54 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: Thanks! That's helpful |
14:54 |
sandbergja |
(and thank you, akilsdonk!) |
14:55 |
sandbergja |
5, 6, 8, and 9 are definitely done |
14:56 |
ohiojoe |
excellent. Thank you. |
14:57 |
ohiojoe |
As to the new business item, I will email the DIG list and try to get a discussion started since we ran out of time here |
14:57 |
ohiojoe |
#action ohiojoe will email DIG list to discuss the suggestion regarding screen name labeling in docs vs Evergreen |
14:57 |
ohiojoe |
with that, I'm afraid we are coming up on the hour. Is there anything else? |
14:58 |
sandbergja |
thanks to hbrennan for lurking! Glad to have you with us |
14:58 |
alynn26_ |
Yep, glad to have you |
14:59 |
ohiojoe |
yeah, thank you, you're welcome any time |
14:59 |
hbrennan |
sandbergja: Sorry I couldn't participate (at circ desk) ..but I'll be reading back! |
14:59 |
ohiojoe |
and with that.. |
14:59 |
ohiojoe |
#endmeeting |
14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting ended Thu Nov 2 14:59:25 2017 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-11-02-14.01.html |
14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-11-02-14.01.txt |
14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-11-02-14.01.log.html |
14:59 |
sandbergja |
thanks for leading, ohiojoe! |
14:59 |
sandbergja |
ohiojoe++ |
14:59 |
alynn26_ |
Ohiojoe++ |
15:00 |
ohiojoe |
Thanks again. Next month I'll email a reminder to the general list again, try and get more folks into these meetings.. |
15:00 |
sandbergja |
and thanks for all your docs work, alynn26_ and abneiman! |
15:00 |
alynn26_ |
Sandbergja++ |
15:00 |
sandbergja |
abneiman++ |
15:00 |
sandbergja |
alynn26_++ |
15:00 |
ohiojoe |
alynn26_++ |
15:00 |
ohiojoe |
sandbergja++ |
15:00 |
ohiojoe |
abneiman++ |
15:01 |
ohiojoe |
I realize now, that's what I meant to do above.. lol |
15:01 |
ohiojoe |
have a good afternoon/noon everyone |
15:02 |
abneiman |
ohiojoe++ sandbergja++ |
15:09 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
15:35 |
Bmagic |
Do I have something misconfigured? I am getting asset.copy_attr_vis_cache doesn't exist in my pg logs. Searching the repository, I don't see it defined in the PG schema. This sounds vaguely familiar |
15:45 |
berick |
bug 1718300 |
15:45 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1718300 in Evergreen "web client serials: OPAC no longer displaying serials created in webby" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718300 |
15:45 |
berick |
Bmagic: ^-- and 1076.function.copy_vis_attr_cache_fixup.sql perhaps? |
15:47 |
Bmagic |
hmmm |
15:47 |
Bmagic |
asset.copy_attr_vis_cache != asset.copy_vis_attr_cache |
15:48 |
Bmagic |
referenced in Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/Application/Storage/Publisher/metabib.pm |
15:49 |
Bmagic |
berick ^ |
15:53 |
bshum |
Huh |
15:53 |
bshum |
That's an interesting read on it |
15:54 |
Bmagic |
do we have a typo in metabib.pm? |
15:55 |
Bmagic |
It also turns up in sitemap_generator |
15:56 |
hbrennan |
ohiojoe: The general list reminder is oh so helpful. Only way I remembered to put it on my calendar! Thanks! |
16:05 |
bshum |
Bmagic: That's what it's starting to look like to me |
16:05 |
bshum |
Which is newer or older I guess |
16:16 |
bshum |
Given that in the DB it's "asset.copy_vis_attr_cache" I'm going to go with those other two references are bad. |
16:17 |
bshum |
Bmagic: Change 'em up and re-test? :D |
16:24 |
bshum |
Bmagic++ |
17:14 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
17:56 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
18:00 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
19:09 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: replacing Admin menu with Administration menu - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=8b3eb6c> |
19:35 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: Fixing menu refs on booking docs - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=096f5a5> |