| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 04:31 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 09:48 |
|
littlet joined #evergreen |
| 13:53 |
|
FreddyEnrique joined #evergreen |
| 13:54 |
FreddyEnrique |
Hi everyone |
| 13:54 |
FreddyEnrique |
Pretty sure you dont remeber me, but I contacted you yesterday |
| 13:55 |
FreddyEnrique |
I mentioned that concerning the instalation process, theres a step which I cant figure it out how to do it |
| 13:56 |
FreddyEnrique |
I cant find the cd /openils/var/web/xul |
| 13:56 |
FreddyEnrique |
It just appear cd /openils/var |
| 13:56 |
jonadab |
Which instructions are you following? |
| 13:57 |
FreddyEnrique |
Let see....Im following the 2.12 instruction |
| 13:57 |
FreddyEnrique |
im starting form the begining |
| 13:58 |
FreddyEnrique |
with the OpenSRF Installation |
| 13:59 |
FreddyEnrique |
Im already in step 11: Update the OpenSRF configuration files |
| 14:00 |
FreddyEnrique |
by chance I checked the openils dir... and the web dir doest appear in var |
| 14:00 |
FreddyEnrique |
Is that a bad sign? |
| 14:01 |
jonadab |
Hmm, I'm trying to find your place. |
| 14:01 |
jonadab |
In the 2.12.0 instructions, step 11 is 11. Configure action triggers for the Evergreen application |
| 14:02 |
jonadab |
IN the OpenSRF 2.5.0 instructions, step 11 is 11. Create the OpenSRF Jabber users |
| 14:02 |
jonadab |
So I'm not clear on exactly where you actually are. |
| 14:02 |
FreddyEnrique |
im in : Update the OpenSRF configuration files |
| 14:03 |
jonadab |
Ok. |
| 14:03 |
FreddyEnrique |
I just stopped there, beacuse I want to make sure everything is going right |
| 14:03 |
jonadab |
Ok, so, you're still installing OpenSRF, right? |
| 14:03 |
FreddyEnrique |
Yes |
| 14:04 |
jonadab |
I wouldn't expect the web/xul stuff to exist yet at that point, using the standard installation order. |
| 14:04 |
FreddyEnrique |
And... I just checked the openils dir... and the www dir doest appear |
| 14:04 |
jonadab |
That stuff's part of OpenILS itself, not part of OpenSRF, if I understand correctly. |
| 14:04 |
FreddyEnrique |
!! |
| 14:04 |
FreddyEnrique |
oh..so I still edd to continue |
| 14:04 |
FreddyEnrique |
need* |
| 14:04 |
jonadab |
OpenSRF is just a communications layer that different Evergreen processes use to talk to each other. |
| 14:05 |
jonadab |
It's like an interprocess communications mechanism that provides network transparency, I believe. |
| 14:05 |
jonadab |
It's built on jabber. |
| 14:06 |
jonadab |
So yeah, I think you can continue to proceed for now. |
| 14:06 |
FreddyEnrique |
Ok, I'm proceeding |
| 14:06 |
jonadab |
If you can get to the point where the srfsh math test passes (you send an add request and get back the answer), then OpenSRF is installed. |
| 14:06 |
jonadab |
At that point you can go on to installing OpenILS itself. |
| 14:07 |
jonadab |
and/or other dependencies like Postgres, depending what order you're doing things in. |
| 16:10 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 16:31 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 18:30 |
FreddyEnrique |
guys |
| 18:30 |
FreddyEnrique |
I was able to do the Testing the default OpenSRF services |
| 18:30 |
FreddyEnrique |
I suppose evething is alright |
| 18:31 |
FreddyEnrique |
still....the web dir doesnt appear... |
| 18:32 |
FreddyEnrique |
Or does it mean I hace to continue the evergreen installation? |
| 18:34 |
FreddyEnrique |
BTW, im totally skipping the optional parts |
| 19:28 |
jonadab |
Continue with the Evergreen installation. |
| 19:28 |
jonadab |
I believe the web dir stuff comes from OpenILS itself, _not_ from OpenSRF. |
| 19:32 |
FreddyEnrique |
btw |
| 19:32 |
FreddyEnrique |
the apache installation is before of after the the opensrf installation? |
| 19:41 |
jonadab |
Either, I think. |
| 19:41 |
jonadab |
But probably best install Apache before OpenILS. |
| 19:42 |
jonadab |
Although, the prerequisites step probably does automatically, come to think. |
| 19:42 |
jonadab |
Not sure if the prerequisites also picks up Postgres. |
| 19:42 |
jonadab |
It might. |
| 19:46 |
jonadab |
If you follow the instructions in the order in which they're written, it should all work. That isn't the only possible order or even necessarily the fastest order, but it's an order that works. |
| 19:47 |
jonadab |
Some of the guys at the conference were saying that they like to change the order in some ways, e.g., I remember they said they create the opensrf user first and download everything _as_ that user, so then they don't have to recursively chown it all, which saves maybe a minute or so. |
| 19:48 |
jonadab |
That sort of optimization is probably more relevant if you're installing a lot of times (e.g., for testing changes) and are familiar with the process and can move through the steps quickly. |
| 19:49 |
jonadab |
BTW, this channel tends to be pretty dead on the weekends; I think a lot of the Evergreen folks don't irc at home. |
| 19:49 |
jonadab |
Which is weird to me, I have IRC up _more_ of the time at home than at work, I think. |
| 19:49 |
jonadab |
But that may be partly because it was the NetHack community that pulled me into IRC, and then I found #evergreen later. |
| 19:53 |
FreddyEnrique |
I see.... i really appreciate your help, even though its family time |
| 19:53 |
FreddyEnrique |
but since I'm still struggling in the university |
| 19:53 |
jonadab |
Not a problem for me. |
| 19:53 |
jonadab |
Like I said, I'm _usually_ on IRC at home (except when asleep). |
| 19:54 |
FreddyEnrique |
jajaja |
| 19:54 |
FreddyEnrique |
forgive...what is.... IRC? |
| 19:54 |
jonadab |
Internet Relay Chat? |
| 19:54 |
jonadab |
The technology we are currently using to communicate. |
| 19:54 |
FreddyEnrique |
got it |
| 19:54 |
jonadab |
Oh, I see, you're using the web interface. |
| 19:55 |
jonadab |
I keep irssi running all the time in a screen session. |
| 19:55 |
FreddyEnrique |
yep..im using chrome |
| 19:56 |
jonadab |
That way even when I go afk and detach from my session, people can still nickping me, and I get the hilights when I reconnect. |
| 19:57 |
jonadab |
And backscroll, although I don't usually read the backscroll in busy channels like #nethack and #evergreen. |
| 19:59 |
FreddyEnrique |
You know...just yesterday was my first time using this IRC. I find it more convenient than the general emails |
| 19:59 |
FreddyEnrique |
For Koha, I usually used that method |
| 20:01 |
jonadab |
email is convenient for situations where you want to be able to think for a while about each reply. |
| 20:02 |
jonadab |
(That is, think for a while while writing each reply.) |
| 20:02 |
jonadab |
But IRC tends to be better for starting a conversation and getting a bunch of answers quickly. |
| 20:03 |
jonadab |
Although the threading aspect of email can be good if the answers are going to be long. |
| 20:03 |
jonadab |
It just depends what you're doing, I guess. |
| 20:04 |
jonadab |
If you want the worst of both worlds, there's always reddit or, heaven help you, Discord. |
| 20:04 |
FreddyEnrique |
a more elaborate question and answer |
| 20:05 |
FreddyEnrique |
Now that you mention it... kid of hard to keep track of my questions |
| 20:05 |
FreddyEnrique |
kind* |
| 20:05 |
jonadab |
Yeah, I don't know if the web interface does logging. |
| 20:05 |
jonadab |
A real IRC client would, of course. |
| 20:06 |
jonadab |
Although #evergreen is publicly logged. |
| 20:06 |
FreddyEnrique |
wait....a real IRC doest need a interface? |
| 20:07 |
jonadab |
Real IRC clients have interfaces, of course, but they're not built into a website. They're actual applications. |
| 20:07 |
jonadab |
weechat is probably the most highly recommended. |
| 20:08 |
jonadab |
I use irssi mostly because I was already using it before I found out about weechat. |
| 20:08 |
jonadab |
I think weechat is newer. |
| 20:08 |
FreddyEnrique |
you are right...it is an application |
| 20:09 |
jonadab |
IRC has been around a long time, so there are dozens of IRC clients. |
| 20:09 |
FreddyEnrique |
but...why this method and not a group in facebook or those commonly used social platforms? |
| 20:09 |
jonadab |
hexchat, chatzilla, xchat, mIRC, I don't even know what they all are. |
| 20:10 |
jonadab |
FreddyEnrique: Facebook is completely inappropriate for several reasons. |
| 20:10 |
FreddyEnrique |
forgive if im not really into that, at least thats how many people in my country does things |
| 20:10 |
jonadab |
1. It's an inappropriate place to put anything that needs to be reliably public. |
| 20:10 |
FreddyEnrique |
I see |
| 20:10 |
jonadab |
2. It's equally inappropriate for anything that needs to be private. |
| 20:11 |
jonadab |
3. It's not _intended_ for this sort of thing, and it shows. |
| 20:11 |
jonadab |
There's another answer to "why IRC": https://xkcd.com/1782/ |
| 20:13 |
jonadab |
IRC has been around for a very long time (it's older than the web) and is firmly entrenched in technical circles, especially among open-source developers. |
| 20:13 |
jonadab |
Most serious open-source projects have a channel on Freenode. |
| 20:14 |
jonadab |
The answer to "why IRC" is "because that's what everyone uses, except for the people who can't decide and keep switching communications platforms every five years." |
| 20:15 |
FreddyEnrique |
Its older than Internet, commonly used among technical circles.... |
| 20:15 |
jonadab |
No, I didn't say older than the internet. I said older than the web. |
| 20:15 |
FreddyEnrique |
do you recommend to install the application? |
| 20:15 |
jonadab |
If you're going to be sticking around long-term, then yes. |
| 20:16 |
jonadab |
If you're only here for a couple of days to do this one install, then maybe not. |
| 20:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
Actually, I'm really looking foward getting to know many Open Source Library software |
| 20:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
Like.... |
| 20:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
Dspace |
| 20:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
Moodle |
| 20:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
OJS |
| 20:17 |
jonadab |
(The web dates to 1992, IRC to 1988; some parts of the internet, such as usenet and email, are older still.) |
| 20:17 |
FreddyEnrique |
My god..... |
| 20:17 |
jonadab |
I didn't get on the internet until 1994. |
| 20:18 |
jonadab |
(Yeah, I know, I'm old.) |
| 20:18 |
FreddyEnrique |
I think the first place that got internet in Peru is Miraflores...quite late actually |
| 20:19 |
jonadab |
Ah. |
| 20:19 |
jonadab |
Yeah, I'd expect it to have arrived down there somewhat later. |
| 20:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
jajaja, but you are really experienced |
| 20:19 |
jonadab |
Maybe '96 or so? Guessing. |
| 20:20 |
FreddyEnrique |
dont think so...mabe in universities. Like UNI for example |
| 20:20 |
jonadab |
I'm in the States, and almost all colleges up here had internet by 1995. |
| 20:20 |
jonadab |
Major universities had it in the seventies. |
| 20:20 |
FreddyEnrique |
damn |
| 20:20 |
jonadab |
After a fashion. I mean, it wasn't the same as now. At all. |
| 20:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
That explains a lot why many libraries still stick to winisis |
| 20:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
have you heard of that software? |
| 20:21 |
jonadab |
I haven't. |
| 20:22 |
FreddyEnrique |
it allowed librarians to catalog books and other materials |
| 20:22 |
jonadab |
But I come from the IT side, not from the library side. I mean, I work at a library, but my schooling wasn't library-related at all. |
| 20:23 |
jonadab |
I didn't get the job at the library until 2000. |
| 20:23 |
FreddyEnrique |
I'm from the library side and really got and interest in those software that helps libraries automate its processes |
| 20:24 |
jonadab |
So I don't know all the library stuff. I mean, I know what MARC is, but if you start throwing around specific tag numbers, my eyes will glaze over _fast_. |
| 20:24 |
FreddyEnrique |
Considering your background then, you are an expert when it comes to tech |
| 20:24 |
FreddyEnrique |
jajajajajaja |
| 20:24 |
jonadab |
Eh, that's relative. |
| 20:24 |
FreddyEnrique |
that was a good one.... |
| 20:28 |
FreddyEnrique |
Then... Let me ask you a question... Why Evergreen? |
| 20:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
I read the American Library Magazine and there is a growing number of libraries changing to this ILS |
| 20:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
That really got my interest |
| 20:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
I'd like to hear your toughts about this |
| 20:30 |
jonadab |
Speaking only for myself: I prefer open-source solutions for several reasons. |
| 20:30 |
jonadab |
1. It's generally a lot easier to figure out what's going on, troubleshoot problems, etc. |
| 20:31 |
jonadab |
When you have a problem with a proprietary black box, you're helpless to do anything but call the vendor and describe the symptoms, and you don't necessarily know even where to look for clues. |
| 20:31 |
jonadab |
I hate that. |
| 20:31 |
jonadab |
2. The community support tends to be a lot better, especially if you're small. |
| 20:32 |
jonadab |
3. Features that a lot of users want are WAY more likely to get implemented in the open-source world. |
| 20:33 |
jonadab |
Speaking about ILS software in particular, we've used two different proprietary solutions in Galion. |
| 20:33 |
bshum |
Fwiw, there is a link in the topic for this channel that points to the public logs for the chat: http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen |
| 20:33 |
jonadab |
The first was reliable, but its UI left a lot to be desired. |
| 20:33 |
FreddyEnrique |
waaaa.....what are those calendars??!!! |
| 20:34 |
jonadab |
The second has been a nightmare. |
| 20:34 |
FreddyEnrique |
uhm... |
| 20:34 |
jonadab |
FreddyEnrique: If you click on a date, it shows you the log of this channel from then. |
| 20:35 |
FreddyEnrique |
You used 2 propietary ILS |
| 20:35 |
jonadab |
Yes, we migrated in 2005. |
| 20:35 |
FreddyEnrique |
I asummed it didnt fullfill the expectatons |
| 20:35 |
FreddyEnrique |
sorry, expectations* |
| 20:35 |
jonadab |
The first one was really showing its age, and the vendor was encouraging everyone to move to their newer product. |
| 20:36 |
jonadab |
The second one has been a large disappointment. |
| 20:36 |
FreddyEnrique |
Oh.... Its wasnt Aleph right? |
| 20:36 |
jonadab |
No. |
| 20:36 |
FreddyEnrique |
uff |
| 20:36 |
jonadab |
Galaxy and Polaris, respectively. |
| 20:36 |
FreddyEnrique |
!!! |
| 20:36 |
FreddyEnrique |
Polaris???? really?? |
| 20:36 |
jonadab |
That's what we moved to in 2005. |
| 20:37 |
jonadab |
We actually had three systems demoed (Polaris, Library.Solution, Horizon). |
| 20:38 |
jonadab |
The staff all liked Library.Solution best of the three, by a wide margin; but we ended up going with Polaris because it was 2005 and there were budget cuts of unknown severity anticipated, and the Polaris quote, after the second round of negotiations, was about $10 thousand cheaper than the TLC quote. |
| 20:38 |
jonadab |
(The Dynix quote was even higher; we did not seriously consider Horizon.) |
| 20:39 |
jonadab |
The ILS software field was pretty broad and active around then. There were libraries in our area on everything from DRA to Millennium. |
| 20:40 |
FreddyEnrique |
Im been told about the high costs of propietary ILS... really out of reach from many libraries here.... |
| 20:41 |
FreddyEnrique |
BTW, what type of library are you working in? Public? Academic? |
| 20:41 |
jonadab |
Public. |
| 20:41 |
jonadab |
We're an Association library, but our official service area is the city of Galion. Which has a population of about ten and a half thousand people. |
| 20:41 |
FreddyEnrique |
American Libraries really take it seriosly.... |
| 20:42 |
jonadab |
Americans expect a lot out of their libraries. |
| 20:43 |
jonadab |
We have to always have all the latest movies and popular books (in regular, large print, audio, ...), etc. |
| 20:43 |
jonadab |
And lots of internet computers so nobody ever has to wait, and so on. |
| 20:44 |
FreddyEnrique |
You know... I really see that kind of expectation really inspirational |
| 20:45 |
FreddyEnrique |
people there expecting a lot from their libraries... here is a far cry from yours |
| 20:46 |
FreddyEnrique |
Some people in my field are trying to make a change though |
| 20:50 |
jonadab |
Perhaps Americans are also a bit spoiled. |
| 20:50 |
jonadab |
THough, of all the things our government spends tax money on, libraries are a long, long way from being the most wasteful. |
| 20:50 |
jonadab |
Good libraries are useful to almost everyone. |
| 20:55 |
FreddyEnrique |
Uhmm...how are things going about the American libraries' budget cuts? I read that the current goverment is planning to do that. And that the Library community is not by any chance allow that |
| 20:55 |
jonadab |
That varies from state to state. |
| 20:56 |
jonadab |
Currently, the Ohio state government is in the process of deciding that for Ohio libraries (and a number of other budget categories). |
| 20:56 |
jonadab |
OLC is of course engaged in political maneouvers in an attempt to convince them not to cut the PLF at all. |
| 20:57 |
jonadab |
I have no idea what may or may not be going on in other states. |
| 20:58 |
jonadab |
But I don't imagine it would change our ILS plans either way at this point, because what we're planning is to move to Evergreen, and that will actually save us money, though that's not the main reason we want to do it. |
| 20:59 |
jonadab |
We might go in with a consortium, for Evergreen purposes. That remains to be decided. |
| 20:59 |
jonadab |
(There's one consortium in particular that our director is interested in and considering.) |
| 21:02 |
FreddyEnrique |
Im trying to get used to this term... Consortium. Basically, it is a group of libraries right? That allows libraries to share resources and have a sigle OPAC. Am I right? |
| 21:11 |
FreddyEnrique |
Oh my god... I still cant get to the cd /openils/var/web/xul |
| 21:15 |
bshum |
FreddyEnrique: Maybe we can help. What have you been trying so far? Do you have a link to the instructions you're following? |
| 21:16 |
FreddyEnrique |
Ok. First. Im using Ubuntu 14.04 server edtion |
| 21:17 |
bshum |
The 64-bit version I hope, but continue :) |
| 21:17 |
FreddyEnrique |
I didnt install any additional stuff, just the SSH |
| 21:17 |
FreddyEnrique |
yep, 64 bit in a virtual box |
| 21:18 |
FreddyEnrique |
First, the page tells me I need to install the openSRF |
| 21:18 |
FreddyEnrique |
Im following the manual for the version 2_5 |
| 21:18 |
bshum |
Yep, sounds right. |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
here are the commands Ive been using |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
wget https://evergreen-ils.org/downloads/opensrf-2.5.0.tar.gz |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
tar -xvf opensrf-2.5.0.tar.gz |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
cd opensrf-2.5.0/ |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
Then...as a Root |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
apt-get install make |
| 21:19 |
bshum |
Yep |
| 21:19 |
FreddyEnrique |
make -f src/extras/Makefile.install ubuntu-trusty |
| 21:20 |
bshum |
Right, and that should install all the pre-reqs for opensrf |
| 21:20 |
FreddyEnrique |
As an user... |
| 21:20 |
bshum |
Then you do the configure / make; then make install |
| 21:20 |
FreddyEnrique |
sudo ./configure --prefix=/openils --sysconfdir=/openils/conf |
| 21:20 |
bshum |
Well make install as root, yep |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
then make |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
make install |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
as a root |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
useradd -m -s /bin/bash opensrf |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
echo "export PATH=\$PATH:/openils/bin" >> /home/opensrf/.bashrc |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
passwd opensrf |
| 21:21 |
FreddyEnrique |
chown -R opensrf:opensrf /openils |
| 21:22 |
FreddyEnrique |
nano /etc/hosts |
| 21:22 |
FreddyEnrique |
after editing that file |
| 21:22 |
bshum |
So were you able to get to the end of the OpenSRF instructions where you do the math test? |
| 21:22 |
bshum |
And that was successful? |
| 21:22 |
FreddyEnrique |
well...actually yes |
| 21:23 |
bshum |
Okay |
| 21:23 |
FreddyEnrique |
the errors comes when I`m in the server installation |
| 21:23 |
bshum |
So when you went back to the Evergreen 2.12.0 steps then |
| 21:23 |
bshum |
Err, 2.12.2 I guess |
| 21:23 |
FreddyEnrique |
yes, the problems star |
| 21:23 |
bshum |
You'd first download and untar the Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2.tar.gz file first |
| 21:24 |
FreddyEnrique |
yes, then the tar xvf command |
| 21:24 |
FreddyEnrique |
I change to that directory |
| 21:24 |
bshum |
So like, wget https://evergreen-ils.org/downloads/Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2a.tar.gz ; then tar xzv Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2a.tar.gz ; cd Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2a |
| 21:24 |
bshum |
Okay |
| 21:25 |
FreddyEnrique |
yes! |
| 21:25 |
bshum |
And then inside there, you have to re-run the Make install for that to get all the next pre-reqs for Evergreen |
| 21:25 |
* bshum |
hasn't installed from tarballs in awhile |
| 21:25 |
FreddyEnrique |
with... make -f Open-ILS/src/extras/Makefile.install ubuntu-trusty command? |
| 21:25 |
* bshum |
spins up a new VM |
| 21:25 |
bshum |
Right |
| 21:26 |
FreddyEnrique |
thats where the first error pops up |
| 21:26 |
bshum |
Okay |
| 21:26 |
FreddyEnrique |
just one error |
| 21:26 |
bshum |
What's that error say? |
| 21:27 |
FreddyEnrique |
it is in spanish... I hope you get it |
| 21:27 |
FreddyEnrique |
make[1]: se sale del directorio «/home/freddy/Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2» |
| 21:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
then...when I put PATH=/openils/bin:$PATH ./configure --prefix=/openils --sysconfdir=/openils/conf make |
| 21:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
this appears make[3]: *** [oils_cstore.la] Error 1 |
| 21:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 |
| 21:29 |
bshum |
Hmm, well that's not good. |
| 21:29 |
FreddyEnrique |
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 |
| 21:30 |
bshum |
And seems to explain why nothing seems to be getting installed for Evergreen |
| 21:31 |
FreddyEnrique |
maybe is the instructions? |
| 21:31 |
bshum |
You ran make -f Open-ILS/src/extras/Makefile.install ubuntu-trusty command as root right? |
| 21:31 |
bshum |
While inside the Evergreen-ILS-2.12.2 directory? |
| 21:31 |
bshum |
In what seems to be your home folder |
| 21:32 |
bshum |
I don't think it's the instructions; they're pretty well-tested these days. |
| 21:32 |
FreddyEnrique |
I wish I could uppload a screenshot to describe it. But yeah. |
| 21:33 |
FreddyEnrique |
I change to root |
| 21:33 |
bshum |
I find https://snag.gy/ pretty useful for sharing screenshots |
| 21:33 |
bshum |
But okay |
| 21:33 |
FreddyEnrique |
can I uppload it here? |
| 21:33 |
FreddyEnrique |
how can I show you my screenshot? |
| 21:35 |
bshum |
The channel itself doesn't have an easy way of sharing screenshots, but you can upload your screenshot to a third-party (like the site I just linked to) and then grab the URL from their hosting of your picture and share it back to the channel |
| 21:35 |
FreddyEnrique |
let see |
| 21:42 |
FreddyEnrique |
https://snag.gy/F3Baf7.jpg |
| 21:43 |
FreddyEnrique |
First time using this application, sorry for the delay |
| 21:44 |
bshum |
No worries, that does seem pretty explanatory to me. |
| 21:44 |
bshum |
The configure / make is trying to find that ldbdpgsql and it can't because it's not getting installed right as part of the first make -f to install the pre-reqs |
| 21:44 |
bshum |
Or at least, that's what it looks like |
| 21:46 |
FreddyEnrique |
you mean... form the opensrf part? |
| 21:46 |
bshum |
No, from the Evergreen part |
| 21:46 |
FreddyEnrique |
Then...I just redo that step? |
| 21:52 |
bshum |
Hey FreddyEnrique, along the top of the IRC chat, you should see different windows of chat |
| 21:52 |
bshum |
You're going to see one from me, I'm going to ask you to try out some screenshare software |
| 21:52 |
FreddyEnrique |
sure, thanks |
| 22:10 |
bshum |
So, for the logs, it looks like the problem appears to be this: cannot find -ldbdpgsql during the "make" step |
| 22:11 |
bshum |
There was a complaint also where somewhere during the make install, it said to run "aptitude remove libdbi0" ; not quite sure what that's about yet.. |
| 22:43 |
bshum |
jonadab++ # helping and answering questions |
