| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 04:31 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 06:18 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 06:29 |
|
Callender joined #evergreen |
| 07:33 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 07:33 |
JBoyer |
jeff, Bmagic: jihpringle is right, jeffdavis wrote that and we use it here also. (The hope was to include some additional UI to verify or allow the full checkout period, etc. but that's not in place.) |
| 07:34 |
JBoyer |
jeff, and yes, it could certainly be seen as a misfeature. I keep it running because it was in place before I got here and haven't brought up throwing it out yet. |
| 08:14 |
|
_bott_ joined #evergreen |
| 08:32 |
csharp |
so... does anyone run a z39.50 server with authentication enabled? |
| 08:33 |
csharp |
we have a request from a library to enable z39.50 access so a vendor can query our catalog and match our records with theirs for ease of ordering |
| 08:34 |
|
berick joined #evergreen |
| 08:34 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 08:41 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:47 |
|
mdriscoll joined #evergreen |
| 09:07 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 09:18 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 09:18 |
Bmagic |
jihpringle++ |
| 09:29 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
| 10:14 |
gmcharlt |
csharp: well, OCLC's Z39.50 service for one |
| 10:14 |
gmcharlt |
doh |
| 10:14 |
gmcharlt |
misread the question |
| 10:15 |
gmcharlt |
but doesn't look hard to configure simple2zoom to do it |
| 10:17 |
bshum |
I vaguely remember doing something like that with B&T |
| 10:18 |
bshum |
(and adding hackery to the added copy retrieval to include the copy ID for order purposes) |
| 10:18 |
bshum |
Not authenticated though :\ |
| 10:47 |
mdriscoll |
Speaking of Z39.50, I would like to add call number prefix to the call number that Z39.50 includes in the 852 $c. I've been poking around SuperCat.pm but I haven't had any luck getting the prefix to display. Any suggestions of where to look? |
| 10:57 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
| 10:58 |
jeff |
csharp: what's driving the requirement for the z39.50 to have authentication enabled? are you exposing some non-public data that i'm not thinking of? |
| 11:00 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 11:07 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 11:19 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 11:37 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 12:10 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 12:18 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Jason Boyer] LP1274999: Next Link Appears at "End" of Copy List - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=04ba0cb> |
| 12:26 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 12:34 |
|
ohiojoe joined #evergreen |
| 12:39 |
|
collum_ joined #evergreen |
| 12:49 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
| 12:56 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 13:01 |
|
hbrennan joined #evergreen |
| 13:02 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 13:02 |
miker |
berick: egPromptDialog.open returns an object containing a "result" which is a promise, correct? Just like any other uibModal ... |
| 13:14 |
jeffdavis |
What would "Forking Error" normally indicate (beyond OpenSRF failing to create a child process)? Just saw that on a test server experiencing an outage, memory seemed adequate and drone counts weren't too high when I checked. |
| 13:17 |
Dyrcona |
jeffdavis: The user may have exceeded the process limit set by the O/S. This can be configured per user, but the O/S also has an absolute limit that cannot be exceeded. |
| 13:17 |
Dyrcona |
jeffdavis: Could mean other things, too. |
| 13:19 |
jeffdavis |
Hmm, total processes seemed ok but maybe I missed something transient. |
| 13:19 |
* jeffdavis |
travels back in time, sets up monitoring for this test server |
| 13:19 |
Dyrcona |
:) |
| 13:20 |
jeffdavis |
unusual_outages_on_test_server_2_days_before_upgrade-- |
| 13:20 |
Dyrcona |
Modern Linux runs a whole pile of stuff. |
| 13:21 |
Dyrcona |
You might check the syslog and kern.log. |
| 13:21 |
Dyrcona |
They may have some record of the event. |
| 13:21 |
Dyrcona |
But, it's usually up to the application to log the small stuff. |
| 13:23 |
jeffdavis |
ah, yep, there it is in syslog: "Out of memory: Kill process 16406 (opensrf-c) score 512 or sacrifice child" |
| 13:24 |
jeffdavis |
thanks Dyrcona |
| 13:26 |
Dyrcona |
yw. |
| 13:26 |
berick |
miker: yes |
| 13:27 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:27 |
Dyrcona |
I love those. Some day, I plan to learn what all of the numbers in those log entries mean. :) |
| 13:32 |
csharp |
jeff: I just wanted to have control over who has access to our bibs via z39.50 |
| 13:32 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 13:36 |
Dyrcona |
Anyone else want to test drive hold targeter v2 repairs and additions? I'm sold. |
| 13:42 |
kmlussier |
Dyrcona: If you think somebody else should test it before it goes in, I can put it on my to-do list for tomorrow. But I'm also comfortable with your ok if you think it's ready to merge. |
| 13:43 |
Dyrcona |
I think it's OK. I like the soft retarget interval. It does what I expected based on the description. |
| 13:44 |
Dyrcona |
There was one thing I wanted to look at, but it was a "bug" in the old targeter. |
| 13:44 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 13:44 |
Dyrcona |
Think I'll check that out, first. |
| 13:48 |
Dyrcona |
I want to see what happen if I place two holds for the same patron for the same title. |
| 13:49 |
|
tspindler joined #evergreen |
| 13:50 |
tspindler |
Just a heads up, the EOB meeting will start in 10 minutes. |
| 13:50 |
berick |
ugh, really not a fan of the patron-search-completed sound effect. (i know i've said this before..) should probably include a null.wav so individual sounds can be easily shushed. |
| 13:50 |
Dyrcona |
berick++ # for hold targeter v2 |
| 13:51 |
berick |
Dyrcona++ # right back atcha |
| 13:51 |
Dyrcona |
:) |
| 13:51 |
Dyrcona |
I think we're going to like the soft retarget interval at C/W MARS. |
| 13:51 |
|
terran_ joined #evergreen |
| 13:51 |
berick |
awesome |
| 13:52 |
Dyrcona |
It picked up the copies where I changed the status from not holdable to holdable. The trick will be to choose the interval that works best for us. |
| 13:55 |
kmlussier |
Dyrcona / berick: Oh, so will this be something that might help with the issue where checking of missing items doesn't capture holds? |
| 13:56 |
tspindler |
EOB will start in 5 minutes |
| 13:57 |
|
scottthomas joined #evergreen |
| 13:57 |
berick |
kmlussier: alas, no. this is still from the context of batch holds targeting, not checking in a specific item. |
| 13:57 |
Dyrcona |
kmlussier: It will help if you run the hold targeter frequently, though. |
| 13:58 |
berick |
Dyrcona: true, it can help the previously missing item get picked up quicker by holds |
| 13:59 |
berick |
just not during the actual checkin |
| 13:59 |
kmlussier |
Well, that's still progress. |
| 13:59 |
Dyrcona |
Right, but I think the new hold-targeter framework could help with that. |
| 13:59 |
kmlussier |
berick++ Dyrcona++ |
| 13:59 |
|
rgagnon joined #evergreen |
| 14:00 |
|
sherbertbc joined #evergreen |
| 14:00 |
tspindler |
#startmeeting 2017-05-18 - Evergreen Oversight Board Meeting |
| 14:00 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting started Thu May 18 14:00:45 2017 US/Eastern. The chair is tspindler. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
| 14:00 |
pinesol_green |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
| 14:00 |
pinesol_green |
The meeting name has been set to '2017_05_18___evergreen_oversight_board_meeting' |
| 14:01 |
tspindler |
#topic roll call |
| 14:01 |
tspindler |
Use the #info command stating name and affiliation |
| 14:01 |
sherbertbc |
#info sherbertbc = Sharon Herbert, Sitka/BC Libraries Co-op |
| 14:01 |
tspindler |
#info tspindler is Tim Spindler, C/W MARS |
| 14:01 |
scottthomas |
#info Scott Thomas, PaILS |
| 14:01 |
collum_ |
#info collum is Garry Collum, Kenton County Public Library |
| 14:01 |
hbrennan |
#info hbrennan is Holly Brennan, Homer Public Library, AK |
| 14:01 |
terran_ |
#info terran is Terran McCanna, PINES |
| 14:01 |
scottthomas |
#info scottthomas is Scott Thomas, PaILS |
| 14:02 |
rgagnon |
#info rgagnon is Ron Gagnon, NOBLE |
| 14:02 |
tspindler |
poke miker |
| 14:03 |
tspindler |
#topic Report of the Chair |
| 14:03 |
tspindler |
I really don't have anything to report |
| 14:03 |
tspindler |
Agenda is here https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:minutes:2017-5-18 |
| 14:03 |
hbrennan |
no news is good news? |
| 14:04 |
tspindler |
#topic Minutes from last meeting |
| 14:04 |
tspindler |
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:minutes:20170405 |
| 14:04 |
tspindler |
Any corrections or changes? |
| 14:05 |
tspindler |
Can I have a motion to accept the minutes? (use #info to move |
| 14:05 |
terran_ |
#info I move to accept the meeting notes as they stand. |
| 14:05 |
rgagnon |
#info Move to accept minutes. |
| 14:06 |
rgagnon |
#info Second |
| 14:06 |
tspindler |
#start vote Accept the minutes of 4/5/2017 |
| 14:06 |
tspindler |
#startvote Accept the minutes of 4/5/2017 |
| 14:06 |
pinesol_green |
Unable to parse vote topic and options. |
| 14:06 |
hbrennan |
+1 |
| 14:06 |
scottthomas |
+1 |
| 14:07 |
tspindler |
need to do command correctly |
| 14:07 |
terran_ |
There is a format we're supposed to do it in, which I always forget |
| 14:07 |
tspindler |
#startvote Minutes |
| 14:07 |
pinesol_green |
Unable to parse vote topic and options. |
| 14:07 |
tspindler |
startvote is the command but getting parse error |
| 14:08 |
tspindler |
#startvote <April Minute> Yea, Nea, Abstain |
| 14:08 |
pinesol_green |
Unable to parse vote topic and options. |
| 14:08 |
tspindler |
anyone have the correct command |
| 14:08 |
tspindler |
#startvote Should we accept the minutes of the 4/5/2017 meeting? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:08 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Should we accept the minutes of the 4/5/2017 meeting? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:08 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:09 |
tspindler |
#vote Yes |
| 14:09 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:09 |
scottthomas |
#vote Yes |
| 14:09 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 14:09 |
collum_ |
#vote yes |
| 14:09 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 14:09 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:10 |
tspindler |
#endvote |
| 14:10 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Should we accept the minutes of the 4/5/2017 meeting?" Results are |
| 14:10 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): tspindler, collum_, rgagnon, terran_, scottthomas, hbrennan, sherbertbc |
| 14:10 |
tspindler |
#topic Financial report |
| 14:11 |
tspindler |
I haven't seen a report. I know gmcharlt had one at past meeting but not sure if we have anything prepared for now. |
| 14:12 |
tspindler |
Moving on |
| 14:12 |
tspindler |
#topic SFC Updates |
| 14:12 |
tspindler |
I think Amy would report on this but I don't see her online at this time. Any other information? |
| 14:12 |
terran_ |
I believe Amy is traveling |
| 14:12 |
tspindler |
Oh yes, saw she was in Italy |
| 14:13 |
terran_ |
She's probably not thinking about us, then :D |
| 14:13 |
tspindler |
Ok, next topic |
| 14:13 |
tspindler |
#topic Release Manager |
| 14:13 |
tspindler |
Does gmcharlt have anything to report? |
| 14:14 |
tspindler |
Ok next topic |
| 14:14 |
tspindler |
#topic SFC Membership Review |
| 14:14 |
tspindler |
I think I'll leave it to Sharon here. |
| 14:15 |
sherbertbc |
The sub-committee has developed a questionnaire that will be sent to four identified non profits to determine what services they can provide to meet our needs. As BCLC is not competing, I will be contacting the four nonprofits to gather info and then anonymize the results to reduce potential of bias. Aiming to get the questionnaires out in early June. |
| 14:15 |
sherbertbc |
any questions? |
| 14:15 |
terran_ |
sherbertbc++ |
| 14:15 |
collum_ |
sherbertbc++ |
| 14:15 |
tspindler |
sherbertbc++ |
| 14:16 |
rgagnon |
sherbertbc++ |
| 14:16 |
scottthomas |
sherbertbc++ |
| 14:16 |
sherbertbc |
rest of committee+++ |
| 14:16 |
tspindler |
She was the last person standing so she got the work dumped on her i'm afraid |
| 14:16 |
sherbertbc |
no problem |
| 14:16 |
tspindler |
#topic 2017 Conference Committee Report |
| 14:17 |
tspindler |
I'm not sure if collum_ or someone else can report. |
| 14:17 |
collum_ |
I don't have any figures. |
| 14:17 |
tspindler |
How did everyone feel about the conference. I thought overall it went well. |
| 14:17 |
collum_ |
We did get the survey results back. Mostly positive responses. |
| 14:18 |
scottthomas |
I heard nothing but good things, and I had a good experience myself. |
| 14:18 |
tspindler |
#info Conference Committe figures and survey incomplete at this time |
| 14:18 |
terran_ |
I had a good conference, but I am worried that the numbers have dropped. |
| 14:19 |
tspindler |
#topic 2018 Conference Committee Report |
| 14:19 |
tspindler |
Is there someone here who can speak on the 2018 conference. |
| 14:20 |
gmcharlt |
sorry for being late, got sidetracked |
| 14:20 |
gmcharlt |
can provide update if desired |
| 14:20 |
tspindler |
gmcharlt: yes please |
| 14:20 |
gmcharlt |
ok, proceeding |
| 14:21 |
gmcharlt |
#info development towards 3.0 is progressing normally |
| 14:21 |
gmcharlt |
#info feedback fest this week is resulting in a number of older pullrequests getting reviewed by community |
| 14:21 |
gmcharlt |
#info security releases in the 2.12 and 2.11 series are expected to be made next week |
| 14:21 |
gmcharlt |
that's it, unless there are anyquestions for me |
| 14:22 |
terran_ |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
hbrennan |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
tspindler |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
scottthomas |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
rgagnon |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
sherbertbc |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:22 |
tspindler |
I like the frequent updates on the list |
| 14:22 |
tspindler |
unrelated but will you still be pulling the financials from SFC or should I be working with Amy? |
| 14:22 |
terran_ |
Definitely! |
| 14:22 |
kmlussier |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:23 |
collum_ |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:24 |
gmcharlt |
tspindler: I will, and will do so later this afternoon |
| 14:24 |
tspindler |
gmcharlt++ |
| 14:24 |
tspindler |
Ok, the next topic. I know kmlussier has some things to discuss. |
| 14:24 |
tspindler |
#topic Outreach Committee |
| 14:25 |
tspindler |
kmlussier has the floor |
| 14:25 |
kmlussier |
I wrote a general report and didn't have time to share it before the meeting. |
| 14:25 |
kmlussier |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=outreach:reports:2017-05-18 |
| 14:26 |
kmlussier |
The Outreach Committee has three specific items we wanted to bring to the board. |
| 14:26 |
kmlussier |
The first is that, when reviewing our wiki page with the original charge, I realized the work of the committee was supposed to expire at the end of December. |
| 14:27 |
kmlussier |
We had a short-term trial period because the original focus of the committee was to rent exhibit booths at conference, which carried a high cost. But the focus has changed over the past two years. |
| 14:28 |
kmlussier |
We would like to continue our work, and we would like the EOB to approve a new charge for the group. |
| 14:28 |
kmlussier |
#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DUTW5cJ6L5CHii8E9HtgqaLgImTogdbb23KLgrI5jJE/edit |
| 14:29 |
kmlussier |
Most of the changes were to reduce verbiage and to remove specific activities that don't really belong in a committee charge. But we would also like the target audience to include an internal audience as well as external. |
| 14:29 |
tspindler |
Any discussion about the proposed charge? |
| 14:29 |
terran_ |
#info I move to approve the changes to the Outreach Committee |
| 14:29 |
scottthomas |
I like all of the changes and definitely think the committee's work should continue. |
| 14:30 |
scottthomas |
#info second |
| 14:30 |
terran_ |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:30 |
tspindler |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:30 |
scottthomas |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:30 |
sherbertbc |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:30 |
tspindler |
any discussion we have a motion and a second |
| 14:31 |
tspindler |
#startvote Should we accept the new charge as presented? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:31 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Should we accept the new charge as presented? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:31 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:31 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 14:31 |
tspindler |
#vote Yes |
| 14:31 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:31 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:31 |
collum_ |
#vote yes |
| 14:31 |
scottthomas |
#vote yes |
| 14:31 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 14:31 |
tspindler |
#endvote |
| 14:31 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Should we accept the new charge as presented?" Results are |
| 14:31 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): tspindler, collum_, rgagnon, terran_, scottthomas, hbrennan, sherbertbc |
| 14:32 |
collum_ |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:32 |
kmlussier |
Moving on... |
| 14:32 |
kmlussier |
#info The Outreach Committee is seeking approval for a budget to cover costs through next April. |
| 14:32 |
kmlussier |
#link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zazk_x3KlrDn0sZmTgdh2rfznL1_I20tJVWavlJGdH0/edit?usp=sharing |
| 14:33 |
kmlussier |
I've made a change to the proposed budget since first posting it to the list. |
| 14:33 |
tspindler |
any discussion? |
| 14:33 |
kmlussier |
After talking with graced, we've reduced the merchandising request to $1,500, which reflects the amount of merchandise we'll need to restock for next year's conference. |
| 14:34 |
tspindler |
kmlussier: have we generally recovered the cost on what we spent on merchandise? |
| 14:35 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 14:35 |
kmlussier |
tspindler: We didn't spend anything on merchandise. Equinox was the merchandise sponsor and paid for the initial stock. |
| 14:35 |
hbrennan |
equinox++ |
| 14:35 |
tspindler |
thanks, can I have a motion to accept the Outreach Committee Budget |
| 14:35 |
kmlussier |
We made $1,800 on merchandise at the conference. |
| 14:35 |
tspindler |
equinox++ |
| 14:36 |
sherbertbc |
equinox ++ |
| 14:36 |
rgagnon |
equinox++ |
| 14:36 |
kmlussier |
Sorry, $1,600 |
| 14:36 |
terran_ |
equinox++ |
| 14:36 |
scottthomas |
#info I will make that motion. |
| 14:36 |
collum_ |
#info second |
| 14:36 |
scottthomas |
equinox++ |
| 14:36 |
tspindler |
We have a motion and a second, any further discussion? |
| 14:37 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
| 14:37 |
tspindler |
#startvote Should we accept the Outreach Commitee budget totaling $4500? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:37 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Should we accept the Outreach Commitee budget totaling $4500? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:37 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:37 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:37 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 14:37 |
collum_ |
#vote yes |
| 14:37 |
tspindler |
#vote Yes |
| 14:37 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 14:37 |
scottthomas |
#vote yes |
| 14:38 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:38 |
tspindler |
#endvote |
| 14:38 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Should we accept the Outreach Commitee budget totaling $4500?" Results are |
| 14:38 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): tspindler, rgagnon, terran_, scottthomas, collum_, hbrennan, sherbertbc |
| 14:39 |
kmlussier |
OK, last thing from me today. |
| 14:39 |
collum_ |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:39 |
kmlussier |
During out meeting at the conference, we also discussed the idea of possibly refreshing the current logo. |
| 14:40 |
kmlussier |
The person who worked on the conference logo did very good work, and, if the EOB thinks it's worthwhile, we would like to approach that person about working on the community logo. |
| 14:40 |
kmlussier |
I didn't include it in the budget request. I first wanted to see what you all thought of the idea. |
| 14:40 |
kmlussier |
I outlined a couple of reasons in my email to the board. |
| 14:41 |
terran_ |
Can you please remind us of those reasons? |
| 14:41 |
hbrennan |
We definitely need an official square/round logo to use |
| 14:42 |
kmlussier |
Yes, so one of the reasons was that we don't have an official small / square logo. |
| 14:42 |
terran_ |
I agree with the need for a square or round version, but I'm not sure about refreshing the standard one. |
| 14:42 |
kmlussier |
The larger reason was the the original logo was done with a rare font that was then customized. It has made it difficult to work with the logo. |
| 14:43 |
terran_ |
Isn't it stored as line art? The font shouldn't matter. |
| 14:43 |
kmlussier |
In our discussions, nobody wanted to see a total redesign. Because I think it identifies the Evergreen brand. |
| 14:43 |
tspindler |
If you just need to convert the frond part of the logo into a square vectored image, I can do that but I was assuming there was more to it than that |
| 14:44 |
kmlussier |
Yes, people have actually used the frond part as an unofficial square logo. |
| 14:44 |
hbrennan |
I think it should be a little more, sometime like the pins |
| 14:44 |
hbrennan |
so it would require a little more design work |
| 14:44 |
hbrennan |
*something like |
| 14:44 |
kmlussier |
terran_: As it was explained to me, it's when you're trying to do something with the logo. For example, when we recently had to change the trademark symbol on the log. |
| 14:45 |
terran_ |
I don't think I understand why that would matter - were they trying to match the font on the TM to the logo font? Because that's not necessary |
| 14:46 |
tspindler |
The font is now a vector graphic that i suppled to Galen and put up on a google folder. But the frond piece is not a line drawing. |
| 14:46 |
tspindler |
However, I could see doing some kind of refresh of the existing image and logo with a professional. |
| 14:47 |
terran_ |
If we're going to do a refresh, I'd want to do it because we want a visual change, not because there are technical issues we can straighten out. |
| 14:47 |
tspindler |
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwdUgxEmWFdEcThNSi04SVJMZ00 |
| 14:47 |
kmlussier |
Yes, in addition to the technical reasons provided, I would say some on the committee thought that a refreshing of the design would be nice. We still want it to be recognizable, but maybe modernized a bit. |
| 14:48 |
hbrennan |
Assuming since no one has been approached about this yet, a budget number isn't handy? |
| 14:48 |
tspindler |
kmlussier, are you looking to attache any money to it yet? |
| 14:49 |
scottthomas |
I agree. If we are going to refresh it, I think we should update the design. |
| 14:49 |
kmlussier |
tspindler: No, not yet. I was looking for feedback before we approached the person about doing the work. |
| 14:49 |
tspindler |
I think its a good idea to do something like this. |
| 14:50 |
tspindler |
If we are not spending money at this time, I'm not sure we need a vote but how do others feel? |
| 14:51 |
scottthomas |
We are in competition with proprietary vendors who seem to regularly refresh their logos. |
| 14:51 |
tspindler |
It seems within the purview to research options |
| 14:51 |
hbrennan |
As a graphic designer myself, I fully agree it needs sprucing up |
| 14:51 |
kmlussier |
heh...sprucing |
| 14:51 |
hbrennan |
(ha!) |
| 14:51 |
collum_ |
I think a square logo along with the elongated one would be nice. |
| 14:51 |
collum_ |
tee hee |
| 14:52 |
hbrennan |
Is it weird to approach one individual about this though? |
| 14:53 |
terran_ |
I think we should also ask for a light-on-black option as well as the green-on-white. |
| 14:53 |
kmlussier |
hbrennan: We could certainly approach others, but the thought was this a person that we know does good work. At least, based on our experience with the conference logo. |
| 14:53 |
kmlussier |
collum_: Was it a librarian who worked on the conference logo? |
| 14:53 |
scottthomas |
We could approach this person and, if we aren't happy with their work or quote, approach others. |
| 14:53 |
collum_ |
It was a graphic designer from one of the Ohio libraries. |
| 14:53 |
kmlussier |
terran_: That's a good point. |
| 14:54 |
collum_ |
I can find the name and send it to you kmlussier. |
| 14:54 |
hbrennan |
I have done contract work that involved designing the logo and providing an RFP |
| 14:54 |
kmlussier |
Thanks collum_ ! |
| 14:54 |
tspindler |
yes, it should work well on the web, in print and social media |
| 14:54 |
terran_ |
I suspect someone within the community would give us a better rate than someone from outside the community. |
| 14:54 |
tspindler |
I know one of our libraries just spent $4000 on a logo with a professional graphic artist |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
hbrennan: Designing the logo as part of the response to the RFP? |
| 14:55 |
hbrennan |
yes |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
wow |
| 14:55 |
terran_ |
Yes, I know two professional graphic designers and they'd probably be in the several-thousand-range as well |
| 14:56 |
kmlussier |
Well, that gives us a ballpark. If we get a quote that seems high compare to those ranges, we can look at getting quotes from others. |
| 14:56 |
tspindler |
I think its worth the the committee to research the issue and come back with a recommendation. Do we want to vote on this? |
| 14:57 |
hbrennan |
Should be much lower than that if an existing logo is provided to work with |
| 14:57 |
hbrennan |
yes, we need more info |
| 14:58 |
terran_ |
#info I move that the Outreach Committee investigates pursuing a logo redesign |
| 14:58 |
tspindler |
The library tha paid the $4000 was for an entirely new design and probably part of a larger marketing strategy |
| 14:58 |
scottthomas |
#info second |
| 14:58 |
hbrennan |
And I'm about to head to the circ desk for a shift so apologies in advance for delayed responses from here on |
| 14:59 |
tspindler |
#startvote Direct the Outreach Committee to research options and report back on the logo design? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Direct the Outreach Committee to research options and report back on the logo design? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:59 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:59 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:59 |
tspindler |
#vote Yes |
| 14:59 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 14:59 |
scottthomas |
#vote yes |
| 14:59 |
collum_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:59 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 14:59 |
tspindler |
#endvote |
| 14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Direct the Outreach Committee to research options and report back on the logo design?" Results are |
| 14:59 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): tspindler, collum_, rgagnon, terran_, scottthomas, hbrennan, sherbertbc |
| 15:00 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 15:00 |
tspindler |
There is no old business and I only have one new item that should be able to be handled quickly |
| 15:00 |
tspindler |
#topic New Business |
| 15:01 |
tspindler |
#info Graced requested payment for the lockbox used at the conference, the expenditure was previousely approved. She provided a receipt and it cost $184 |
| 15:01 |
tspindler |
Can I have a motion that we make the payment? |
| 15:01 |
graced |
er... no just the $28.78 |
| 15:02 |
tspindler |
I missed that then. thanks for the correction. |
| 15:02 |
graced |
Sorry - should have circled that on the receipt |
| 15:02 |
terran_ |
#info I move that we make the payment |
| 15:02 |
rgagnon |
#info Second |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
#startvote Make the payment of 28.78 for the lockbox? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 15:03 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Make the payment of 28.78 for the lockbox? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 15:03 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 15:03 |
collum_ |
#vote yes |
| 15:03 |
sherbertbc |
#vote Yes |
| 15:03 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
#vote Yes |
| 15:03 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 15:03 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 15:03 |
scottthomas |
#vote yes |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
Any other issues to bring up? |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
#endvote |
| 15:03 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Make the payment of 28.78 for the lockbox?" Results are |
| 15:03 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): collum_, tspindler, rgagnon, terran_, scottthomas, hbrennan, sherbertbc |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
Can I have a motion to adjourn? |
| 15:04 |
terran_ |
There's a bug squashing week coming up in June |
| 15:04 |
rgagnon |
#info Move to adjourn |
| 15:04 |
hbrennan |
#info second |
| 15:04 |
tspindler |
#endmeeting |
| 15:04 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting ended Thu May 18 15:04:27 2017 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
| 15:04 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-05-18-14.00.html |
| 15:04 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-05-18-14.00.txt |
| 15:04 |
pinesol_green |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-05-18-14.00.log.html |
| 15:04 |
sherbertbc |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
collum_ |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
terran_ |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
hbrennan |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
rgagnon |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
scottthomas |
tspindler++ |
| 15:04 |
tspindler |
Thanks all, made it just over an hour |
| 15:04 |
kmlussier |
tspindler++ |
| 15:05 |
hbrennan |
tspindler: not bad at all! |
| 15:09 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1677661 Hold Targeter V2 Repairs & Improvements - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=3073bcb> |
| 15:09 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1677661 Targeter V2 extras release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=54dc1aa> |
| 15:09 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1677661 Targeter V2 remove unused batch API - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=d1c2d9c> |
| 15:09 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1677661 Hold targeter live test use API, etc. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=238dba9> |
| 15:10 |
terran_ |
kmlussier: are you going to update the outreach committee page with the text changes? |
| 15:10 |
kmlussier |
terran_: Yes, I will. |
| 15:10 |
kmlussier |
But probably not until tomorrow. |
| 15:10 |
terran_ |
kmlussier: excellent, one less thing to put on my to-do list :D |
| 15:10 |
kmlussier |
terran++ |
| 15:11 |
terran_ |
kmussier++ |
| 15:22 |
Dyrcona |
I should not try to outsmart git rebase.... |
| 15:22 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
| 15:22 |
Dyrcona |
I tried getting fancy with the options and got myself into a mess. |
| 15:22 |
Dyrcona |
A plain-old git rebase just did what I wanted anyway. |
| 15:23 |
Dyrcona |
Because I had commits from the other branch with different hashes, I thought a --merge option would work better than a plain rebase. |
| 15:23 |
Dyrcona |
Lesson learned. :) |
| 15:30 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 15:43 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 15:53 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 16:06 |
|
tspindler left #evergreen |
| 16:31 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 16:37 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 16:49 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 16:56 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 17:03 |
Dyrcona |
JBoyer++ # Even though he's not around to defend himself. :) |
| 17:12 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:19 |
|
jwoodard joined #evergreen |
| 17:22 |
Bmagic |
Do I remember someone saying they had an issue with the web based staff client on 16.04? |
| 17:23 |
Bmagic |
funny story, me too |
| 17:29 |
Bmagic |
grunt all results in PhantomJS 2.1.1 (Linux 0.0.0) ERROR |
| 17:39 |
Bmagic |
The repo's must have changed because my installation routine hasn't changed. This worked a couple of weeks ago |
| 17:40 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 17:45 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
| 17:47 |
Bmagic |
oh hey! it's a bug |
| 17:47 |
Bmagic |
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1671165 |
| 17:47 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1671165 in Evergreen 2.11 "Grunt all step fails when building web client" [High,Fix released] |
| 17:47 |
Bmagic |
kmlussier++ |
| 20:02 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 20:24 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Jason Etheridge] LP#1491875: avoid erroneous "unsaved data" popup during MARC record creation - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=956432c> |
| 21:54 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Chris Sharp] LP#1610246 Classic Circulation View excluding circulations - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9d8c721> |
| 21:54 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1610246: add upgrade note - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9144829> |
| 22:20 |
|
genpaku joined #evergreen |
| 22:24 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 22:50 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] doc: fix location of a release note stub - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=75e6560> |
| 23:42 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 23:56 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
