| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 04:30 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 06:40 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 07:11 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:32 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 08:44 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:50 |
|
csharp joined #evergreen |
| 08:51 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 08:57 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 09:13 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 09:18 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
| 09:21 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 09:36 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:38 |
|
terran_ joined #evergreen |
| 09:47 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 10:22 |
|
Dawn joined #evergreen |
| 10:24 |
Guest64139 |
Hi Everyone, I moderated the circulation interest group during the Evergreen Conference. There was a large interest in a circ interest group listserv from the group. Does anyone object to having a listserv for the circ interest group? Thanks, |
| 10:26 |
|
ddale joined #evergreen |
| 10:26 |
ddale |
Hi Everyone, I moderated the circulation interest group during the Evergreen Conference. There was a large interest in a circ interest group listserv from the group. Does anyone object to having a listserv for the circ interest group? Thanks, |
| 10:28 |
jeff |
hi, ddale! i've no strong opinion either way, but i can provide some history that you'll likely run into, as well as a question or two: |
| 10:29 |
jeff |
1) any reason why the open-ils-general list doesn't meet your need? |
| 10:30 |
jeff |
2) there was a similar post-conference desire for a "sysadmin" mailing list a few years back, which went mostly unused and eventually died completely. your situation may be different, but i'm sure the spectre of the failed sysadmin interest list will likely be raised as you continue down this path. :-) |
| 10:33 |
* mmorgan |
would like to see more discussion of circulation issues, whether it be on the general list or a dedicated one. |
| 10:33 |
ddale |
Thanks, Jeff! I appreciate the feedback. The general open-ils list can be cumbersome with so many tracks going at one time. Front line circ staff want to be able to communicate without wading through other conversations |
| 10:35 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 10:37 |
jeff |
and another question, if you don't mind: were there any notes made available from the circ interest group meeting/discussion at the conference? i'd be interested in hearing more about what topics came up. |
| 10:39 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 10:45 |
* mmorgan |
can see both sides of this. |
| 10:46 |
mmorgan |
I can understand why frontline circ users might be more inclined to join and participate in a list that focuses on circ issues. |
| 10:46 |
mmorgan |
But I would be concerned that many subscribers to the general list might have valuable input, but may not choose to subscribe to the circ list. |
| 10:50 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 10:51 |
Dyrcona |
I don't think we need more lists. The admin list was shut down for lack of traffic. |
| 10:52 |
ddale |
Jeff, yes there were notes made. I emailed those to everyone that attended. I will be happy to post those here or email them to you. |
| 10:56 |
|
Jillianne2 joined #evergreen |
| 10:56 |
mmorgan |
ddale: Would you consider sharing the topics with the general list for the benefit of those that were not able to attend? |
| 10:58 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 11:01 |
|
ddale joined #evergreen |
| 11:02 |
ddale |
I am trying to post the notes. |
| 11:02 |
ddale |
i used the large pastes link at the top of the page |
| 11:02 |
ddale |
This link should take you to it http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/82?tx=on&submit=Format+it%21 |
| 11:03 |
ddale |
Keep in mind these are the topics of discussion. Some were determined to be already resolved during discussion. |
| 11:08 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 11:11 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1670407 Lost checkin re-opens transaction - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=4ccad96> |
| 11:11 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Dan Wells] LP#1670407 Add tests for xact_finish close/re-open - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=687da46> |
| 11:11 |
|
ddale_ joined #evergreen |
| 11:17 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 11:20 |
|
ddale joined #evergreen |
| 11:22 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 11:23 |
dbs |
At some point we should probably discuss our base level of browser support again, as I started trying to support IE9 with my dojoless rewrite and then thought "wait, really?" |
| 11:24 |
bshum |
dbs: I thought we gave up on IE9 long ago |
| 11:24 |
bshum |
When Microsoft did |
| 11:24 |
bshum |
If we haven't, we really should... |
| 11:25 |
* bshum |
pulls out this page for giggles: https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=compatible_browsers |
| 11:25 |
* bshum |
has fond memories of Evergreen 1.6.0.4 |
| 11:25 |
bshum |
:D |
| 11:27 |
dbs |
Well, we haven't really put a stake in the ground (or guided devs) as to what level of browser support we target :/ |
| 11:27 |
bshum |
Personally I'd expect only as good as IE11. Anything older is way out of support. |
| 11:27 |
bshum |
ie-- # just 'cause |
| 11:27 |
dbs |
yeah, I saw that page and laughed |
| 11:28 |
dbs |
we also have a bit about browser support in TPAC at the bottom of https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=dev:opac:template-toolkit:todos |
| 11:28 |
dbs |
"Internet Explorer 7 / 8 / 9", "Firefox 4 / 5" |
| 11:31 |
bshum |
Well, Vista is dead, so IE9 should be gone too, no? :) |
| 11:33 |
* bshum |
finds that "deprecate me" page stuff to start deleting things with |
| 11:33 |
bshum |
Or you know what, we should just kill these pages, shouldn't we? |
| 11:36 |
berick |
dbwells++ # billing bugs |
| 11:40 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
| 11:43 |
mmorgan |
dbwells++ |
| 11:46 |
|
_adb joined #evergreen |
| 11:49 |
|
remingtron joined #evergreen |
| 12:30 |
jonadab |
Pretty sure I'd rather support all versions of Mozilla back to 1.0, than try to support more than about 1 old version of IE. |
| 12:38 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 12:48 |
berick |
agoben: FWIW, my hackaway poll NO responses were really "if needed" responses. i picked the dates i preferred, not the ones I required. |
| 12:49 |
agoben |
Noted! Thanks, berick! |
| 13:06 |
|
dteston joined #evergreen |
| 13:13 |
terran_ |
agoben: Thanks for hosting again! I really enjoyed it there last year. |
| 13:15 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
| 13:17 |
agoben |
Thrilled to have everyone back! :) Thanks, terran_! |
| 13:21 |
|
dteston joined #evergreen |
| 13:25 |
Dyrcona |
Yes, I'm looking forward to the hack-away. |
| 13:30 |
* Dyrcona |
doesn't have any known conflicts with any of the hack-away dates. |
| 14:51 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 15:02 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
Hmm |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
https://answers.launchpad.net/evergreen/+question/622549 |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
Someone went to Launchpad questions to ask about evergreen install help |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
Based on the question, I'm not sure if they're asking for help though, vs. services |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
I'm tempted to point at the README documentation, and then also include a link the vendor page |
| 15:32 |
bshum |
Any other suggestions? |
| 15:33 |
abneiman |
bshum: FWIW, appears that it's the same person who asked about this late Saturday night in IRC http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen/2017-04-15 |
| 15:34 |
terran_ |
Responding with the README and the vendor list seems like a reasonable place to start. |
| 15:40 |
bshum |
abneiman: Aha, yeah I wondered if that was the case. Makes sense. |
| 15:40 |
bshum |
I put some initial reply up there to point them at a few places. Guess we'll see what they actually want/need. |
| 15:52 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 16:30 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 16:38 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 17:09 |
|
mmorgan1 left #evergreen |
| 18:50 |
|
_adb joined #evergreen |
| 20:05 |
jeffdavis |
gmcharlt: re bug 1681466 - do I understand correctly that we just need to add a string definition to Open-ILS/src/templates/staff/base_js.tt2 ? |
| 20:05 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1681466 in Evergreen "webstaff: crash when attempting to open opt-in confirmation modal " [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681466 |
| 20:21 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 21:28 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 21:35 |
kmlussier |
@sortinghat |
| 21:35 |
pinesol_green |
Hmm... kmlussier... Let me see now... HUFFLEPUFF! |
| 21:49 |
jonadab |
Of course. |
| 21:50 |
jonadab |
Hufflepuff have the best documentation, do they not? |
| 22:18 |
kmlussier |
Do they? I always thought it was just the house for those who are not brave, smart or evil. |
| 22:20 |
|
genpaku joined #evergreen |
| 22:29 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1641708 Work log avoid storing unneeded data - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b409024> |
| 22:29 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1641708: follow-up - only record hold_id when logging hold placement - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ebdf2f7> |
| 23:00 |
|
Guest69420 left #evergreen |
