Evergreen ILS Website

IRC log for #evergreen, 2017-04-18

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat

All times shown according to the server's local time.

Time Nick Message
04:30 pinesol_green News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live>
06:40 rlefaive joined #evergreen
07:11 rjackson_isl joined #evergreen
07:32 agoben joined #evergreen
08:44 mmorgan joined #evergreen
08:50 csharp joined #evergreen
08:51 bos20k joined #evergreen
08:57 bos20k joined #evergreen
09:13 collum joined #evergreen
09:18 maryj joined #evergreen
09:21 collum joined #evergreen
09:36 yboston joined #evergreen
09:38 terran_ joined #evergreen
09:47 bos20k joined #evergreen
10:22 Dawn joined #evergreen
10:24 Guest64139 Hi Everyone, I moderated the circulation interest group during the Evergreen Conference. There was a large interest in a circ interest group listserv from the group. Does anyone object to having a listserv for the circ interest group? Thanks,
10:26 ddale joined #evergreen
10:26 ddale Hi Everyone, I moderated the circulation interest group during the Evergreen Conference. There was a large interest in a circ interest group listserv from the group. Does anyone object to having a listserv for the circ interest group? Thanks,
10:28 jeff hi, ddale! i've no strong opinion either way, but i can provide some history that you'll likely run into, as well as a question or two:
10:29 jeff 1) any reason why the open-ils-general list doesn't meet your need?
10:30 jeff 2) there was a similar post-conference desire for a "sysadmin" mailing list a few years back, which went mostly unused and eventually died completely. your situation may be different, but i'm sure the spectre of the failed sysadmin interest list will likely be raised as you continue down this path. :-)
10:33 * mmorgan would like to see more discussion of circulation issues, whether it be on the general list or a dedicated one.
10:33 ddale Thanks, Jeff! I appreciate the feedback. The general open-ils list can be cumbersome with so many tracks going at one time. Front line circ staff want to be able to communicate without wading through other conversations
10:35 Dyrcona joined #evergreen
10:37 jeff and another question, if you don't mind: were there any notes made available from the circ interest group meeting/discussion at the conference? i'd be interested in hearing more about what topics came up.
10:39 Jillianne joined #evergreen
10:45 * mmorgan can see both sides of this.
10:46 mmorgan I can understand why frontline circ users might be more inclined to join and participate in a list that focuses on circ issues.
10:46 mmorgan But I would be concerned that many subscribers to the general list might have valuable input, but may not choose to subscribe to the circ list.
10:50 Christineb joined #evergreen
10:51 Dyrcona I don't think we need more lists. The admin list was shut down for lack of traffic.
10:52 ddale Jeff, yes there were notes made. I emailed those to everyone that attended. I will be happy to post those here or email them to you.
10:56 Jillianne2 joined #evergreen
10:56 mmorgan ddale: Would you consider sharing the topics with the general list for the benefit of those that were not able to attend?
10:58 Jillianne joined #evergreen
11:01 ddale joined #evergreen
11:02 ddale I am trying to post the notes.
11:02 ddale i used the large pastes link at the top of the page
11:02 ddale This link should take you to it  http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/8​2?tx=on&amp;submit=Format+it%21
11:03 ddale Keep in mind these are the topics of discussion. Some were determined to be already resolved during discussion.
11:08 rlefaive joined #evergreen
11:11 pinesol_green [evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1670407 Lost checkin re-opens transaction - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=4ccad96>
11:11 pinesol_green [evergreen|Dan Wells] LP#1670407 Add tests for xact_finish close/re-open - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=687da46>
11:11 ddale_ joined #evergreen
11:17 sandbergja joined #evergreen
11:20 ddale joined #evergreen
11:22 Dyrcona joined #evergreen
11:23 dbs At some point we should probably discuss our base level of browser support again, as I started trying to support IE9 with my dojoless rewrite and then thought "wait, really?"
11:24 bshum dbs: I thought we gave up on IE9 long ago
11:24 bshum When Microsoft did
11:24 bshum If we haven't, we really should...
11:25 * bshum pulls out this page for giggles:  https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/​doku.php?id=compatible_browsers
11:25 * bshum has fond memories of Evergreen 1.6.0.4
11:25 bshum :D
11:27 dbs Well, we haven't really put a stake in the ground (or guided devs) as to what level of browser support we target :/
11:27 bshum Personally I'd expect only as good as IE11.  Anything older is way out of support.
11:27 bshum ie-- # just 'cause
11:27 dbs yeah, I saw that page and laughed
11:28 dbs we also have a bit about browser support in TPAC at the bottom of https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.p​hp?id=dev:opac:template-toolkit:todos
11:28 dbs "Internet Explorer 7 / 8 / 9", "Firefox 4 / 5"
11:31 bshum Well, Vista is dead, so IE9 should be gone too, no?  :)
11:33 * bshum finds that "deprecate me" page stuff to start deleting things with
11:33 bshum Or you know what, we should just kill these pages, shouldn't we?
11:36 berick dbwells++ # billing bugs
11:40 khuckins__ joined #evergreen
11:43 mmorgan dbwells++
11:46 _adb joined #evergreen
11:49 remingtron joined #evergreen
12:30 jonadab Pretty sure I'd rather support all versions of Mozilla back to 1.0, than try to support more than about 1 old version of IE.
12:38 Jillianne joined #evergreen
12:48 berick agoben: FWIW, my hackaway poll NO responses were really "if needed" responses.  i picked the dates i preferred, not the ones I required.
12:49 agoben Noted!  Thanks, berick!
13:06 dteston joined #evergreen
13:13 terran_ agoben: Thanks for hosting again! I really enjoyed it there last year.
13:15 maryj joined #evergreen
13:17 agoben Thrilled to have everyone back!  :)  Thanks, terran_!
13:21 dteston joined #evergreen
13:25 Dyrcona Yes, I'm looking forward to the hack-away.
13:30 * Dyrcona doesn't have any known conflicts with any of the hack-away dates.
14:51 rlefaive joined #evergreen
15:02 mmorgan1 joined #evergreen
15:31 bshum Hmm
15:31 bshum https://answers.launchpad.ne​t/evergreen/+question/622549
15:31 bshum Someone went to Launchpad questions to ask about evergreen install help
15:31 bshum Based on the question, I'm not sure if they're asking for help though, vs. services
15:31 bshum I'm tempted to point at the README documentation, and then also include a link the vendor page
15:32 bshum Any other suggestions?
15:33 abneiman bshum: FWIW, appears that it's the same person who asked about this late Saturday night in IRC http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen/2017-04-15
15:34 terran_ Responding with the README and the vendor list seems like a reasonable place to start.
15:40 bshum abneiman: Aha, yeah I wondered if that was the case.  Makes sense.
15:40 bshum I put some initial reply up there to point them at a few places.  Guess we'll see what they actually want/need.
15:52 collum joined #evergreen
16:30 pinesol_green News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live>
16:38 Jillianne joined #evergreen
17:09 mmorgan1 left #evergreen
18:50 _adb joined #evergreen
20:05 jeffdavis gmcharlt: re bug 1681466 - do I understand correctly that we just need to add a string definition to Open-ILS/src/templates/staff/base_js.tt2 ?
20:05 pinesol_green Launchpad bug 1681466 in Evergreen "webstaff: crash when attempting to open opt-in confirmation modal " [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681466
20:21 Jillianne joined #evergreen
21:28 kmlussier joined #evergreen
21:35 kmlussier @sortinghat
21:35 pinesol_green Hmm... kmlussier... Let me see now... HUFFLEPUFF!
21:49 jonadab Of course.
21:50 jonadab Hufflepuff have the best documentation, do they not?
22:18 kmlussier Do they? I always thought it was just the house for those who are not brave, smart or evil.
22:20 genpaku joined #evergreen
22:29 pinesol_green [evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1641708 Work log avoid storing unneeded data - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b409024>
22:29 pinesol_green [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1641708: follow-up - only record hold_id when logging hold placement - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ebdf2f7>
23:00 Guest69420 left #evergreen

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat