Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:29 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
00:52 |
|
mtj_ joined #evergreen |
00:56 |
|
jeff__ joined #evergreen |
01:23 |
|
jeff_ joined #evergreen |
01:31 |
|
mtj_ joined #evergreen |
02:08 |
|
Mark__T joined #evergreen |
02:15 |
|
tsbere joined #evergreen |
02:36 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
03:48 |
|
tsbere joined #evergreen |
05:28 |
|
fparks joined #evergreen |
05:28 |
|
sseng joined #evergreen |
05:28 |
|
ktomita joined #evergreen |
07:26 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
07:34 |
|
timlaptop joined #evergreen |
07:44 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
08:03 |
|
shadowspar joined #evergreen |
08:08 |
|
akilsdonk_ joined #evergreen |
08:24 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
08:26 |
|
kbeswick joined #evergreen |
08:27 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
08:34 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
08:37 |
|
Shae joined #evergreen |
08:42 |
|
RoganH joined #evergreen |
08:42 |
|
zxiiro joined #evergreen |
08:56 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
09:01 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
09:08 |
|
sborger joined #evergreen |
09:19 |
|
kmlussier1 joined #evergreen |
09:21 |
mmorgan |
jboyer-isl: your suggestion to delete rows from the action_trigger.event table worked, I was able to rerun my test trigger. Thanks! |
09:22 |
jboyer-isl |
Good to hear. maybe now I can clean up some of the failed events that are sitting around in ours. :D |
09:29 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
09:33 |
bshum |
So I'm getting some javascript errors on large pull lists when using the "Clear Hold Shelf" option directly off the Circulation menu actions. |
09:34 |
bshum |
If I go browse the hold shelf directly, let it load, then click "view clearable holds" it eventually loads them all, then clicking "Clear these holds" takes some time (with a long script running prompt) |
09:34 |
bshum |
But eventually clears |
09:34 |
bshum |
I'm wondering if the direct action is doing something weird and dying out. |
09:34 |
bshum |
Possibly an unfinished issue with bug 1017989 |
09:34 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1017989 in Evergreen 2.4 "fix clear shelf action with 25 or more holds" (affected: 6, heat: 28) [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1017989 |
09:35 |
* bshum |
tries capturing the JS error message |
09:37 |
bshum |
Oh, you know what it might be... something interrupted the action script and it generated as an incomplete JS error. |
09:37 |
* bshum |
will investigate further. Sorry for the potential false alarm. |
09:38 |
bshum |
Ah there it is. |
09:38 |
bshum |
So there's two kinds of errors |
09:39 |
bshum |
http://pastie.org/8190066 |
09:39 |
Dyrcona |
bshum: bad and worse? |
09:39 |
bshum |
The first happens if it takes too long and dies I'm thinking |
09:39 |
bshum |
The second seems to happen if you get frustrated and kill it off or close the window in any way. Since it interrupts it |
09:42 |
bshum |
Okay I've consistenly made the first error network timeout happen three times now with different sized hold shelfs over 25+ (a few hundred really) |
09:45 |
Dyrcona |
bshum: SNAFU.... |
09:46 |
bshum |
Dyrcona: Apparently. |
09:46 |
bshum |
I'll ponder this more when I get to the office. |
09:47 |
bshum |
I'm wondering if this is more consequence of slow hold retargeting (as it clears the holds and finds new targets) biting us in other places. |
09:47 |
csharp |
bshum: maybe related to bug 1167979? |
09:47 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1167979 in Evergreen "Circulation > Clear Shelf-Expired Holds fails " (affected: 3, heat: 16) [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1167979 |
09:47 |
|
Guest20621 joined #evergreen |
09:47 |
* csharp |
was just looking at unresolved PINES dev requests and came across that one |
09:48 |
bshum |
csharp: Yeah that sounds like it. I really need to re-read the bugs again. |
09:48 |
RoganH |
Does PINES have a long list of dev requests? |
09:48 |
* bshum |
marks it confirmed :D |
10:00 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
10:01 |
csharp |
RoganH: always ;-) |
10:01 |
csharp |
bshum++ |
10:02 |
RoganH |
csharp: I'm always curious, lol. In SCLENDS we always have a long list of casual development interests but a much shorter serious list. I've assumed it's that way everywhere but never know. |
10:13 |
|
dboyle joined #evergreen |
10:20 |
Dyrcona |
It's not free as in beer, nor is it free as in freedom. It's free as in kittens. |
10:24 |
phasefx |
in that sense, nothing is free :) |
10:24 |
Dyrcona |
Exactly. |
10:31 |
|
fparks_ joined #evergreen |
10:31 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
10:54 |
|
dboyle_ joined #evergreen |
10:55 |
|
tfaile joined #evergreen |
10:57 |
|
jdouma joined #evergreen |
11:05 |
|
zerick joined #evergreen |
11:14 |
jeff_ |
Dyrcona: i'm starting to push things up to https://github.com/tadl/iNCIPit in preparation for our enabling of ncip tomorrow afternoon. You had asked about it the other day. |
11:15 |
Dyrcona |
jeff_: Cool. Thanks for letting me know. I'm interested in what changes you've made to it. |
11:16 |
jeff_ |
i've incorporated all of the changes you and dan made in the jonscott repo |
11:16 |
jeff_ |
(so that i'm not starting from an already-diverged point) |
11:28 |
|
gdunbar joined #evergreen |
11:35 |
|
acoomes joined #evergreen |
11:45 |
|
smyers_ joined #evergreen |
11:52 |
|
fparks joined #evergreen |
11:53 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
12:01 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
12:18 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
12:37 |
|
stevenyvr2 joined #evergreen |
12:59 |
|
smyers__ joined #evergreen |
13:05 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
13:07 |
bshum |
I think freenode hates me |
13:08 |
Dyrcona |
And a number of others, apparently. ;) |
13:23 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
13:28 |
Dyrcona |
bshum, wb! |
13:41 |
|
rsinger_ joined #evergreen |
13:42 |
|
sseng joined #evergreen |
13:42 |
|
rsinger_ joined #evergreen |
14:13 |
dbwells |
jeff_: Let me know whenever you are done with your latest NCIP commits, and I will pull those into the jonscott repo right away. |
14:13 |
jeff_ |
dbwells: thanks! |
14:14 |
jeff_ |
dbwells: are you guys using the duplicate message detection? i've removed it in https://github.com/tadl/iNCIPit/commit/537b6a763ae6ec1a48d1bd9439daa177436f3bf1 |
14:15 |
dbwells |
jeff_: If your testing shows it should be removed, I have no issue with removing it. |
14:21 |
|
sseng joined #evergreen |
14:22 |
Dyrcona |
FWIW, I thought it should be removed the first time that I tried testing iNCIPit. |
14:24 |
jeff_ |
In testing, we rarely received duplicate messages (other than those that were legit retries after a failure to respond properly). The duplicate message detection was apparently due to an old issue that is no longer an issue, and it can cause problems such as failure to auth the same patron twice in a row. |
14:24 |
jeff_ |
Also, it would require shared storage or a modification to use memcache to work in multi-server environments, so I was pleased when told by MeLCat staff that it should no longer be needed. :-) |
14:26 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
14:28 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
14:29 |
bshum |
Am I back? Maybe... |
14:30 |
rfrasur |
You're here. Is this where you meant to be? |
14:31 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
14:32 |
bshum |
Perhaps. |
14:32 |
Dyrcona |
Yes, but for how long? |
14:32 |
bshum |
I've just been having weird disconnect problems today :( |
14:32 |
bshum |
Dyrcona: That is the question.... |
14:32 |
kmlussier |
bshum: Nice to see you again! |
14:33 |
Dyrcona |
And here I thought Dyrcona was the answer. :p |
14:33 |
rfrasur |
Dyrcona++ |
14:35 |
RoganH |
bshum: you've been popping in and out more than a rabbit on methamphetamines |
14:36 |
rfrasur |
hmm, I'm not sure if that's good or not. |
14:36 |
rfrasur |
sounds like an ifunny video |
14:36 |
RoganH |
given that his connection has been wonky I'd say bad, I just hope it's just IRC |
14:37 |
RoganH |
It's probably just the NSA trying to make sure they get a full stream of his activity though. Apparently his emails, calendars and phone calls aren't enough anymore. |
14:37 |
Dyrcona |
OFTC has not been causing him problems. |
14:38 |
bshum |
Yeah, it's something weird with freenode from my linode. It just couldn't maintain a connection, pinging out, etc. |
14:39 |
bshum |
I'm crossing my fingers that it's calmed down a bit. |
14:39 |
|
dboyle__ joined #evergreen |
14:39 |
|
dboyle___ joined #evergreen |
14:40 |
RoganH |
Nah, I prefer the paranoid over the rational and data driven answer. Clearly the NSA. I have my tinfoil hat on. |
14:40 |
Dyrcona |
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action... |
14:42 |
* rfrasur |
likes to leave catchphrases for the NSA |
14:42 |
rfrasur |
but I won't do it in here. |
14:42 |
RoganH |
See Ben? I'd check for bugs. And a tail. |
14:42 |
rfrasur |
(and also North Korea) |
14:43 |
RoganH |
North Korea can't heat their own apartments. They're not high on my worry list. |
14:43 |
rfrasur |
Oh, I'm not worried about any of them. |
14:44 |
rfrasur |
which is why it's fun...ish |
14:44 |
|
jventuro joined #evergreen |
14:45 |
RoganH |
I worry about the threats that no one expects. |
14:45 |
rfrasur |
Expect them ;-) |
14:45 |
rfrasur |
If someone can dream it up, someone else can and will eventually implement it |
14:46 |
|
CarrieC joined #evergreen |
14:47 |
rfrasur |
and that's not even counting natural catastrophe. |
14:47 |
* rfrasur |
is a ray of sunshine on a cloudy day. |
14:47 |
rfrasur |
:D |
14:49 |
rfrasur |
(this is what happens when I get everything planned done on my day off) |
14:49 |
* rfrasur |
goes to find something to do. |
14:51 |
jventuro |
Good afternoon Evergreen type people! The Reports Interest Group meeting will begin in about 10 minutes. |
14:51 |
|
chtrotter joined #evergreen |
14:59 |
jventuro |
The RIG meeting will be starting in 1 minute. Here's the agenda: http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-reports:meetings:2013-07-30 |
15:00 |
jventuro |
#startmeeting 2013-07-30 Evergreen Reports Interest Group |
15:00 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting started Tue Jul 30 15:00:09 2013 US/Eastern. The chair is jventuro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
15:00 |
pinesol_green |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. |
15:00 |
pinesol_green |
The meeting name has been set to '2013_07_30_evergreen_reports_interest_group' |
15:00 |
jventuro |
Hi there! We'll start with introductions as usual. |
15:00 |
* jventuro |
is Jessica Venturo, Bibliomation |
15:01 |
* chtrotter |
is Cristina Trotter, Oconee Regional Library System (PINES) |
15:01 |
jventuro |
Please introduce yourself if you're participating (don't be shy!) |
15:01 |
|
dagreen joined #evergreen |
15:02 |
|
JennB joined #evergreen |
15:02 |
JennB |
Hello reports! |
15:02 |
* gsams |
is Geoff Sams, North Texas Library Consortium |
15:02 |
jventuro |
Hello JennB! |
15:03 |
gsams |
I'll just be listening in as it were |
15:03 |
gsams |
I'm trying to become more involved |
15:03 |
jventuro |
No problem gsams. Welcome :) |
15:03 |
|
kateb joined #evergreen |
15:04 |
chtrotter |
Hi, JennB and gsams! |
15:04 |
jventuro |
Is this our whole crew today? |
15:04 |
|
annag joined #evergreen |
15:05 |
chtrotter |
Lots of folks have been joining the chat. Anyone else here for the Reports Meeting? We are doing intros now. |
15:06 |
dagreen |
* dagreen is David Green, NC Cardinal (State Library of North Carolina) here to listen in and become more involved, just like gsams |
15:06 |
JennB |
Im here for reports. Whee! |
15:06 |
jventuro |
Welcome dagreen |
15:06 |
annag |
I'm here for the RIG meeting too |
15:07 |
chtrotter |
Hi annag and dagreen! |
15:08 |
jventuro |
Welcome, all. I'll give everyone a minute to look over the notes from the conference: http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-reports:meetings:2013-04-10 |
15:08 |
jventuro |
Let me know if you have any corrections, additions, questions, etc. |
15:09 |
chtrotter |
Real quick: I don't know if some of y'all are just new to RIG, or IRC chat altogether, but I know when I first joined RIG I was clueless about IRC chatting. I found this site helpful: http://www.ircbeginner.com/ircinfo/ircc-commands.html |
15:10 |
chtrotter |
The notes look good to me...based on what I could hear via Skype. |
15:11 |
dagreen |
Much appreciated on the IRC info, chtrotter. Thank you. |
15:11 |
jventuro |
That's a great resource. chtrotter++ |
15:11 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
15:13 |
jventuro |
if nobody has any further comments about the notes, I'll get started with the first item in old business, sort of an extension of the conversation we had at the conference. |
15:13 |
* csharp |
is Chris Sharp, GPLS - late, but mostly present |
15:14 |
jventuro |
Hi csharp! |
15:14 |
|
beantownbug joined #evergreen |
15:15 |
jventuro |
OK, first #topic Reworking the Wish List |
15:15 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
15:16 |
jventuro |
For the newbies and those who need a reminder, the current wish list can be found here: http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-reports:rig_wish_lists |
15:16 |
jventuro |
It hasn't been updated since 2011, and needs some attention. |
15:17 |
jventuro |
I have an idea about how this might work that I'd like to run past the group, and if anyone else has any ideas as we discuss, feel free to share those also. |
15:17 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
15:18 |
jventuro |
I thought it might be a good idea to start fresh and ask for ideas for wish list items on the evergreen-reports email list |
15:19 |
jventuro |
I would really like for us to track who and where the ideas came from on the wiki so we can follow up |
15:19 |
* csharp |
can help create requested templates |
15:20 |
jventuro |
csharp++ I was just going to ask if anyone would like to volunteer to help build templates! |
15:21 |
csharp |
happy to |
15:22 |
chtrotter |
I like the idea of tracking them on the wiki, too. I think some of the items that require development or fixes can added to launchpad (such as the desire to share templates), but help on templates in general would be better off on the wiki, I think. |
15:24 |
chtrotter |
Does anyone know Brian Feifarek? I see that he noted a couple of wishlist items as "in progress." Maybe we could get an update? |
15:24 |
csharp |
I believe he was working with LBA under the IMLS grant |
15:24 |
csharp |
so I don't know if he's around much anymore |
15:26 |
jventuro |
Do you think it might be a good idea to list names and contact info of whoever is building the template too to avoid such things in the future? Similar to what DIG does? |
15:26 |
csharp |
yeah |
15:26 |
csharp |
it would also be good to know contact info for the requestors as well |
15:27 |
csharp |
the ones listed there are actually too vague to act on |
15:27 |
chtrotter |
Agreed. |
15:27 |
jventuro |
Agreed. That's why I was thinking we could just start fresh. |
15:27 |
csharp |
or at least, they are wide open to (mis)interpretation ;-) |
15:28 |
csharp |
so whoever's requesting needs to be specific about what they want to see and how they need it filtered |
15:29 |
jventuro |
Yes. I will mention that in the message I send out on the list. |
15:30 |
jventuro |
And if we have their contact info, we can get clarification if needed. |
15:32 |
chtrotter |
Sounds good to me! |
15:32 |
jventuro |
Any other ideas on how we can make this work? |
15:34 |
chtrotter |
Well, I would be sure to add request date info and a column for a link to the template instructions. We might need to categorize the wishlist items, since some are template-specific, while others are development ideas. |
15:35 |
jventuro |
Good idea. |
15:36 |
csharp |
probably also a good idea for requestors to include their EG version, since that may be a factor in template portability |
15:36 |
jventuro |
Good call! |
15:37 |
jventuro |
Do you guys think this should be a survey instead of an email request? |
15:38 |
jventuro |
I like the idea of a survey because it separates out the questions, but I'm afraid it might make some folks hesitant to respond. |
15:39 |
dagreen |
Maybe we could ask requesters to send a dummy Excel output? Some of our users are better at describing their needs in that fashion. |
15:41 |
chtrotter |
I think it is definitely worth suggesting to requesters, if they find it easier to explain their needs. The survey sounds like an extra step. I was going to ask how we were going to handle email requests. I was thinking that some email requests get such a quick response it is not worth adding to the wishlist, but if there is no answer after a week or so, we could add it to the wishlist. What do y'all think? |
15:42 |
jventuro |
I think that's a good idea. |
15:45 |
chtrotter |
Alrightee. So here comes the next question: Who wants to be the lucky person to keep track of the email list for possible wishlist additions? |
15:45 |
jventuro |
I was wondering the same thing about email requests. Should I have requesters respond to the list, or directly to me. |
15:45 |
|
AaronZ-PLS joined #evergreen |
15:46 |
jventuro |
I have no problem with doing that, chtrotter. I am the list admin :) |
15:46 |
AaronZ-PLS |
Looking for an action trigger hook to send a test email every day, is there one that would work? |
15:47 |
jventuro |
Hi AaronZ-PLS. We're having a meeting at the moment. Would you mind tabling your question for 15 minutes or so? |
15:48 |
AaronZ-PLS |
Willdo. |
15:49 |
jventuro |
Thanks! |
15:49 |
chtrotter |
I would continue to encourage them to be sent to the list first, since there might be a quick response from the community. |
15:51 |
* chtrotter |
has to run for just a minute. Patron needs help. BRB. |
15:52 |
jventuro |
OK. In that case #action Jessica will ask Evergreen-reports list subscribers to send Wish List items and template help requests directly to the reports email list. |
15:53 |
jventuro |
So I guess anyone who'd like to help with building the templates can just monitor the reports list? |
15:53 |
csharp |
yep |
15:54 |
jventuro |
Awesome. |
15:54 |
JennB |
Sounds good. The list works for me! |
15:55 |
jventuro |
And anything that doesn't get snagged in a period of time can go up on the wiki. |
15:55 |
jventuro |
What do we want to set for the time limit? |
15:56 |
JennB |
for submitting a report? |
15:57 |
chtrotter |
I would say a week or two. |
15:58 |
jventuro |
I was thinking the time limit would be how long they go unanswered before they get put on the wiki page, but that's a good point. Should there be a limit to how long folks can submit ideas? |
15:58 |
csharp |
well, I think the onus should probably be on the submitter for following up - "no one answered me on the email list, so I'll put this on the wiki" |
16:00 |
kbutler |
I think they'd be more likely to go up if someone(s) in particular were responsible for putting them on the wiki. |
16:01 |
jventuro |
I agree with kbutler |
16:01 |
* csharp |
has got to run but will read the scrollback/log |
16:02 |
jventuro |
I would certainly encourage folks to post on the wiki, but some things might get lost |
16:02 |
chtrotter |
I agree. I think there are many folks who are reluctant to edit the wiki. |
16:03 |
chtrotter |
What do you think about sending a blurb out to both lists every once in a while about the new items on the wishlist? Hopefully this will lure in more folks to work on wishlist items. |
16:03 |
jventuro |
I think that's a great idea. |
16:03 |
jventuro |
How often should that happen? |
16:04 |
chtrotter |
Maybe monthly? Or at least with every reminder about the next RIG meeting. |
16:05 |
jventuro |
I think monthly is a bit too often. I was thinking quarterly or twice a year. |
16:07 |
kbutler |
With the meeting reminders might be good. But it might depend on the volume of items. If there are hardly any then it would not make sense to do it frequently. |
16:07 |
jventuro |
I can try certainly try sending it out with meeting reminders to see how it goes. |
16:08 |
jventuro |
I have a feeling we will see diminishing returns after a while. |
16:09 |
chtrotter |
Have we determined how long they should be on the list before adding to the wiki? |
16:09 |
jventuro |
2 weeks? |
16:09 |
chtrotter |
Sounds good to me. |
16:10 |
jventuro |
Very good. |
16:11 |
kbutler |
Sounds good. |
16:11 |
jventuro |
#action Jessica will monitor requests and add items that have not been answered within 2 weeks to the wiki. |
16:12 |
jventuro |
We're way over time. Any more to say on this topic? |
16:12 |
chtrotter |
No more from me. I gotta run soon. |
16:13 |
jventuro |
OK, anything else to bring up before we adjourn? |
16:13 |
jventuro |
I think the rest of the agenda can be tabled until the next meeting. |
16:14 |
chtrotter |
Sounds good to me. No real news on the PINES development. We are working out the requirements. |
16:15 |
jventuro |
OK, then. Thanks for coming everybody! |
16:15 |
chtrotter |
jventuro++ |
16:15 |
chtrotter |
Bye, y'all! |
16:16 |
jventuro |
#endmeeting |
16:16 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting ended Tue Jul 30 16:16:17 2013 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
16:16 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2013/evergreen.2013-07-30-15.00.html |
16:16 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2013/evergreen.2013-07-30-15.00.txt |
16:16 |
pinesol_green |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2013/evergreen.2013-07-30-15.00.log.html |
16:17 |
AaronZ-PLS |
Looking for an action trigger hook to send a test email every day, is there one that would work? |
16:21 |
paxed |
AaronZ-PLS: if you just want to send a test email, you could just invoke mail directly from crontab ...? |
16:21 |
AaronZ-PLS |
paxed: Could do that, but looking to make action triggers arent hanging as well as making sure email is happy from end to end |
16:36 |
gsams |
AaronZ-PLS: I know it wouldn't be quite as informative, but the mail log should be a pretty good indication of whether action triggers are working or not. I can't say that I've tried looking into it in any other way myself. |
17:11 |
|
smyers_ joined #evergreen |
17:12 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
17:19 |
|
dboyle joined #evergreen |
17:42 |
|
kbeswick joined #evergreen |
17:47 |
|
AndroUser2 joined #evergreen |
17:49 |
AndroUser2 |
This work? |
17:51 |
rfrasur |
Better? |
17:51 |
rfrasur |
Hah |
17:59 |
|
AndroUser2 joined #evergreen |
17:59 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
18:05 |
|
fparks joined #evergreen |
18:24 |
|
CarrieC left #evergreen |
18:28 |
|
stevenyvr2 left #evergreen |
19:04 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
19:18 |
|
jihpringle left #evergreen |
21:37 |
|
rsinger_ joined #evergreen |
23:42 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
23:52 |
|
stevenyvr2 joined #evergreen |
23:52 |
|
stevenyvr2 left #evergreen |