Time |
Nick |
Message |
01:29 |
|
Mark__T joined #evergreen |
01:57 |
|
sseng_ joined #evergreen |
01:58 |
|
BigRig joined #evergreen |
04:28 |
|
rri_ joined #evergreen |
04:28 |
|
wjr__ joined #evergreen |
04:28 |
|
dbs_ joined #evergreen |
04:29 |
|
pmurray` joined #evergreen |
04:29 |
|
jeff___ joined #evergreen |
04:29 |
|
mtj_- joined #evergreen |
05:11 |
|
ktomita joined #evergreen |
06:08 |
|
sseng joined #evergreen |
06:08 |
|
ktomita_ joined #evergreen |
06:08 |
|
fparks joined #evergreen |
06:11 |
|
dconnor joined #evergreen |
06:39 |
|
jeff___ joined #evergreen |
07:26 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
07:37 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
08:09 |
|
misilot joined #evergreen |
08:10 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
08:21 |
|
pmurray joined #evergreen |
08:27 |
|
kbeswick joined #evergreen |
08:35 |
|
akilsdonk_ joined #evergreen |
08:35 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
08:41 |
|
finnx joined #evergreen |
08:48 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
08:51 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
09:00 |
|
Meliss joined #evergreen |
09:05 |
|
moodaepo_nb joined #evergreen |
09:08 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
09:19 |
Dyrcona |
Grr. pg_restore ran for over 24 hours. |
09:20 |
Dyrcona |
I had to kill CREATE INDEX metabib_full_rec_index_vector_idx ON metabib.real_full_rec USING gist (index_vector); for it to finally finish. |
09:20 |
Dyrcona |
I'm now running the above via psql. |
09:20 |
dbs_ |
yikes. |
09:36 |
* Dyrcona |
wonders if he should run upgrade scripts while that is going on. |
09:52 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
09:52 |
|
mschell joined #evergreen |
09:56 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
09:57 |
* dbs |
could have sworn we were going to cut over to GIN instead of GIST a few releases back |
10:02 |
|
kayals_ joined #evergreen |
10:18 |
jeff |
gmcharlt++ for libxml goodness in MARC::File::XML |
10:26 |
Dyrcona |
Hey! That create index that ran since 11:27 yesterday, finished in about an hour after I killed it and restarted it. |
10:26 |
Dyrcona |
bad comma! |
10:27 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
10:36 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
10:42 |
|
dboyle joined #evergreen |
10:56 |
|
Meliss1 joined #evergreen |
10:56 |
|
zerick joined #evergreen |
11:04 |
|
kayals joined #evergreen |
11:35 |
jeffdavis |
dbs: I believe you're right about that. We've been using GIN indexes for a while now FWIW. |
11:36 |
bshum |
dbs: Maybe it's some orphaned branch somewhere. |
11:37 |
Dyrcona |
Maybe its just our database that may not have had all the indexes recreated at every upgrade? |
11:38 |
Dyrcona |
recreated/redefined.... |
11:43 |
|
phasefx joined #evergreen |
11:45 |
|
jdouma joined #evergreen |
11:57 |
|
acoomes joined #evergreen |
12:00 |
|
smyers_ joined #evergreen |
12:24 |
rfrasur |
There are few things nicer than having someone be both pleasant AND knowledgeable on the phone. |
12:26 |
tsbere |
rfrasur: Pleasant, knowledgeable, and permitted by their company rules to help you, perhaps? I find the first two fairly often with the third absent. :( |
12:27 |
rfrasur |
tsbere: I know! But it just happened. |
12:27 |
* rfrasur |
has renewed faith in humanity. |
12:35 |
rfrasur |
But then I tried to deal w/ adobe reader and microsoft word and realized why those moments are so rare. |
12:36 |
rfrasur |
@hate Microsoft |
12:36 |
pinesol_green |
rfrasur: The operation succeeded. rfrasur hates Microsoft. |
12:36 |
rfrasur |
@hate Adobe |
12:36 |
pinesol_green |
rfrasur: The operation succeeded. rfrasur hates Adobe. |
12:38 |
|
stevenyvr2 joined #evergreen |
12:49 |
|
mllewellyn joined #evergreen |
13:15 |
|
jhpringle joined #evergreen |
13:16 |
_bott_ |
I think related to bug 976054, I'm not getting URI only bibs to show up in bookbags. Can anyone else reproduce this? |
13:16 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 976054 in Evergreen "Tpac - not showing deleted bibs in my lists" (affected: 2, heat: 10) [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/976054 |
13:18 |
kmlussier |
_bott_: I think there may be a bug on that. Let me look. |
13:19 |
|
linuxpoet left #evergreen |
13:19 |
kmlussier |
_bott_: No, it's a little different. That bug was related to adding those records to bookbags. https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/979038 |
13:19 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 979038 in Evergreen "tpac: Records with a located URI cannot be added to a list" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [Low,Confirmed] |
13:21 |
_bott_ |
I think both bugs are related. The item is entered into the table, but it's not visible via TPAC |
13:22 |
_bott_ |
Much like 976054, which notes a title, "no longer had any items attached". |
13:23 |
kmlussier |
_bott_: Sure, that makes sense. I was just coming to the same conclusion. I must have thought the problem was adding the item when, in fact, I just wasn't seeing it there. Never checked in the database to see what was happening. |
13:23 |
* Dyrcona |
dies a little more inside..... |
13:25 |
* rfrasur |
wonders if one of our access points is dying or if Comcast is having issues. |
13:26 |
kmlussier |
_bott_: What version of Evergreen are you running? I just tried it on 2.3 and didn't have any trouble. |
13:27 |
_bott_ |
Ah, 2.2'ish. |
13:28 |
_bott_ |
I'll dig into any related pieces I can find. |
13:32 |
jeff_ |
oops: j => $copy->{call_numner}, |
13:33 |
|
kayals joined #evergreen |
13:33 |
jeff_ |
"use strict" did not help me there. |
13:33 |
dbs |
Ah. The return of the Numenorian king. |
13:33 |
gmcharlt |
dbs++ |
13:34 |
jeff_ |
dbs++ |
13:36 |
phasefx |
remember tolkien-ring networks? <ducks> |
13:40 |
bshum |
dbs: We also hid subfield 6 as part of work in bug 1085554 which was released for 2.3.4 according to the tracker. |
13:40 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1085554 in Evergreen "TPAC - hide subfield 6 and 8 from record title display" (affected: 2, heat: 12) [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1085554 |
13:40 |
|
zed1 joined #evergreen |
13:41 |
bshum |
But dbs++ for replying faster than I could :) |
13:41 |
dbs |
bshum: yeah, I was looking at the 2.3 branch too and thinking "Man, I don't even know if we're talking TPAC or JSPAC at this point" |
13:46 |
|
moodaepo_nb joined #evergreen |
13:56 |
|
Evergreen joined #evergreen |
13:57 |
Evergreen |
I'm working to get EDI working on our Evergren install, and I'm getting a Address Already in Use error, no matter what port I give it when I start edi_webrick.bash. Any ideas what is wrong? |
14:00 |
jeff_ |
Given an evergreen database with postgresql encoding UTF-8, i I see the following string in psql output, am I correct in thinking that this is the XML as it appears in the db, and this is not psql showing me an escaped version of the data? Montalván |
14:01 |
jeff_ |
Evergreen: I'm not well-versed in EDI, but I can stab in the dark until someone else comes along -- what ports have you tried to use? |
14:01 |
bshum |
Evergreen: I think the default port is 9191? So do you have stuff running on that port already for that server? |
14:02 |
Evergreen |
9191, 9391, 9193, 9292, and so on. Nothing is running on those ports. |
14:02 |
bshum |
And also, curious where you changed the port value. I envisioned edi_webrick.cnf for the config options, but I haven't changed it either. |
14:02 |
jeff_ |
Evergreen: what is the exact text of the error? |
14:02 |
* tsbere |
once saw that kind of error when security layers said "you can't open ports for the world to connect to unless I have been told you can" - selinux might do that? |
14:02 |
Evergreen |
before i start edi_webrick, 9191 is not in use |
14:03 |
Evergreen |
TCPServer Error: Address already in use - bind(2) |
14:04 |
Evergreen |
To spell it out more, using the default port 9191, nothing is running. Then when I start edi_webrick, it shows that is running on 9191, but then it throws the error that the port is in use, and it won't let me connect to port 9191 using the test_client.pl or telnet |
14:05 |
Evergreen |
It's almost like it's tripping over itself. |
14:06 |
Dyrcona |
Evergreen: netstat -an will tell you what ports are in use on your server. Maybe something is using 9191 and you aren't aware of it. |
14:07 |
|
kbeswick joined #evergreen |
14:07 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
14:08 |
Evergreen |
That's what I thought as well. But netstat -an shows nothing on 9191, nor does lsof -i :9191 |
14:08 |
rfrasur |
(who is Evergreen?) |
14:09 |
tsbere |
Thought: Is it configured to listen twice, and the second time is being stepped on by the first? |
14:10 |
Dyrcona |
rfrasur: I'm going to guess someone from Asbury Seminary. |
14:10 |
* rfrasur |
nods |
14:10 |
bshum |
That was going to be my guess too, given the recent EDI questions on the list. |
14:10 |
Evergreen |
Yes, that's me |
14:10 |
Evergreen |
typo |
14:11 |
pgardella |
there we go |
14:11 |
rfrasur |
ahh :-) |
14:11 |
pgardella |
tsbere: how would i know if it was configured to listen twice? I'm using it striaght out of the box |
14:12 |
tsbere |
pgardella: No clue, we don't use that functionality right now. |
14:12 |
pgardella |
:) |
14:12 |
* tsbere |
is just guessing based on experience with other services |
14:12 |
bshum |
pgardella: Out of the box, ours just "worked". I've never seen that problem before. |
14:15 |
pgardella |
well, I reran install.sh and now even though I get the same error, I can at least connect to taht port |
14:20 |
bshum |
pgardella: Just curious, which version of Evergreen are you working with? |
14:20 |
pgardella |
2.3.2 |
14:21 |
* dbs |
wonders if there was a fix to EDI stuff in the subsequent 7 point releases |
14:27 |
dbs |
Acq: EDI omnibus bugfix package from af46b5cc031 was January, 2013 |
14:27 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley] Acq: EDI omnibus bugfix package - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=af46b5c> |
14:28 |
dbs |
which probably would have been 2.3.3 |
14:28 |
pgardella |
Ah, good point. Thanks. We'll try that! |
14:29 |
dbs |
In general, it's tougher on us if bugs are reported for versions that aren't up to date :/ |
14:29 |
|
zed1 left #evergreen |
14:29 |
pgardella |
Yeah, I know. Sorry. :( |
14:30 |
|
zed1 joined #evergreen |
14:30 |
bshum |
Looks like omnibus was linked to 2.3.4 actually. Though 2.3.3 had some EDI reader cleanup too. |
14:31 |
bshum |
I've also got this vague recollection that there's some custom branch for edi that I had to checkout manually somewhere along the line |
14:31 |
bshum |
I'm looking for old references |
14:31 |
bshum |
But that might only apply for new EDI invoicing work in 2.4. |
14:35 |
jeff_ |
hah. |
14:35 |
jeff_ |
use encoding 'utf8'; |
14:35 |
jeff_ |
completely messing me up today. |
14:36 |
jeff_ |
(not needed by my code, and deprecated in 5.19 for seemingly good reasons) |
14:42 |
jeff_ |
hrm. Montalván becomes Montalvâan after a MARC::File::XML -> yaz-marcdump journey. |
14:48 |
Dyrcona |
jeff_: Are e1 and e2 valid utf-8 codepoints? |
14:48 |
|
pgardella left #evergreen |
14:48 |
jeff_ |
yeah, but the second is wrong. still digging. |
14:49 |
jeff_ |
looks like i needed to pass explicit encoding to new_from_xml |
14:49 |
|
Callender_ joined #evergreen |
14:50 |
dbs |
jeff_: there should be a bunch of examples sprinkled through Evergreen of how to do it; eeevil and I tried to make things consistent, once upon a time |
14:50 |
jeff_ |
in an evergreen database, is any biblio.record_entry.marc data with leader position 09 set to ' ' an error? it's not possible to have MARC8 in marcxml, is it? |
14:51 |
gmcharlt |
jeff_: correct, Leader/09 should be set to 'a' throughout |
14:51 |
jeff_ |
dbs: yeah. i'm getting some of my clues from marc_export -- much credit to everyone who worked on that. |
14:51 |
|
Callender__ joined #evergreen |
14:51 |
Dyrcona |
jeff_: I don't think e1 or e2 are valid as single characters in UTF-8. I think they start longer sequences. |
14:52 |
jeff_ |
Dyrcona: U+00E1 and U+00E2 seem to be valid on their own. maybe U+00E1 != á ? |
14:52 |
Dyrcona |
jeff_: No, it isn't. |
14:52 |
|
RoganH joined #evergreen |
14:52 |
csharp |
tt2++ |
14:52 |
|
Callender joined #evergreen |
14:52 |
jeff_ |
anyway, passing UTF-8 to new_from_xml seems to be working, and i'm going to exclude those records where the leader/09 isn't 'a' -- we'll see how many there are. |
14:52 |
bshum |
Found it. There was some special changes to the install process for EDI with bug 1030041 |
14:52 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1030041 in Evergreen "ORDER record copy-level data for "enriched" EDI " (affected: 1, heat: 8) [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1030041 |
14:53 |
bshum |
To grab a custom git checkout for openils-mapper from http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/random.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/berick/openils-mapper |
14:53 |
jeff_ |
Dyrcona: ah. there's another place I'm wrong. :-) |
14:53 |
bshum |
berick: Do I poke you further on that one? :) |
14:53 |
Dyrcona |
I mean I don't think U+00E1 equal á |
14:54 |
Dyrcona |
jeff_: I'm guessing you have MARC-8 or ISO-8859-1 input here. |
14:56 |
Dyrcona |
U+00E1 = á |
14:57 |
berick |
bshum: hmm, the code all lives on github now (since that's where the original code lives) https://github.com/berick/openils-mapper/tree/GIR-segments-for-copy-data |
14:58 |
Dyrcona |
The property entity is á |
14:58 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: I'm not so sure about that -- I think á means the same as &x00E1; -- that's part of the range where iso-8859-1 and Unicode overlap |
14:58 |
Dyrcona |
proper |
14:58 |
gmcharlt |
á that is |
14:59 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt: I'm going by http://www.utf8-chartable.de/unicode-utf8-table.pl?start=128&number=128&names=-&utf8=0x&htmlent=1 |
14:59 |
Dyrcona |
You are probably correct, just the same. |
14:59 |
gmcharlt |
yeah, &#xNNNN; are numeric character references in XML, not octet references |
14:59 |
Dyrcona |
The 00 may be stripped in the entity, not sure. |
15:00 |
bshum |
berick: Ah gotcha, I didn't have the updated branch URL in my old logs. |
15:01 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: yep, I believe it is |
15:02 |
* jeff |
bangs on the reporting db with select marc from biblio.record_entry where marc ~ '.*<leader>......... .*' limit 1; |
15:03 |
jeff |
no rows. |
15:04 |
* jeff |
revises to select marc from biblio.record_entry where marc !~ '.*<leader[^>]*>.........a.*' limit 1; |
15:05 |
Dyrcona |
I was erroneously expecting the entity to correspond with the utf-8 hex code. |
15:06 |
jeff |
25996 records do not match '.*<leader[^>]*>.........a.*' |
15:06 |
jeff |
hrm. |
15:07 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: it does, leading zeroes just get truncated |
15:08 |
jeff |
only 3447 of those records are not-deleted. |
15:08 |
jeff |
ugh. |
15:09 |
bshum |
berick: Are we pointing at your new branch on github during the install though? Just thinking of the stock setup. |
15:11 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: One of your records is likely bib -1, if that makes you feel any better. ;) |
15:12 |
jeff_ |
heh |
15:12 |
jeff |
it does. |
15:13 |
Dyrcona |
It has no leader, just an empty <record /> with namespace, at least in my database. |
15:14 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt++ # for bearing with me in a moment of confusion on my part |
15:15 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: my pleasure; character set issues have given me a ton of headaches over the years, and I'm happy to help NOT spread the pain around |
15:16 |
|
Callender joined #evergreen |
15:17 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt: Speaking of which, you said a while ago that you were going to release a new version of MARC::Charset. I see 1.34 is still the latest on CPAN. |
15:18 |
Dyrcona |
Those changes that I picked from sourceforge worked for me, except the Hangul records as you noted. |
15:18 |
* dbs |
was thinking about updating Fedora packages sometime in the next few weeks |
15:18 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: yep, sudden loss of tuits for some Cyrllic corrections I'm working on -- release soonish, though |
15:18 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt++ |
15:19 |
dbs |
gmcharlt++ |
15:20 |
berick |
bshum: i don't recall offhand if any of the EDI configuration/install is documented. (it's been a while) |
15:20 |
Dyrcona |
I find it amusing that when I tell someone we're having charset problems with MARC, they always ask, "Is it Cyrillic?" |
15:20 |
Dyrcona |
I usually have to say, "No, its Vietnamese." |
15:20 |
Dyrcona |
;) |
15:20 |
bshum |
berick: Yeah it's in the docs. I guess we need to adjust them slightly to point at the new github location. |
15:20 |
bshum |
For 2.4 and 2.3 too, I'll bet. |
15:20 |
berick |
yeah |
15:24 |
bshum |
I'm tackling something with ou proximity quirkiness; but I'll mock up a branch to change the docs later this evening maybe. |
15:24 |
berick |
bshum: well, i could push it all back to the evregreen repo. i threw it on github under the hopes I could get it merged back into mbklein's original repo, but in the long run i don't think it's a reasonable approach. |
15:34 |
jeff |
more good news: specifying the encoding to new_from_xml also gives a heck of a speed boost, since it was transcoding to marc8 before. :P |
15:34 |
jeff |
i really thought that the defaults were properly set, and that i had verified that. |
15:41 |
jeff |
hah. went from about 600 reconds/sec to 20,000 records/sec |
15:42 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: Do you know how many times MARC::Record->new_from_xml() appears in the EG code? |
15:42 |
jeff |
no, but i'm about to find out, either from you or from ack. |
15:43 |
jeff |
new_from_xml appears 124 times |
15:43 |
jeff |
(in master) |
15:43 |
Dyrcona |
So, there are 124 opportunities for improvement. :) |
15:44 |
jeff |
now of course a lot of that is not live code, being upgrade scripts, etc. |
15:44 |
Dyrcona |
Right. |
15:44 |
jeff |
Dyrcona: this speed is something that the Evergreen code I was looking at as an example (marc_export) already was taking advantage of. |
15:44 |
Dyrcona |
Multiple upgrades to the same database functions. |
15:44 |
jeff |
but there could be others. :-) |
15:45 |
Dyrcona |
I see a few that inlcude the encoding as a parameter. |
15:45 |
Dyrcona |
Maybe it isn't that big of a deal. |
15:45 |
jeff |
whenever i wait for a selfcheck to run the MODS xslt to get the title of each of my 38 holds, i consider ways to improve that performance |
15:45 |
jeff |
(unrelated to new_from_xml) |
15:46 |
jeff |
like, caching the most commonly used mods values, or delaying/backgrounding the xslt from happening during the initial patron info SIP requests... |
15:47 |
Dyrcona |
Most of the uses of it in perl modules specify the encoding. |
15:47 |
jeff |
so yeah, i can do a full export of the in-scope bibs + holdings in just over 8 minutes now. previously it was taking 2.5 - 3 hours. |
15:49 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: I think I need to check a couple of my export scripts now.... |
15:50 |
Dyrcona |
Ah well, already specifying UTF-8..... |
15:53 |
jeff_ |
for context, that's just a subset of our records: 222,861 holdings across 165,247 bibs. |
15:54 |
jeff_ |
i need to exclude some more items, actually. forgot to exclude age hold protected stuff, which won't be in scope here. |
15:54 |
* jeff_ |
looks for an existing db-level "ahp is in effect" |
15:56 |
dbs |
if those usages of new_from_xml() that don't specify encoding use " use MARC::File::XML ( BinaryEncoding => 'utf8', ... " then they should still be fine. |
15:59 |
dbs |
unless I'm misunderstanding. of course I'm also looking at MARC::File::XML 0.93 |
16:00 |
dbs |
Actually, even if they don't specify that, they should default to utf-8. Huh. |
16:00 |
* dbs |
makes a mental note to compare with MARC-XML 1.0.1 |
16:06 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
16:08 |
dbs |
looks the same. hmm. |
16:14 |
* gmcharlt |
was kinda hoping it would, since the main point of MARC-XML 1.0.1 was to get Moar Speedz without changing behavior |
16:17 |
dbs |
gmcharlt: does what jeff is saying make any sense to you? I don't see how he could get an automatic transcode to marc8 happening unless he explicitly set the default encoding to marc8 :/ |
16:19 |
gmcharlt |
dbs: it current will auto-transcode if the Leader/09 is not 'a' |
16:19 |
gmcharlt |
*currently |
16:25 |
dbs |
gmcharlt: ah, right. so bad incoming XML |
16:25 |
|
tmccanna joined #evergreen |
16:25 |
|
tmccanna left #evergreen |
16:28 |
jeff_ |
it seemed to be doing that in cases other than where ldr/09 was not 'a' |
16:29 |
jeff_ |
i can probably give a test case. |
16:32 |
jeff_ |
i'm not a huge fan of age hold protection rules / policies, so i appreciate the aliased / abbreviated name of config.rule_age_hold_protect. |
16:32 |
jeff_ |
AND (crahp.age IS NULL OR AGE(NOW(), acp.create_date)) > crahp.age) |
16:33 |
gmcharlt |
jeff_: I'll await with interest |
17:25 |
jeff_ |
ah. |
17:25 |
jeff_ |
having this: use MARC::File::XML ( BinaryEncoding => 'UTF-8' ); |
17:26 |
jeff_ |
then somewhere after an eval having this: import MARC::File::XML; # reset SAX parser so that one bad record doesn't kill the entire export |
17:26 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
17:28 |
jeff_ |
even if it's never hit, because the eval test never fires, the use is still parsed/executed... |
17:30 |
jeff_ |
so i used marc_export as an example, but not enough of it. |
17:31 |
dbs |
gmcharlt: I've pushed MARC::File::XML packages for 1.0.1 to Fedora rawhide and 19 testing; in a few days they should be part of stable |
17:31 |
gmcharlt |
dbs++ |
17:31 |
jeff_ |
and now i know what to look for next time. |
17:32 |
jeff_ |
i wonder if that's what was causing the marc8 transcoding to show up in profiling on larger batches. |
17:32 |
jeff_ |
*dig*, *dig* |
17:33 |
jeff |
and of course, since sax isn't in play in recent versions, the whole reinit step might not be required -- if it ever was? |
17:33 |
jeff_ |
dunno. |
17:35 |
|
finnx left #evergreen |
17:38 |
* dbs |
wonders idly if that "import MARC::File::XML" should be "import MARC::File::XML ( BinaryEncoding => 'UTF-8' )" |
17:40 |
jeff |
in marc_import? it doesn't much matter because the new_from_xml supplies an encoding arg. |
17:41 |
jeff |
oh heck. |
17:41 |
jeff |
yeah, that's another thing -- i was doing two uses, not one use and one import. |
17:42 |
jeff |
which is why the second one (which should have been import if i was copying marc_export) was being parsed at BEGIN time rather than when it should -- only when the eval fell through. |
17:42 |
dbs |
heh |
17:45 |
jeff |
anyway, i don't have any issues to point at at this time, i've re-learned a bunch of things i've forgotten or overlooked, and i may do more digging on the profiling that seemed to point at marc8, in light of what i now know. |
17:45 |
jeff |
oh. |
17:47 |
jeff |
yeah, that was due to the encoding being reset to marc8. |
17:47 |
jeff |
all mysteries solved! time to go pack more boxes! |
17:50 |
gmcharlt |
at least you're not opening them, so hopefully no more mysteries this evening as well ;) |
17:54 |
berick |
*shudder* at opening a box and a marc8 blob pops out |
17:56 |
berick |
marc8 blob => http://perla94.edublogs.org/files/2012/03/abyss-blob1-1b364p8.jpg |
17:57 |
gmcharlt |
berick: pass the mental bleach, would ya? |
17:57 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |
18:16 |
|
zed1 left #evergreen |
18:24 |
|
acoomes joined #evergreen |
18:36 |
jeff_ |
gmcharlt: only mystery surrounding boxes is "where am i going to put all these?" |
18:37 |
jeff_ |
"hello, i'd like to inquire about your storage units. size? do they come in 'tardis'?" |
18:39 |
gmcharlt |
"why yes, for the low fee of one Triganic Ningi" |
22:12 |
|
stevenyvr2 joined #evergreen |
22:12 |
|
stevenyvr2 left #evergreen |
23:44 |
|
mcooper joined #evergreen |