| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 07:05 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 09:21 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:48 |
Dyrcona |
Perl-- # Can't call method "clear_events" on unblessed reference at ./fix-mark-item-lost.pl line 40. AFAICT, clear_events is not a method, but maybe because I'm using OpenILS::Utils::Cronscript, Perl thinks it is. |
| 09:49 |
Dyrcona |
Even if I change it to events_clear. I tried reset before. I swear I have another script where reset_event worked fine as a name. |
| 09:49 |
Dyrcona |
OK, let's try rectify_.. |
| 09:51 |
Dyrcona |
Grr. Still says it is a method. |
| 09:52 |
Dyrcona |
OK, Perl, you win. I'll drop the subroutine and past the code inside the loop. |
| 09:53 |
Dyrcona |
And, I'll do that for the other subroutine before it gets hal-done and blows up again. |
| 09:55 |
Dyrcona |
Can't locate object method "fetch_action_trigger_event" via package "OpenILS::Utils::CStoreEditor" at ./fix-mark-item-lost.pl line 43. Oh, really? |
| 09:55 |
Dyrcona |
Oh, duh. It's retrieve_ not fetch_ ... @blame brain |
| 09:56 |
Dyrcona |
It's doing something! |
| 10:04 |
Dyrcona |
The update part was fast. Firing 368 events one after the other takes a little while. |
| 10:06 |
Dyrcona |
It worked! My failed but complete mark item lost events have been repaired. |
| 10:36 |
Dyrcona |
It's faster in production. |
| 11:07 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:35 |
Bmagic |
Perl++ # balance |
| 11:37 |
Dyrcona |
I'm stumped by that error. I guess the CStoreEditor generated methods, i.e. AUTOLOAD, was catching it. I've not encountered that before, though. |
| 11:55 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 13:51 |
* Dyrcona |
clocks out early today. |
| 14:01 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 15:03 |
|
smayo joined #evergreen |
| 16:14 |
berick |
hmm, if I repurpose some of the deleted osrf/eg Java code (which i largely wrote fwiw), can I re-release it with Apache2 license? https://github.com/kcls/evergreen-java |
| 16:18 |
berick |
really just the idl parsing bits |
| 16:36 |
|
smayo joined #evergreen |
| 16:45 |
goood |
berick: from a strict licensing standpoint, if you get an OK from everyone that contributed code, yep. if that's just you, the mirror is all you need! :) |
| 16:47 |
goood |
berick: I assume you're looking to add that to something that's already Apache 2.0 and don't want to fight the license issues on that side? |
| 16:51 |
berick |
well, making it as easy as possible for bibliocommons to use the code (if they even want to) w/o going full MIT. kinda of stabbing in the dark to be honest |
| 17:05 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
