| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 07:05 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 07:30 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:41 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 07:57 |
|
BDorsey joined #evergreen |
| 07:57 |
|
cbrown-isl joined #evergreen |
| 08:27 |
|
kworstell_isl joined #evergreen |
| 08:40 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:41 |
|
dguarrac joined #evergreen |
| 08:42 |
|
kworstell-isl joined #evergreen |
| 08:47 |
|
redavis joined #evergreen |
| 08:59 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:02 |
|
dmoore_beta joined #evergreen |
| 09:30 |
|
Guest14 joined #evergreen |
| 09:52 |
|
cbrown joined #evergreen |
| 10:01 |
|
mantis joined #evergreen |
| 10:01 |
mantis |
running through the 3.11.6 ver install on a test server and I got a lot of these errors when building our Angular files |
| 10:01 |
mantis |
ex; Error: src/main.ts:1:32 - error TS2307: Cannot find module '@angular/core' or its corresponding type declarations. |
| 10:01 |
mantis |
not sure why this is a problem now |
| 10:03 |
JBoyer |
mantis, that looks like you're either running the "build from git" instructions when you don't need to or if you are installing from git maybe missed one of the pre-req install steps? |
| 10:03 |
mantis |
this is the command |
| 10:03 |
mantis |
ng build --configuration production |
| 10:04 |
JBoyer |
The npm install step is what I'm wondering about, that's what pulls down things like angular core and friends. |
| 10:04 |
mantis |
I know it's technically outdated |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
also run into this after running CHROME_BIN=/usr/bin/chromium-browser npm run test |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
23 07 2024 09:59:20.061:ERROR [karma-server]: Error: Found 1 load error |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
at Server.<anonymous> (/home/opensrf/Evergreen-ILS-3.11.6-biblio/Open-ILS/src/eg2/node_modules/karma/lib/server.js:243:26) |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
at Object.onceWrapper (node:events:631:28) |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
at Server.emit (node:events:529:35) |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
at Server.emit (node:domain:489:12) |
| 10:05 |
mantis |
at emitListeningNT (node:net:1851:10) |
| 10:05 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 10:06 |
JBoyer |
is there anything in /home/opensrf/Evergreen-ILS-3.11.6-biblio/Open-ILS/src/eg2/node_modules and was a different version of Evergreen installed previously? |
| 10:06 |
mantis |
I'll check |
| 10:07 |
Dyrcona |
mantis: Are you using the tarball or git? |
| 10:07 |
mantis |
git |
| 10:08 |
Dyrcona |
Did you do sudo make -f Open-ILS/src/extras/Makefile.install <distro>-<release>-developer ? |
| 10:08 |
mantis |
yes |
| 10:08 |
mantis |
sudo make -f Open-ILS/src/extras/Makefile.install ubuntu-focalsudo make -f Open-ILS/src/extras/Makefile.install ubuntu-focal-developer |
| 10:09 |
Dyrcona |
And you did `npm install` before `ng build` in the Open-ILS/src/eg2 directory? |
| 10:09 |
mantis |
yes |
| 10:10 |
mantis |
this is the order |
| 10:10 |
mantis |
cd ~/Evergreen-ILS-3.11.6-biblio/Open-ILS/src/eg2npm installng build --configuration production |
| 10:11 |
Dyrcona |
This "Evergreen-ILS-3.11.6-biblio" conerns me. I assume you have non-standard changes in there? |
| 10:12 |
Dyrcona |
Also, does this make a difference `ng build --configuration=production` ? /me isn't sure if the = is required or optional. |
| 10:12 |
mantis |
we've been using these naming conventions for our folders for a while and I don't think it was an issue |
| 10:13 |
mantis |
it's just the directory we have on this server that is after we run code prep with diff files to compare to our customizations and I didn't see nay conflicts |
| 10:13 |
Dyrcona |
OK. The naming implies to me it's not stock but has custom branches applied that's all. |
| 10:13 |
Dyrcona |
No conflicts does not mean no problems. |
| 10:14 |
mantis |
right |
| 10:14 |
mantis |
checking out the node nodules |
| 10:14 |
mantis |
*modules |
| 10:14 |
Dyrcona |
Is this machine clean. Has it had Evergreen installed before, perhaps an older release? |
| 10:15 |
Dyrcona |
If you said before, I'm sorry that I missed it in the scroll back. |
| 10:16 |
Dyrcona |
If nothing else works, you could try deleting and reinstalling node. I have a script to delete node: https://pastebin.com/CP4bPZLz |
| 10:18 |
mantis |
Yeah it had Evergreen 3.11.4 on here |
| 10:18 |
mantis |
though I am comparing angular/core directories and there are a couple of differences |
| 10:18 |
Dyrcona |
Well, that's not old enough to cause issues with different node versions. |
| 10:18 |
mantis |
esm2020 and testing folders are not in evgtest2 |
| 10:19 |
mantis |
Dyrcona++ |
| 10:19 |
mantis |
I'll try the reinstallation |
| 10:20 |
Dyrcona |
I wonder if something made it into 3.11.6 that should not have? I built it. It installed fine from the tarball, but I did not attempt an upgrade. |
| 10:20 |
mantis |
should I remove the node_modules before or after running the build commands? |
| 10:21 |
Dyrcona |
BTW, I am working on Lp2060734 again today. I've made a couple of releases with it, and I'm about to test the results of those releases on Debian Bookworm and Ubuntu 24.04, so I'm also in the middle of doing installations. |
| 10:21 |
Dyrcona |
Lp 2060734 |
| 10:21 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 2060734 in Evergreen "Various changes to the release process" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060734 - Assigned to Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) |
| 10:23 |
Dyrcona |
I should build one from git, maybe. |
| 10:24 |
sleary |
mantis before |
| 10:24 |
mmorgan |
mantis: 3.11.7 is the release just out that Dyrcona built. Is that the one you are installing? |
| 10:24 |
mantis |
I'm running 3.11.6 |
| 10:24 |
Dyrcona |
sleary++ I missed the question. I was looking something up. |
| 10:24 |
mantis |
sorry installing 3.11.6 |
| 10:25 |
mantis |
sleary++ |
| 10:25 |
mmorgan |
Ok! Just making sure. |
| 10:25 |
Dyrcona |
Oh, right..... Too many versions... Too much information... |
| 10:26 |
Dyrcona |
Try 3.11.7, then, it's the latest. :) |
| 10:28 |
mantis |
removing the node_modules folder was the right call |
| 10:28 |
mantis |
JBoyer++ |
| 10:28 |
mantis |
Drycona++ |
| 10:29 |
JBoyer |
glad to hear things are working again1 |
| 10:31 |
mantis |
hooray |
| 10:33 |
Dyrcona |
Pro tip: It helps to have Ejabberd running when you try to register the accounts. |
| 10:34 |
Dyrcona |
guess who forgot to restart it? |
| 10:34 |
Dyrcona |
@who forgot to restart Ejabberd |
| 10:34 |
pinesol |
kworstell-isl forgot to restart Ejabberd. |
| 10:42 |
Dyrcona |
I should script this again or look into ansible. |
| 10:48 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 11:00 |
csharp_ |
@who 's the boss? |
| 11:00 |
pinesol |
Jaysal 's the boss. |
| 11:09 |
ian1 |
Angela Bauer is the boss |
| 11:09 |
csharp_ |
ian1: well, yeah :-) |
| 11:10 |
ian1 |
Sorry. Want paying attention and saw a joke opportunity. lol |
| 11:10 |
csharp_ |
ian1: always jump on a joke opportunity |
| 11:10 |
ian1 |
8-) |
| 11:10 |
csharp_ |
@quote random |
| 11:10 |
pinesol |
csharp_: Quote #138: "< JBoyer> I accidentally bought some Rooibos red tea and I think I've stumbled onto a terrorist plot. It smells like a cup of cigarettes and tastes like tobacco and licorice." (added by csharp at 09:27 AM, January 28, 2016) |
| 11:37 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 11:45 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:50 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 11:52 |
Dyrcona |
Does anyone know OTTOTH of a branch with a database upgrade other than the reports permissions branch? (I've applied it already for my test purposes.) |
| 11:52 |
Dyrcona |
I think I have one hanging around maybe. It might have gone in. |
| 11:56 |
Dyrcona |
I can use Lp 1835953 |
| 11:57 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1835953 in Evergreen "Circulation auto renewal remaining should not be nullable" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1835953 |
| 11:57 |
Dyrcona |
Hm... something wrong with my configuration. The two tests that depend on apache failed. |
| 11:59 |
Dyrcona |
I'll look into it after lunch. |
| 12:03 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:19 |
JBoyer |
To this day I do not understand rooibos tea. (At least that one, I know there's more than one type.) |
| 12:40 |
Dyrcona |
Looks like my problem was nginx needed a restart. |
| 12:41 |
* Dyrcona |
has never had rooibos tea. |
| 12:42 |
Dyrcona |
Ok. gonna test my fake upgrade from 3.14.0 to 3.14.1, then I'll do 3.14.1 to 3.14.2.... :) |
| 12:46 |
Dyrcona |
Think I'll do somethin' unorthodox... I'll reinstall the 3.14.0 schema and data, then run the db upgrade, and then install 3.14.1. After that, I'll run the tests. |
| 13:01 |
|
cbrown_isl joined #evergreen |
| 13:03 |
Dyrcona |
So, that works... |
| 13:05 |
|
cbrown joined #evergreen |
| 13:05 |
Dyrcona |
Ok, there's an issue with the potential update tot he make_release script. If one doesn't manually remove the INSERT INTO config.upgrade_log (version, applied_to) VALUES ('3.14.1', :eg_version); line, it's still there when the next one is added. |
| 13:05 |
Dyrcona |
It should be relatively simple to take care of. |
| 13:48 |
berick |
are we clear to merge stuff to main? thinking about looking at bug 2054842 |
| 13:48 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 2054842 in OpenSRF "Add Installation on Ubuntu 24.04" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2054842 |
| 14:01 |
|
ian1 joined #evergreen |
| 14:05 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 14:06 |
sandbergja |
berick: yes, please merge to main to your heart's content |
| 14:13 |
Dyrcona |
berick: I was thinking of making an OpenSRF 3.3 backport of that branch that preserves support for Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04. The current OpenSRF branch removes it. |
| 14:15 |
Dyrcona |
sandbergja: I'm looking at Lp 2060734 and have made a couple of changes. O |
| 14:15 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 2060734 in Evergreen "Various changes to the release process" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060734 - Assigned to Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) |
| 14:15 |
sandbergja |
Dyrcona++ |
| 14:15 |
Dyrcona |
I'd like your opinion on https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=856c73ece974e7f2c7dd8c456d3df6f1d8273e04 |
| 14:17 |
Dyrcona |
sandbergja: I think an alternate way of doing that would be to add +dev to the version in 002.schema.config.sql and add a sed earlier to remove such lines if they exist. |
| 14:18 |
sandbergja |
It looks good to me! |
| 14:19 |
Dyrcona |
OK. I moderately prefer deleting the line over modifying it. |
| 14:19 |
sandbergja |
agree, it does seem cleaner |
| 14:21 |
Dyrcona |
OK. That's the one we'll go with. I'm basically done. I'll update the Lp bug and add some instructions for testing it in a comment. I exercised just about everything it does. |
| 14:24 |
Dyrcona |
I'm going to give that commit another test or two first. |
| 14:25 |
sandbergja |
woo hoo! Thanks so much, Dyrcona! |
| 14:33 |
Dyrcona |
sandbergja++ This branch will make certain aspects of the releases so much easier. |
| 14:34 |
sandbergja |
I'm glad! And we as a community can keep chipping away at it. |
| 14:36 |
Dyrcona |
Dojo stalling again. I shouldna cleaned the release directory out. |
| 15:30 |
pinesol |
News from commits: LP 2054842: Add support of Ubuntu 24.04 Noble Numbat <https://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=c99c13af05f103820e12c8c91b355ba3b88cb9d9> |
| 15:35 |
Dyrcona |
berick++ |
| 15:39 |
Dyrcona |
I'm going to make a branch to "backport" Ubuntu 24.04 to OpenSRF rel_3_3 while keeping Ubuntu 2.04. I'm not sure that we want to force a new OpenSRF release for Evergreen 3.14. I'll make a new Lp bug. |
| 15:49 |
|
smayo joined #evergreen |
| 15:50 |
|
mantis left #evergreen |
| 17:09 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 18:56 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
