| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 06:12 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 07:29 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 07:48 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 08:00 |
|
mantis1 joined #evergreen |
| 08:26 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 08:39 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 08:56 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 09:05 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 09:25 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 09:32 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 09:34 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 10:20 |
Dyrcona |
How do circulations with a stop_fines of LOST have a checkin_time and xact_finish is NULL? Restoration of overdue fines? |
| 10:26 |
csharp_ |
marking lost doesn't check the item in |
| 10:27 |
csharp_ |
and xact_finish should be null until the item is checked in or paid for |
| 10:40 |
Dyrcona |
csharp_: Right, but checking a lost item should set both unless fines were restored, right? |
| 10:41 |
Dyrcona |
Oh, never mind... You answered that. |
| 10:41 |
Dyrcona |
CLAIMSRETURNED is also interesting.... |
| 11:12 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 13:12 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 13:37 |
miker |
jeffdavis: should be fine, modulo maybe needing to remove in-db translation rows. do remember to run autogen.sh and do some restarts after |
| 13:37 |
miker |
ha... he said a day later. |
| 13:39 |
jeffdavis |
that's encouraging though, thanks :) |
| 13:39 |
collum |
I just read yesterday's log 5 minutes ago, so it really flowed nicely. |
| 14:01 |
|
jvwoolf left #evergreen |
| 14:06 |
jeffdavis |
Is it feasible to redirect the holdings editor to always use the AngJS version? I don't want to mess with all the hard-coded links to the Angular holdings editor but we're considering sticking with the AngJS one when we go to 3.9 next month. |
| 14:07 |
jeffdavis |
I'm not confident Angular routing would always respect an Apache redirect or whatever. |
| 14:48 |
Dyrcona |
jeffdavis: AngularJS doesn't get a say in the matter. If Apache says, "3XX go here," the browser's gonna go there. |
| 14:51 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 14:52 |
|
_collum joined #evergreen |
| 14:53 |
|
_collum joined #evergreen |
| 14:55 |
|
rjackson_isl_hom joined #evergreen |
| 14:55 |
|
collum_ joined #evergreen |
| 14:57 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 15:26 |
JBoyer |
Dyrcona, it might have a say if it tells the browser "I'm going to do a thing, so just change your document.location to what I say" without even contacting the server. I'm not sure if Angular is automatically doing that for us (I think it can) but I know that's a thing that JS can do these days. |
| 15:31 |
Dyrcona |
JavaScript has always been able to change the document location, and the server has always been able to say go somewhere else when the browser requests the URL. |
| 15:32 |
Dyrcona |
AFAIK, JavaScript can't override the redirect, but the browser is free to ignore the redirect, but there will then be no content to show the user. |
| 15:33 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 15:34 |
JBoyer |
I'm saying the location can change without a server roundtrip. No server to say "go here instead" |
| 15:35 |
JBoyer |
That's not to say it's used heavily in the angular client, but it is a thing that can be done and I imagine the Angular Router would be the thing to do it if needed. |
| 15:45 |
Dyrcona |
I suppose a JS-only relocation is possible, but that seems wrong to me. |
| 15:49 |
jeffdavis |
I feel that way about a lot of JS related stuff. Speaking of which... |
| 15:49 |
jeffdavis |
npm-- |
| 15:53 |
Dyrcona |
Well, npm is a security hole, but so are several other package systems. |
| 16:02 |
csharp_ |
@who told NPM they are a security hole? |
| 16:02 |
pinesol |
scottangel told NPM they are a security hole. |
| 16:07 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 17:02 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
