| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 06:03 |
|
bdljohn1 joined #evergreen |
| 07:03 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 07:08 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:33 |
|
bdljohn1 left #evergreen |
| 07:33 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
| 08:22 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 08:39 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:47 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 09:09 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:39 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 10:09 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 10:14 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:28 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:23 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 11:31 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 11:56 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 11:59 |
|
aabbee joined #evergreen |
| 12:03 |
|
rsulejmani joined #evergreen |
| 12:03 |
rsulejmani |
berick: I get an error when installing evergreen with the ansible installer http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/10000 |
| 12:15 |
berick |
rsulejmani: hm. ubuntu 16.04? |
| 12:17 |
rsulejmani |
berick: ubuntu 18.04 |
| 12:18 |
berick |
there is no ubuntu-18.04 branch yet |
| 12:18 |
rsulejmani |
ok |
| 12:19 |
Dyrcona |
rsulejmani: Yesterday you asked about running and Evergreen and Apache on the same server. Did you mean running Evergreen and some other applications via Apache on the same server? |
| 12:21 |
rsulejmani |
Dyrcona: Yes |
| 12:22 |
Dyrcona |
The answer is that it depends on what the other applications are doing. You may also need to modify the configuration of Apache quite a bit. I've never actually tried it beyond adding small applications to Evergreen itself. |
| 12:23 |
Dyrcona |
You know about virtual host configuration in Apache? |
| 12:25 |
|
jvwoolf1 joined #evergreen |
| 12:28 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
| 12:37 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 12:37 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 13:21 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 13:45 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 14:16 |
berick |
Dyrcona++ # reminder |
| 14:16 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 14:40 |
JBoyer |
Dyrcona++ |
| 14:51 |
Dyrcona |
Upgrading the O/S release on a FreeBSD VM while listening to '80s music seems like a perfect combination. |
| 14:53 |
* Dyrcona |
hopes the WiFi holds out. :) |
| 15:00 |
Dyrcona |
Hmm. Twenty-five open bugs with both the pullrequest and signedoff tags. Something to bring up tomorrow? |
| 15:07 |
* csharp |
has been planning to get to some of those |
| 15:10 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
| 15:10 |
Dyrcona |
Well, I'm testing an easy one right now. |
| 15:11 |
Dyrcona |
Running 2 VMs on the laptop. Who would have dreamed of that a few years ago? |
| 15:21 |
JBoyer |
If you'd like to re-live those days you could try running one inside the other, heh. |
| 15:23 |
bshum |
JBoyer: I'm not entirely sure it would allow you to do that. I know some hypervisors dont' like it when the guests try to use the same procs that are already being used by the host |
| 15:23 |
bshum |
Or at least, it didn't let me when I tried it years ago... maybe the newer stuff is "better" now? |
| 15:24 |
JBoyer |
bshum, oh, you don't get to use the nice hardware bits on the inside. That's what brings back that authentic feeling to running a VM on a laptop. Frames per second becomes seconds per frame, etc. :) |
| 15:24 |
Dyrcona |
heh. |
| 15:25 |
Dyrcona |
The branch needs a release note, but I'll write it then push it. |
| 15:26 |
* JBoyer |
needs to work on his LP saved search game to better help with testing, etc. |
| 15:38 |
* Dyrcona |
scratches his head at some git weirdness |
| 15:39 |
Dyrcona |
Oh! Duh! |
| 15:40 |
Dyrcona |
I forgot to rebase --continue. :) |
| 15:44 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Rogan Hamby] Lp 1805897: Add Item Status to the Holdings of marc_export.in - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=20a7f91> |
| 15:44 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] Lp 1805897: Add Release Note - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=4340597> |
| 15:46 |
Dyrcona |
@weather |
| 15:46 |
pinesol |
Dyrcona: Methuen, MA :: Clear :: 61F/16C | Tuesday: Mainly clear. Lows overnight in the mid 20s. Tuesday Night: Mainly clear skies. Low near 25F. Winds NW at 10 to 15 mph. |
| 15:46 |
Dyrcona |
That's just...crazy. |
| 15:47 |
berick |
yeah, 70's here. got the windows open. |
| 15:48 |
Dyrcona |
@weather wnzw |
| 15:48 |
pinesol |
Dyrcona: Error: I could not find a valid location for: wnzw |
| 15:48 |
Dyrcona |
@weather NZWN |
| 15:48 |
pinesol |
Dyrcona: Wellington International, New Zealand :: Light Rain :: 57F/14C | Wednesday: Windy. Showers this morning with clearing during the afternoon hours. High 63F. Winds SSE at 20 to 30 mph. Chance of rain 50%. Wednesday Night: Partly cloudy. Windy this evening. Low 56F. Winds SE at 20 to 30 mph. |
| 15:49 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, and it's summer there.... |
| 16:00 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 16:41 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 17:08 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:16 |
Bmagic |
Anyone have an idea why a circulation would accumulate fines passed the max_fine threshold? action.circulation shows max of 10.50 but the bills have climbed up to 16.50 and are still climbing. No payments have been made and no voids. |
| 17:18 |
Bmagic |
Maybe a renewal circ with fines on the parent? |
| 17:31 |
jihpringle |
Bmagic: might be worth checking the setting "Cap Max Fine at Item Price" just to rule it out |
| 17:32 |
Bmagic |
Would the action.circulation.max_fine be the end all be all? |
| 17:33 |
Bmagic |
That setting is set to false for this library |
| 17:35 |
Dyrcona |
Bmagic: It should cap at max fines. What's the fine amount? There was a bug where fines would go over max fines if the fine rate added up to more, like a max fines of $3.00 and a fine rate of $2.00/day, it would got to $4.00 at least. |
| 17:37 |
jihpringle |
I think that bug was resolved by the library setting "Truncate fines to max fine amount" |
| 17:39 |
berick |
Bmagic: multiple circs via renewal can certainly exceed max fines across the combined set |
| 17:39 |
Bmagic |
the circulation has a max_fine set to 10.05 and it's accumulated 16.50 so far |
| 17:40 |
Bmagic |
16.50 at .50 per day, and the xact ID is the same for all $16.50 worth |
| 17:40 |
* berick |
nods |
| 17:40 |
Bmagic |
the first circulation has $5.00 worth of fines with a different xact |
| 17:43 |
Bmagic |
we are chalking it up to a fluke... it is strange though |
| 17:44 |
berick |
Bmagic: all of the 16.50 are 0.50 entries? no manual billings? |
| 17:44 |
Bmagic |
right |
| 17:44 |
Bmagic |
btype=1 note="System Generated Overdue Fine" |
| 17:50 |
Dyrcona |
I know this is obvious, but the max fine rule actually shows up on the action.circulation row? |
| 17:51 |
Bmagic |
yep |
| 17:51 |
Bmagic |
that's what makes it so straightforward. The action.circulation plainly shows a max_fine of 10.05 |
| 17:51 |
Dyrcona |
10.05? not 10.50? |
| 17:53 |
Dyrcona |
What is stop_fines set to? |
| 17:54 |
Bmagic |
null |
| 17:55 |
Bmagic |
and yes, 10.05 |
| 17:57 |
Dyrcona |
Does the due date look correct, i.e. not monkeyed with? bug 1786312 |
| 17:57 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1786312 in Evergreen "Extending circ due date can result in exceeding max fines" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1786312 |
| 17:59 |
Dyrcona |
Why 10.05 and not 10.00? What's the purpose of the extra five cents? |
| 18:00 |
Bmagic |
I think to allow it to go over 10 but not 11 |
| 18:00 |
Bmagic |
the due_date is "2019-01-11 23:59:59-06" |
| 18:00 |
Bmagic |
looks normal to me |
| 18:01 |
berick |
does it match the xact_start + duration ? |
| 18:01 |
Bmagic |
berick: no! |
| 18:01 |
Dyrcona |
That's the bug. |
| 18:01 |
berick |
Dyrcona++ |
| 18:02 |
Bmagic |
That calculation comes to "2018-12-25 16:06:37-06" |
| 18:02 |
Bmagic |
it's the bug above? |
| 18:02 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, sounds like it. |
| 18:03 |
Bmagic |
sweet! Wow, didn't think we would have arrived at a conclusion |
| 18:03 |
Bmagic |
Dyrcona++ |
| 18:03 |
Dyrcona |
Also looks like someone missed a closed day. |
| 18:03 |
Bmagic |
berick++ |
| 18:03 |
berick |
assuming the branch wasn't closed from 12/25 -> 01/11 |
| 18:03 |
Bmagic |
so, the theory is that the due_date was manually entered during renewal somehow? |
| 18:04 |
Dyrcona |
The bug indicates that fines have to start accruing and then the due date is altered. |
| 18:04 |
berick |
checked out, was overdue for a while, staff extended the due date (no renewal), more fines accrue after 2nd due date exceeded |
| 18:04 |
Dyrcona |
The dates on the billing entries would help you figure that out. |
| 18:05 |
Dyrcona |
If there's an obvious gap. |
| 18:05 |
Bmagic |
the dates are sequential but there is a weekend missing between 1-19 and 1-22 |
| 18:06 |
Dyrcona |
Are there fines for other weekends? |
| 18:06 |
Bmagic |
but that's the only weekend. Not sure what's special about that weekend |
| 18:06 |
Bmagic |
yeah, there are... perhaps that was the day it was extended by the staff manually... |
| 18:07 |
berick |
open-ils.circ.circulation.due_date.update is the API |
| 18:08 |
berick |
if you wanna get your grep on |
| 18:08 |
Bmagic |
:) |
| 18:09 |
Bmagic |
I'm going to have to go right this moment. I'll have to get my grep on tomorrow morning |
| 18:10 |
Dyrcona |
You might want to total the fines before and after those dates. |
| 18:10 |
Dyrcona |
Then, you can estimate where it should stop. |
| 18:10 |
Dyrcona |
Good luck! |
| 18:10 |
Dyrcona |
berick++ |
| 18:11 |
* Dyrcona |
signs out, too. |
| 18:11 |
Bmagic |
lata! |
| 19:14 |
|
jamesrf joined #evergreen |
