| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:25 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 04:30 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 06:56 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 07:11 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:49 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
| 08:08 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 08:15 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 08:26 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 08:36 |
|
RMiller joined #evergreen |
| 08:40 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 09:01 |
|
nfburton joined #evergreen |
| 09:08 |
|
terran joined #evergreen |
| 09:16 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:43 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 09:52 |
csharp |
Bmagic: are y'all sending out HTML email notices from EG? I seem to remember you working on that in the last few years |
| 09:59 |
Bmagic |
csharp: are you referring to: bug 1532236 |
| 09:59 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1532236 in Evergreen "Evergreen should allow for HTML formatted action trigger emails" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1532236 |
| 09:59 |
Bmagic |
yes, we are allowing for HTML on production |
| 10:00 |
Bmagic |
using the syntax mentioned on the bug |
| 10:03 |
csharp |
Bmagic: perfect - thanks! |
| 10:29 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 10:30 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 10:58 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 11:01 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 11:33 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 11:42 |
|
aabbee joined #evergreen |
| 12:13 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 12:20 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 12:25 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 13:01 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
| 13:08 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 13:45 |
gmcharlt |
has anybody had an opportunity to test the OpenSRF 3.1 beta? |
| 14:01 |
Dyrcona |
No, but I've been using OpenSRF master for a while. |
| 14:02 |
Dyrcona |
including updating my VMs this week for some light weight work testing things for my conference presentation. |
| 14:09 |
JBoyer |
I was going to say no but upon actually bothering to look, I've been running master in production for a while now. Haven't given proper attention to any specific features beyond websocketd support though. |
| 14:15 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 14:30 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 14:51 |
berick |
cesardv: I can grab bug #1737800 (and un-assign you)? |
| 14:51 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1737800 in Evergreen "Web Client: Pending Patrons No Delete" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1737800 - Assigned to Cesar V (cesardv) |
| 14:58 |
* berick |
thinks the answer is probably yet |
| 14:58 |
berick |
er, yes |
| 15:01 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Cesar Velez] LP#1737800 - add delete action to pending patrons - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=5d52073> |
| 15:03 |
phasefx |
gmcharlt: fwiw, 3.1 beta passed qa tests and my smoketest with a dev system |
| 15:26 |
Dyrcona |
I'll push bug 1801998 in the interest of getting it in before tomorrow's releases, if they're still on. Last that I heard they were, but haven't heard anything since last week. |
| 15:26 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1801998 in Evergreen 3.2 "Deprecate Hatch storage for 3.2" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1801998 |
| 15:29 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1801998 Deprecate Hatch for data storage - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ec3ce4b> |
| 15:29 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] Lp 1801998: Deprecate Hatch Storage Grammar Fix - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=3493da5> |
| 15:31 |
berick |
Dyrcona++ |
| 15:32 |
Dyrcona |
Launchpad seems to be acting up at the moment. I get errors every second or third thing that I try to do. |
| 15:32 |
Dyrcona |
berick++ |
| 15:33 |
Dyrcona |
It would be good if someone looked at bug 1803734 before tomorrow. |
| 15:33 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1803734 in Evergreen 3.2 "edi_order_pusher.pl blindly pushes ancient orders" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1803734 |
| 15:34 |
Dyrcona |
And bug 1806709 |
| 15:34 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1806709 in Evergreen 3.2 "Add Billing History grid persist-key to server-side db settings" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1806709 |
| 15:58 |
|
jvwoolf1 joined #evergreen |
| 16:06 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
| 16:30 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 16:38 |
|
hbrennan joined #evergreen |
| 16:44 |
hbrennan |
bshum: FYI autogen didn't solve the "unclickable item barcode" issue :( |
| 16:44 |
hbrennan |
but diving in deep, there's a xul reference in there |
| 16:53 |
hbrennan |
<a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="xulG.new_tab(xulG.urls.XUL_COPY_STATUS, {}, {'from_item_details_new': true, 'barcodes': ['000097859']})">000097859</a> |
| 17:02 |
bshum |
hbrennan: Hmm, well darn. |
| 17:02 |
bshum |
hbrennan: That XUL reference looks like it's trying to call up the copy status XUL interface page with the item barcode, but not actually doing it if you're still not getting there. |
| 17:02 |
hbrennan |
bshum: exactly |
| 17:02 |
bshum |
I forgot was this in the XUL client or web client? And on 3.0? |
| 17:03 |
hbrennan |
webby! |
| 17:03 |
hbrennan |
3.0.5 |
| 17:03 |
bshum |
Well that sounds like webby sucked in 3.0 :) |
| 17:03 |
hbrennan |
Haha, yup |
| 17:03 |
hbrennan |
I was just going to ask what you were on, but, you have no library.... |
| 17:03 |
bshum |
No, I don't have a library :) |
| 17:04 |
hbrennan |
I'm pretty sure it's a super major showstopper bug but we're the only ones using that version? |
| 17:04 |
bshum |
I'll just think of all of the Evergreen libraries in the world as my children anyways |
| 17:04 |
hbrennan |
bshum: Ha! (heart emoji) |
| 17:04 |
bshum |
Speaking from my own opinion, fixing webby issues in previous releases is a pain :) |
| 17:04 |
bshum |
Fixing them in current ones isn't much better either. |
| 17:05 |
bshum |
If it's not broken for others on 3.1 or 3.2, it's community-advisable to just say "plan your next upgrade" |
| 17:05 |
hbrennan |
We're building a test of 3.1.something this week |
| 17:05 |
hbrennan |
It's not even broken on 3.0.9, the closest I could survey |
| 17:06 |
hbrennan |
Literally no one has this issue, which is why I went in the direction that it must be us |
| 17:06 |
bshum |
Yeah :( |
| 17:06 |
bshum |
I hate it when that happens :) |
| 17:06 |
hbrennan |
Instead, it looks like it must be 3.0.5 |
| 17:06 |
bshum |
It wouldn't surprise me if a particular point release is borked in some unknown and strange way |
| 17:06 |
hbrennan |
I just never believe I'm the only one |
| 17:06 |
hbrennan |
But I guess we were the first to go 3.0 |
| 17:06 |
bshum |
That's usually why we tell folks to be on the latest one ;) |
| 17:06 |
bshum |
But I have the luxury of saying stuff like that |
| 17:07 |
hbrennan |
I'm too excitable. I should probably stop reading release notes. They promise so much fun and new. |
| 17:12 |
bshum |
New is always better. |
| 17:12 |
hbrennan |
Except when it's not. :) |
| 17:12 |
bshum |
When it was up to me, life on the bleeding edge was the only way to go |
| 17:12 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:12 |
bshum |
But I was more in-tune with the development then |
| 17:12 |
bshum |
So it was easier to know where the mines were going to be |
| 17:13 |
bshum |
I don't get to test as much as I'd like to, now. |
| 17:13 |
hbrennan |
Well thankfully we can still run the xul client. Which is why this has been on my backburner for a while. |
| 17:13 |
hbrennan |
But now I'm leaving my position and need to push up web training |
| 17:13 |
bshum |
It makes me wonder if maybe it's a customization issue |
| 17:13 |
hbrennan |
Clicking on barcodes is kinda important |
| 17:14 |
bshum |
Like something in the TPAC code was changed locally, and it affected the difference between the XUL way and web client way of how that block of code is rendered |
| 17:14 |
bshum |
Or it could be a buggy 3.0.5 |
| 17:14 |
hbrennan |
I have done extremely minimal customization (no time) .. really mainly css, and not at all recently |
| 17:15 |
bshum |
Okay, just thinking aloud. :) |
| 17:15 |
hbrennan |
But who knows. I actually tried to look at Biblio catalog to see what was there and then realized I couldn't go to item depth without staff credentials.. I don't know what I'll do when that gets taken away from me at my library as well |
| 17:15 |
hbrennan |
How will I know who to get mad at for keeping a book I want too long?! |
| 17:16 |
bshum |
Heh |
| 17:17 |
bshum |
Well, good luck on all that. If I think of anything more interesting to check out, I'll say something. More so than, "time to upgrade" :D |
| 17:18 |
bshum |
Though it's always a good time to upgrade |
| 17:18 |
hbrennan |
Absolutely! |
| 17:18 |
* bshum |
wanders off |
| 17:18 |
hbrennan |
remingtron says he went to 3.2 in Dec! |
| 17:19 |
hbrennan |
bshum++ Thanks. Just wanted to keep you in the loop of my saga |
| 20:42 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 20:54 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] Lp 1803734: Only push on-order purchase orders in edi_order_pusher.pl. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b5c8093> |
