| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:26 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
| 00:27 |
|
rlefaive__ joined #evergreen |
| 01:29 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
| 06:11 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 07:06 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:21 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 07:28 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
| 08:47 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Cesar Velez] LP#1739087 - add [x] to volcopy editor volume rows - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ad1d99c> |
| 08:47 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Cesar Velez] LP#1739087 - add [x] to volcopy editor volume rows-FollowUp - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=7417b39> |
| 08:47 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Cesar Velez] LP#1739087 - enable vol to be zeroed - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ef3fa14> |
| 09:05 |
|
lsach joined #evergreen |
| 09:36 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:37 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:54 |
Dyrcona |
berick: Will you be around or are you running from the hurricane? |
| 09:58 |
|
aabbee joined #evergreen |
| 09:59 |
berick |
Dyrcona: i'll be around |
| 10:00 |
Dyrcona |
berick: OK. Thought I had a question about the OpenSRF README for websocketd, but think I have an answer. |
| 10:05 |
* berick |
nods |
| 10:08 |
|
stephengwills joined #evergreen |
| 10:18 |
bshum |
bug 1735816 |
| 10:18 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1735816 in Evergreen "Cannot Delete Existing Copy Notes" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1735816 |
| 10:21 |
JBoyer |
It just needs looooovve! |
| 10:23 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, we're going to look at it today, IIANM. |
| 10:26 |
JBoyer |
Dyrcona++ |
| 10:26 |
aabbee |
what's the status of evergreen3.2 on ubuntu18.04? https://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/install/README_3_2.html only lists 16.04 and 14.04. is this likely to work, or should i stick with xenial? |
| 10:27 |
bshum |
aabbee: Stick with xenial |
| 10:27 |
bshum |
18.04 is not supported yet |
| 10:27 |
bshum |
OpenSRF is not compatible with it |
| 10:27 |
bshum |
And we're still working on that before we get to the Evergreen parts |
| 10:27 |
aabbee |
bshum++ # ok, thank you! |
| 10:29 |
JBoyer |
berick, I do have a question about customizing eg2 templates. I know there was talk of a way to load custom overrides (a templates_local dir), did that make it in or is the generally accepted way to customize the new templates to make changes in the Evergreen source pre-build? |
| 10:30 |
berick |
JBoyer: for now, changing the source pre-build is the only option |
| 10:30 |
JBoyer |
berick++ |
| 10:30 |
JBoyer |
I was kind of hoping that was the case, otherwise I would begin to doubt my reading ability. ;) |
| 10:33 |
Dyrcona |
Fun with OpenSRF 3.0 and Evergren 3.0: gateway 2018-09-12 10:30:12 [WARN:9710:transport_session.c:869:] Text of error message received from Jabber: XML stanza is too big |
| 10:44 |
bshum |
Dyrcona: Possibly --> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1710293 |
| 10:44 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1710293 in Evergreen 3.1 "Remaining chunk/bundle work" [Medium,New] |
| 10:44 |
Dyrcona |
Yes. |
| 10:46 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:47 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 10:53 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 10:56 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 10:57 |
stephengwills |
Two questions: Apropos JBoyer’s question: Are there any best practice workflow docs for pulling a pre-build branch, applying org specific mods and maintaining it until it’s time to merge a new release onto it? The dev docs i’ve found speak to contributing to a working branch but that is not the place one maintains their custom production code correct? |
| 10:57 |
JBoyer |
stephengwills, No, you wouldn't want to store anything local in a working branch on git.evergreen-ils.org. |
| 10:58 |
berick |
stephengwills: it varies, we keep local changes in a private repo and regularly rebase it over the stock code. |
| 10:58 |
JBoyer |
What we do here is run a local git server that pulls from git.evergreen-ils.org every morning, then we can pull from it and push branches that only exist locally and on our local git server. |
| 10:59 |
JBoyer |
Or in fewer words, what berick said. |
| 10:59 |
miker |
stephengwills: not documented, but a common way is to use a repo (or, just a convention-based namespace in a repo) to hold the main branch you're tracking, a set of topic branches, and then create a combined branch as needed by rebasing the main branch, forking it, and cherry picking the topic branch commits onto the new combined branch |
| 11:02 |
stephengwills |
k, tx. I’m trying to get those workflows documented for Balsam and figured it was something like that. |
| 11:02 |
JBoyer |
So long as you don't put anything sensitive in there you could use a github repo to do this rather than managing it yourself. |
| 11:02 |
JBoyer |
(less sure how to pull from elsewhere in that case though) |
| 11:03 |
Dyrcona |
We also use a private repo for customization and configuration. |
| 11:04 |
Dyrcona |
berick: I updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/opensrf/+bug/1777180 You'll probably see the email, but I thought I'd let you know. |
| 11:04 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1777180 in OpenSRF "Wishlist: Websocketd Gateway Support" [Wishlist,Confirmed] |
| 11:05 |
berick |
thanks Dy |
| 11:05 |
|
terran joined #evergreen |
| 11:05 |
berick |
hm, tab-complete, you're my only hope |
| 11:05 |
berick |
thanks Dyrcona |
| 11:05 |
csharp |
Dyrcona: JBoyer: we're about to dig into looking at bug 1735816 too, FYI |
| 11:05 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1735816 in Evergreen "Cannot Delete Existing Copy Notes" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1735816 |
| 11:06 |
JBoyer |
Now there's an autocompletion I haven't heard in a long time... |
| 11:07 |
berick |
:) |
| 11:16 |
|
jvwoolf1 joined #evergreen |
| 11:17 |
csharp |
Hello there! |
| 11:17 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 11:20 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] LP1665052: Fix checkin workstation display on recent circs view - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=6de97f9> |
| 11:28 |
bshum |
berick: FYI, I'm going to push the websocketd to OpenSRF master. Worked for me and I like Dyrcona's doc updates too. |
| 11:28 |
berick |
bshum++ |
| 11:29 |
bshum |
berick++ Dyrcona++ jeffdavis++ # trailblazers |
| 11:29 |
berick |
then i can merge the ansible branch |
| 11:30 |
pinesol |
[opensrf|Bill Erickson] LP#1777180 Websocketd gateway and test scripts - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=21c9c76> |
| 11:30 |
pinesol |
[opensrf|Jason Stephenson] LP#1777180 Update README for websocketd - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=d1c33b4> |
| 11:31 |
csharp |
okay for bug 1735816, after applying the patch, we're not seeing already-entered copy notes when we click copy notes - I can confirm they are created in the DB |
| 11:31 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1735816 in Evergreen "Cannot Delete Existing Copy Notes" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1735816 |
| 11:31 |
csharp |
gathering console output now |
| 11:33 |
csharp |
https://pastebin.com/MpTDEThb - no actual errors showing |
| 11:35 |
JBoyer |
:/ Have you done all of the clear cache/hard reload voodoo that Chrome wants you too doo? |
| 11:37 |
csharp |
yeppers |
| 11:38 |
|
blongwell joined #evergreen |
| 11:40 |
bshum |
sandbergja++ # your testing notes are great! |
| 11:42 |
sandbergja |
Thanks! |
| 11:43 |
JBoyer |
Well that's fabulous, it looks like that patch has fallen off of production here... and all of our other machines. woo. |
| 11:43 |
JBoyer |
One moment. |
| 11:46 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] Lp 1746251: Fix Circulation Modifier typos. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b549d59> |
| 11:48 |
bshum |
sandbergja: Well I like them mainly because I clearly don't remember how to actually use Evergreen anymore :( |
| 11:48 |
bshum |
So knowing which menus to click through or interfaces to look at saves me time, haha |
| 11:50 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 11:58 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 11:59 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 12:00 |
JBoyer |
csharp, annoyingly, they are showing here one the one server that apparently has that patch installed. |
| 12:03 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:03 |
* JBoyer |
will investigate post-lunch |
| 12:24 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 12:34 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] LP1775640: Adds deposit columns to Item Status and Holdings View grids - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=f3e7a33> |
| 12:37 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 12:48 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Steven Callender] LP1792014: KPAC fix for opac.holds.org_unit_not_pickup_lib in org_selector. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=7567914> |
| 12:53 |
|
montgoc1 joined #evergreen |
| 12:53 |
bshum |
berick: I'm curious, if using the websocketd ansible branch, do we have to install unzip too? (the unarchive command documentation seems to indicate that we need it installed to do the work) |
| 12:53 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 12:53 |
bshum |
And I don't see it defined in the installer |
| 12:56 |
berick |
bshum: yes, you probably do |
| 12:56 |
berick |
should probably add that to the installer |
| 12:56 |
bshum |
berick: Do you think we should just toss it into the prereqs for OpenSRF in general? So that folks don't trip on that either if doing it manually? |
| 12:57 |
bshum |
I mean most people would notice when they went to run the unzip command and it fails |
| 12:57 |
bshum |
And know to get the unzip package |
| 12:57 |
berick |
bshum: i would say so, I install zip/unzip by default everywhere. |
| 12:58 |
berick |
or add it to the websocketd docs, at least |
| 12:58 |
Dyrcona |
We should add zip to the prereqs for OpenSRF. Installing the zip package typically installs unzip, too. |
| 12:59 |
Dyrcona |
Or we could just install unzip. |
| 13:00 |
|
aabbee left #evergreen |
| 13:00 |
|
aabbee joined #evergreen |
| 13:02 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 13:05 |
bshum |
berick: I'll mock up a branch to add those to the prereq list |
| 13:05 |
bshum |
I consider it a continuation of the websocketd stuff, so I'll tag it with that LP# |
| 13:06 |
Dyrcona |
bshum +1 |
| 13:09 |
bshum |
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/OpenSRF.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/user/bshum/lp1777180-continued |
| 13:14 |
Dyrcona |
bshum: Works for me, I'll signoff and push it. |
| 13:14 |
bshum |
Dyrcona++ |
| 13:14 |
|
beanjammin joined #evergreen |
| 13:18 |
pinesol |
[opensrf|Ben Shum] LP#1777180: Add zip/unzip to prerequisites - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=da7e927> |
| 13:21 |
|
dkyle1 joined #evergreen |
| 13:25 |
bshum |
phasefx: FYI, I'm thinking to rebase the branches to eliminate wheezy install targets |
| 13:25 |
bshum |
And push those through, since Wheezy is definitely EOL |
| 13:25 |
bshum |
I know you're in the process of building a new live test server, but I just wanted to give you a head's up before I go ahead |
| 13:26 |
miker |
bshum: IMO, that's kinda a version-y thing... we know that up to 3.1 works on wheezy, so I'd say remove it for master only. thoughts? |
| 13:26 |
bshum |
miker: Yes I was only going to push that change for master only |
| 13:26 |
bshum |
(for 3.2) |
| 13:26 |
phasefx |
sounds good to me |
| 13:26 |
miker |
cool, thanks |
| 13:26 |
bshum |
I didn't think to backport that removal |
| 13:26 |
bshum |
Seemed far too impactful :D |
| 13:27 |
bshum |
But I'm glad you brought it up |
| 13:27 |
miker |
yeah .. "hey, why won't my 3.1 upgrade anymore?" |
| 13:27 |
bshum |
miker: Yeah, lol |
| 13:28 |
Dyrcona |
"Tempted by the fruit of another..." Wait, wrong Squeeze. |
| 13:33 |
|
terran joined #evergreen |
| 13:35 |
aabbee |
any chance i could get a second opinion on bug 1731272? on the one hand, i don't know if the stupid fix actually works (works on *my* machine...). on the other hand, there's gotta be a better way. on the THIRD hand, how worthwhile is it to try to fix this when ang6 is seemingly just around the corner? |
| 13:35 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1731272 in Evergreen "web client: "Set default view" breaks record page loading" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1731272 - Assigned to Galen Charlton (gmc) |
| 13:39 |
bshum |
Does anyone have any strong opinions about the naming of the example folder for apache_24 vs. just plain apache? with the removal of wheezy, we can just retain one set of configs and keep the folder named apache_24 in case there's further future versions? Or just fall back to having just everything in an "apache" folder? |
| 13:39 |
miker |
aabbee: I suspect the approach is correct, but the ng way of spelling setTimeout is $timeout() |
| 13:42 |
aabbee |
miker: ok, that's easy enough to change. as far as i can tell, the only reason we need to muck around with the event queue anyway is because we're using angularjs promises instead of ecma6 promises. but if the whole thing is being rewritten for ang6 anyway, why bother, y'kno? |
| 13:43 |
miker |
aabbee: well, there's no telling when the ang6 version will drop for production use, so it's good to fix, IMO |
| 13:44 |
berick |
yeah, we def. want to keep fixing the bugs |
| 13:45 |
aabbee |
*if* it actually fixes the problem and doesn't introduce any new problems (going back to: "there has got to be a better way"). hoping to get confirmation from Jane whether or not the fix even works, but thanks for the insight. |
| 13:48 |
miker |
fwiw, there are lots of spots where we have to sprinkle a $timeout() due to apply/digest race conditions |
| 13:49 |
miker |
I'm glad we don't support IE ... think of all the phantom click sounds! |
| 13:49 |
berick |
that means it's working! |
| 13:50 |
berick |
well, not functioning, of course, but putting forth effort |
| 13:54 |
jihpringle |
aabbee: that fix is on my list to test in a sandbox later today |
| 13:55 |
aabbee |
jihpringle: great news, thank you! i hope it just misplaced the line when it was merged and is an easy fix. looking forward to knowing either way. |
| 14:18 |
pinesol |
[opensrf|Jason Stephenson] Lp#1718459: Remove Debian 7 Wheezy installation support. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=265aa9f> |
| 14:20 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 14:20 |
|
montgoc01 joined #evergreen |
| 14:20 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] Lp#1718459: Remove Debian 7 Wheezy Installation Support - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=c6437c2> |
| 14:23 |
bshum |
Reading that stuff, it looks like our server_upgrade.adoc hasn't been updated for master since 2.12 |
| 14:23 |
bshum |
I guess we haven't been forward porting those from the release branches |
| 14:27 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 14:28 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Ben Shum] LP#1718459: Remove apache 2.2 language from README - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=bacd986> |
| 14:36 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 14:36 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] LP1743654: Fleshing out the Created By column in Item Status - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=5eaa171> |
| 14:36 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] LP 1743654: Removing a duplicate flesh_fields array entry - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=be9f2cc> |
| 14:40 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Cesar Velez] LP#1776917 - fix patron bill grid lacking bill ID - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=cf2298b> |
| 14:51 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Chris Sharp] LP#1269574 - Exclude backordered copies from deletion. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=8689047> |
| 14:57 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 14:58 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 15:02 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 15:10 |
bshum |
berick: I'm going to try using the latest ansible from the PPA and see if it helps us get around that npm problem. The github bug you linked to seems to indicate that it's "fixed" in 2.3+ and the ansible version that ships with Ubuntu 16.04 is 2.0.ish |
| 15:10 |
bshum |
So... fingers crossed that nothing bigger blows up? :D |
| 15:11 |
bshum |
Ansible 2.6, whee |
| 15:12 |
JBoyer |
bshum, I can confirm that it should work with 2.6. ;) |
| 15:12 |
bshum |
JBoyer++ # cool! I'll find out in a few moments too, but glad to know that it'll be good |
| 15:14 |
bshum |
If it's good, then I think we can just modify the readme to include the PPA step prior to installing ansible and get back to a happy place then. |
| 15:15 |
berick |
bshum++ |
| 15:15 |
JBoyer |
Ubuntu is really irritating in that regard. If I wanted to have to constantly add vendor repositories to get access to modern-ish versions of things I could always run RedHat. :/ |
| 15:15 |
berick |
oh, need to merge websocketd branch.. |
| 15:16 |
Dyrcona |
JBoyer: LFS. |
| 15:17 |
berick |
bshum: just merged websocketd commits |
| 15:17 |
bshum |
berick++ |
| 15:21 |
* bshum |
waits for the magic to happen now |
| 15:22 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 15:27 |
bshum |
Aww, it still was unhappy with npm :( |
| 15:30 |
JBoyer |
Oh. :/ |
| 15:30 |
JBoyer |
No more than I've looked at that branch I'm not sure what it's doing exactly, what's the big ugly red blob of an error say? |
| 15:33 |
berick |
JBoyer: the problem is it won't run 'npm install' |
| 15:33 |
berick |
if you've already done that in the past, it will contineu working |
| 15:33 |
bshum |
Yeah, npm install is my problem |
| 15:33 |
berick |
rather, you won't notice the issue |
| 15:33 |
bshum |
I just ran them manually and continuing my merry way I guess |
| 15:33 |
JBoyer |
Ah. Which I have. I see. |
| 15:34 |
JBoyer |
Is it actually an ansible thing or is that just where it's most apparent? |
| 15:35 |
jeff |
for context, where is the github issue in question? |
| 15:35 |
bshum |
Running the steps manually, I haven't had a problem yet. |
| 15:35 |
bshum |
So I think it's only with ansible on clean VMs without the stuff installed |
| 15:37 |
bshum |
http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/14100?wr=on&submit=Format+it%21 |
| 15:37 |
bshum |
JBoyer: This is the error that's shown on my screen |
| 15:38 |
bshum |
I'm going to check for that debug log next |
| 15:39 |
jeff |
yes, i'd be interested in seeing the contents of the referenced /home/benjamin/.npm/_logs/2018-09-12T19_26_40_044Z-debug.log file |
| 15:39 |
bshum |
Hmm |
| 15:40 |
pastebot |
"bshum" at 64.57.241.14 pasted "debug npm log" (1428 lines) at http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/14101 |
| 15:41 |
jeff |
oh, it's: |
| 15:41 |
jeff |
"npm ERR! Command failed: /usr/bin/git clone --depth=1 -q -b npm git://github.com/rxfork/ngOrderObjectBy.git /home/benjamin/.npm/_cacache/tmp/git-clone-83a9574e", |
| 15:41 |
jeff |
"npm ERR! /home/benjamin/.npm/_cacache/tmp/git-clone-83a9574e/.git: Permission denied", |
| 15:41 |
bshum |
Yeah that |
| 15:41 |
JBoyer |
I wonder what user it's run as. I should really look at this playbook directly rather than just guessing what it's doing. Is this in berick's github or somewhere else? |
| 15:41 |
jeff |
jq can be handy for formatting the JSON that ansible spits out. |
| 15:42 |
berick |
JBoyer: yeah, mine |
| 15:42 |
* berick |
reads up |
| 15:42 |
jeff |
though it's still a lot of blobs of text with escaped newlines, at least it breaks things into nicely formatted key/value (blob) pairs. :-) |
| 15:42 |
JBoyer |
Or just a s/\\n/\n/g :) |
| 15:43 |
berick |
bshum: is /home/benjamin/.npm/_cacache/tmp/git-clone-83a9574e/.git owned by root? (or parent directory)? |
| 15:46 |
berick |
maybe need to set "become_method: su" for the npm stuff so it doesn't put root-owned stuff into the login user's home dir. |
| 15:47 |
jeff |
why are you running npm as root? |
| 15:47 |
berick |
jeff: only for the install -g @angular/cli bit |
| 15:47 |
berick |
i wonder if we can get rid of that, though |
| 15:48 |
JBoyer |
I thought all of the stuff that needed to be done by root was in <blah>-developer? |
| 15:48 |
bshum |
berick: Hmm, that directory doesn't exist on my test system anymore, but the folders leading up to it seem to be owned by me |
| 15:48 |
JBoyer |
my entire build (after prereqs) is run by opensrf until install time. |
| 15:49 |
berick |
JBoyer: it is... |
| 15:49 |
bshum |
Would it matter that I'm using myself benjamin, rather than opensrf to run the step though? Since the user is opensrf for the Evergreen repo |
| 15:51 |
JBoyer |
It looks like the user that is running npm at that point needs write access to ~ and ./, so long as both of those are true it shouldn't matter who is it. |
| 15:51 |
berick |
i think i just have an unnecessary 'become' or two in there |
| 15:52 |
berick |
heh, yml using "-" makes looking at diff's weird |
| 15:52 |
JBoyer |
I'll admit, I haven't looked at the npm module yet so I don't know what it's doing, but I'd remove the become for the AngularJS Node Build task and see if that makes it happy. |
| 15:53 |
JBoyer |
--its |
| 15:53 |
JBoyer |
---dashes all |
| 15:53 |
JBoyer |
-----the way down |
| 15:53 |
JBoyer |
+- oops. |
| 15:53 |
berick |
https://gist.github.com/berick/6a5f9f111de78f23dbfd8f17227fa534 -- for example ;) |
| 15:53 |
jeff |
berick: ah, yeah. looks like installing @angular/cli locally is possible, but weird. |
| 15:54 |
berick |
anyway, the 2 "becomes" are what I'm trying to remove |
| 15:54 |
* berick |
doesn't have a clean vm handy at the moment to test |
| 15:54 |
bshum |
I can test that out on my busted VM with the error :) |
| 15:55 |
bshum |
But I'll retest it on a clean VM afterwards |
| 15:55 |
berick |
bshum: cool, may have to do some chown'ing first |
| 15:55 |
bshum |
I was just going to blow away the directories and start over too, but yeah I getcha |
| 15:55 |
berick |
the ultimate chown |
| 15:56 |
berick |
you belong to the void now, little directory |
| 15:59 |
JBoyer |
berick++ |
| 16:03 |
bshum |
berick: Still seems unhappy, I assumed I was blowing away the .npm directories |
| 16:04 |
bshum |
I'll poke at this stuff more closely later |
| 16:04 |
berick |
k, i will too |
| 16:04 |
berick |
wondering now if the preceeding 'become' on make -f ...Makefile.install needs to change |
| 16:04 |
berick |
it needs to be there, of course |
| 16:04 |
berick |
but maybe modified |
| 16:23 |
Dyrcona |
The wheezy removal branch broke it. |
| 16:25 |
berick |
ah, i'll def spend some time on it in the morning then |
| 16:26 |
bshum |
Failed to restart websocketd-osrf.service: Unit websocketd-osrf.service not found. |
| 16:26 |
bshum |
berick: Well we're making some progress :) |
| 16:26 |
bshum |
I got almost to the end this time |
| 16:26 |
berick |
bshum: you enabled service files setting? |
| 16:26 |
bshum |
For the logs, adding "become_user: opensrf" to the angularjs step helped |
| 16:27 |
bshum |
berick: Aha, it's set to "false" by default |
| 16:27 |
berick |
yeah, thought that might be presumptious |
| 16:27 |
bshum |
Gotcha |
| 16:27 |
berick |
or however that word is spelled |
| 16:27 |
bshum |
Then perhaps we need to add something for the ansible step so that it doesn't call the websocketd by default |
| 16:28 |
bshum |
If it's not selected |
| 16:28 |
berick |
ah, yes, definitely |
| 16:28 |
berick |
faulty assumption in the code |
| 16:28 |
bshum |
Okay, time to blow away the whole VM and build a new one to retest cleanly :) |
| 16:28 |
bshum |
Or maybe drive home first and deal with it later |
| 16:30 |
bshum |
berick: I'll make a new branch with all the fixes I've noticed that we need |
| 16:30 |
berick |
bshum++ |
| 16:41 |
bshum |
berick: It's presumptuous, but if a user did not setup the osrfwebsocket service, they'd have to start that manually, right? |
| 16:42 |
bshum |
If we don't set it to true |
| 16:42 |
* bshum |
ponders that further |
| 16:43 |
berick |
right |
| 16:44 |
bshum |
Maybe we should split the services install options |
| 16:44 |
bshum |
And then install the one for osrfwebsocket by default so that we can use it and start it up |
| 16:44 |
bshum |
I think for majority users, we'd want that option to exist and be turned on |
| 16:44 |
bshum |
Or at least, I would :D |
| 16:45 |
berick |
yeah, +1 to that. it is an OS-specific installer and this just makes that whole thing easier |
| 16:49 |
bshum |
berick: I'll put all those thoughts into a branch and test everyone on fresh VMs tomorrow |
| 16:50 |
bshum |
Thanks! |
| 16:50 |
bshum |
Signing off for now, have a nice day y'all |
| 16:50 |
Bmagic |
lata |
| 16:51 |
berick |
later bshum |
| 16:51 |
berick |
and thanks again |
| 17:50 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 19:20 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
