Time |
Nick |
Message |
06:32 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Failed Running perl live tests <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
06:32 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Failed Log Output: osrfsys.log - Expected 3 errors but encountered 7. <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
06:54 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
07:07 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
07:10 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
07:36 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
07:41 |
JBoyer |
kmlussier++ |
07:41 |
JBoyer |
berick++ |
07:41 |
JBoyer |
gmcharlt++ |
07:41 |
JBoyer |
(catching up from the meeting I had to bail on) |
08:21 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
08:38 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
08:46 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
08:50 |
|
aabbee joined #evergreen |
09:11 |
rjackson_isl |
HELP! trying to rollback some mismerges and need to reingest a few thousand bibs |
09:11 |
rjackson_isl |
trying this: select metabib.reingest_record_attributes( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not undeleted order by sub_bibid limit 1; |
09:11 |
rjackson_isl |
but it doesn't work as is |
09:17 |
mmorgan |
rjackson_isl: Did you really mean "not undeleted" ? |
09:18 |
rjackson_isl |
I have a flag in the table named undeleted |
09:18 |
rjackson_isl |
bad choice of column name? |
09:19 |
rjackson_isl |
let me rename it to something like bibundel |
09:19 |
mmorgan |
How is it failing, are you getting an error, or it is not making any changes? |
09:19 |
rjackson_isl |
it just spins |
09:19 |
csharp |
so by "mismerges" to you mean that an automated process merged bibs that shouldn't have been merged, or something else? |
09:19 |
csharp |
s/to/do/ |
09:20 |
rjackson_isl |
yeah - after a migration we mismerged via scripts |
09:20 |
csharp |
ah |
09:20 |
rjackson_isl |
:( |
09:20 |
csharp |
do you have a snapshot of those records pre-merge? |
09:20 |
rjackson_isl |
yeah - on our sandbox |
09:20 |
csharp |
bibs/call_numbers/copies |
09:21 |
rjackson_isl |
have temp tables set up for call numbers and holds to be updated |
09:21 |
rjackson_isl |
but need to reinstate bibs |
09:21 |
csharp |
@seen abowling |
09:21 |
pinesol |
csharp: abowling was last seen in #evergreen 7 weeks, 2 days, 18 hours, and 57 seconds ago: <abowling> miker: figures! one of these days, we're gonna get a single browser that does everything "correctly" :) |
09:22 |
csharp |
abowling had to do similar work after a migration back in the spring and may have some tools to share |
09:22 |
rjackson_isl |
++csharp |
09:22 |
Dyrcona |
rjackson_isl: How many bibs are you talking about? What do you mean "it just spins?" |
09:22 |
rjackson_isl |
I thnk JBoyer has the logic I just am lacking in the how to execute! |
09:23 |
rjackson_isl |
with the example I provided it should have only been one |
09:23 |
rjackson_isl |
(limit 1) |
09:23 |
mmorgan |
I'm still hung up on "not undeleted" That means to me that you're looking for deleted bibs, unless I'm misunderstanding your local column |
09:23 |
rjackson_isl |
and Jboyer is offsite for most of the day |
09:24 |
rjackson_isl |
added the column to the driver table local.bad_merges with default 'f' |
09:24 |
rjackson_isl |
bool falg |
09:25 |
rjackson_isl |
s/falg/flag |
09:25 |
Dyrcona |
rjackson_isl: That limit is irrelevant. With the order by, it could still take a long time to find a record if there are a lot of them and no indexes. |
09:25 |
rjackson_isl |
driver has 2652 entries |
09:26 |
csharp |
yeah, might need to add indexes to the working tables so you can find things more quickly |
09:26 |
Dyrcona |
Also, how long are you waiting before giving up? |
09:26 |
rjackson_isl |
for the limit 1 I waited a couple of minutes |
09:26 |
rjackson_isl |
updating the table to reset the flag with the order by is simlutaneous |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
sorry for the extended post: |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
begin; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id in (select sub_bibid from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1) and deleted = 't'; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
select metabib.reingest_record_attributes( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
select metabib.reingest_metabib_field_entries( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
select metabib.reingest_metabib_full_rec( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
update local.bad_merges set bibundel = 't' where sub_bibid in (select sub_bibid from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1); |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
--commit; |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
IO started at limit 10 but that was a no go so I went with limit 1 and still didn't work |
09:27 |
rjackson_isl |
thinking that the function call is not liking my syntax |
09:29 |
Dyrcona |
How many rows in config.attr_definition? |
09:30 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
09:31 |
rjackson_isl |
don't seem to have that table? |
09:31 |
csharp |
rjackson_isl: you might consider breaking them into a file with individual reingest calls for each bib id |
09:32 |
Dyrcona |
Sorry, config.record_attr_definition. |
09:32 |
rjackson_isl |
yeah - I was trying that and got hung up on the sql to create sql :( |
09:32 |
csharp |
reingest takes a while for each record |
09:32 |
rjackson_isl |
820 |
09:34 |
Dyrcona |
Did you run that script as you pasted it? |
09:34 |
Dyrcona |
If so, replace the commented out commit with a rollback. |
09:35 |
rjackson_isl |
I tried once (except column was undeleted not bibundel |
09:35 |
Dyrcona |
I think you're spinning because you never end the transaction. |
09:35 |
rjackson_isl |
I did the rollback(s) |
09:35 |
rjackson_isl |
I always start with --commit; to be on the safge side |
09:35 |
Dyrcona |
Start with rollback to be on the safe side. |
09:36 |
Dyrcona |
Then change rollback to commit when you're sure. |
09:36 |
rjackson_isl |
++ |
09:36 |
* Dyrcona |
looks up a flag... |
09:37 |
rjackson_isl |
I could go this route if I knew the syntax for delimiting/escaping from the command line |
09:37 |
rjackson_isl |
select $$update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id = $$||sub_bibid||$$ and deleted = 't';$$ from local.bad_merges; |
09:38 |
rjackson_isl |
that would get me the individual commands per bib id |
09:40 |
Dyrcona |
You do that with a script, too, as jeff suggested. |
09:40 |
Dyrcona |
Sorry, must have been csharp. ;) |
09:41 |
* Dyrcona |
is lost in the scrollback. |
09:41 |
rjackson_isl |
Ringht - but I am lacking in the syntax to pipe to sql to get the commands out of the database using the driver table |
09:42 |
Dyrcona |
rjackson_isl: Do you know how to concatenate strings in SQL, ie, 'select metabib.reingest_metabib_field(' || sub_bibid || ') ....'? |
09:42 |
rjackson_isl |
right I was trying this |
09:42 |
rjackson_isl |
echo "$$update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id = $$||sub_bibid||$$ and deleted = 't';$$ from local.bad_merges;"|psql -U Uname -h dbname > reinstate_sql.txt |
09:43 |
rjackson_isl |
doesn't like and I tries adding \ in front of $ and still no go - not sure where it is getting lost in translation :( |
09:44 |
rjackson_isl |
the statement itself from within psql works to genereate the desired sql |
09:44 |
Dyrcona |
No. Writ a SQL select script that selects a string for each row in the table, run it with psql with the -A and -t options, then pipe it to an output file. |
09:45 |
Dyrcona |
To make it easier on yourself, use true and false instead of 't' and 'f'. |
09:46 |
rjackson_isl |
++ that might do the trick! |
09:46 |
rjackson_isl |
Dyrcona++ |
09:46 |
Dyrcona |
You'll want a select for sql command you want to run, and I wouldn't worry about the order too much. |
09:46 |
Dyrcona |
for each sql command.. |
09:59 |
* berick |
preps a perl live test fix patch |
10:02 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
10:02 |
rjackson_isl |
oh joy a couple of duplicate tcn values trying to udelete the bibs - off to find and change those to uniqueness! |
10:04 |
Dyrcona |
Was the merge matching on a field related to the tcn, i.e. 001 or 035? |
10:05 |
rjackson_isl |
sorry - I didn't participate in the merge portion |
10:07 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
10:30 |
berick |
ok perl live test fixes pushed: |
10:30 |
berick |
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/user/berick/perl-live-test-failure-2018-09-06 |
10:30 |
berick |
2 commits -- test/sign-off/merge volunteer needed |
10:31 |
bshum |
berick++ |
10:33 |
Dyrcona |
The closed_date is new in 3.2/master, right? |
10:34 |
bshum |
Looks like it |
10:35 |
berick |
yes |
10:35 |
berick |
ditto the other fix |
10:38 |
Dyrcona |
I can test the tests in a few. |
10:40 |
Dyrcona |
Oh, I hear off stage voices telling me that someone is going to test the branch with the ansible installer. |
10:41 |
berick |
Dyrcona: heads up, I had some problems w/ my ansible installer yesterday... |
10:41 |
berick |
the 'npm' command is acting funky |
10:41 |
Dyrcona |
Heh. npm always acts funky. |
10:41 |
Dyrcona |
I couldn't use npm update for a while recently. 404 errors. |
10:42 |
Dyrcona |
Later that day, it worked just fine. |
10:42 |
berick |
possible https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/26582 |
10:42 |
berick |
*possibly |
10:43 |
Dyrcona |
Mine looked like this: https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/13490 |
10:44 |
Dyrcona |
But, I don't think it was that, exactly, because it fixed itself when the CDN got itself sorted out. |
10:44 |
berick |
for my ansible issue, running "npm install" by hand allowed me to complete the install |
10:44 |
bshum |
Well my ansible run hasn't died quite yet. So I'm waiting to see where it lands me then. |
10:44 |
Bmagic |
rjackson_isl: what about auditor.biblio_record_entry_history? |
10:45 |
Dyrcona |
I haven't looked at the ansible installer, but plan to do so soonish. |
10:45 |
berick |
I'll have a number of branches to merge once 3.2. and new opensrf are released |
10:45 |
rjackson_isl |
aren't going that route since we had a before image on our migration server just loaded |
10:45 |
Bmagic |
right on |
10:45 |
rjackson_isl |
almost finished with the cleanup now |
10:45 |
berick |
ang6 stuff, websocketd stuff, remove xul client building |
10:45 |
Bmagic |
oh good |
10:45 |
rjackson_isl |
bibs have been undeleted and reingested |
10:46 |
rjackson_isl |
just need to flip call numbers and title level holds |
10:46 |
Dyrcona |
I also plan to look at websocketd. Did you want to merge it in for the beta release tomorrow? |
10:47 |
bshum |
Gah |
10:47 |
bshum |
fm_IDL.xml changes |
10:47 |
bshum |
I guess my ansible install is going to blow up anyways cause of i18n problems |
10:47 |
berick |
Dyrcona: well, hoping it's merged before the opensrf release, not necessarily by tomorrow, though |
10:47 |
berick |
we still have a little time before osrf release is cut |
10:47 |
berick |
i wouldn't complain, though ;) |
10:48 |
Dyrcona |
I'll see what I can get to today and tomorrow. I've already volunteered to test the 3.2 beta. |
10:48 |
Dyrcona |
Of course, next week is bug squashing week... |
10:50 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
10:51 |
bshum |
berick: Assuming my live tests complete successfully in a second here, I'll push your changes through and then I'd like to do a PO template sync so that I can have less breakage while testing Evergreen with i18n enabled. |
10:51 |
berick |
bshum++ |
10:52 |
bshum |
"All tests successful" yay! |
10:54 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1635354 Invoice close date perl live test - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=505e46b> |
10:54 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1774277 Acq requests live test vandelay repair - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=30a0646> |
11:00 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
11:01 |
* bshum |
assumes that more fieldmapper changes will come with the merging for ang6, etc. so I'll check for PO template sync again after we get those in. |
11:02 |
Dyrcona |
bshum++ |
11:02 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Ben Shum] Translation updates - newpot - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=46543fa> |
11:03 |
berick |
bshum: actually, no, just a single <link> fix |
11:03 |
berick |
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=bfa49a7c1ecabde6a9ce88e198fc0bf03b7de694 |
11:03 |
berick |
that's the only change |
11:04 |
bshum |
That might be okay then |
11:04 |
bshum |
It's not a string that needs to be entity-ized or whatever they call that |
11:04 |
Dyrcona |
So, think I'll go head and test websocketd without a proxy on one of my test vms with production data and the branch we'll use for our next update at CW MARS. |
11:04 |
berick |
right |
11:05 |
berick |
Dyrcona: nice. |
11:05 |
* Dyrcona |
has a selfish motive. It's a bummer having to kill apache2 processes every hour or two. |
11:08 |
Dyrcona |
Too bad we don't use cmake. We could have it automatically build websocketd for us. |
11:08 |
Dyrcona |
Or, we could add it as a git submodule, but that is less fun. |
11:16 |
Dyrcona |
I think we'll need a better way to start websocketd in the long run. |
11:27 |
berick |
yeah, not everyone wants to add service files |
11:27 |
berick |
could add it to osrf_control |
11:27 |
Dyrcona |
ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR: Suppose I need to do something about certificates? |
11:28 |
berick |
Dyrcona: https://github.com/joewalnes/websocketd/blob/master/help.go#L49 |
11:28 |
berick |
command line ops for that |
11:28 |
Dyrcona |
I was just about there. :) |
11:33 |
berick |
i wonder if we should add an optional build target in the EG makefile for building the web clients. that way if you have the -developer deps installed, a simple 'make' builds everything. no extra steps. |
11:34 |
Dyrcona |
berick: Sounds like a good idea, and websocketd appears to work. I can login at least. :) |
11:35 |
berick |
Dyrcona: oh good! as far as I know, that's the first non-proxy ssl test |
11:35 |
Dyrcona |
Hm... I suppose websocketd doesn't have to run as root because it uses a port higher than 1024. |
11:35 |
berick |
yes, i've been running as opensrf |
11:35 |
Dyrcona |
I started it with sudo out of an overabundance of caution. |
11:36 |
Dyrcona |
I didn't have to change any Apache configuration or anything in Evergreen, either. Very nice! berick++ |
11:37 |
Dyrcona |
I'll test this week and next before adding my sign off. |
11:42 |
berick |
Dyrcona++ |
11:45 |
Dyrcona |
Ah ha. I still need root because of permissions on my ssl private key file. |
11:47 |
Dyrcona |
I don't recommend changing those permissions for anyone following along at home. :) |
11:56 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
11:59 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
12:05 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
12:10 |
|
nfBurton joined #evergreen |
12:11 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
12:25 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
12:40 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
13:18 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
13:28 |
|
ohiojoe joined #evergreen |
13:45 |
ohiojoe |
good afternoon everyone, DIG meeting in 15 minutes |
13:47 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
13:49 |
ohiojoe |
testing one two three (taps mic) is this thing on? |
13:52 |
jeff |
ohiojoe: loud and clear. |
13:52 |
* kmlussier |
waves at ohiojoe |
13:52 |
ohiojoe |
excellent, thank you |
13:56 |
remingtron |
ohiojoe: I'll be lurking, but not fully engaged for today's meeting. |
13:57 |
ohiojoe |
remingtron: sounds good :-) |
14:00 |
ohiojoe |
#startmeeting 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting |
14:00 |
pinesol |
Meeting started Thu Sep 6 14:00:49 2018 US/Eastern. The chair is ohiojoe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
14:00 |
pinesol |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
14:00 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:00 |
pinesol |
The meeting name has been set to '2018_09_06___documentation_interest_group_meeting' |
14:00 |
ohiojoe |
#topic agenda |
14:00 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now agenda (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:01 |
ohiojoe |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:dig_meetings:20180906-agenda |
14:01 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Introductions: please paste "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent |
14:01 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now Introductions: please paste "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:01 |
ohiojoe |
#info ohiojoe is Joe Knueven, an Evergreen enthusiast |
14:02 |
sandbergja |
#info sandbergja is Jane Sandberg, Linn-Benton Community College |
14:02 |
remingtron |
#info remingtron is Remington Steed, Hekman Library (Calvin College) |
14:02 |
abneiman |
#info abneiman is Andrea Neiman, Equinox |
14:04 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Ongoing Business |
14:04 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now Ongoing Business (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:04 |
ohiojoe |
#topic Progress on documenting new features in Evergreen 3.1 (and previous) |
14:04 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now Progress on documenting new features in Evergreen 3.1 (and previous) (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:06 |
sandbergja |
Just a note that I'll be putting together the 3.2 release notes tonight |
14:06 |
sandbergja |
So more sweet features to look forward to! |
14:06 |
abneiman |
Not for 3.1, but I have a handful of adocs ready for some upcoming 3.2 features -- where would you like me to PR them? |
14:07 |
remingtron |
abneiman: I'd prefer a working repo branch, but github works too |
14:08 |
remingtron |
sandbergja++ #releasenotes wrangler |
14:08 |
ohiojoe |
I probably need to change that to 3.2 and previous actually.. I thought about that when I put it together.. |
14:08 |
abneiman |
remingtron: right, I meant, is there a specific directory within github where you'd like me to put them? |
14:08 |
ohiojoe |
sandbergja++ |
14:08 |
sandbergja |
abneiman++ #always does such great documentation |
14:09 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: thanks, but I can only take credit for the adoc conversion! The hard part was done by my colleagues :) |
14:10 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: would you be able to add them to the existing docs structure, and then add references to root.adoc and the other manual root files, so they show up in the official manuals? |
14:10 |
remingtron |
abneiman: oh, right, sorry. |
14:10 |
sandbergja |
I'm happy to help out if you have any questions |
14:11 |
abneiman |
sandberja: I will try! I'm still learning the docs process. Will give you a yell if needed, thanks :) |
14:11 |
sandbergja |
Sounds great! |
14:12 |
sandbergja |
I'm also wondering if I could be more helpful when putting together release notes, for the non-Equinox features |
14:13 |
sandbergja |
I'm happy to add new 3.2 features to the Documentation Needs list on the wiki as I work on the release notes |
14:13 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: I'd like to learn how to compile release notes, in case you are not available (or would like a break) |
14:14 |
sandbergja |
Also, if the release notes for a 3.2 feature seem good, is it okay if I just add them to the documentation proper, rather than the docs needs list? |
14:14 |
remingtron |
sandbergja: Yes! Streamlined! |
14:14 |
kmlussier |
sandbergja: Yes, I think there was an entry for the permission group tree that could go directly in the docs. |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: Sure! It would be great to have more backup! |
14:15 |
kmlussier |
It even came with screenshots! |
14:15 |
ohiojoe |
streamlining is rarely a bad thing |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
FYI, the release notes process is here: |
14:15 |
sandbergja |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:release_notes_process |
14:16 |
sandbergja |
also, I'm pretty new to the release notes process, kmlussier is the release notes expert! |
14:16 |
kmlussier |
sandbergja is an expert by now! :) |
14:18 |
sandbergja |
kmlussier: awww, shucks! Thanks! |
14:19 |
ohiojoe |
this feels like a good time to say thank you to you all for what you do to get docs written and out the door (colleagues included.. :-) ) |
14:19 |
ohiojoe |
with that, do we have anything else on this topic? |
14:19 |
remingtron |
everybody++ |
14:19 |
remingtron |
Just a quick note about the to-do page: |
14:19 |
remingtron |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:documentation_needs |
14:20 |
remingtron |
I've tried to add an entry for each easy/bitesize task near the top, to make it easier for new contributors to jump in |
14:20 |
remingtron |
As always, edits/improvements are welcome! |
14:22 |
sandbergja |
I like the bitesize tasks at the top! |
14:22 |
sandbergja |
remingtron++ |
14:22 |
ohiojoe |
remingtron++ |
14:22 |
ohiojoe |
I agree |
14:22 |
ohiojoe |
something I can try to jump in on once my evenings free up a bit.. |
14:23 |
sandbergja |
One question about the consolidated documentation needs page: should we eventually remove the completed parts? |
14:23 |
sandbergja |
I see a few strikethroughs from a while ago |
14:23 |
remingtron |
sandbergja: yes, I think so |
14:25 |
sandbergja |
It always feels so good when the docs needs pages on the wiki get smaller! :-D |
14:25 |
ohiojoe |
probably a good idea.. worst case, we clear those and they get added back if someone sees something new that needs done in/on that area.. |
14:28 |
ohiojoe |
well, I could try to go through there and tidy those up a bit if you all would like.. |
14:29 |
sandbergja |
ohiojoe++ # that would be super |
14:30 |
ohiojoe |
do you see any value in keeping the completed tasks listed any place else or shall I just delete them? I always get nervous about deleting things if they could have some utility to the community.. |
14:31 |
sandbergja |
I think the completed tasks are already available two places: in the wiki page history, and in the git commits of the actual doumentation files in the repository |
14:31 |
ohiojoe |
excellent, delete it is then.. |
14:32 |
ohiojoe |
#action ohiojoe will tidy up the Evergreen Documentation Needs page |
14:32 |
ohiojoe |
ok, do we have anything else here? |
14:32 |
remingtron |
one more quick thing |
14:32 |
ohiojoe |
please :-) |
14:33 |
remingtron |
If anyone wants to review docs that someone else has already written, check the to-do page for the "Fix me!" flag |
14:34 |
remingtron |
I've been using that flag for drafts that have been shared but not committed yet |
14:34 |
remingtron |
that's all! |
14:35 |
ohiojoe |
and with that, it looks like it's time to jump to one on one and small group collaboration.. |
14:35 |
sandbergja |
Yay! I'm excited! |
14:35 |
ohiojoe |
#topic one on one and small group collaboration on documentation |
14:35 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now one on one and small group collaboration on documentation (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting) |
14:35 |
ohiojoe |
I figured we should stay "in session" since we agreed that this would be part of the meeting |
14:36 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: do you want to work together on something? Either release note process or getting your adoc into the structure of the docs folder? |
14:37 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: sure, how about we try the latter? |
14:38 |
abneiman |
The first one I have is Batch Actions, which belongs under OPAC |
14:39 |
remingtron |
ohiojoe: I'm not able to grab a task right now, but you can ping me if you get stuck on anything. |
14:40 |
sandbergja |
So, I would say that it should be included in both the OPAC manual and the consolidated manual |
14:40 |
sandbergja |
So, it would be a three-step process |
14:40 |
ohiojoe |
remingtron: thank you. I was thinking I'd see if I can get anything started on one of those bite sized tasks.. |
14:40 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
14:41 |
sandbergja |
1) add your adoc to an appropriate folder (Evergreen/docs/opac seems good) |
14:41 |
sandbergja |
2) add a reference to that file in docs/root.adoc for the consolidated manual |
14:41 |
sandbergja |
3) add a reference to your file in docs/root_opac.adoc to add it to the OPAC manual |
14:42 |
abneiman |
ok, proceeding |
14:48 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: done |
14:49 |
abneiman |
no wait, skipped a step |
14:50 |
abneiman |
NOW done |
14:51 |
sandbergja |
abneiman++ |
14:51 |
sandbergja |
Yay! |
14:51 |
abneiman |
does it look correct from your end? |
14:56 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: let me see |
14:57 |
abneiman |
sandbergja++ |
15:00 |
sandbergja |
abneiman: I'm just not sure about one thing |
15:01 |
sandbergja |
I didn't see the screenshots in the docs/media folder, and I didn't see a pull request of yours adding them. But they are showing up just fine here: https://github.com/evergreen-library-system/Evergreen/pull/64? |
15:01 |
sandbergja |
Did I miss where you added those screenshots to the repository? |
15:02 |
abneiman |
sandbergja: I added them as attachments on the pullrequest in github, which is how I'd been told to do it? |
15:02 |
abneiman |
If a separate PR to docs/media is preferred I can do that |
15:02 |
sandbergja |
Oh, interesting! I just don |
15:02 |
sandbergja |
^ I didn't know about those |
15:03 |
sandbergja |
I think we're probably good, then. :-) |
15:03 |
abneiman |
cool! that was less intimidating that I thought it would be. Thanks for your help! sandbergja++ |
15:03 |
ohiojoe |
abneiman++ |
15:03 |
ohiojoe |
sandbergja++ |
15:03 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
15:04 |
ohiojoe |
and with that, I'm going to go ahead and close the meeting. feel free to keep collaborating if you have time.. :-) |
15:04 |
ohiojoe |
#endmeeting |
15:04 |
|
Topic for #evergreen is now Welcome to the #evergreen library system channel! | We are publicly logged: http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen | Large pastes at http://paste.evergreen-ils.org | Can't speak? Make sure your nickname is registered and that you are identified to freenode services: https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration |
15:04 |
pinesol |
Meeting ended Thu Sep 6 15:04:48 2018 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
15:04 |
pinesol |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.html |
15:04 |
pinesol |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.txt |
15:04 |
pinesol |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.log.html |
15:05 |
abneiman |
ohiojoe++ |
15:05 |
remingtron |
ohiojoe++ |
15:05 |
sandbergja |
ohiojoe++ |
15:05 |
abneiman |
sandberja: I have to go do other things, but I'll put the other set I have up sometime today. |
15:06 |
ohiojoe |
Thank you for participating. This looks like it's going to be a good change for DIG. We'll just need to get more folks out for the fun.. |
15:06 |
sandbergja |
For release peeps (and git-oriented docs peeps): I just created a collab working branch for the 3.2 release notes: collab/sandbergja/release_notes_3_2 |
15:07 |
abneiman |
ohiojoe: do you mind putting DIG on the community calendar as a regular, recurring event? That might help with turnout. |
15:07 |
sandbergja |
Here's a link: http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/sandbergja/release_notes_3_2 |
15:07 |
ohiojoe |
abneiman: I thought I'd done that.. I'll go back and make sure it gets on there |
15:07 |
berick |
sandbergja++ |
15:38 |
berick |
gmcharlt: FYI, I just pushed to a separate branch support for building browser clients via Evergreen 'make'. |
15:38 |
berick |
http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/berick/lp1775466-ang6-base-app-3.2-squash-plus-makefile |
15:38 |
gmcharlt |
berick: noted, thanks |
15:38 |
gmcharlt |
I'm about to push my ang6 signoff branch |
15:38 |
berick |
i could see putting that into a separate bug or merging along with the ang6 stuff -- in any event, it might be helpful |
15:38 |
gmcharlt |
only additional patch will be a change to the release notes |
15:38 |
berick |
gmcharlt: yeah, don't let me distract you |
15:38 |
* berick |
nods |
15:39 |
gmcharlt |
wait, I lie |
15:39 |
gmcharlt |
there will be another one for syncing the navbars |
15:39 |
berick |
k |
15:40 |
berick |
i'll push my makefile changes to a new branch |
15:40 |
berick |
er, a new LP |
16:01 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
16:10 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
16:25 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
16:47 |
gmcharlt |
berick: et. al. - I've pushed a signoff branch for bug 1775466 and am +1 for merging it for the beta |
16:47 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1775466 in Evergreen "Angular6 Base Application" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1775466 |
16:48 |
berick |
gmcharlt++ |
16:50 |
berick |
things have been pretty quiet today, so I see no need to delay much more. i'm going to reivew gmcharlt's branch and do a few more tests then merge unless I hear otherwise in the next 30 mins or so |
17:17 |
|
mmorgan1 left #evergreen |
17:21 |
gmcharlt |
berick: are you planning on merging the disable-XUL branch, assuming nobody jumps in right away to give it third-eyes? |
17:22 |
berick |
gmcharlt: i certainly can |
17:22 |
* Dyrcona |
should do that, but the weather changed and I now have a headache. |
17:22 |
gmcharlt |
reason I'm asking - once ang6 is merged and disable-XUL is merged, I can put bug 1791162 through its paces and mereg (unless I find problems) |
17:22 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1791162 in Evergreen "Support building the browser client via Evergreen 'make'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791162 |
17:23 |
berick |
gmcharlt: righto, i'll have them both merged within the next 15 minutes |
17:23 |
gmcharlt |
and.... if it's OK with you, tack on a further change to set SKIP_XUL=YES in make_release |
17:23 |
gmcharlt |
(missed thinking of that yesterday) |
17:23 |
berick |
gmcharlt: and that branch may need the 'rm -rf' additions you added (in the make clean's) |
17:24 |
berick |
+1 to skip_xul=yes |
17:24 |
gmcharlt |
berick: ah, indeed |
17:25 |
Dyrcona |
If you want someone to test a 3.2 beta branch before making a tarball, I can probably manage that. |
17:26 |
berick |
Dyrcona: a final set of eyes before tarballin' would certainly be appreciated |
17:27 |
Dyrcona |
I have a clean VM that I prepared for next week. I'll use that. |
17:31 |
berick |
gmcharlt: merged |
17:31 |
* berick |
exhales |
17:32 |
pinesol |
Showing latest 5 of 18 commits to Evergreen... |
17:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1775466 Stamping DB upgrade for Ang6 app - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=81324a8> |
17:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: disable XUL staff client by default - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=23fd5ef> |
17:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: make_release no longer munges STAMP_ID in the README - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=e3032ad> |
17:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: adjust or remove references to old staff client in install doc - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9d2ddf6> |
17:32 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: add release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0469a1c> |
17:53 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
17:55 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
18:22 |
gmcharlt |
berick: I've done my testing of bug 1791162 |
18:22 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1791162 in Evergreen "Support building the browser client via Evergreen 'make'" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791162 |
18:23 |
gmcharlt |
I've left a comment, but I think this needs a bit more baking time and should be left for the RC |
18:23 |
gmcharlt |
and for the purpose of the beta build, leave make_release as it is; build masters can just supply -x to skip building the XUL client |
18:29 |
Dyrcona |
:) |
18:30 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
18:33 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt++ berick++ |
18:33 |
Dyrcona |
headache-- |
18:40 |
|
rsulejmani joined #evergreen |
18:41 |
rsulejmani |
I can't access the Staff web portal it gives me a 403 Forbidden error |
18:45 |
gmcharlt |
Dyrcona: berick: did run into bug 1791184 and wrote a patch |
18:45 |
pinesol |
Launchpad bug 1791184 in Evergreen "'make clean' removes pingest.pl" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791184 |
18:46 |
Dyrcona |
rsulejmani: That sounds.... |
18:48 |
Dyrcona |
Oops! I missed that comment, and I never run make clean. Well, almost never. |
18:54 |
Dyrcona |
Works for me! |
18:58 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1791184: ensure that 'make clean' doesn't delete pingest.pl - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=bb8c14f> |
18:59 |
Dyrcona |
@later tell rsulejmani It sounds like you are either running Apache as the wrong user or your files are not owned by the proper user. We'll need more information to determine which, or if it is something else. |
18:59 |
pinesol |
Dyrcona: The operation succeeded. |
19:02 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
19:04 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
19:05 |
|
dluch joined #evergreen |
19:05 |
|
Bmagic joined #evergreen |
19:05 |
|
foobarrel joined #evergreen |
20:14 |
pinesol |
Showing latest 5 of 6 commits to Evergreen... |
20:14 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: adding translators to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=689e9af> |
20:14 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] More additions to the 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0f68495> |
20:15 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: Adding two more entries to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=43e0db0> |
20:15 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: adding more contributor info to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b7abce6> |
20:15 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: merge 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9e58a1d> |
20:27 |
pinesol |
[evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: spellchecking 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=832c606> |
21:30 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
21:49 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |