Evergreen ILS Website

IRC log for #evergreen, 2018-09-06

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat

All times shown according to the server's local time.

Time Nick Message
06:32 pinesol News from qatests: Failed Running perl live tests <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live>
06:32 pinesol News from qatests: Failed Log Output: osrfsys.log - Expected 3 errors but encountered 7. <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live>
06:54 agoben joined #evergreen
07:07 Dyrcona joined #evergreen
07:10 rjackson_isl joined #evergreen
07:36 rlefaive joined #evergreen
07:41 JBoyer kmlussier++
07:41 JBoyer berick++
07:41 JBoyer gmcharlt++
07:41 JBoyer (catching up from the meeting I had to bail on)
08:21 collum joined #evergreen
08:38 mmorgan joined #evergreen
08:46 jvwoolf joined #evergreen
08:50 aabbee joined #evergreen
09:11 rjackson_isl HELP! trying to rollback some mismerges and need to reingest a few thousand bibs
09:11 rjackson_isl trying this: select metabib.reingest_record_attributes( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not undeleted order by sub_bibid limit 1;
09:11 rjackson_isl but it doesn't work as is
09:17 mmorgan rjackson_isl: Did you really mean "not undeleted" ?
09:18 rjackson_isl I have a flag in the table named undeleted
09:18 rjackson_isl bad choice of column name?
09:19 rjackson_isl let me rename it to something like bibundel
09:19 mmorgan How is it failing, are you getting an error, or it is not making any changes?
09:19 rjackson_isl it just spins
09:19 csharp so by "mismerges" to you mean that an automated process merged bibs that shouldn't have been merged, or something else?
09:19 csharp s/to/do/
09:20 rjackson_isl yeah - after a migration we mismerged via scripts
09:20 csharp ah
09:20 rjackson_isl :(
09:20 csharp do you have a snapshot of those records pre-merge?
09:20 rjackson_isl yeah - on our sandbox
09:20 csharp bibs/call_numbers/copies
09:21 rjackson_isl have temp tables set up for call numbers and holds to be updated
09:21 rjackson_isl but need to reinstate bibs
09:21 csharp @seen abowling
09:21 pinesol csharp: abowling was last seen in #evergreen 7 weeks, 2 days, 18 hours, and 57 seconds ago: <abowling> miker: figures! one of these days, we're gonna get a single browser that does everything "correctly" :)
09:22 csharp abowling had to do similar work after a migration back in the spring and may have some tools to share
09:22 rjackson_isl ++csharp
09:22 Dyrcona rjackson_isl: How many bibs are you talking about? What do you mean "it just spins?"
09:22 rjackson_isl I thnk JBoyer has the logic I just am lacking in the how to execute!
09:23 rjackson_isl with the example I provided it should have only been one
09:23 rjackson_isl (limit 1)
09:23 mmorgan I'm still hung up on "not undeleted" That means to me that you're looking for deleted bibs, unless I'm misunderstanding your local column
09:23 rjackson_isl and Jboyer is offsite for most of the day
09:24 rjackson_isl added the column to the driver table local.bad_merges with default 'f'
09:24 rjackson_isl bool falg
09:25 rjackson_isl s/falg/flag
09:25 Dyrcona rjackson_isl: That limit is irrelevant. With the order by, it could still take a long time to find a record if there are a lot of them and no indexes.
09:25 rjackson_isl driver has 2652 entries
09:26 csharp yeah, might need to add indexes to the working tables so you can find things more quickly
09:26 Dyrcona Also, how long are you waiting before giving up?
09:26 rjackson_isl for the limit 1 I waited a couple of minutes
09:26 rjackson_isl updating the table to reset the flag with the order by is simlutaneous
09:27 rjackson_isl sorry for the extended post:
09:27 rjackson_isl begin;
09:27 rjackson_isl update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id  in (select sub_bibid from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1) and deleted = 't';
09:27 rjackson_isl select metabib.reingest_record_attributes( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1;
09:27 rjackson_isl select metabib.reingest_metabib_field_entries( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1;
09:27 rjackson_isl select metabib.reingest_metabib_full_rec( sub_bibid ) from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1;
09:27 rjackson_isl update local.bad_merges set bibundel = 't' where sub_bibid in (select sub_bibid from local.bad_merges where not bibundel order by sub_bibid limit 1);
09:27 rjackson_isl --commit;
09:27 rjackson_isl IO started at limit 10 but that was a no go so I went with limit 1 and still didn't work
09:27 rjackson_isl thinking that the function call is not liking my syntax
09:29 Dyrcona How many rows in config.attr_definition?
09:30 yboston joined #evergreen
09:31 rjackson_isl don't seem to have that table?
09:31 csharp rjackson_isl: you might consider breaking them into a file with individual reingest calls for each bib id
09:32 Dyrcona Sorry, config.record_attr_definition.
09:32 rjackson_isl yeah - I was trying that and got hung up on the sql to create sql :(
09:32 csharp reingest takes a while for each record
09:32 rjackson_isl 820
09:34 Dyrcona Did you run that script as you pasted it?
09:34 Dyrcona If so, replace the commented out commit with a rollback.
09:35 rjackson_isl I tried once (except column was undeleted not bibundel
09:35 Dyrcona I think you're spinning because you never end the transaction.
09:35 rjackson_isl I did the rollback(s)
09:35 rjackson_isl I always start with --commit; to be on the safge side
09:35 Dyrcona Start with rollback to be on the safe side.
09:36 Dyrcona Then change rollback to commit when you're sure.
09:36 rjackson_isl ++
09:36 * Dyrcona looks up a flag...
09:37 rjackson_isl I could go this route if I knew the syntax for delimiting/escaping from the command line
09:37 rjackson_isl select $$update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id = $$||sub_bibid||$$ and deleted = 't';$$ from local.bad_merges;
09:38 rjackson_isl that would get me the individual commands per bib id
09:40 Dyrcona You do that with a script, too, as jeff suggested.
09:40 Dyrcona Sorry, must have been csharp. ;)
09:41 * Dyrcona is lost in the scrollback.
09:41 rjackson_isl Ringht - but I am lacking in the syntax to pipe to sql to get the commands out of the database using the driver table
09:42 Dyrcona rjackson_isl: Do you know how to concatenate strings in SQL, ie, 'select metabib.reingest_metabib_field(' || sub_bibid || ') ....'?
09:42 rjackson_isl right I was trying this
09:42 rjackson_isl echo "$$update biblio.record_entry set deleted = 'f', active = 't' where id = $$||sub_bibid||$$ and deleted = 't';$$ from local.bad_merges;"|psql -U Uname -h dbname > reinstate_sql.txt
09:43 rjackson_isl doesn't like and I tries adding \ in front of $ and still no go - not sure where it is getting lost in translation :(
09:44 rjackson_isl the statement itself from within psql works to genereate the desired sql
09:44 Dyrcona No. Writ a SQL select script that selects a string for each row in the table, run it with psql with the -A and -t options, then pipe it to an output file.
09:45 Dyrcona To make it easier on yourself, use true and false instead of 't' and 'f'.
09:46 rjackson_isl ++ that might do the trick!
09:46 rjackson_isl Dyrcona++
09:46 Dyrcona You'll want a select for sql command you want to run, and I wouldn't worry about the order too much.
09:46 Dyrcona for each sql command..
09:59 * berick preps a perl live test fix patch
10:02 rlefaive_ joined #evergreen
10:02 rjackson_isl oh joy a couple of duplicate tcn values trying to udelete the bibs - off to find and change those to uniqueness!
10:04 Dyrcona Was the merge matching on a field related to the tcn, i.e. 001 or 035?
10:05 rjackson_isl sorry - I didn't participate in the merge portion
10:07 kmlussier joined #evergreen
10:30 berick ok perl live test fixes pushed:
10:30 berick http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/E​vergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/user​/berick/perl-live-test-failure-2018-09-06
10:30 berick 2 commits -- test/sign-off/merge volunteer needed
10:31 bshum berick++
10:33 Dyrcona The closed_date is new in 3.2/master, right?
10:34 bshum Looks like it
10:35 berick yes
10:35 berick ditto the other fix
10:38 Dyrcona I can test the tests in a few.
10:40 Dyrcona Oh, I hear off stage voices telling me that someone is going to test the branch with the ansible installer.
10:41 berick Dyrcona: heads up, I had some problems w/ my ansible installer yesterday...
10:41 berick the 'npm' command is acting funky
10:41 Dyrcona Heh. npm always acts funky.
10:41 Dyrcona I couldn't use npm update for a while recently. 404 errors.
10:42 Dyrcona Later that day, it worked just fine.
10:42 berick possible https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/26582
10:42 berick *possibly
10:43 Dyrcona Mine looked like this: https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/13490
10:44 Dyrcona But, I don't think it was that, exactly, because it fixed itself when the CDN got itself sorted out.
10:44 berick for my ansible issue, running "npm install" by hand allowed me to complete the install
10:44 bshum Well my ansible run hasn't died quite yet.  So I'm waiting to see where it lands me then.
10:44 Bmagic rjackson_isl: what about auditor.biblio_record_entry_history?
10:45 Dyrcona I haven't looked at the ansible installer, but plan to do so soonish.
10:45 berick I'll have a number of branches to merge once 3.2. and new opensrf are released
10:45 rjackson_isl aren't going that route since we had a before image on our migration server just loaded
10:45 Bmagic right on
10:45 rjackson_isl almost finished with the cleanup now
10:45 berick ang6 stuff, websocketd stuff, remove xul client building
10:45 Bmagic oh good
10:45 rjackson_isl bibs have been undeleted and reingested
10:46 rjackson_isl just need to flip call numbers and title level holds
10:46 Dyrcona I also plan to look at websocketd. Did you want to merge it in for the beta release tomorrow?
10:47 bshum Gah
10:47 bshum fm_IDL.xml changes
10:47 bshum I guess my ansible install is going to blow up anyways cause of i18n problems
10:47 berick Dyrcona: well, hoping it's merged before the opensrf release, not necessarily by tomorrow, though
10:47 berick we still have a little time before osrf release is cut
10:47 berick i wouldn't complain, though ;)
10:48 Dyrcona I'll see what I can get to today and tomorrow. I've already volunteered to test the 3.2 beta.
10:48 Dyrcona Of course, next week is bug squashing week...
10:50 Christineb joined #evergreen
10:51 bshum berick: Assuming my live tests complete successfully in a second here, I'll push your changes through and then I'd like to do a PO template sync so that I can have less breakage while testing Evergreen with i18n enabled.
10:51 berick bshum++
10:52 bshum "All tests successful" yay!
10:54 pinesol [evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1635354 Invoice close date perl live test - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=505e46b>
10:54 pinesol [evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1774277 Acq requests live test vandelay repair - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=30a0646>
11:00 khuckins_ joined #evergreen
11:01 * bshum assumes that more fieldmapper changes will come with the merging for ang6, etc. so I'll check for PO template sync again after we get those in.
11:02 Dyrcona bshum++
11:02 pinesol [evergreen|Ben Shum] Translation updates - newpot - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=46543fa>
11:03 berick bshum: actually, no, just a single <link> fix
11:03 berick http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=worki​ng/Evergreen.git;a=commitdiff;h=bfa49​a7c1ecabde6a9ce88e198fc0bf03b7de694
11:03 berick that's the only change
11:04 bshum That might be okay then
11:04 bshum It's not a string that needs to be entity-ized or whatever they call that
11:04 Dyrcona So, think I'll go head and test websocketd without a proxy on one of my test vms with production data and the branch we'll use for our next update at CW MARS.
11:04 berick right
11:05 berick Dyrcona: nice.
11:05 * Dyrcona has a selfish motive. It's a bummer having to kill apache2 processes every hour or two.
11:08 Dyrcona Too bad we don't use cmake. We could have it automatically build websocketd for us.
11:08 Dyrcona Or, we could add it as a git submodule, but that is less fun.
11:16 Dyrcona I think we'll need a better way to start websocketd in the long run.
11:27 berick yeah, not everyone wants to add service files
11:27 berick could add it to osrf_control
11:27 Dyrcona ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR: Suppose I need to do something about certificates?
11:28 berick Dyrcona: https://github.com/joewalnes/web​socketd/blob/master/help.go#L49
11:28 berick command line ops for that
11:28 Dyrcona I was just about there. :)
11:33 berick i wonder if we should add an optional build target in the EG makefile for building the web clients.  that way if you have the -developer deps installed, a simple 'make' builds everything.  no extra steps.
11:34 Dyrcona berick: Sounds like a good idea, and websocketd appears to work. I can login at least. :)
11:35 berick Dyrcona: oh good!  as far as I know, that's the first non-proxy ssl test
11:35 Dyrcona Hm... I suppose websocketd doesn't have to run as root because it uses a port higher than 1024.
11:35 berick yes, i've been running as opensrf
11:35 Dyrcona I started it with sudo out of an overabundance of caution.
11:36 Dyrcona I didn't have to change any Apache configuration or anything in Evergreen, either. Very nice! berick++
11:37 Dyrcona I'll test this week and next before adding my sign off.
11:42 berick Dyrcona++
11:45 Dyrcona Ah ha. I still need root because of permissions on my ssl private key file.
11:47 Dyrcona I don't recommend changing those permissions for anyone following along at home. :)
11:56 khuckins_ joined #evergreen
11:59 rlefaive joined #evergreen
12:05 yboston joined #evergreen
12:10 nfBurton joined #evergreen
12:11 jihpringle joined #evergreen
12:25 rlefaive joined #evergreen
12:40 yboston joined #evergreen
13:18 bdljohn joined #evergreen
13:28 ohiojoe joined #evergreen
13:45 ohiojoe good afternoon everyone, DIG meeting in 15 minutes
13:47 sandbergja joined #evergreen
13:49 ohiojoe testing one two three (taps mic) is this thing on?
13:52 jeff ohiojoe: loud and clear.
13:52 * kmlussier waves at ohiojoe
13:52 ohiojoe excellent, thank you
13:56 remingtron ohiojoe: I'll be lurking, but not fully engaged for today's meeting.
13:57 ohiojoe remingtron:  sounds good :-)
14:00 ohiojoe #startmeeting 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting
14:00 pinesol Meeting started Thu Sep  6 14:00:49 2018 US/Eastern.  The chair is ohiojoe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00 pinesol Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00 Topic for #evergreen is now  (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:00 pinesol The meeting name has been set to '2018_09_06___documentatio​n_interest_group_meeting'
14:00 ohiojoe #topic agenda
14:00 Topic for #evergreen is now agenda (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:01 ohiojoe #link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=​evergreen-docs:dig_meetings:20180906-agenda
14:01 ohiojoe #topic Introductions: please paste "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent
14:01 Topic for #evergreen is now Introductions: please paste "#info <username> is <name> <affiliation>" to identify who you are and what organization, if any, you represent (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:01 ohiojoe #info ohiojoe is Joe Knueven,  an Evergreen enthusiast
14:02 sandbergja #info sandbergja is Jane Sandberg, Linn-Benton Community College
14:02 remingtron #info remingtron is Remington Steed, Hekman Library (Calvin College)
14:02 abneiman #info abneiman is Andrea Neiman, Equinox
14:04 ohiojoe #topic Ongoing Business
14:04 Topic for #evergreen is now Ongoing Business (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:04 ohiojoe #topic Progress on documenting new features in Evergreen 3.1 (and previous)
14:04 Topic for #evergreen is now Progress on documenting new features in Evergreen 3.1 (and previous) (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:06 sandbergja Just a note that I'll be putting together the 3.2 release notes tonight
14:06 sandbergja So more sweet features to look forward to!
14:06 abneiman Not for 3.1, but I have a handful of adocs ready for some upcoming 3.2 features -- where would you like me to PR them?
14:07 remingtron abneiman: I'd prefer a working repo branch, but github works too
14:08 remingtron sandbergja++ #releasenotes wrangler
14:08 ohiojoe I probably need to change that to 3.2 and previous actually..  I thought about that when I put it together..
14:08 abneiman remingtron: right, I meant, is there a specific directory within github where you'd like me to put them?
14:08 ohiojoe sandbergja++
14:08 sandbergja abneiman++ #always does such great documentation
14:09 abneiman sandbergja: thanks, but I can only take credit for the adoc conversion!  The hard part was done by my colleagues :)
14:10 sandbergja abneiman: would you be able to add them to the existing docs structure, and then add references to root.adoc and the other manual root files, so they show up in the official manuals?
14:10 remingtron abneiman: oh, right, sorry.
14:10 sandbergja I'm happy to help out if you have any questions
14:11 abneiman sandberja: I will try! I'm still learning the docs process.  Will give you a yell if needed, thanks :)
14:11 sandbergja Sounds great!
14:12 sandbergja I'm also wondering if I could be more helpful when putting together release notes, for the non-Equinox features
14:13 sandbergja I'm happy to add new 3.2 features to the Documentation Needs list on the wiki as I work on the release notes
14:13 abneiman sandbergja: I'd like to learn how to compile release notes, in case you are not available (or would like a break)
14:14 sandbergja Also, if the release notes for a 3.2 feature seem good, is it okay if I just add them to the documentation proper, rather than the docs needs list?
14:14 remingtron sandbergja: Yes! Streamlined!
14:14 kmlussier sandbergja: Yes, I think there was an entry for the permission group tree that could go directly in the docs.
14:15 sandbergja abneiman: Sure!  It would be great to have more backup!
14:15 kmlussier It even came with screenshots!
14:15 ohiojoe streamlining is rarely a bad thing
14:15 sandbergja FYI, the release notes process is here:
14:15 sandbergja #link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?​id=evergreen-docs:release_notes_process
14:16 sandbergja also, I'm pretty new to the release notes process, kmlussier is the release notes expert!
14:16 kmlussier sandbergja is an expert by now! :)
14:18 sandbergja kmlussier: awww, shucks!  Thanks!
14:19 ohiojoe this feels like a good time to say thank you to you all for what you do to get docs written and out the door  (colleagues included.. :-)  )
14:19 ohiojoe with that, do we have anything else on this topic?
14:19 remingtron everybody++
14:19 remingtron Just a quick note about the to-do page:
14:19 remingtron #link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php​?id=evergreen-docs:documentation_needs
14:20 remingtron I've tried to add an entry for each easy/bitesize task near the top, to make it easier for new contributors to jump in
14:20 remingtron As always, edits/improvements are welcome!
14:22 sandbergja I like the bitesize tasks at the top!
14:22 sandbergja remingtron++
14:22 ohiojoe remingtron++
14:22 ohiojoe I agree
14:22 ohiojoe something I can try to jump in on once my evenings free up a bit..
14:23 sandbergja One question about the consolidated documentation needs page: should we eventually remove the completed parts?
14:23 sandbergja I see a few strikethroughs from a while ago
14:23 remingtron sandbergja: yes, I think so
14:25 sandbergja It always feels so good when the docs needs pages on the wiki get smaller! :-D
14:25 ohiojoe probably a good idea..  worst case, we clear those and they get added back if someone sees something new that needs done in/on that area..
14:28 ohiojoe well, I could try to go through there and tidy those up a bit if you all would like..
14:29 sandbergja ohiojoe++ # that would be super
14:30 ohiojoe do you see any value in keeping the completed tasks listed any place else or shall I just delete them?  I always get nervous about deleting things if they could have some utility to the community..
14:31 sandbergja I think the completed tasks are already available two places: in the wiki page history, and in the git commits of the actual doumentation files in the repository
14:31 ohiojoe excellent, delete it is then..
14:32 ohiojoe #action ohiojoe will tidy up the Evergreen Documentation Needs page
14:32 ohiojoe ok, do we have anything else here?
14:32 remingtron one more quick thing
14:32 ohiojoe please :-)
14:33 remingtron If anyone wants to review docs that someone else has already written, check the to-do page for the "Fix me!" flag
14:34 remingtron I've been using that flag for drafts that have been shared but not committed yet
14:34 remingtron that's all!
14:35 ohiojoe and with that, it looks like it's time to jump to one on one and small group collaboration..
14:35 sandbergja Yay!  I'm excited!
14:35 ohiojoe #topic one on one and small group collaboration on documentation
14:35 Topic for #evergreen is now one on one and small group collaboration on documentation (Meeting topic: 2018-09-06 – Documentation Interest Group Meeting)
14:35 ohiojoe I figured we should stay "in session" since we agreed that this would be part of the meeting
14:36 sandbergja abneiman: do you want to work together on something?  Either release note process or getting your adoc into the structure of the docs folder?
14:37 abneiman sandbergja: sure, how about we try the latter?
14:38 abneiman The first one I have is Batch Actions, which belongs under OPAC
14:39 remingtron ohiojoe: I'm not able to grab a task right now, but you can ping me if you get stuck on anything.
14:40 sandbergja So, I would say that it should be included in both the OPAC manual and the consolidated manual
14:40 sandbergja So, it would be a three-step process
14:40 ohiojoe remingtron:  thank you.  I was thinking I'd see if I can get anything started on one of those bite sized tasks..
14:40 khuckins_ joined #evergreen
14:41 sandbergja 1) add your adoc to an appropriate folder (Evergreen/docs/opac seems good)
14:41 sandbergja 2) add a reference to that file in docs/root.adoc for the consolidated manual
14:41 sandbergja 3) add a reference to your file in docs/root_opac.adoc to add it to the OPAC manual
14:42 abneiman ok, proceeding
14:48 abneiman sandbergja: done
14:49 abneiman no wait, skipped a step
14:50 abneiman NOW done
14:51 sandbergja abneiman++
14:51 sandbergja Yay!
14:51 abneiman does it look correct from your end?
14:56 sandbergja abneiman: let me see
14:57 abneiman sandbergja++
15:00 sandbergja abneiman: I'm just not sure about one thing
15:01 sandbergja I didn't see the screenshots in the docs/media folder, and I didn't see a pull request of yours adding them.  But they are showing up just fine here: https://github.com/evergreen-li​brary-system/Evergreen/pull/64?
15:01 sandbergja Did I miss where you added those screenshots to the repository?
15:02 abneiman sandbergja: I added them as attachments on the pullrequest in github, which is how I'd been told to do it?
15:02 abneiman If a separate PR to docs/media is preferred I can do that
15:02 sandbergja Oh, interesting!  I just don
15:02 sandbergja ^ I didn't know about those
15:03 sandbergja I think we're probably good, then. :-)
15:03 abneiman cool!  that was less intimidating that I thought it would be.  Thanks for your help!  sandbergja++
15:03 ohiojoe abneiman++
15:03 ohiojoe sandbergja++
15:03 mmorgan1 joined #evergreen
15:04 ohiojoe and with that, I'm going to go ahead and close the meeting.  feel free to keep collaborating if you have time.. :-)
15:04 ohiojoe #endmeeting
15:04 Topic for #evergreen is now Welcome to the #evergreen library system channel! | We are publicly logged: http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen | Large pastes at http://paste.evergreen-ils.org | Can't speak? Make sure your nickname is registered and that you are identified to freenode services: https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration
15:04 pinesol Meeting ended Thu Sep  6 15:04:48 2018 US/Eastern.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
15:04 pinesol Minutes:        http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergr​een/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.html
15:04 pinesol Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergr​een/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.txt
15:04 pinesol Log:            http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergree​n/2018/evergreen.2018-09-06-14.00.log.html
15:05 abneiman ohiojoe++
15:05 remingtron ohiojoe++
15:05 sandbergja ohiojoe++
15:05 abneiman sandberja: I have to go do other things, but I'll put the other set I have up sometime today.
15:06 ohiojoe Thank you for participating.  This looks like it's going to be a good change for DIG.  We'll just need to get more folks out for the fun..
15:06 sandbergja For release peeps (and git-oriented docs peeps): I just created a collab working branch for the 3.2 release notes: collab/sandbergja/release_notes_3_2
15:07 abneiman ohiojoe: do you mind putting DIG on the community calendar as a regular, recurring event?  That might help with turnout.
15:07 sandbergja Here's a link: http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=workin​g/Evergreen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/head​s/collab/sandbergja/release_notes_3_2
15:07 ohiojoe abneiman:  I thought I'd done that..  I'll go back and make sure it gets on there
15:07 berick sandbergja++
15:38 berick gmcharlt: FYI, I just pushed to a separate branch support for building browser clients via Evergreen 'make'.
15:38 berick http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=working/Evergre​en.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/collab/berick/lp​1775466-ang6-base-app-3.2-squash-plus-makefile
15:38 gmcharlt berick: noted, thanks
15:38 gmcharlt I'm about to push my ang6 signoff branch
15:38 berick i could see putting that into a separate bug or merging along with the ang6 stuff -- in any event, it might be helpful
15:38 gmcharlt only additional patch will be a change to the release notes
15:38 berick gmcharlt: yeah, don't let me distract you
15:38 * berick nods
15:39 gmcharlt wait, I lie
15:39 gmcharlt there will be another one for syncing the navbars
15:39 berick k
15:40 berick i'll push my makefile changes to a new branch
15:40 berick er, a new LP
16:01 khuckins joined #evergreen
16:10 khuckins_ joined #evergreen
16:25 yboston joined #evergreen
16:47 gmcharlt berick: et. al. - I've pushed a signoff branch for bug 1775466 and am +1 for merging it for the beta
16:47 pinesol Launchpad bug 1775466 in Evergreen "Angular6 Base Application" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1775466
16:48 berick gmcharlt++
16:50 berick things have been pretty quiet today, so I see no need to delay much more.  i'm going to reivew gmcharlt's branch and do a few more tests then merge unless I hear otherwise in the next 30 mins or so
17:17 mmorgan1 left #evergreen
17:21 gmcharlt berick: are you planning on merging the disable-XUL branch, assuming nobody jumps in right away to give it third-eyes?
17:22 berick gmcharlt: i certainly can
17:22 * Dyrcona should do that, but the weather changed and I now have a headache.
17:22 gmcharlt reason I'm asking - once ang6 is merged and disable-XUL is merged, I can put bug 1791162 through its paces and mereg (unless I find problems)
17:22 pinesol Launchpad bug 1791162 in Evergreen "Support building the browser client via Evergreen 'make'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791162
17:23 berick gmcharlt: righto, i'll have them both merged within the next 15 minutes
17:23 gmcharlt and.... if it's OK with you, tack on a further change to set SKIP_XUL=YES in make_release
17:23 gmcharlt (missed thinking of that yesterday)
17:23 berick gmcharlt: and that branch may need the 'rm -rf' additions you added (in the make clean's)
17:24 berick +1 to skip_xul=yes
17:24 gmcharlt berick: ah, indeed
17:25 Dyrcona If you want someone to test a 3.2 beta branch before making a tarball, I can probably manage that.
17:26 berick Dyrcona: a final set of eyes before tarballin' would certainly be appreciated
17:27 Dyrcona I have a clean VM that I prepared for next week. I'll use that.
17:31 berick gmcharlt: merged
17:31 * berick exhales
17:32 pinesol Showing latest 5 of 18 commits to Evergreen...
17:32 pinesol [evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1775466 Stamping DB upgrade for Ang6 app - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=81324a8>
17:32 pinesol [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: disable XUL staff client by default - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=23fd5ef>
17:32 pinesol [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: make_release no longer munges STAMP_ID in the README - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=e3032ad>
17:32 pinesol [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: adjust or remove references to old staff client in install doc - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9d2ddf6>
17:32 pinesol [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1790923: add release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0469a1c>
17:53 sandbergja joined #evergreen
17:55 khuckins joined #evergreen
18:22 gmcharlt berick: I've done my testing of bug 1791162
18:22 pinesol Launchpad bug 1791162 in Evergreen "Support building the browser client via Evergreen 'make'" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791162
18:23 gmcharlt I've left a comment, but I think this needs a bit more baking time and should be left for the RC
18:23 gmcharlt and for the purpose of the beta build, leave make_release as it is; build masters can just supply -x to skip building the XUL client
18:29 Dyrcona :)
18:30 pinesol News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live>
18:33 Dyrcona gmcharlt++ berick++
18:33 Dyrcona headache--
18:40 rsulejmani joined #evergreen
18:41 rsulejmani I can't access the Staff web portal it gives me a 403 Forbidden error
18:45 gmcharlt Dyrcona: berick: did run into bug 1791184 and wrote a patch
18:45 pinesol Launchpad bug 1791184 in Evergreen "'make clean' removes pingest.pl" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791184
18:46 Dyrcona rsulejmani: That sounds....
18:48 Dyrcona Oops! I missed that comment, and I never run make clean. Well, almost never.
18:54 Dyrcona Works for me!
18:58 pinesol [evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1791184: ensure that 'make clean' doesn't delete pingest.pl - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=bb8c14f>
18:59 Dyrcona @later tell rsulejmani It sounds like you are either running Apache as the wrong user or your files are not owned by the proper user. We'll need more information to determine which, or if it is something else.
18:59 pinesol Dyrcona: The operation succeeded.
19:02 rjackson_isl joined #evergreen
19:04 jihpringle joined #evergreen
19:05 dluch joined #evergreen
19:05 Bmagic joined #evergreen
19:05 foobarrel joined #evergreen
20:14 pinesol Showing latest 5 of 6 commits to Evergreen...
20:14 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: adding translators to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=689e9af>
20:14 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] More additions to the 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0f68495>
20:15 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: Adding two more entries to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=43e0db0>
20:15 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: adding more contributor info to 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=b7abce6>
20:15 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: merge 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9e58a1d>
20:27 pinesol [evergreen|Jane Sandberg] Docs: spellchecking 3.2 release notes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=​Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=832c606>
21:30 sandbergja joined #evergreen
21:49 sandbergja joined #evergreen

| Channels | #evergreen index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | summary | Join Webchat