| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:35 |
|
dbwells_ joined #evergreen |
| 01:50 |
|
Our joined #evergreen |
| 03:46 |
|
nou joined #evergreen |
| 03:57 |
|
Exaeta joined #evergreen |
| 03:58 |
|
Evidlo28 joined #evergreen |
| 04:57 |
|
bsanford joined #evergreen |
| 05:13 |
|
Henry_Jia19 joined #evergreen |
| 05:14 |
|
theaetetus joined #evergreen |
| 05:24 |
|
hubcaps13 joined #evergreen |
| 05:30 |
|
d__b joined #evergreen |
| 05:39 |
|
duckgoose12 joined #evergreen |
| 05:42 |
|
Selavi9 joined #evergreen |
| 05:56 |
|
quiz9626 joined #evergreen |
| 06:28 |
|
Slumlord_8 joined #evergreen |
| 06:31 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 07:02 |
|
JBoyer joined #evergreen |
| 07:04 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:04 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 07:24 |
|
dwgreen joined #evergreen |
| 08:21 |
|
sophiya joined #evergreen |
| 08:41 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 08:42 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 08:49 |
|
brynjar25 joined #evergreen |
| 09:02 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 09:06 |
|
dwgreen joined #evergreen |
| 09:17 |
|
idjit joined #evergreen |
| 09:22 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:36 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 09:41 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 09:52 |
|
sirnaysayer4 joined #evergreen |
| 10:14 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
| 10:23 |
|
ningalls joined #evergreen |
| 10:53 |
|
p3pp3rb0x joined #evergreen |
| 10:53 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 10:57 |
|
Guest96298 joined #evergreen |
| 11:00 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 11:14 |
* miker |
watches a tumbleweed roll by |
| 11:20 |
* rhamby_ |
plays a six string guitar slowly |
| 11:25 |
* phasefx |
dares the harmonica |
| 11:28 |
phasefx |
oh give me a home, where the data does flow, and the patrons and librarians play; where seldom is heard, a discouraging word, and the software compiles today |
| 11:31 |
JBoyer |
phasefx++ |
| 11:48 |
JBoyer |
If anyone wants to drop some knowledge on me when there's time, I was trying to figure out why we're using trigger based fake FK's in some of the places we are. It looks to me like it's doing the same thing as a regular constraint, aside from the "AFTER INSERT OR..." part. |
| 11:53 |
miker |
JBoyer: inheritance, particularly the asset.copy -> serial.unit hierarchy. fkeys can't see child tables (for implementation reasons). if we're using them outside fkeys against acp or the money.payment hierarchy, that would be interesting to know |
| 11:55 |
miker |
PG implementation reasons. PG requires a unique index on the referenced column, but does not have unique indexes that span tables (tables in an inheritance hierarchy, in this case). yet. |
| 11:55 |
miker |
looks like that may be coming for PG 11 or 12 |
| 11:55 |
JBoyer |
That may be enough of an explainer then, I didn't realize the "select id from asset.copy" part of them included serial.unit. (I haven't experimented much and we have nothing in there anyway) |
| 11:56 |
miker |
it does |
| 11:56 |
JBoyer |
I've just been looking at the inventory date patch today so that's what had me wondering. |
| 11:56 |
miker |
but the internal query generated for real fkeys says "select id from only asset.copy" |
| 11:57 |
miker |
which stops PG from including child tables |
| 11:57 |
JBoyer |
AH. |
| 11:57 |
jeff |
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/ddl-inherit.html is a good starting point for inheritence, and the Caveats section is worth a read. |
| 11:57 |
JBoyer |
Huh, that was a little more enthusiastic than intended. Ah. |
| 11:57 |
JBoyer |
I'll check it out. |
| 11:57 |
JBoyer |
miker++ |
| 11:58 |
JBoyer |
jeff++ |
| 12:10 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:15 |
jeff |
Do we have a gneral framework for establishing defaults for user settings? |
| 12:16 |
jeff |
gneral. |
| 12:17 |
jeff |
Or even a way to distinguish between a value that has been defaulted vs one that has been explicitly set by the user. Probably not. |
| 12:17 |
miker |
1) new features are turned on and 2) don't change behavior at an upgrade ;) |
| 12:17 |
miker |
jeff: oh, you mean a way to tell what the default was/is. nope |
| 12:18 |
jeff |
And before that, selecting a default value for a setting on the patron registration / self registration interface, settable at an org unit level. |
| 12:20 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 12:20 |
miker |
I was actually thinking of YAOUSen... so, nm me. I think user settings are case-by-case |
| 12:28 |
|
dkyle1 left #evergreen |
| 12:36 |
|
bdljohn joined #evergreen |
| 12:42 |
|
Xiti1 joined #evergreen |
| 12:43 |
|
terran_ joined #evergreen |
| 12:54 |
|
rlefaive_ joined #evergreen |
| 13:04 |
|
some_weirdo26 joined #evergreen |
| 13:06 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:13 |
|
hbrennan joined #evergreen |
| 13:19 |
|
Taylor25 joined #evergreen |
| 13:23 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:32 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 13:34 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:37 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:38 |
csharp |
@quote add <phasefx> oh give me a home, where the data does flow, and the patrons and librarians play; where seldom is heard, a discouraging word, and the software compiles today |
| 13:38 |
pinesol |
csharp: The operation succeeded. Quote #190 added. |
| 13:42 |
hbrennan |
phasefx++ csharp++ |
| 13:42 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 13:45 |
miker |
T-15 until EOB meeting |
| 13:52 |
|
afterl joined #evergreen |
| 13:58 |
miker |
T-2 to EOB meeting start |
| 13:58 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 14:00 |
miker |
terran++ # agenda |
| 14:00 |
miker |
ok ... we'll get started |
| 14:00 |
miker |
#startmeeting 2018-08-16 - EOB meeting |
| 14:00 |
pinesol |
Meeting started Thu Aug 16 14:00:59 2018 US/Eastern. The chair is miker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
| 14:01 |
pinesol |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
| 14:01 |
pinesol |
The meeting name has been set to '2018_08_16___eob_meeting' |
| 14:01 |
miker |
#topic Introductions -- announce yourself, please |
| 14:01 |
miker |
#info miker = Mike Rylander, EOLI |
| 14:01 |
terran_ |
#info terran is Terran McCanna, PINES |
| 14:01 |
agoben |
#info agoben is Anna Goben, Evergreen Indiana |
| 14:01 |
collum |
#info collum is Garry Collum, KCPL |
| 14:01 |
jvwoolf |
#info jvwoolf is Jessica Woolford, Bibliomation |
| 14:01 |
JBoyer |
#info JasonB is Jason Boyer, Indiana State Library |
| 14:02 |
miker |
I saw afterl join... |
| 14:02 |
afterl |
yes |
| 14:02 |
afterl |
#info afterl is Amy Terlaga, Bibliomation |
| 14:02 |
hbrennan |
#info hbrennan is Holly Brennan Homer Public Library AK |
| 14:02 |
hbrennan |
ahh |
| 14:02 |
miker |
we may not get a scott |
| 14:03 |
miker |
to start things off |
| 14:03 |
miker |
#topic Approval or Correction of Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-07-20-14.03.html |
| 14:03 |
|
rgagnon joined #evergreen |
| 14:03 |
miker |
does anybody have anything to address re the minutes? |
| 14:03 |
miker |
rgagnon: hello, and welcome! |
| 14:04 |
rgagnon |
Thanks, sorry I'm late. |
| 14:04 |
miker |
we just started to look at the minutes, very first thing, no worries |
| 14:04 |
miker |
http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-07-20-14.03.html |
| 14:04 |
rgagnon |
Look fine to me. |
| 14:05 |
JBoyer |
I don't see anything that needs changed, no. |
| 14:05 |
jvwoolf |
Nothing to add here. |
| 14:05 |
agoben |
Same |
| 14:05 |
miker |
motion to approve? |
| 14:05 |
rgagnon |
So moved. |
| 14:05 |
collum |
Second |
| 14:05 |
miker |
#startvote Approve 2018-07-20 meeting minutes? yes, no |
| 14:05 |
pinesol |
Begin voting on: Approve 2018-07-20 meeting minutes? Valid vote options are yes, no. |
| 14:05 |
pinesol |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:06 |
terran_ |
#vote Yes |
| 14:06 |
miker |
#vote yes |
| 14:06 |
JBoyer |
#vote yes |
| 14:06 |
collum |
#vote Yes |
| 14:06 |
rgagnon |
#vote Yes |
| 14:06 |
agoben |
#vote yes |
| 14:06 |
jvwoolf |
#vote yes |
| 14:06 |
hbrennan |
#vote yes |
| 14:07 |
miker |
#endvote |
| 14:07 |
pinesol |
Voted on "Approve 2018-07-20 meeting minutes?" Results are |
| 14:07 |
pinesol |
yes (8): rgagnon, JBoyer, agoben, miker, terran_, collum, hbrennan, jvwoolf |
| 14:07 |
miker |
Thanks. On to officer reports |
| 14:07 |
miker |
#topic Chair report |
| 14:07 |
miker |
Nothing much here that won't be discussed later |
| 14:07 |
miker |
#topic Financial report |
| 14:08 |
miker |
Galen is unavailable, so I don't have an updated ledger today. |
| 14:08 |
miker |
However, we have several outstanding transactions that need to be addressed with SFC, which brings us to.. |
| 14:08 |
miker |
#topic SFC Update |
| 14:08 |
miker |
#info SFC wants information on the logo artist we used before paying the $250 invoice. They want to make sure the trademark and copyright are protected. |
| 14:09 |
miker |
kmlussier: do I recall correctly that you were point on the logo redesign? |
| 14:09 |
kmlussier |
miker: Yes, I've been waiting to hear back from them on what they need. |
| 14:09 |
miker |
ok, perfect, thank. so you've been in contact with them in the last month? |
| 14:09 |
afterl |
miker: I have |
| 14:10 |
kmlussier |
Yes, I go through afterl |
| 14:10 |
kmlussier |
miker / afterl: If they need a contract to be signed, I can make that happen. I'm sure it won't be a problem. |
| 14:10 |
kmlussier |
But I would like to get that invoice paid. She's been waiting on it for a while. |
| 14:10 |
miker |
That seems to be the concern, yeah |
| 14:11 |
miker |
does the artist have a standard contract we can send SFC? |
| 14:11 |
miker |
that is really a question we can answer out-of-band |
| 14:11 |
kmlussier |
miker: We can check. She is also the same artist who did the work for the 2017 conference. Maybe there is a contract that we used then that could be repurposed? |
| 14:13 |
miker |
the main thing is, can the EOB do anything to help? It seems like SFC hasn't been explicit yet about what they need, other than their surprise at not having a contract |
| 14:14 |
rgagnon |
One of their messages expressed concern about who owned the rights to it |
| 14:15 |
kmlussier |
miker: Let's chat after the meeting. After hearing the initial concern, I asked what they needed from us next, but never heard back. I'll touch base with Sam and see if she has a standard contract. If not, I could pull something together, but I assume it needs SFC review first. |
| 14:15 |
miker |
afterl: do you want to just ask SFC for their simplest "copyright and trademark are retained by customer" contract? |
| 14:15 |
afterl |
Yes, I can do that |
| 14:15 |
miker |
sorry, was typing |
| 14:16 |
afterl |
sorry |
| 14:16 |
miker |
kmlussier: do you want to ask SFC for a simple contract, or should you and I chat first? |
| 14:17 |
kmlussier |
miker: Getting a simple contract from them would be ideal. That way, it will start off with the language that is acceptable to them. |
| 14:17 |
miker |
ok, let's see if we can do that... |
| 14:18 |
afterl |
miker: Just want to say that I've written Karen four times about this and have received no response. |
| 14:18 |
miker |
#action afterl will ask SFC for a simple graphic design contract that make ownership of the work product explicit |
| 14:18 |
miker |
oh, well |
| 14:18 |
miker |
#info strike that last action |
| 14:18 |
miker |
afterl: sorry, I didn't follow that. I misunderstood |
| 14:19 |
afterl |
miker: I haven't asked specifically for a simple contract |
| 14:19 |
afterl |
But I've asked for guidance |
| 14:20 |
miker |
do you want to give it one more try with that request, or do you want to hand that one off? I didn't realize they were being that unresponsive to you. I'm sorry |
| 14:20 |
JBoyer |
Being contract related is this something Bradley could help with? (I may be misremembering his name, the SFC lawyer we've spoken to before?) |
| 14:21 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: You're thinking of Tony. But he is no longer with the Conservancy. |
| 14:21 |
JBoyer |
Ah, well two strikes at once there. Thanks |
| 14:21 |
afterl |
miker: I'm willing to give it one more try but there are a number of issues that need addressing and I think they're waiting on us too. |
| 14:22 |
afterl |
Wondering if we respond to their request, maybe that will help with ours. |
| 14:22 |
kmlussier |
If it helps, I can always start off with a standard simple contract. Maybe they'll respond more quickly if they have something to react to? |
| 14:22 |
JBoyer |
+1 to that. |
| 14:22 |
miker |
afterl: my hope is we can separate them and push past the log jam. |
| 14:22 |
miker |
kmlussier: +1 from me as well. |
| 14:23 |
afterl |
miker: I like kmlussier's suggestion |
| 14:23 |
afterl |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
terran_ |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
hbrennan |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
collum |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
jvwoolf |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
rgagnon |
+1 |
| 14:23 |
miker |
awesome, so that's a start on the logo, thank you kmlussier! |
| 14:23 |
miker |
#action kmlussier to create a basic contract re the logo artist and offer it to SFC |
| 14:23 |
miker |
thanks! |
| 14:24 |
miker |
Next on the SFC topic... |
| 14:24 |
miker |
#info MOBIUS invoices from May/June (and, with recent work, likely more). There is still some misunderstanding about Evergreen's use of the MOBIUS lawyers for NPO creation. |
| 14:24 |
miker |
My understanding was the MOBIUS and SFC were going to set up a simple agreement for services to be provided by MOBIUS. |
| 14:24 |
miker |
after the whole conference contract kerfluffle |
| 14:25 |
terran_ |
That was my understanding too. |
| 14:26 |
miker |
however, it seems that didn't happen. so I will try to link Donna and Karen back up for that, unless someone else would like to give it a shot. I did not succeed last time... |
| 14:26 |
JBoyer |
Where did that trail run cold, MOBIUS or SFC? |
| 14:27 |
miker |
JBoyer: my understanding was that they were in direct contact for the purpose of ironing out some contractual agreement |
| 14:28 |
miker |
something that wasn't burdensome to MOBIUS and gave SFC the legal papering they need |
| 14:28 |
miker |
that's to say, I am not sure which or if one or the other dropped a ball... |
| 14:28 |
JBoyer |
I see. |
| 14:29 |
miker |
I did drop the "is this done?" checking ball, though. |
| 14:29 |
agoben |
Karen's one email indicated a preference that no contract be signed between them. |
| 14:30 |
agoben |
From May 24th. Not sure if I missed more recent updates to that convo though in my search. |
| 14:30 |
* miker |
looks |
| 14:30 |
agoben |
May be just have been in reference to the conference though, on re-reading. |
| 14:31 |
miker |
yes, that is how I read her initial email in the thread, too |
| 14:32 |
miker |
then we had the conference call, though, and my recollection is that SFC and MOBIUS had more to discuss, and would. |
| 14:32 |
miker |
but I don't have good notes from the call, unfortunately |
| 14:33 |
JBoyer |
Oh, and the reason I mistook Tony for Bradley is that Bradley Kuhn was in the MOBIUS invoice thread when Karen was unavailable. Maybe he can help move a couple things along or at least make sure our messages are getting somewhere. |
| 14:34 |
JBoyer |
Abra-ca-CC:'d and all that. |
| 14:34 |
miker |
so, maybe we just need to clarify the role of MOBIUS with SFC, in the broader context. services post-separation. |
| 14:34 |
jvwoolf |
That seems to be what Karen is looking for in the email about the invoices. |
| 14:34 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 14:34 |
miker |
I hesitate to bring Bradly into ongoing and complicated discussions, TBH |
| 14:36 |
JBoyer |
That's fair. But if no one can get a reply from Karen he might be a potential starting point to continue the discussion. |
| 14:36 |
miker |
and, holy wow, I never even saw that invoice thread in june |
| 14:36 |
JBoyer |
I was about to say, in their defense I didn't see any replies to that thread either. :/ |
| 14:36 |
miker |
ok, I'll reply on that thread and attempt to provide clarity |
| 14:37 |
miker |
it will be in the morning tomorrow, though |
| 14:37 |
jvwoolf |
miker: Do you want to be poked in the future, if we don't see reply come through on something like that? |
| 14:38 |
miker |
#action mike will get back to the MOBIUS invoice thread, try to provide clarity |
| 14:39 |
miker |
jvwoolf: I heartily encourage all board members to go ahead and engage, especially if something looks abandoned. or poke me if there's consensus and I'm just not providing that to SFC (or whoever) |
| 14:40 |
miker |
alright... moving on to the final SFC item for the day (before SFC eats the whole hour) |
| 14:41 |
miker |
#info as of 2018-08-01 we don't have confirmation that all the 2017 and 2018 conference-related transactions have been pushed to the final ledger. But, I don't have a ledger dump from today, so I suggest we table this until we do. |
| 14:41 |
miker |
which |
| 14:41 |
miker |
#action mike will request an updated ledger report from Galen, once he's available next week |
| 14:42 |
miker |
if it's still substantially out of date, we need to figure out why |
| 14:42 |
miker |
as a separate issue to the first two above |
| 14:43 |
miker |
and, finally, afterl: do you have any more fun SFC stuff of note from the last month? |
| 14:43 |
afterl |
Well, there are more conference related issues. |
| 14:43 |
miker |
that reads much snarkier than I intended after our SFC discussion... |
| 14:43 |
miker |
afterl: 2017 or 2018 conference? |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
Both |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
No |
| 14:44 |
miker |
I mean, one or both of those, or do you mean 2019 |
| 14:44 |
miker |
ok |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
2018 and 2019 |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
For 2018 I'm still waiting to hear about the final totals |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
but that's related to your ledger concerns |
| 14:45 |
afterl |
There's at least one check I know of that didn't get cashed |
| 14:45 |
miker |
yeah, I don't want to jump on them if the ledger actually is up to date now :) |
| 14:45 |
afterl |
Right. |
| 14:45 |
afterl |
And Scott is still waiting to hear about the registration setup for 2019 |
| 14:46 |
terran_ |
For the check, was that a check they sent out or a check they took in? |
| 14:46 |
afterl |
Check they took in |
| 14:46 |
miker |
against a 2018 conference A/R? or new for 2019 |
| 14:46 |
afterl |
2018 |
| 14:47 |
terran_ |
So that's similar to the previous year when it took them what, 9 months, to update our income? |
| 14:47 |
afterl |
I guess that's right |
| 14:47 |
afterl |
I can try to follow up on these conference matters with Bradley |
| 14:48 |
afterl |
He does respond eventually. |
| 14:49 |
afterl |
Failing that, a call might be in order for all of this. |
| 14:49 |
afterl |
But I think that's it. You touched on the main issues. |
| 14:49 |
miker |
ok, thank you |
| 14:50 |
miker |
#action afterl will follow up with Bradley re conference transactions |
| 14:50 |
|
t0ne27 joined #evergreen |
| 14:50 |
miker |
whew, ok. next up |
| 14:50 |
miker |
#topic Release manager (Bill Erickson) |
| 14:50 |
miker |
Bill, any updates/requests/etc to share? |
| 14:50 |
miker |
berick: -^ sorry |
| 14:51 |
miker |
we may not have a berick available... so, we'll move on to committees |
| 14:51 |
miker |
#topic 2019 Conference committee (Scott Thomas) |
| 14:52 |
miker |
I have an update from Scott: 2019 Conference: Planning is on schedule. We have a logo and are about to start working on sponsorships and lining up a keynote. |
| 14:52 |
miker |
anyone else have 2019 updates they're aware of? |
| 14:52 |
collum |
The webpage has been started. https://evergreen-ils.org/conference/2019-evergreen-international-conference/ |
| 14:53 |
terran_ |
And we'll be starting regular conference committee meetings in September |
| 14:53 |
terran_ |
We got the food menu and are perusing snack options :D |
| 14:53 |
miker |
most important part of the conf! |
| 14:54 |
afterl |
collum, terran_ ++ |
| 14:54 |
terran_ |
I'm lobbying for the ice cream sundae bar |
| 14:54 |
hbrennan |
ohh that was fun in Hood River |
| 14:54 |
miker |
As you should, as you should. |
| 14:54 |
afterl |
ice cream sundae bar ++ |
| 14:54 |
miker |
just so we don't overrun time by too much |
| 14:54 |
miker |
#topic Outreach committee (Kathy Lussier) |
| 14:54 |
miker |
Kathy, anything outreachy to update us on, or needs from the committee? |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
Yes |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
I shared two voting matters with the EOB earlier this month. One related to our funding request for the year, and the other relates to adopting the new official logo for use when a logo is required for a round or square space. |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
#link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2018-August/002249.html |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
We should probably hold off on voting on the logo until the contract / payment issues are resolved. |
| 14:56 |
kmlussier |
miker: If you want to hold off on voting on the funding request until the next meeting, that's fine. Not much time left in this meeting. |
| 14:56 |
miker |
kmlussier: I appreciate that, and I think you can count on the support of the board |
| 14:57 |
terran_ |
+1 |
| 14:57 |
kmlussier |
Also, we had a productive meeting earlier this month. We're brainstorming ideas on acknowledging people who help out in the community, on making the web site more useful to people outside the community, and on a central core message for outreach. |
| 14:57 |
agoben |
+1 |
| 14:57 |
kmlussier |
More info here - https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=outreach:meetings:2018-08-01 |
| 14:57 |
kmlussier |
That's it from me. |
| 14:57 |
terran_ |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
miker |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
jvwoolf |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
rgagnon |
kmlussier ++ |
| 14:57 |
agoben |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
hbrennan |
kmlussier:++ |
| 14:57 |
collum |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
miker |
#topic Update on nonprofit status |
| 14:57 |
miker |
From Scott: IRS 1023: I am working with Jenkins & King on the narrative for the form. The EOB will need to pass a COI policy. We will also need last year’s financial information from SFC. |
| 14:57 |
miker |
Can I get a volunteer to find some likely COI policies we can evaluate? Note: implementation will require a consent decree or a phone meeting, but we can discuss via email. |
| 14:58 |
rgagnon |
I can provide the standard IRS one, which is typically used. |
| 14:58 |
miker |
rgagnon: do you want to be the holder of the COI for the 1023 process? |
| 14:59 |
rgagnon |
Sure, I can work on that part. |
| 14:59 |
miker |
thanks. we just need to circulate and get general approval. after that, I'll pull together a consent degree for us to sign in counterparts |
| 15:00 |
terran_ |
rgagnon++ miker++ |
| 15:00 |
agoben |
rgagnon++ |
| 15:00 |
collum |
rgagnon++ miker++ |
| 15:00 |
JBoyer |
rgagnon++ |
| 15:00 |
jvwoolf |
rgagnon++ |
| 15:00 |
miker |
#action rgagnon will wrangle a COI policy into shape for us to submit with the 1023 |
| 15:00 |
miker |
we're close to the end, and I have some /good/ news |
| 15:01 |
miker |
#topic Search for an Evergreen lawyer |
| 15:01 |
miker |
#info I found 3 lawyers that seem worth investigating. In no particular order: |
| 15:01 |
miker |
#info https://www.martindale.com/st-louis/missouri/goldstein-and-pressman-p-c-1044427-f/ |
| 15:01 |
miker |
#info https://www.martindale.com/chesterfield/missouri/roger-r-fagerberg-1046792-f/ |
| 15:01 |
miker |
#info https://www.lawyers.com/kansas-city/missouri/slagle-bernard-and-gorman-a-professional-corporation-1035672-f/ |
| 15:01 |
miker |
All three mention non-profits (or tax exempt orgs) and corporate or small-biz law |
| 15:01 |
miker |
Who would like to draft a set of questions so that we might evaluate them? And, more imporantly, can I get a volunteer or three to initiate contact with them, explain our needs, and evaluate their suitability? |
| 15:03 |
jvwoolf |
I can be a contacter |
| 15:03 |
jvwoolf |
I would want help getting a message together to send, though |
| 15:03 |
miker |
jvwoolf++ # thank you |
| 15:03 |
rgagnon |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:03 |
terran_ |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:03 |
agoben |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:04 |
collum |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:04 |
miker |
note: I suspect it will end up being a phone call after initial email |
| 15:04 |
miker |
I'm happy to be on that call, but really want broader input on how we will evaluate fit |
| 15:05 |
jvwoolf |
miker: Yes, please be on the call :) |
| 15:05 |
miker |
jvwoolf: would you mind starting an email discussion to flesh that out some? I think community input would be useful here |
| 15:05 |
terran_ |
Or how about a shared doc with possible questions? |
| 15:06 |
miker |
on the eob evergreen-ils.org list, I mean. |
| 15:06 |
miker |
terran_: perhaps in addition to, to collect the discussion in a more final form? |
| 15:06 |
terran_ |
+1 |
| 15:06 |
miker |
+1 to shared docs, yes |
| 15:07 |
jvwoolf |
miker: terran: Yes, I want everyone's input |
| 15:07 |
miker |
awesome, folks |
| 15:07 |
jvwoolf |
Expect that first draft to be very basic :) |
| 15:09 |
miker |
#action jvwoolf will create a shared doc (or use one created by someone else) and email thread to fill it with lawyer evaluation input on the eob mailing list |
| 15:09 |
miker |
that's all the existing business to go through. does anyone have new business to raise? |
| 15:10 |
JBoyer |
None here. |
| 15:10 |
miker |
if not, we're 10 mins over, and I want to set you all free |
| 15:10 |
miker |
then, hearing nothing |
| 15:10 |
terran_ |
I don't have anything |
| 15:10 |
miker |
Thanks all! |
| 15:10 |
miker |
#endmeeting |
| 15:10 |
pinesol |
Meeting ended Thu Aug 16 15:10:29 2018 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
| 15:10 |
pinesol |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-08-16-14.00.html |
| 15:10 |
pinesol |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-08-16-14.00.txt |
| 15:10 |
pinesol |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2018/evergreen.2018-08-16-14.00.log.html |
| 15:10 |
JBoyer |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
terran_ |
Ciao! |
| 15:10 |
collum |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
rgagnon |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
JBoyer |
kmlussier++ |
| 15:10 |
jvwoolf |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
JBoyer |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:10 |
hbrennan |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
terran_ |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
JBoyer |
afterl++ |
| 15:10 |
agoben |
miker++ |
| 15:10 |
hbrennan |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:11 |
miker |
jvwoolf++ |
| 15:11 |
miker |
kmlussier++ |
| 15:11 |
miker |
afterl++ |
| 15:11 |
miker |
rgagnon++ |
| 15:11 |
miker |
all for taking stuff off my plate |
| 15:12 |
|
afterl left #evergreen |
| 15:26 |
|
vegii21 joined #evergreen |
| 15:38 |
|
JBoyer joined #evergreen |
| 15:45 |
miker |
jeff++ # protecting IRC from gremlins |
| 15:59 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 16:03 |
|
khuckins joined #evergreen |
| 17:06 |
kmlussier |
Wow! People are definitely more interested in the item vs. copy question than they were in the cart vs. basket question. 97 responses so far. |
| 17:07 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:34 |
|
promote joined #evergreen |
| 17:46 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 18:12 |
|
Alucard4200 joined #evergreen |
| 18:32 |
pinesol |
News from qatests: Testing Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 20:14 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 20:51 |
|
infernix5 joined #evergreen |
| 21:07 |
|
cyberlard25 joined #evergreen |
| 21:24 |
|
Sharker joined #evergreen |
| 21:50 |
|
justyns joined #evergreen |
| 21:52 |
|
justyns was kicked by jeff: justyns |
| 22:35 |
|
mstroup joined #evergreen |
| 22:37 |
|
xCore joined #evergreen |
| 23:23 |
|
Guest32814 joined #evergreen |
| 23:30 |
|
BruceS2 joined #evergreen |
