| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:37 |
* dbs |
wonders what madness is suddenly causing a request for / to redirect to /eg/opac/home and then to /eg/opac/login?redirect_to=%2Feg%2Fopac%2Flogin%3Fredirect_to%3D%252Feg%252Fopac%252Flogin%253Fredirect_to... |
| 01:49 |
dbs |
ahh. if you happen to create an /openils/var/web/eg directory, you get... much pain |
| 05:01 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Success <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 07:14 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
| 07:23 |
|
agoben joined #evergreen |
| 08:12 |
jeff |
dbs: yep, i think jeffdavis and i ran into that a while back. |
| 08:12 |
|
NawJo joined #evergreen |
| 08:54 |
|
teletype01 joined #evergreen |
| 08:56 |
graced |
csharp: If PINES hasn't booked flights to the Evergreen conference yet, today would be a good day. Prices went down $250 last night - Delta is sitting at $261 right now. |
| 08:58 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 09:07 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 09:18 |
|
afterl joined #evergreen |
| 09:18 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
| 09:23 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
| 09:24 |
Dyrcona |
kmlussier: You said the 2.12-beta deadline is tomorrow, yes? |
| 09:24 |
kmlussier |
Dyrcona: yes. |
| 09:25 |
kmlussier |
But there's also a weekend after tomorrow during which nobody is working on cutting a release. |
| 09:25 |
gmcharlt |
HINT HINT? ;) |
| 09:27 |
Dyrcona |
OK. |
| 09:29 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 09:41 |
kmlussier |
Dyrcona++ # Work on bug 1624366 |
| 09:41 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1624366 in Evergreen "Evergreen integration with obalkyknih.cz (Czech added content provider)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624366 - Assigned to Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) |
| 09:43 |
Dyrcona |
Yeah, that's why I asked. |
| 09:54 |
dbs |
jeff: sounded familiar, but at 1:00 AM I was flailing a bit :) |
| 09:54 |
|
bos20k joined #evergreen |
| 09:55 |
dbs |
I'm wondering if the clause in the eg_vhost.conf for Location /eg w/ SetHandler None for ^.*(.js|.css)$ actually works at all |
| 10:00 |
JBoyer |
Speaking of the beta deadline, I'd like to point out that bug 1661747 and bug 1517137 would benefit from more eyes, if only briefly. A release note has been added for the new A/T helper, and the permissions upgrade script will Do The Right Thing if you've added some, all, or none of the permissions either where the script puts them or at ids > 1000. |
| 10:00 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1661747 in Evergreen "Add get_org_unit_ancestor_at_depth to action trigger reactor helpers" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1661747 |
| 10:00 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1517137 in Evergreen "Missing Permissions omnibus bugfix package Nov 2015" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1517137 |
| 10:00 |
* miker |
grabs TWO db upgrade scripts: 1016 and 1017 |
| 10:10 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Kathy Lussier] LP#1553287: Add part information to biblio.fingerprint - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=abbcc13> |
| 10:10 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Mike Rylander] Stamping upgrade script for including parts in bib fingerprints - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=4ff655b> |
| 10:10 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1528901: avoid accidental bib fingerprint collisions - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=cacb686> |
| 10:10 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Mike Rylander] Stamping upgrade script for separating fingerprint components - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=c4d1595> |
| 10:16 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Thomas Berezansky] Apply sort for ident_type dropdown - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=83b9d79> |
| 10:25 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: I looked at the upgrade script for the missing permissions last night. I had a follow-up question. |
| 10:25 |
JBoyer |
ok |
| 10:26 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: When I ran the upgrade script, it kept my existing permissions with their id at >1000. I'm fine with that, but is that what you expected? |
| 10:27 |
kmlussier |
From your comment, I though you were planning to give the existing permission the new id. |
| 10:27 |
JBoyer |
It is not. :/ |
| 10:28 |
JBoyer |
No, the plan was to change the name of the existing, insert the corrected version, then duplicate the mappings and delete the >1000 version. Now that I think about it though, if it's not deleting the mappings also that doesn't happen. |
| 10:28 |
JBoyer |
Drats. |
| 10:28 |
JBoyer |
time for a short meeting. Back soon! |
| 10:29 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Did you want to work on it some more or should we look at putting it in the way it is? |
| 10:29 |
|
jvwoolf joined #evergreen |
| 10:29 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Yes, I'm about to head into a meeting too. I'll check back later. |
| 10:31 |
|
mmorgan1 joined #evergreen |
| 10:45 |
JBoyer |
Meeting over. I'll fix it. My testing method was just lacking (add perm at >1000, run script, woo.) This time I'll assign it to a few groups to make sure the right thing is done. |
| 11:03 |
|
Christineb joined #evergreen |
| 11:15 |
JBoyer |
kmlussier, Given the way the script is written I'm rather confused how it would keep the >1000 permissions around. Did it not insert the <1000 versions? (they can't both exist in the table simultaneously) |
| 11:15 |
JBoyer |
I will say if you've inserted anything in the id = 564 to 589 range those will be "skipped" under the assumption you needed it before running the script and have dealt with everything yourself. |
| 11:21 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
| 11:27 |
gmcharlt |
https://evergreen-ils.org/upcoming-evergreen-and-opensrf-security-releases/ |
| 11:58 |
gmcharlt |
as of now, I'm declaring a freeze on substantive merges to rel_2_11 and rel_2_10 in preparation for today's releases |
| 11:58 |
gmcharlt |
I'm also claiming 1018 in the name of baby ducks everywhere |
| 11:59 |
gmcharlt |
merging to master is OK as far as 2.10 and 2.11 are concerned, but please ping me first if you really need to merge in a schema update |
| 12:08 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
| 12:11 |
Dyrcona |
pinesol_green: What do I want for lunch? |
| 12:11 |
pinesol_green |
Dyrcona: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) |
| 12:11 |
pinesol_green |
Dyrcona: I see nothing, I know nothing! |
| 12:12 |
Dyrcona |
@dunno get 7 |
| 12:12 |
pinesol_green |
Dyrcona: Dunno #7: "You probably want hard-boiled eggs." (added by Dyrcona at 05:11 PM, July 02, 2012) |
| 12:14 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Just back from my meeting. It did not insert the <1000 versions. |
| 12:14 |
* kmlussier |
will try it again on another VM. |
| 12:16 |
|
bmills joined #evergreen |
| 12:16 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Actually, I think it might be user error on my part. Let me check and get back to you. |
| 12:21 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
| 12:23 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 12:25 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Apparently I needed to enter the correct code for the permission for it to work correctly. :) |
| 12:25 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: I'll sign off and merge that one later today. Sorry for the confusion. |
| 12:47 |
|
brahmina joined #evergreen |
| 13:04 |
JBoyer |
kmlussier, Quite alright, I'm just glad I'm not loosing my mind. ;) |
| 13:05 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 13:05 |
kmlussier |
JBoyer: Nope. I think it's clear who is losing their mind these days. :) |
| 13:32 |
|
rgagnon joined #evergreen |
| 13:38 |
afterl |
kmlussier: :-D |
| 13:38 |
Dyrcona |
I just made github repos for my Boopsie and Backstage software that I wrote at MVLC. |
| 13:39 |
Dyrcona |
Is anyone using the Safari record loader? If so, I'll make a github repo for that one. |
| 13:39 |
* kmlussier |
waves to afterl |
| 13:40 |
Dyrcona |
There's a meeting at two, isn't there. :) |
| 13:41 |
Dyrcona |
Oh, and also my helperfuncs repo. I think gmcharlt expressed an interest in having these added to Evergreen at one point. Maybe it was someone else. |
| 13:42 |
* gmcharlt |
's ears perk up |
| 13:42 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt: https://github.com/Dyrcona/helperfuncs |
| 13:42 |
* Dyrcona |
goes ahead and pushes safariload. |
| 13:46 |
|
ohiojoe joined #evergreen |
| 13:46 |
|
tspindler joined #evergreen |
| 13:52 |
graced |
EOB meeting in 8 minutes |
| 13:56 |
|
terran joined #evergreen |
| 13:57 |
|
sherbertbc joined #evergreen |
| 13:58 |
graced |
EOB meeting in 2 minutes |
| 14:01 |
graced |
#startmeeting Evergreen Oversight Board Meeting, February 16, 2017 |
| 14:01 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting started Thu Feb 16 14:01:08 2017 US/Eastern. The chair is graced. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
| 14:01 |
pinesol_green |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
| 14:01 |
pinesol_green |
The meeting name has been set to 'evergreen_oversight_board_meeting__february_16__2017' |
| 14:01 |
graced |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:minutes:2017-2-16 Agenda |
| 14:01 |
graced |
#topic Introductions |
| 14:01 |
graced |
Oversight Board members, please introduce yourself with #info |
| 14:01 |
graced |
#info graced is Grace Dunbar, Equinox |
| 14:01 |
afterl |
#info afterl is Amy Terlaga, Bibliomation |
| 14:01 |
miker |
#info miker is Mike Rylander, EOLI |
| 14:01 |
terran |
#info terran is Terran McCanna, Georgia PINES |
| 14:01 |
tspindler |
#info tspindler is Tim Spindler, C/W MARS |
| 14:01 |
collum |
#info collum is Garry Collum, Kenton County Public Library |
| 14:02 |
rgagnon |
#info rgagnon is Ron Gagnon, NOBLE |
| 14:02 |
|
rfrasur joined #evergreen |
| 14:03 |
graced |
We have a quorum. |
| 14:03 |
sherbertbc |
#info sherbertbc is Sharon Herbert, BC Libraries Cooperative |
| 14:03 |
graced |
#topic Approve Minutes from last meeting |
| 14:03 |
graced |
The minutes have been up for review since our last meeting. |
| 14:03 |
tspindler |
Move to accept minutes |
| 14:04 |
graced |
#link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-December/001637.html |
| 14:04 |
graced |
well that's the wrong link |
| 14:04 |
terran |
:D |
| 14:04 |
graced |
#link http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2016/evergreen.2016-12-15-14.01.html |
| 14:04 |
graced |
there we go |
| 14:04 |
|
rfrasur_ joined #evergreen |
| 14:05 |
rfrasur_ |
This is going to keep kicking me. I can already tell. |
| 14:05 |
graced |
Are there any corrections? |
| 14:05 |
miker |
none from me |
| 14:05 |
terran |
looks good to me |
| 14:05 |
graced |
like any of us can remember what happened back in December |
| 14:05 |
terran |
I don't even remember Christmas |
| 14:06 |
graced |
Hearing no requests for corrections... |
| 14:06 |
graced |
#agreed The EOB accepted the minutes from the December 15 meeting |
| 14:07 |
graced |
#topic Old Business and Action items |
| 14:07 |
graced |
#info graced to have gmcharlt pull financial update next week and look for NC pmt credit |
| 14:07 |
graced |
#info On 12/20/2016 the Evergreen ledger was updated by the SFC with the NC payment from April as well as several other outstanding payments. |
| 14:07 |
graced |
The ledger appears to be up to date. Questions about that action item? |
| 14:08 |
miker |
we don't have any outstanding balances from last year anymore, right? |
| 14:08 |
graced |
miker: correct |
| 14:08 |
miker |
thanks |
| 14:08 |
afterl |
that's a happy thing |
| 14:08 |
terran |
Thank you to all of you who were persistent getting that corrected. |
| 14:08 |
rfrasur_ |
very happy |
| 14:09 |
graced |
end of year tax wrap ups tend to motivate like nothing else |
| 14:09 |
graced |
okay, moving on |
| 14:09 |
graced |
#info miker volunteered to update the git repo and web site with the 2.4 and 2.4.1 ROG changes. |
| 14:09 |
graced |
miker: done? |
| 14:09 |
miker |
yeppers |
| 14:09 |
miker |
rhamby++ for the web assist |
| 14:09 |
graced |
let the record show "yeppers" |
| 14:09 |
graced |
:) |
| 14:09 |
graced |
thanks to you both |
| 14:10 |
graced |
#info rfrasur volunteed to assist with EOB election process on task force |
| 14:10 |
graced |
Grace sent recap of election procedures and draft timelines/emails to Ruth for review. |
| 14:10 |
rfrasur_ |
Right |
| 14:10 |
graced |
rfrasur_: have you got what you need to lead the process? |
| 14:10 |
rfrasur_ |
Yup |
| 14:10 |
graced |
Do you need some volunteers to help? |
| 14:11 |
graced |
because we need to start the election process in about a week |
| 14:11 |
rfrasur_ |
Not at this point, but I might discover I do in the next few hours. |
| 14:11 |
rfrasur_ |
Right, I'll be sending out the call for nominations next Monday. |
| 14:11 |
graced |
sherbertbc assisted last year, so she might be willing :) |
| 14:12 |
rfrasur_ |
And I believe she's expressed willingness this year as well. |
| 14:12 |
graced |
Also, I think it's good to have more folks who know how to do it than not. |
| 14:12 |
terran |
I'd be happy to if you need additional assistance as well. |
| 14:12 |
sherbertbc |
just let me know |
| 14:12 |
rfrasur_ |
But the years tend to run together, so I might be recalling last year. Terran, thank you. Sherbertbc, thank you. |
| 14:13 |
graced |
#info sherbert and terran have volunteered to assist in the election process |
| 14:13 |
graced |
Does anyone have questions or concerns about the election process we used last year? |
| 14:13 |
graced |
before we move on... |
| 14:13 |
tspindler |
none here |
| 14:13 |
afterl |
Last year's was good |
| 14:14 |
terran |
I don't recall any problems last year |
| 14:14 |
rgagnon |
None here, either. |
| 14:14 |
collum |
none here |
| 14:14 |
graced |
Right on. |
| 14:14 |
graced |
#info rgagnon volunteered to draft the wording for the officer limitations and special elections. |
| 14:14 |
graced |
The proposed changes to sections 2.4 and 2.5 of the Rules of Governance were sent out on this email thread. |
| 14:14 |
graced |
#link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-December/001637.html |
| 14:14 |
graced |
Any discussion? |
| 14:15 |
graced |
is everyone frantically re-reading that email right now? |
| 14:15 |
miker |
heh |
| 14:15 |
tspindler |
yes, but I don't remember having any issues with it |
| 14:16 |
terran |
ditto |
| 14:16 |
rfrasur_ |
Same |
| 14:16 |
afterl |
No issues here |
| 14:17 |
graced |
I move we vote on the proposed changes to sections 2.4 and 2.5. |
| 14:17 |
miker |
there was one suggestion from graced. thoughts on that? |
| 14:17 |
miker |
I don't seen any discussion on-thread about that... did I miss it? |
| 14:18 |
graced |
also - the link I sent won't capture that since it was in a different month |
| 14:18 |
graced |
#link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2017-February/001656.html |
| 14:19 |
miker |
bah, beat me to it |
| 14:19 |
graced |
Two things in that email. |
| 14:19 |
graced |
Section 2.4 e. Each year, the Board shall undertake the electronic |
| 14:19 |
graced |
collection and counting of votes for the Board election using a documented |
| 14:19 |
graced |
voting platform that is widely accessible to the Evergreen community. [proposed |
| 14:19 |
graced |
additional wording] *Election processes should begin 6 weeks prior to the |
| 14:19 |
graced |
annual conference or April 1st, whichever comes first. No less than one |
| 14:19 |
graced |
full week shall be set aside for voting. All voting, including |
| 14:19 |
graced |
officer elections must be completed prior to the first day of the Evergreen |
| 14:19 |
graced |
Conference.* |
| 14:19 |
graced |
and "suggest renaming section 2.4 to "Terms and Elections"." |
| 14:20 |
terran |
Those modifications work for me. |
| 14:20 |
afterl |
I think it's good to have that in writing. |
| 14:20 |
rfrasur_ |
Ah yes. I remember it well (mostly). That sounds good to me as well. |
| 14:20 |
collum |
+1 on the modifications |
| 14:20 |
tspindler |
+1 to modifications |
| 14:20 |
rgagnon |
+1 to modifications |
| 14:21 |
miker |
+1 from me as well |
| 14:21 |
sherbertbc |
+1 |
| 14:21 |
afterl |
+1 |
| 14:21 |
graced |
Well then, I move we vote on the proposed changes to sections 2.4 and 2.5 with the modifications laid out here: http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2017-February/001656.html |
| 14:21 |
miker |
seconded |
| 14:22 |
graced |
#startvote Shall the Board agree to amend the Rules of Governance sections 2.4 and 2.5 with the specific changes set forth in the above referenced email and with the modifications referenced here: http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2017-February/001656.html ? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:22 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Shall the Board agree to amend the Rules of Governance sections 2.4 and 2.5 with the specific changes set forth in the above referenced email and with the modifications referenced here: http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2017-February/001656.html ? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:22 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:22 |
miker |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
terran |
#vote Yes |
| 14:22 |
graced |
#vote Yes |
| 14:22 |
afterl |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
tspindler |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
collum |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
rfrasur_ |
#vote yes |
| 14:22 |
rgagnon |
#vote yes |
| 14:23 |
graced |
#endvote |
| 14:23 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Shall the Board agree to amend the Rules of Governance sections 2.4 and 2.5 with the specific changes set forth in the above referenced email and with the modifications referenced here: http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2017-February/001656.html ?" Results are |
| 14:23 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (9): afterl, tspindler, rfrasur_, miker, rgagnon, graced, collum, terran, sherbertbc |
| 14:23 |
graced |
#agreed The Board agrees to amend the Rules of Governance sections 2.4 and 2.5. |
| 14:23 |
graced |
You all know what comes next right? |
| 14:23 |
graced |
Do I have a volunteer to update the docs in the git repo and web site? |
| 14:23 |
* miker |
raises hand |
| 14:23 |
graced |
#action miker volunteered to update the git repo and web site with the 2.4 and 2.5 changes. |
| 14:23 |
graced |
bless you, miker |
| 14:23 |
afterl |
miker++ |
| 14:23 |
terran |
miker++ |
| 14:23 |
collum |
miker++ |
| 14:23 |
rgagnon |
miker ++ |
| 14:23 |
miker |
I feel like that was pre-planned, graced ;) |
| 14:23 |
tspindler |
miker++ |
| 14:23 |
graced |
MAYBE |
| 14:24 |
graced |
It might have been pre-typed in my cheatsheet |
| 14:24 |
graced |
Are there any other outstanding action items? |
| 14:24 |
graced |
hearing none... |
| 14:24 |
graced |
#topic Other Old Business |
| 14:25 |
graced |
#info Karen from the SFC requested a phone call with afterl on 2/14 |
| 14:25 |
graced |
afterl: Anything to report? |
| 14:25 |
afterl |
Yes ... |
| 14:25 |
afterl |
Last Tuesday Karen Sandler from the SFC and I touched base via a phone call. Karen was wondering if we had immediate plans to transition from the SFC to another entity, like Equinox since they are now a non-profit. |
| 14:25 |
afterl |
I told her we had no specific plans, that we were in the very early stages of looking at our future. Karen also suggested that they could send someone to our conference in Kentucky if we wanted some help should there be a decision to transition to another group. The call was brief. |
| 14:26 |
terran |
Did you get the impression that they were eager for us to leave? |
| 14:26 |
graced |
afterl: just so I'm clear she offered to send someone to Covington to help with an *immediate* transition or just informational? |
| 14:27 |
afterl |
I took her to mean that it would be immediate. That said, I could have misunderstood. |
| 14:27 |
afterl |
In other words, I could follow up for clarification |
| 14:27 |
graced |
I guess that answers terran's question, too |
| 14:27 |
rfrasur_ |
Is there some reason she'd think we'd want to have an immediate transition at the conference? |
| 14:27 |
tspindler |
did you have any impression they had any opinion about staying or leaving? |
| 14:27 |
afterl |
Okay, I did ask that. |
| 14:28 |
afterl |
tspindler and terran: I asked, were you looking for us to leave? |
| 14:28 |
afterl |
And her reply was no, that if we decided to stay, that was cool. (paraphrased) |
| 14:30 |
graced |
Well, that segues nicely into our next agenda item. |
| 14:30 |
terran |
Interesting. |
| 14:30 |
graced |
And afterl I know you have to leave early today so let's move on if that's okay wiht everyone? |
| 14:30 |
tspindler |
yes |
| 14:30 |
sherbertbc |
yes |
| 14:30 |
graced |
#info tspindler provided an update from the Task Force |
| 14:31 |
graced |
#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fYw1-kgtaN5oM3s2cYTlETaRXMfddsVBecziujBp0sQ |
| 14:31 |
graced |
tspindler++ |
| 14:31 |
graced |
This was a lot of work, thank you for putting this together. |
| 14:31 |
collum |
tspindler++ |
| 14:31 |
terran |
tspindler++ Thank you! |
| 14:31 |
sherbertbc |
tspindler++ |
| 14:31 |
tspindler |
Thanks to miker, sherbertbc, and rhamby |
| 14:31 |
rgagnon |
tspindler++ |
| 14:31 |
graced |
I don't know if everyone has had a chance to review this yet |
| 14:31 |
graced |
Perhaps we should consider questions and points of clarification now and then take some time to digest the information presented before we go any further. |
| 14:31 |
tspindler |
I think the bottom line is there is no slam dunk solution. |
| 14:32 |
graced |
tspindler: exactly |
| 14:32 |
graced |
there's a lot to consider |
| 14:32 |
graced |
A topic this size will likely require a special meeting. |
| 14:32 |
terran |
Or several |
| 14:32 |
tspindler |
there are clearly some organizations we would not want to move to |
| 14:32 |
graced |
indeed |
| 14:32 |
tspindler |
would it be worth meeting some during the conference? |
| 14:33 |
rfrasur_ |
I think so. |
| 14:33 |
terran |
Yes |
| 14:33 |
graced |
I think we should try to fit in one meeting prior to the conference if we can |
| 14:33 |
graced |
Should we schedule a special session or maybe usurp next month's meeting agenda just for this? |
| 14:33 |
tspindler |
also, do we want to the report to get in another format to be incorporated with the openils site |
| 14:33 |
terran |
We could at least rule out some of the options before the conference |
| 14:34 |
rfrasur_ |
terran, that's a good point. |
| 14:34 |
graced |
tspindler: I think adding it to the git repo for sure would be good. I bet miker can do that |
| 14:34 |
miker |
graced: +1 to usurpation. it's certainly the biggest thing facing the board |
| 14:34 |
miker |
I certainly can. tspindler, do you have an asciidoc version? if not, I'll do that |
| 14:35 |
rfrasur_ |
graced, maybe if we can do the "weeding" that terran suggests at the next meeting, that'd give us time to also digest a little more of those directions that might also be positive and we could spend more time on those at the conference. |
| 14:35 |
afterl |
I agree with miker. Usurp. |
| 14:35 |
tspindler |
miker: i can create an ASCII doc version |
| 14:35 |
miker |
tspindler++ |
| 14:35 |
rfrasur_ |
and we might not need to usurp the whole meeting, but at least most of it. |
| 14:35 |
graced |
rfrasur_ exactly, I think you and terran are right |
| 14:36 |
tspindler |
I think sherbertbc, miker, rhamby and I can let you know what we would remove from the options |
| 14:36 |
sherbertbc |
+1 |
| 14:36 |
graced |
We'll probably want a brief conference update at the next meeting but yes, usurpation for the rest of the agenda |
| 14:36 |
graced |
tspindler++ sounds good |
| 14:37 |
terran |
+1 |
| 14:37 |
collum |
+1 |
| 14:37 |
afterl |
+1 |
| 14:37 |
rgagnon |
+1 |
| 14:37 |
rfrasur_ |
+1 |
| 14:37 |
graced |
#agreed The Board agrees to usurp "most" of the next scheduled meeting to deal with the Task Force report and future direction/actions |
| 14:38 |
graced |
are there any other questions or comments on this topic for now? |
| 14:38 |
graced |
Any other old business? |
| 14:39 |
collum |
afterl mentioned that Karen Sandler was willing to send someone to the conference. Do we need any more input from them? |
| 14:39 |
graced |
collum: Not at this point, I don't think. |
| 14:39 |
tspindler |
i don't see a need for that at this point |
| 14:39 |
graced |
The fiscal sponsorship agreement is fairly clear |
| 14:40 |
miker |
agreed, no need |
| 14:40 |
graced |
any other comments or old business? |
| 14:40 |
miker |
and I'm sure they'd rather not incur the expense |
| 14:40 |
collum |
sounds good |
| 14:41 |
graced |
moving on... Can I beg your indulgence to skip ahead in the agenda so afterl can announce the 2018 conference site selection before she has to leave? |
| 14:41 |
miker |
please |
| 14:41 |
graced |
#topic 2018 conference site selection |
| 14:41 |
graced |
afterl? |
| 14:41 |
afterl |
Drum roll .... |
| 14:41 |
afterl |
The 2018 Evergreen Conference Site Selection Committee has chosen the next host and venue for the 2018 conference. The MOBIUS consortium will be our 2018 conference host and St. Charles, Missouri will be the 2018 location. Conference dates to be determined. Congratulations, MOBIUS! They are very excited to be the next host! |
| 14:42 |
graced |
MOBIUS++ |
| 14:42 |
terran |
Hooray! |
| 14:42 |
tspindler |
St. Charles++ |
| 14:42 |
rfrasur_ |
MOBIUS++ |
| 14:42 |
graced |
thanks to afterl and her team for leading the site selection process |
| 14:42 |
rgagnon |
MOBIUS++, Site Committee++ |
| 14:42 |
kmlussier |
MOBIUS++ |
| 14:43 |
rfrasur_ |
That's awesome. Congrats to the MO contingent. Very exciting. |
| 14:43 |
graced |
And thank you to everyone who submitted proposals |
| 14:43 |
collum |
MOBIOUS++ |
| 14:43 |
graced |
okay - back to the agenda |
| 14:43 |
afterl |
And thank you, graced, for shifting things around so that I could get my reports in! |
| 14:43 |
collum |
or MOBIUS++, rather |
| 14:43 |
graced |
afterl: but of course |
| 14:44 |
afterl |
:-D |
| 14:44 |
graced |
#topic Financial Update |
| 14:44 |
graced |
#link https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:financials:update_2017_02_15 |
| 14:44 |
|
afterl left #evergreen |
| 14:44 |
graced |
#info Our balance with Conservancy is $67,944.78 |
| 14:44 |
graced |
Questions or comments? |
| 14:45 |
graced |
moving on then... |
| 14:45 |
graced |
#topic Committee Reports |
| 14:45 |
graced |
#topic Conference Committee |
| 14:45 |
graced |
#info As of about noon on 2/15 we have 85 paid full conference registrations, 38 paid pre-conference registrations totalling roughly $28,135. We have secured $27,535 in exhibit fees and sponsorships. |
| 14:45 |
graced |
Things are going well, but we do need to secure some more sponsorships. |
| 14:45 |
graced |
The team is hard at work on it, and I have complete confidence that we'll be fine |
| 14:45 |
graced |
Questions for me or Joe? |
| 14:46 |
graced |
I'll take that as a no. |
| 14:47 |
graced |
#topic Outreach Committee Business |
| 14:47 |
miker |
do we know OTTOYH the revenue from last year's conf? |
| 14:47 |
miker |
doh |
| 14:47 |
graced |
miker: revenue or profit? |
| 14:47 |
miker |
revenue |
| 14:47 |
graced |
not offhand |
| 14:47 |
miker |
if we double current registrations, will we beat last year? |
| 14:48 |
miker |
k, that's fine, carry on :) |
| 14:48 |
graced |
I'll dig up some comparison numbers and send those out next week |
| 14:48 |
graced |
okay - back to Outreach |
| 14:48 |
graced |
kmlussier? |
| 14:48 |
kmlussier |
Hi! |
| 14:49 |
* graced |
waves at kmlussier |
| 14:49 |
kmlussier |
I added my Outreach report to the agenda. |
| 14:49 |
kmlussier |
rhamby and I have started getting ourselves organized for the 2016 annual report. |
| 14:49 |
kmlussier |
We should be sending out a community survey again sometime soon. |
| 14:50 |
rhamby |
early next week is my goal |
| 14:50 |
kmlussier |
I would also like to submit a request again for meeting room space at ALA in Chicago in June. The cost of the room is $120. |
| 14:50 |
kmlussier |
rhamby++ |
| 14:51 |
rfrasur_ |
If we're looking for a motion about the ALA space, I'll make that motion. |
| 14:51 |
rgagnon |
Second |
| 14:51 |
kmlussier |
We had a meeting for MidWinter, but, since I did not attend MidWinter, I've only heard second-hand reports on how it went. I do know we had a good turnout and discussion at last year's Annual conference. |
| 14:52 |
graced |
any further questions? |
| 14:52 |
graced |
#startvote Shall the Board agree to approve the expenditure of $120 for an ALA Annual meeting room for the 2017 conference in Chicago? Yes, No, Abstain |
| 14:52 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Shall the Board agree to approve the expenditure of $120 for an ALA Annual meeting room for the 2017 conference in Chicago? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
| 14:52 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
| 14:52 |
sherbertbc |
#vote yes |
| 14:52 |
graced |
#vote Yes |
| 14:52 |
miker |
#vote yes |
| 14:52 |
tspindler |
#vote yes |
| 14:53 |
|
Stompro joined #evergreen |
| 14:53 |
rgagnon |
#vote yes |
| 14:53 |
terran |
#vote Yes |
| 14:53 |
rfrasur_ |
#vote yes |
| 14:53 |
collum |
#vote yes |
| 14:53 |
graced |
#endvote |
| 14:53 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Shall the Board agree to approve the expenditure of $120 for an ALA Annual meeting room for the 2017 conference in Chicago?" Results are |
| 14:53 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (8): tspindler, rgagnon, rfrasur_, miker, graced, collum, terran, sherbertbc |
| 14:53 |
graced |
#agreed the Board approved $120 for an ALA Annual meeting room |
| 14:53 |
graced |
Anything else for outreach kmlussier? |
| 14:54 |
kmlussier |
That's it. |
| 14:54 |
graced |
#topic Release Manager's Report |
| 14:54 |
graced |
kmlussier? |
| 14:54 |
kmlussier |
The 2.12 feature freeze deadline is tomorrow. We've been busy this week testing new features to be included in the release. |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
On the agenda, I highlighted some of the new features that have already made it into 2.12. |
| 14:55 |
kmlussier |
gmcharlt will be cutting the beta release next week. It should be available on Wednesday. |
| 14:56 |
kmlussier |
Also, the web client seems to be making some nice progress for 2.12. |
| 14:56 |
kmlussier |
That's all I have. |
| 14:56 |
graced |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
tspindler |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
collum |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
sherbertbc |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
terran |
I'd like to throw in a plug for Bug Squashing Week Feb 27-Mar 3 to go along with that :) |
| 14:57 |
rgagnon |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
terran |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
miker |
kmlussier++ |
| 14:57 |
kmlussier |
Yes, thanks for the reminder terran! |
| 14:57 |
graced |
#info Bug Squashing Week Feb 27-Mar 3 !! |
| 14:58 |
graced |
okay, I'm going to move us along and try to finish this agenda real quick |
| 14:58 |
graced |
#topic New Business |
| 14:58 |
graced |
#topic Evergreen Logo needs to be updated to a registered trademark |
| 14:58 |
graced |
#info When the SFC registered the word mark "Evergreen” in 2014 the policy wording and the Logo with the ™ were not updated to reflect that. |
| 14:58 |
graced |
Does anyone have the ability (fancy software programs) to correct the current logo to replace the TM with an R ? |
| 14:58 |
tspindler |
I have Illustrator and goud do that |
| 14:59 |
tspindler |
could do that |
| 14:59 |
graced |
thank you! |
| 14:59 |
graced |
#action tspindler to fix the Evergreen logo and ensure that the new logo is propagated to all the appropriate places. |
| 14:59 |
graced |
gmchalrt can help you with that last bit |
| 14:59 |
graced |
#info Tony sent me the correct legal wording to use to replace the wording in the current policy for trademark use. I’ll forward that to the list for informational purposes but I see no issue with updating the policy immediately. |
| 14:59 |
sherbertbc |
tspindler++ |
| 15:00 |
graced |
Objections to updating the policy wording (to reflect R rather than TM)? |
| 15:00 |
terran |
none here |
| 15:00 |
rgagnon |
None here |
| 15:00 |
collum |
none |
| 15:00 |
rfrasur_ |
nope |
| 15:00 |
sherbertbc |
none |
| 15:00 |
graced |
#action graced to update trademark policy wording on website/repo. |
| 15:00 |
graced |
And last but not least |
| 15:00 |
miker |
terran: can PINES supply the original raw data files for tspindler? I'm not (easily) finding them on the web site |
| 15:00 |
graced |
#topic SFC Request for fundraising help |
| 15:01 |
terran |
Umm... I'll ask. I'm not sure who has them. |
| 15:01 |
tspindler |
miker: if they can't it is a simple enought logo it would not be hard to recreate as vector graphic |
| 15:01 |
graced |
#action Terran to ask if raw image files exist of Evergreen logo |
| 15:02 |
graced |
#info the SFC sent an email asking for projects to help them raise funds. |
| 15:02 |
graced |
I believe I forwarded that |
| 15:02 |
graced |
Does anyone have thoughts about what we’re comfortable doing to help? |
| 15:03 |
rfrasur_ |
I think our 10% is part of raising funds. We're already working for Evergreen, and our institutions... |
| 15:03 |
tspindler |
rfrasur: agreed |
| 15:03 |
graced |
perhaps the outreach committee could tweet about it? |
| 15:04 |
graced |
Would there be objections to that? Or support of that? |
| 15:04 |
kmlussier |
The outreach committee can help the EOB in whatever way you see fit. |
| 15:04 |
graced |
Ambivalence to that? |
| 15:04 |
rfrasur_ |
I'm definitely not against that, but it's up to the outreach committee. If the rest of the board is cool with it, I'll be cool with it. |
| 15:04 |
rgagnon |
Sounds like a good idea. |
| 15:05 |
tspindler |
I'm fine with assistance like this I just would not want to transfer any funds |
| 15:05 |
graced |
It's easy enough to schedule a few tweets in support of their fundraising efforts |
| 15:05 |
rfrasur_ |
If the outreach committee doesn't think it'd be a burden, then I support it. |
| 15:05 |
kmlussier |
I think I've retweeted things for them from the EG account in the past. |
| 15:05 |
collum |
I'm OK with that, if the outreach committee is. |
| 15:06 |
graced |
#action kmlussier and the outreach committee to schedule a few tweets to support the SFC's fundraiser |
| 15:06 |
terran |
Retweeting is fine. I'm not interested in expending more of our limited time and resources on it though. |
| 15:07 |
graced |
thanks everyone, appreciate your thoughts/advice on that |
| 15:07 |
graced |
Is there any other new business? |
| 15:07 |
graced |
hearing none and seeing that we're 7 minutes over.... I'm sticking a fork in this meeting |
| 15:08 |
graced |
Thanks everyone! |
| 15:08 |
graced |
#endmeeting |
| 15:08 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting ended Thu Feb 16 15:08:05 2017 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
| 15:08 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-02-16-14.01.html |
| 15:08 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-02-16-14.01.txt |
| 15:08 |
pinesol_green |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2017/evergreen.2017-02-16-14.01.log.html |
| 15:08 |
rfrasur_ |
Thanks all. |
| 15:08 |
miker |
graced++ |
| 15:08 |
terran |
Thanks everyone, ciao! |
| 15:08 |
sherbertbc |
graced++ |
| 15:08 |
collum |
graced++ |
| 15:08 |
tspindler |
graced++ |
| 15:08 |
kmlussier |
graced++ |
| 15:08 |
graced |
y'all++ |
| 15:08 |
|
tspindler left #evergreen |
| 15:08 |
rgagnon |
graced++ |
| 15:09 |
kmlussier |
berick: I think I'm ready to merge hatch. Did you want to squash some of the commits in that branch before I do so? |
| 15:09 |
* kmlussier |
is getting ready to do her hatch happy dance. |
| 15:09 |
graced |
I believe it's a hatch hootenanny |
| 15:09 |
graced |
OR so berick said in his conference proposal |
| 15:09 |
* berick |
looks |
| 15:09 |
berick |
hah, you guys are awesome |
| 15:10 |
graced |
it's true |
| 15:10 |
graced |
and modest |
| 15:12 |
miker |
berick: you mentioned the google app store as the eventual home ... do you think we'll be super-versioning hatch for different versions of EG, or just trying really hard not to break the API so future hatches can work with older EGs? |
| 15:14 |
berick |
kmlussier: i could go either way on squashing. The bulk was already squashed. some commits makes sense as-is. other new commits each address bugs in the LP, so keeping them separate is not a bad thing, imo. if squashing is desired, though, i'm happy to. othwerwise, I say go for it. |
| 15:15 |
kmlussier |
berick: I had no strong opinions, so I'll go for it. Thanks! |
| 15:15 |
kmlussier |
berick++ |
| 15:16 |
berick |
miker: my sincere hope is future hatches can work with older EG's. so far through recent testing, the API has been stable. i expect we'll need some hatch-specific versioning, though. |
| 15:16 |
kmlussier |
I'm thinking at release time, we probably should put the hatch installer on the downloads page? |
| 15:16 |
berick |
kmlussier: makes sense. |
| 15:16 |
berick |
kmlussier: are you planning to also merge the Hatch branch into Hatch master? I can do that if you're not |
| 15:17 |
miker |
berick: so, this'll be hatch-v0, maybe? and when offline is there, hatch-v1? something like that? |
| 15:17 |
berick |
miker: yeah |
| 15:17 |
miker |
ok. something along the lines of libpq, where they just bump the version when the protocol changes |
| 15:18 |
kmlussier |
berick: Yes, can you do it? |
| 15:18 |
berick |
kmlussier: can do |
| 15:19 |
kmlussier |
Out of curiosity, do all core committers also have permission to merge to hatch master? |
| 15:19 |
berick |
miker: yeah, i've been using 0.0.1 0.0.2, but that's probably overkill. 1.0, 1.1, ... (add offline) 2.0, 2.1.. seems reasonable |
| 15:20 |
miker |
yeah, hopefully hatch won't be changing much, excepting any bug fixes or rubustifications. or forced changes from the goog |
| 15:21 |
berick |
exactly |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
Showing latest 5 of 11 commits to Evergreen... |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1646166 Hatch settings migration - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=1fc83b6> |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1646166 Hatch loader matches on explicit DOM content - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=0d98891> |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1646166 Hatch attach point is documentElement - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=327542c> |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1646166 Hatch templated print content type repair - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=590f351> |
| 15:25 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Bill Erickson] LP#1646166 Hatch printing multi root-node templates - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=500b727> |
| 15:28 |
berick |
kmlussier++ |
| 15:28 |
berick |
Hatch.git updated too |
| 15:29 |
mmorgan |
berick++ |
| 15:29 |
mmorgan |
kmlussier++ |
| 15:29 |
kmlussier |
berick++ |
| 15:29 |
mmorgan |
@who is the Hatch Master? |
| 15:29 |
pinesol_green |
abneiman is the Hatch Master. |
| 15:29 |
abneiman |
uhhhh |
| 15:29 |
abneiman |
LOL |
| 15:30 |
abneiman |
sadly, false |
| 15:30 |
mmorgan |
:) |
| 15:30 |
kmlussier |
abneiman: It's a lot less scarier than it may seem. |
| 15:31 |
abneiman |
kmlussier++ # I'll get there someday... |
| 15:38 |
gmcharlt |
OpenSRF 2.4.2 and 2.5.0-alpha2 are cut but not yet available for download |
| 15:38 |
gmcharlt |
Evergreen 2.11.3 is cut and staged courtesy of dbwells |
| 15:39 |
gmcharlt |
I'm working on 2.10.10 now; once its up, it'll be time for the release announcements |
| 15:40 |
berick |
gmcharlt++ |
| 15:40 |
berick |
dbwells++ |
| 15:40 |
jeff |
gmcharlt++ dbwells++ |
| 15:41 |
jeff |
kmlussier++ miker++ jeffdavis++ and i'm missing a few more, i'm sure |
| 15:42 |
jeff |
gmcharlt: OpenSRF 2.4.2 cut but tag/branch not pushed yet pending announcement? |
| 15:42 |
gmcharlt |
jeff: correct, I'll push branches post-announcement |
| 15:43 |
Dyrcona |
gmcharlt++ dbwells++ |
| 16:29 |
gmcharlt |
OpenSRF 2.4.2 and 2.5.0-alpha2 are now available from https://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf-downloads/ |
| 16:29 |
gmcharlt |
if anybody here has a moment to do a quick sanity check, I'd appreciate it |
| 16:35 |
gmcharlt |
similarly, https://evergreen-ils.org/egdownloads/ is now updated |
| 16:37 |
kmlussier |
gmcharlt++ dbwells++ |
| 16:53 |
gmcharlt |
https://evergreen-ils.org/security-releases-opensrf-2-4-2-and-2-5-0-alpha2-evergreen-2-10-10-and-evergreen-2-11-3/ |
| 16:57 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Mike Rylander] LP#1652382: normalization of memcache keys in C code - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=dbc54c6> |
| 16:57 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Mike Rylander] LP#1652382: Make use of the clean key just created - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=3277648> |
| 16:57 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Galen Charlton] LP#1652382: handle cases where supplied key is longer than 250 bytes - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=7524221> |
| 16:57 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Galen Charlton] LP#1652382: more improvements to cache key munging - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=cbd252b> |
| 16:58 |
|
khuckins__ joined #evergreen |
| 17:01 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Chris Sharp] LP#16663435 - Stripe org settings lack view permissions. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=e664df4> |
| 17:01 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Jason Stephenson] LP#16663435 - Release Note for Missing Stripe Settings Permissions - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=a02bcf5> |
| 17:01 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#16663435: stamp database update - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=c9af31b> |
| 17:02 |
pinesol_green |
News from qatests: Test Failure <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live> |
| 17:03 |
kmlussier |
uh oh |
| 17:03 |
kmlussier |
That's must be from the code I merged last night. |
| 17:03 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] release notes for 2.10.10 - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=9af4ae7> |
| 17:04 |
kmlussier |
But the test passed this morning. hmmmm |
| 17:07 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
| 17:15 |
|
khuckins_ joined #evergreen |
| 17:37 |
jeffdavis |
updated bug 1541559 with a branch for review and some basic setup instructions |
| 17:37 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1541559 in Evergreen "OneClickdigital API integration" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1541559 - Assigned to Jeff Davis (jdavis-sitka) |
| 17:38 |
jeffdavis |
branch supports holdings/availability lookup and patron transaction lookup for OneClickdigital and OverDrive; no support yet for actually *doing* transactions (checking out titles etc) directly in the TPAC, that's still forthcoming |
| 18:10 |
jeffdavis |
gmcharlt: OpenSRF 2.4.2 tarball and updated rel_2_4 branch both successfully sanity-checked here |
| 18:11 |
gmcharlt |
jeff++ |
| 18:11 |
gmcharlt |
well, yes |
| 18:11 |
gmcharlt |
but also |
| 18:11 |
gmcharlt |
jeffdavis++ |
| 18:11 |
gmcharlt |
:) |
| 18:11 |
jeffdavis |
:) |
| 18:11 |
jeffdavis |
Thanks for wrangling the release! |
| 18:34 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Dan Wells] Forward port 2.11.3 upgrade script - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=922b4b3> |
| 18:54 |
|
Jillianne joined #evergreen |
| 19:09 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 19:36 |
Dyrcona |
Oh. I'm still signed in... I forgot. |
| 20:39 |
* kmlussier |
thinks she knows why the test failed today. |
| 20:44 |
kmlussier |
When I was working on bug 1553287, I noticed that the addition of parts would break up all of our metarecord groups in the test data. |
| 20:44 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1553287 in Evergreen "Incorporating part information into biblio fingerprint" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1553287 |
| 20:44 |
kmlussier |
And the test relies on 3 records being part of the same metarecord group. |
| 20:46 |
kmlussier |
So we need new sample records that can be grouped together and then point the test to those records. |
| 20:50 |
kmlussier |
Maybe we can get a few Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone records to add to the test data. They have the added benefit of being easy to remember. |
| 21:04 |
jeff |
sounds reasonable. :-) |
| 21:16 |
rhamby |
kmlussier: I vote for at least one lovecraft collection to be added |
| 21:17 |
kmlussier |
rhamby: Sure! You got the MARC records? |
| 21:18 |
rhamby |
kmlussier: I can make it happen. |
| 21:18 |
kmlussier |
rhamby: One of my longtime Board members is a big H.P. Lovecraft fan. |
| 21:19 |
rhamby |
kmlussier: I can get a few records together that would be in the same metarecord and submit it as a patch. |
| 21:19 |
kmlussier |
Excellent! rhamby++ |
| 21:19 |
rhamby |
A few groups in fact. |
| 21:19 |
rhamby |
I'll have it in this weekend. |
| 21:19 |
kmlussier |
Great, thanks! |
| 21:31 |
kmlussier |
Actually, I was wrong. It's harry potter and the goblet of fire, not the sorcerer's stone, that's currently in the Concerto dataset. |
| 21:32 |
kmlussier |
@sortinghat |
| 21:32 |
pinesol_green |
Hmm... kmlussier... Let me see now... HUFFLEPUFF! |
| 21:32 |
kmlussier |
Yeah, that pretty much sums up my day. |
| 22:06 |
dbs |
I've applied the OpenSRF 2.4.2 tarball but waiting another couple of hours for restart |
| 22:50 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
| 23:00 |
|
deepbook5broo joined #evergreen |
| 23:00 |
|
deepbook5broo left #evergreen |
| 23:13 |
|
teletype02 joined #evergreen |
