| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 12:46 |
|
bmills joined #evergreen |
| 13:10 |
|
rlefaive joined #evergreen |
| 13:34 |
* csharp |
LOLs |
| 13:35 |
csharp |
last night we did some system maintenance, including some datawork, and all looked well when we quit |
| 13:35 |
csharp |
this morning, we got multiple helpdesk tickets saying that the patron voter registration survey was no longer showing in the patron reg form |
| 13:36 |
csharp |
so I immediately assumed we'd broken something, of course |
| 13:36 |
csharp |
turns out, the survey, whose "start date" was 9/2/2006 had an "end date" of 9/2/2016 |
| 13:37 |
csharp |
so I guess phasefx, miker, or berick (or bradl) couldn't have imagined that EG would have lasted this long, at least in PINES |
| 13:37 |
csharp |
tl;dr: HAPPY 10th BIRTHDAY, EVERGREEN! ;-) |
| 13:38 |
miker |
heh :) |
| 13:39 |
* csharp |
set the new end date to 9/2/2036, since *he* can't imagine it lasting another 20 years |
| 13:40 |
miker |
csharp: I created a couple reports in '08, I think, as a canary to make sure Clark was running. still get emails on the first of every month |
| 13:40 |
csharp |
miker: I've seen those before and wondered if you were still getting them |
| 14:03 |
* dbs |
wonders how many sites actually install Evergreen from the release tarballs vs. their own git repos w/ customizations, and what that would mean for the docs if it turned out that the answer was "almost everyone installs from a custom git branch" |
| 14:08 |
dbs |
http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_optional_extra_steps_for_browser_based_staff_client.html#_install_dependencies_for_browser_based_staff_client links to a node.js install doc page that no longer exists, and the "moved to" link points to generic node.js docs, nothing specifically about installaion |
| 14:09 |
dbs |
would https://nodejs.org/en/download/package-manager maybe be a better destination? |
| 14:11 |
dbs |
or maybe not link there at all, if we're really building node.js 0.10.28 from source instead of the node.js LTS packaged release of 4.5.0 |
| 14:13 |
dbs |
0.10.28 was released in 2014... maybe I'm just going to skip the web staff client for now. |
| 14:14 |
|
bmills joined #evergreen |
| 14:18 |
|
bmills1 joined #evergreen |
| 14:18 |
|
bmills1 joined #evergreen |
| 14:23 |
csharp |
dbs: we install from release tarballs and overlay our customized files on top |
| 14:25 |
dbs |
csharp: seems like a good approach, too |
| 14:29 |
csharp |
you can really only document agreed-upon releases, which is why we are not in the "run EG from master" camp |
| 14:30 |
dbs |
maybe if we had a couple of different approaches documented, even just as wiki pages that are linked from the docs, that might help less sysadmin-savvy sites |
| 14:30 |
dbs |
csharp: heh, we're in the "run EG from rel_2_10 camp" (or will be if all goes well over the next couple of days) |
| 14:39 |
csharp |
dbs: best of luck! |
| 14:40 |
dbs |
thanks, router just responded '4' to opensrf.math add 2,2 so things are going well so far :) |
| 15:47 |
csharp |
sheesh - purging old resolved transits is totally not fast and I have like 19M to do :-/ |
| 15:48 |
csharp |
I don't see any triggers to disable or anything, but I'm assuming it has to check the tables that inherit it |
| 15:48 |
csharp |
been running for >16 hours |
| 15:51 |
csharp |
yep - EXPLAIN confirms that it does a seq scan of action.transit_copy, action.hold_transit_copy and action.reservation_transit_copy |
| 15:51 |
csharp |
thatsa buncha rowsa |
| 15:56 |
dbs |
wow. |
| 15:57 |
dbs |
any indexes that might help avoid the seq scan? |
| 16:03 |
dbs |
mmm. trying node 4.5.0 from the 3rd party packages, but npm is very unhappy at npm install time about the other nodejs packaged modules that were previously installed by Makefile.install (because they're ancient) |
| 16:04 |
dbs |
I really should let this go |
| 16:04 |
csharp |
I think this describes what's happening: http://grokbase.com/t/postgresql/pgsql-general/047122kcsf/slow-deletion-of-data-from-tables#20040708rozrweucvkkb2nxqvb5t5qq43i |
| 16:07 |
csharp |
your experience is illustrating my queasiness about the nodejs dependencies in general - seems like it's not nearly as reliable as, say, CPAN |
| 16:08 |
* dbs |
uses 'apt-cache autoremove' to get rid of the old ubuntu-trusty universe nodejs packages |
| 16:09 |
dbs |
well in this case it was primarily the ubuntu-trusty version of nodejs causing the problem. also our docs saying to install nodejs ancient version from source when our Makefile.install installs the slightly more ancient ubuntu-trusty package is surprising |
| 16:11 |
dbs |
oh yay, now that the crufty packaged versions are gone I get unmet dependency errors. forget this. |
| 16:12 |
csharp |
ugh |
| 16:17 |
dbs |
For posterity: http://pastebin.ca/3710320 |
| 16:32 |
dbs |
oh hey, 'rm -fr node_modules bower_components && npm install && bower install && grunt all' worked a lot better (still a number of deprecation and DoS warnings but works...) |
| 17:12 |
|
gmcharlt joined #evergreen |
| 17:16 |
|
gmcharlt joined #evergreen |
| 17:25 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 17:32 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 17:39 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 17:59 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 18:05 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 18:10 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 18:15 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 18:57 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 19:02 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 19:06 |
|
jeff joined #evergreen |
| 19:43 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 20:08 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 21:46 |
|
dbs joined #evergreen |
| 22:35 |
dbs |
sorry folks: https://status.linode.com/ |
