Time |
Nick |
Message |
02:49 |
|
Callender_ joined #evergreen |
04:57 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
07:40 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
07:48 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
08:00 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
08:11 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
08:16 |
|
rjackson_isl joined #evergreen |
08:21 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
08:22 |
|
ericar_ joined #evergreen |
08:33 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
08:39 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
08:39 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
08:51 |
|
Shae joined #evergreen |
08:52 |
|
ericar_ joined #evergreen |
09:01 |
|
jwoodard joined #evergreen |
09:11 |
|
Newziky joined #evergreen |
09:12 |
csharp |
eeevil: I definitely see a difference post-fix for bug 1438136 on my test server (http://next.gapines.org), but when I applied it to PINES production just now, I'm still seeing long-running queries - I'll try and dig up a core query and EXPLAIN ANALYZE it |
09:12 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1438136 in Evergreen "OPAC searching significantly slowed by adding format filters" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1438136 |
09:14 |
|
montgoc1 joined #evergreen |
09:17 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
09:18 |
csharp |
eeevil: http://pastebin.com/vAD0GMZ9 - whenever you get a free moment ;-) |
09:19 |
csharp |
it's still underestimating the number of rows to scan for the mrv index |
09:20 |
|
Newziky left #evergreen |
09:21 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
09:30 |
csharp |
dbs: if you don't mind, I'm going to work on branch-ifying your (and eeevil's) solution to bug 1206936 to make that pushable into master |
09:30 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1206936 in Evergreen "money.transaction_billing_summary view displays incorrect billing_type and billing_note for the actual last transaction" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1206936 |
09:37 |
|
RoganH joined #evergreen |
09:41 |
jeff |
@weather ktvc |
09:41 |
pinesol_green |
jeff: The current temperature in Traverse City, Michigan is 39.2°F (8:53 AM EDT on May 19, 2015). Conditions: Overcast. Humidity: 73%. Dew Point: 32.0°F. Windchill: 32.0°F. Pressure: 30.13 in 1020 hPa (Rising). Freeze warning in effect from midnight tonight to 8 am EDT Wednesday... |
09:41 |
mmorgan |
Brrrr... |
09:43 |
csharp |
@weather 30033 |
09:43 |
pinesol_green |
csharp: The current temperature in Leafmore, Decatur, Georgia is 71.1°F (9:42 AM EDT on May 19, 2015). Conditions: Scattered Clouds. Humidity: -999%. Dew Point: 12.2°F. Pressure: 30.08 in 1018 hPa (Steady). |
09:44 |
csharp |
argh - now I'm arguing with myself about whether money.transaction_billing_summary and money.transaction_billing_type_summary can have the same view definition |
09:45 |
* csharp |
doesn't know what each does |
09:47 |
csharp |
hmm, I don't see either defined in fm_IDL.xml |
09:47 |
csharp |
obviously they're used somewhere, right? |
09:48 |
pastebot |
"mmorgan" at 64.57.241.14 pasted "transaction.billing... View definitions" (15 lines) at http://paste.evergreen-ils.org/55 |
09:50 |
jeff |
csharp: they currently differ and you're proposing changing them to be similar/identical? |
09:50 |
rjackson_isl |
jeff: burned the tops of my feet a bit at Esch Rd Beach on Saturday - it was 75 and mostly calm then |
09:52 |
csharp |
jeff: right - basically dbs's approach is to use the money.materialized_billable_xact_summary table to populate money.transaction_billing_summary, but if we're going to do that, I think it makes sense to change all of the views that have the flaw in bug 1206936 |
09:52 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1206936 in Evergreen "money.transaction_billing_summary view displays incorrect billing_type and billing_note for the actual last transaction" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1206936 |
09:53 |
csharp |
and with that approach, there's not a way to distinguish the two views, except by name |
09:53 |
csharp |
grepping the code only shows were the views are created in the SQL script, so I'm at a loss to where to look next at where they are actually referred to :-/ |
09:55 |
jeff |
money.transaction_billing_summary may have been unused since 2006, commit ef811b8 |
09:55 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|miker] speeding up the open_transaction_summary view - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=ef811b8> |
09:57 |
csharp |
hmm |
09:57 |
mmorgan |
money.transaction_billing_summary looks correct in that it's selecting last(billing.billing_type). money.transaction_billing_type_summary does not look correct as it is not selecting the LAST billing type. |
09:58 |
jeff |
And it's possible that money.transaction_billing_type_summary has never been used since being introduced in 2005, commit 06d7269 |
09:58 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|miker] adding "open only" views - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=06d7269> |
09:59 |
csharp |
mmorgan: see the original description for bug 1206936 for how that's not working as expected |
09:59 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1206936 in Evergreen "money.transaction_billing_summary view displays incorrect billing_type and billing_note for the actual last transaction" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1206936 |
10:00 |
csharp |
wow - ok |
10:01 |
jeff |
Note my use of "may" and "possible". I'm just going by what I'm seeing in git with basic string searches. |
10:01 |
csharp |
well, you're confirming my original findings that "ain't nothin' usin' these thangs" |
10:01 |
jeff |
Also, especially since the views are documented in the schema docs, it's possible that anyone writing SQL reports may have used them. |
10:02 |
csharp |
yeah |
10:03 |
jeff |
Not sure if I'd advocate "fix+deprecate, remove" or "remove". |
10:03 |
jeff |
Since if you were using them they probably were giving data other than that you sought... |
10:04 |
csharp |
well, the complaint that spawned the bug was that one of our PINES librarians found that the last billing type and last billing note were often wrong when running reports that would otherwise depend on those being right |
10:04 |
jeff |
Having pulled more chunks of Craftsman out of the repo during my layovers, I'm leaning toward "excise in a precise, documented, but otherwise ruthless fashion" |
10:04 |
jboyer-isl |
In cases like this I'm a fan of "Don't fix, paste red flags everywhere + fast track deprecation, remove in version now()+1. |
10:05 |
jboyer-isl |
If it's fixed, people will just keep using it. |
10:05 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl: yeah, I'm not interested in fixing something that's not used anywhere |
10:05 |
jeff |
Because is it possible that someone's custom skin was referencing that image that was brought in with Craftsman but not removed when Craftsman was removed? Sure. Is it worth carrying around a whole pile of Craftsman "just in case"? My opinion there is "no." |
10:06 |
csharp |
this is an example of my not knowing how the front end connects to the back end - I'm now going to have to retrace my steps and figure out how I got here in the first place |
10:07 |
jeff |
jboyer-isl: since you have "log all queries" for pgbadger purposes, can you grep a month or so worth of production queries to see if those views are referenced? ;-) |
10:07 |
jboyer-isl |
pgbadger only looks at yesterday's queries, so we only keep a couple weeks worth for situations like this. But I imagine that's enough... ;) |
10:08 |
jeff |
presumably, as long as we're not missing a generated reference to the view name that only comes into play on the third monday of every month containing a blue moon. |
10:09 |
jboyer-isl |
Heh, to explain for the logs: pgbadger creates static reports, so it only needs to look at a single day at a time, build that report, and then never look again. It will let you keep as many as you like. |
10:09 |
csharp |
Classic Open Transaction Summary was the original view with the trouble, according to the ol' helpdesk |
10:10 |
jboyer-isl |
Ah, "Classic" in the name. Set it aflame, problem solved. ;) |
10:11 |
csharp |
which pulls its data from money.open_billable_xact_summary |
10:12 |
jeff |
poetic. |
10:12 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl++ |
10:12 |
jeff |
stay away from poison ivy by remembering: "Leaves of three? Let it be." |
10:13 |
jeff |
avoid zombie reporting views by remembering: "Classic in the name? Set it aflame." |
10:13 |
jboyer-isl |
jeff++ |
10:13 |
csharp |
I like it (or I would if 95% of all PINES reports templates weren't built on such views :-) ) |
10:14 |
csharp |
reports-- |
10:15 |
jeff |
well, right. in this context a "Classic" report is code for "A report that tries to do it the way that PINES was used to doing is so as not to be too new and scary." :-) |
10:18 |
csharp |
6b3661b8 |
10:18 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|erickson] updated some existing billing views to use the new (faster) money.materialized_billable_xact_summary - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=6b3661b> |
10:25 |
|
dbwells joined #evergreen |
10:33 |
csharp |
ok - it's not just the reports issue (which was apparently fixed with the above commit long ago) - when looking at the bills summary for a patron account, the wrong last billing type is showing |
10:33 |
csharp |
*that's* why dbs got involved, because someone found that there too |
10:33 |
jeff |
csharp: where are you seeing the wrong billing type? |
10:35 |
csharp |
for a couple of example patron accounts, in the Bills UI, the summary shows a Last Billing Type when that column is displayed (in one case "Overdue Materials"), but when Full Details is selected, I can see that the *actual* last billing type was "Lost Materials" |
10:37 |
csharp |
http://irc.evergreen-ils.org/evergreen/2013-07-31#i_18620 shows a discussion a couple of years ago when the bug was originally filed |
10:37 |
jeff |
And it isn't a case of "item was marked lost at 14:30 on a day where it had ALSO been billed an overdue fine (in the FUTURE) at 23:59? |
10:37 |
csharp |
jeff: right - it's not that |
10:37 |
jeff |
k. always have to check. :-) |
10:38 |
csharp |
"eeevil csharp: actually, the use of last() there is just to get /any/ billing type, we don't care which ... or, rather, we couldn't care which, inexpensively, when the view was written originally because there were no window functions. there are now, so we can care cheaply" |
10:38 |
csharp |
but window functions were resource-depleting which is why we're looking at just using the materialized view at this point |
10:39 |
csharp |
but my plan of attack will only include tables actually in use ;-) |
10:39 |
jeff |
resource-depleting as in they consumed a bit of ram? |
10:46 |
|
RoganH_ joined #evergreen |
10:50 |
csharp |
jeff: well, just bad queries, actually - long-running |
10:51 |
csharp |
jeff: would you mind helping me locate where "search_money_billable_transaction_summary" is defined? as in "my $mbts = $e->search_money_billable_transaction_summary", line 2269 of Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/Application/Actor.pm |
10:51 |
csharp |
I feel like I'm being led in a circle when grepping (or ack-ing actually) the code for that :-/ |
10:52 |
jeff |
auto-generated methods in CStoreEditor.pm, iirc. |
10:52 |
jeff |
hold for line number. |
10:52 |
csharp |
aaahhh |
10:53 |
* berick |
confirms |
10:54 |
jeff |
Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/Utils/CStoreEditor.pm in sub "init", near the comment "Load up the methods from the FM classes" around line 917 in master |
10:54 |
csharp |
jeff++ # excellent |
10:59 |
csharp |
okay - so that leads me to money.materialized_billable_xact_summary, which is a view of money.billable_xact_summary, which uses the same last() functions that caused the problem in the first place :-/ |
10:59 |
csharp |
so... I'm back to where I started |
11:00 |
jboyer-isl |
if money.materialized... is a view, issues are piling up rapidly. |
11:00 |
csharp |
funny, my original thought was "well, looks like this is all sewn up. I'll just throw it into a branch so we can start the sign-off process" |
11:01 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl: it's a materialized view |
11:01 |
Dyrcona |
materialized usually means a table standing in for a view. |
11:01 |
jboyer-isl |
Also, Re: grepping for money.transaction_billing_summary, no mention in the db logs for the last 12 days. |
11:02 |
jboyer-isl |
csharp: Oh, but you may be running a version of postgres that has legit materialized views, where mine are still built from triggers. That would make \d+ in psql give us different things. |
11:02 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl: nah - this is trigger-based - whatever's in core EG |
11:03 |
jboyer-isl |
Then it should still be a real table, that's what I've got here. |
11:03 |
csharp |
and this <-- is why that bug has been open for nearly 2 years :-/ |
11:03 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl: yeah - sorry - it's a real table - I should have been more accurate |
11:04 |
csharp |
I get to a point where I just decide it's too much work for the slender benefit |
11:06 |
jboyer-isl |
I thought there was some interest in getting core to base the definition of (some of?) our manually materialized views to use the built-in PG stuff at some point, but that may be further down the line. |
11:11 |
csharp |
I like the way that sounds and I'm up for helping when the time comes |
11:14 |
jeff |
jboyer-isl: presently in 9.3 and 9.4, postgresql "native" materialized views are only updated on-demand, and in full (not incrementally). |
11:16 |
jboyer-isl |
jeff: Eeewww... That doesn't sound at all good. All the joys of using a naive garbage collection system, now in database form! |
11:17 |
jeff |
Also, there's a bug with pg_restore when using materialized views: postgres can attempt to refresh the view (populate it) before indexes are created, which is... slow. |
11:23 |
jboyer-isl |
This is how the sausage gets made I suppose, new features, new bugs. |
11:31 |
bshum |
Stompro++ # new docs committer |
11:39 |
jeff |
Stompro++ |
11:42 |
jboyer-isl |
jeff: you have collectionHQ mail |
11:42 |
jeff |
jboyer-isl++ thanks! |
11:42 |
jboyer-isl |
Good luck |
11:43 |
Dyrcona |
<aol_voice>You've got mail!</aol_voice> |
11:44 |
jboyer-isl |
Dyrcona understands how I think. |
11:54 |
|
bmills joined #evergreen |
12:01 |
dkyle1 |
so ccvm has id 587 but ccaed has no coded_value 587.... seems to be why I can't get a book to properly re-ingest and have a book icon - don't know how it got an ebook icon to begin with |
12:02 |
dkyle1 |
removing the 587 from ccvm and re-saving the bib did change the icon from ebook to book. anyone know if that will cause other problems? |
12:03 |
dkyle1 |
and possibly a bug in the seed data |
12:10 |
* tsbere |
has little to no clue what dkyle1 is talking about at this point |
12:11 |
* dkyle1 |
laughs |
12:14 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: I will say that the icon_format definition for book (which controls when that shows up) says that the item_form can't be one of several values, including those that are required for ebook to show up... |
12:15 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: From my docs, any of the following item forms will stop the book search filter/icon: a,b,c,f,o,q,r,s (d, for large print, only stops the icon) |
12:16 |
dkyle1 |
had a book that was displaying with an ebook icon, found that config.coded_value_map row id 587 has no corresponding coded_value entry in config.composite_attr_entry_definition |
12:16 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: ebooks show up with item_form set to one of o,q,s |
12:16 |
Dyrcona |
Check the MARC is the usual answer. |
12:17 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: MVLC's row 587 isn't ebook, it is "item_form=q", which the ebook and book icon_formats check indirectly. |
12:17 |
dkyle1 |
Dyrcona: indeed, and item_form showed blank in marc editor, but showed as q in metabib.record_attr_flat |
12:17 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
12:17 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: The real solution is to find out where that q is coming from and remove it from the marc. |
12:19 |
dkyle1 |
tsbere: thanks, yes. I was re-saving the marc but not seeing the expected change in metabib.record_attr_flat |
12:19 |
dkyle1 |
until I removed the 587 row from ccvm |
12:20 |
Dyrcona |
I wouldn't remove the row. |
12:21 |
Dyrcona |
I think something in the 007 and/or 008 can also affect that, not just the "fixed" fields. |
12:23 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
12:23 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: All that removing the row does is break the item_form indexing. |
12:24 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: The item_form can come from the 006 or the 008. Where varies by marc type. |
12:24 |
dkyle1 |
tsbere: I won't leave it out, but for some reason that allowed me to fix that record |
12:25 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: Further, the 006 is repeatable and likely isn't represented in the fixed field editor because of that. |
12:26 |
tsbere |
generally going to be position 23 in the 008 or position 6 in the 006. |
12:28 |
dkyle1 |
tsbere: so what is the purpose of the config.composite_attr_entry_definition table? |
12:29 |
dkyle1 |
tsbere++ and I thought I knew a lot about marc... |
12:29 |
tsbere |
dkyle1: When a ccvm entry is tied to a "composite" type the definition is in that table |
12:29 |
tsbere |
composite being "based on other types that would have already been looked up before the composite check" |
12:29 |
tsbere |
basically |
12:30 |
dkyle1 |
tsbere: ok, and the definition is where when not tied to a composite type |
12:31 |
tsbere |
varies. <_< |
12:31 |
kmlussier |
dkyle1: I don't know if this is helpful at all, but you can see what data is required for the default icons at http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.8/_marc_record_attributes.html#_search_and_icon_formats |
12:31 |
tsbere |
config.record_attr_definition has a small collection of options |
12:32 |
dkyle1 |
kmlussier++ |
12:33 |
dkyle1 |
we didn't upgrade for quite a while, so I have a number of new table relationships to fully grok |
12:34 |
kmlussier |
tsbere++ #For creating that particular piece of documentation. |
12:35 |
tsbere |
Oh, wow, I forgot I had included "where to find item format by record type" in there. |
12:44 |
Dyrcona |
Signing out 'cause I'm changing wireless networks in a minute or ten. |
12:54 |
jeff |
of the two images "progressbar_green.gif" and "progressbar_green-old.gif", both are in use, and the former isn't green anymore. :-) |
12:55 |
jeff |
Of the 131 image files added by the craftsman skin, 127 are no longer in use and are now slated for removal. |
13:06 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
13:08 |
kmlussier |
jeff: Not only is it not green, but it's not much of a bar either. :) |
13:12 |
jeff |
launchpad-- the fastest way to search for something should not be to order by bug id and page back |
13:12 |
|
maryj joined #evergreen |
13:13 |
tsbere |
jeff: I usually submit a "new" bug to search. <_< |
13:13 |
jeff |
yeah. i've done that also. |
13:13 |
jeff |
of course, it's possible that there isn't a bug when i thought there was. |
13:31 |
berick |
jeff++ # cleanup |
13:38 |
jeff |
berick: did you open a bug on removing the legacy self checkout interface? i know there's the branch... |
13:38 |
jeff |
but can't tell if i can't find the bug because of launchpad or because it does not exist. :-) |
13:43 |
berick |
jeff: bug 1312297 |
13:43 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1312297 in Evergreen "time to remove the old web-based selfcheck interface" (affected: 2, heat: 10) [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1312297 |
13:43 |
berick |
jeff: fyi, i googled 'site:bugs.launchpad.net evergreen selfcheck remove' ;) |
13:43 |
berick |
only way anything works for me |
13:44 |
* bshum |
likes the "deprecation" tagged bugs :) |
13:45 |
kmlussier |
RoganH_++ # http://www.roganhamby.com/evergreen/2015/5/18/evergreen-conference-2015?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter |
13:48 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
13:58 |
jboyer-isl |
csharp: I posted something to the dev and general lists a while ago, is it stuck in a mod queue? |
13:58 |
jboyer-isl |
I don't know who else has such access to the lists, but I'd welcome help from wherever. |
14:12 |
jeff |
berick: thanks! |
14:41 |
|
cmccarthy joined #evergreen |
14:54 |
bshum |
jboyer-isl: I think csharp is the primary admin for those mailing lists |
14:54 |
* bshum |
checks the wiki |
14:54 |
bshum |
http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=website_administration#evergreen_mailing_lists |
14:54 |
bshum |
Looks like phasefx may have powers too |
14:55 |
bshum |
jboyer-isl: Maybe they can fix it for you, and make you a moderator too. |
14:55 |
bshum |
:P |
15:02 |
csharp |
jboyer-isl: I don't see anything in the moderation queues for either list from you |
15:06 |
|
cyclops joined #evergreen |
15:11 |
jeff |
good excuse for me to log in and remember that those lists aren't on the community list host yet. :-) |
15:11 |
bshum |
At some point we ought to finish the plan and execute moving those over. |
15:27 |
csharp |
personally, I would just start new lists, "General", "Dev", "Documentation", and the git commit lists on the list.evergreen-ils.org server, have a 30 day "transitional period" where both lists work, then close down the list.georgialibraries.org lists down and move the older archives over |
15:28 |
dbs |
csharp++ |
15:28 |
csharp |
that way we aren't really trying to migrate anything |
15:30 |
csharp |
if'n y'all want, we could begin that transition, say June 1 and be fully moved over by July 1 (those dates are weekdays, so no awkwardness around weekends/holidays) |
15:31 |
csharp |
mailman scripts make mass export/import of current members very easy |
15:31 |
bshum |
Certainly a good thing. |
15:31 |
bshum |
My only thought is still back to keeping the name "dev" for that list, and instead using something else more generic. |
15:32 |
bshum |
Like "technical" |
15:32 |
bshum |
Just to avoid the whole round yet again about why "dev" is for "developers" |
15:32 |
bshum |
But anywho..... |
15:32 |
jeff |
What's the purpose of making the migration take 30 days? |
15:47 |
csharp |
jeff: it was a nice round number plucked from thin air to account for people who may only occasionally check EG mail? it's arbitrary, though, so if someone has a better idea, I'm all for it ;-) |
15:49 |
jeff |
Do you see there needing to be some user action that every subscriber takes during that period of time? |
15:49 |
csharp |
nah |
15:49 |
csharp |
we could just subscribe all the current subscribers to each list to the new version |
15:50 |
jeff |
So it's just a "have two lists that are disconnected from each other for 30 days for maximum confusion" period? ;-) |
15:50 |
jeff |
infrastructure hack-a-way. my backyard, grill + wifi. |
15:50 |
csharp |
I just figured people might need time to adjust to the change - I'm open to alternatives |
15:52 |
jboyer-isl |
I just re-sent it, lets see if it has again run afoul of cosmic rays or something. |
15:56 |
gmcharlt |
csharp: I personally would prefer advance warning followed by a firm cutoff |
15:56 |
csharp |
gmcharlt: fine with me |
16:00 |
jboyer-isl |
Aha, I apparently signed up under my old email (jboyer1@...) and now have to fix that. |
16:02 |
jboyer-isl |
Oh, Change Globally check box, you are my best friend. |
16:07 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
16:08 |
jboyer-isl |
I sent that thing 3 times and couldn't be bothered to correct that awful looking run-on sentence. Madness. |
16:10 |
jeff |
amused at the SSL warnings on jboyer-isl's onedrive.live.com urls |
16:11 |
jeff |
(SHA-1 cert in the chain and not itself rooted in the trust store) |
16:11 |
jeff |
you probably won't see if it your browser/os includes the cert in question in its default trust store. |
16:12 |
jboyer-isl |
I wondered what warnings you might be seeing. Are you on Windows? I don't think I've seen that here. |
16:13 |
jeff |
standard SHA-1 warning in Chrome, "The site is using outdated security settings that may prevent future versions of Chrome from being able to safely access it." |
16:13 |
jeff |
red X, no interstitial. |
16:15 |
jeff |
mostly because my relevant trust store doesn't include "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5" |
16:16 |
|
abowling joined #evergreen |
16:16 |
jboyer-isl |
Oh, those. I see. |
16:16 |
jeff |
so it has to rely on chaining it to "Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority", which is in my trust store. |
16:16 |
jeff |
but that signature algorithm is SHA-1, thus the warning is tripped. |
17:07 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
17:34 |
|
abowling left #evergreen |
19:57 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
20:16 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
21:11 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
22:32 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
22:34 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |