| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:20 |
|
gsams joined #evergreen |
| 03:38 |
|
artunit joined #evergreen |
| 09:20 |
|
Arlene joined #evergreen |
| 10:10 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
| 10:24 |
|
phasefx joined #evergreen |
| 12:24 |
tsbere |
gsams, jonadab: [0-9.]+ would include decimal places just fine, including a trailing one. |
| 12:35 |
jonadab |
tsbere: Oh, yes, true. I forgot that SQL regexes can do the + part. |
| 12:35 |
tsbere |
jonadab: I was thinking more "instead of [0-9](?:[.]\d+)?" |
| 12:36 |
tsbere |
jonadab: Also, instead of [.] most people would probably write \. |
| 12:36 |
jonadab |
Right, [0-9.] is simpler, albeit slightly less precise. |
| 13:06 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
| 14:14 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
| 14:18 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
| 14:30 |
|
eeevil joined #evergreen |
| 14:31 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
| 14:54 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
| 15:30 |
|
eeevil joined #evergreen |
| 17:08 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
| 17:34 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
| 19:18 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
| 20:16 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
| 23:45 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
