| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 05:15 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
| 09:36 |
|
dbwells joined #evergreen |
| 10:09 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
| 12:11 |
bshum |
@coin |
| 12:11 |
pinesol_green |
bshum: heads |
| 12:14 |
dbs |
@coin |
| 12:14 |
pinesol_green |
dbs: heads |
| 12:55 |
|
buzzy joined #evergreen |
| 15:09 |
|
kbutler joined #evergreen |
| 15:17 |
bshum |
kbutler: Well that is a puzzlement. |
| 15:18 |
kbutler |
I was certainly puzzled. |
| 15:18 |
* tsbere |
wonders what is a puzzlement |
| 15:18 |
dbs |
docs getting truncated |
| 15:18 |
bshum |
I imagine it's probably just a syntax issue in the rel_2_6 and rel_2_5 branches |
| 15:18 |
dbs |
usually due to asciidoc coding errors, yeah. |
| 15:20 |
bshum |
I bet it's http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=c0e0e39d49f1188575f609cb1c30f3626da678ad |
| 15:20 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Josh Stompro] Documentation: LP#1386854 - Locally Hosted Added Content. - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=c0e0e39> |
| 15:21 |
kbutler |
Can anyone help me to understand what is the difference between a 'circulation limit set' and a 'circulation limit group'? |
| 15:21 |
* dbs |
briefly considers adding an integration test for doc builds |
| 15:23 |
tsbere |
kbutler: Limit group is used in circ tagging. Limit set is a set of conditions to count/limit circs with. |
| 15:24 |
kbutler |
tsbere: So limit group is not going to be useful for creating circulation rules for patron types? |
| 15:25 |
|
mtcarlson joined #evergreen |
| 15:25 |
tsbere |
kbutler: Depends on what you are doing. A group could be used to tag things based on MARC values, for example tagging all vr_format set to DVD circs. You could then limit to 10 DVDs out at a time without worrying about circ mods. |
| 15:26 |
bshum |
Aha |
| 15:27 |
bshum |
tsbere++ # helping to spot the part that might be broken in the docs |
| 15:30 |
* dbs |
feels dumb for just having "invented" the sysadmin's best friend shell syntax: 'bar > foo.out 2>&1 && mail -s "Upgrade part one is done" foobar example.com' |
| 15:30 |
dbs |
Dumb because I'm sure sysadmins have been doing the same sort of thing for decades for long-running processes. |
| 15:31 |
dbs |
Now I can go and play games with my kids while I wait for the next part of the database upgrade to complete :) |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
kbutler: I removed a potentially errant line from the docs in rel_2_5 and rel_2_6 branches. Hopefully during the next rebuild we'll see things go back to normal. |
| 15:31 |
bshum |
kbutler++ |
| 15:32 |
kbutler |
bshum++ Thanks! |
| 15:32 |
kbutler |
tsbere: Hmm. Thanks for the explanation. |
| 16:58 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
| 17:10 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
