Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:44 |
|
nhilton joined #evergreen |
00:51 |
|
nhilton_ joined #evergreen |
02:47 |
|
terence joined #evergreen |
05:27 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Failure - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
06:12 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
06:30 |
* bshum |
wishes everyone a happy Monday. |
06:35 |
bshum |
@later tell gmcharlt Guess we'll need a plan to upgrade Piwik someday for the webstats.http://piwik.org/blog/2014/10/announcing-piwik-will-end-php-5-3-support-six-months-may-2015/ |
06:35 |
pinesol_green |
bshum: The operation succeeded. |
06:41 |
|
mtate joined #evergreen |
06:41 |
|
eeevil joined #evergreen |
06:42 |
|
phasefx joined #evergreen |
06:42 |
|
Callender joined #evergreen |
06:43 |
|
graced joined #evergreen |
07:37 |
|
rjackson-isl joined #evergreen |
07:43 |
csharp |
@quote random |
07:43 |
pinesol_green |
csharp: Quote #81: "< pinesol_green> git doesn't seem to love anything." (added by csharp at 02:26 PM, March 07, 2014) |
07:50 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
07:51 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
07:55 |
csharp |
bshum: you mentioned cutting a 2.7.1 branch... is that in the immediate future? or will that need to wait until you're back in the US? |
08:00 |
|
StephenGWills joined #evergreen |
08:12 |
csharp |
StephenGWills: welcome! long time no IR See ;-) |
08:15 |
* csharp |
tries to wrap his head around 'git rebase' again :-/ |
08:15 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
08:15 |
StephenGWills |
csharp: rm -rf and git clone ;) |
08:15 |
csharp |
what I want to do is take all the commits I've applied to rel_2_5_1 and replay them on top of rel_2_7_0, but it's not clear to me how I would do that |
08:15 |
StephenGWills |
and thanks for the hi! |
08:16 |
StephenGWills |
ditto |
08:16 |
csharp |
StephenGWills++ |
08:17 |
StephenGWills |
git branch, git merge maybe? |
08:19 |
csharp |
oh - I think I got it |
08:20 |
csharp |
check out rel_2_5_1, git branch <some branch name>, git checkout <some branch name>, git rebase -i rel_2_7_0 |
08:20 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
08:20 |
csharp |
that appears to be doing what I want |
08:21 |
Dyrcona |
csharp: We base all of our custom branches on master. They then usually backport rather cleanly, at least for a while. |
08:22 |
Dyrcona |
Of course we also run from master and stay pretty close to the latest releases. |
08:24 |
Dyrcona |
Off topic: Damn! It takes a long time to send 300GB of backups to San Diego. I think it would be faster to toss a tape into a FedEx envelope. |
08:24 |
csharp |
I'll think about that approach - I can see how that would be advantageous |
08:24 |
csharp |
the problem is that I don't really keep up a PINES master branch at this point (not enough hands on deck) |
08:25 |
csharp |
Dyrcona: is that where you host offsite backups? |
08:25 |
Dyrcona |
We keep individual modifications in their own branches. |
08:25 |
csharp |
ah, I see |
08:26 |
Dyrcona |
csharp: I/we use rsync.net. They have several sites. My and MVLC's backups happen to be hosted in their San Diego site. |
08:26 |
csharp |
ah |
08:27 |
Dyrcona |
git is really useful for branching and mixing and matching. |
08:28 |
Dyrcona |
And I said I/we above, 'cause we use them for work and I have a separate personal account for my not-MVLC stuff. |
08:29 |
csharp |
gotcha |
08:29 |
Dyrcona |
Two conversations at once! Yay! ;) |
08:29 |
csharp |
multitasking! |
08:31 |
Dyrcona |
Now, three. ;) |
08:34 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
08:43 |
csharp |
as I watch git-rebase happen, I shudder at the idea of sifting through these 102 commits manually (which is how I have always done it in the past) |
09:10 |
bshum |
mosh++ # this is quite nice! |
09:10 |
bshum |
csharp: I didn't get to finish 2.7.1 before I left for my travels |
09:27 |
tsbere |
csharp: Sometimes git cherry-pick is better, wrapped in a "give me all the commit hashes from <base branch> to HEAD on the customized branch, then cherry-pick them into the new customization branch in order" - Lets you skip some of the "prep version and upgrade script" commits from release branches. |
09:27 |
tsbere |
(without having to find them in the interactive list) |
09:32 |
phasefx |
jeff: roger roger, thanks man re: dns and test |
09:47 |
csharp |
bshum: no prob ;-) |
09:47 |
csharp |
tsbere: thanks for the tip - I was able to quickly identify and comment out the undesired commits |
09:48 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
09:57 |
Dyrcona |
csharp: tsbere came up with a nice little shell script, git-quickpick, to add a quickpick command to git that does what he describes above. |
09:58 |
|
akilsdonk_ joined #evergreen |
10:11 |
|
wjr joined #evergreen |
10:12 |
|
KOMAL joined #evergreen |
10:13 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
10:32 |
|
mllewellyn joined #evergreen |
10:33 |
|
dananji joined #evergreen |
10:36 |
|
dreuther joined #evergreen |
10:39 |
|
sal_ joined #evergreen |
11:00 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
11:32 |
|
sandbergja joined #evergreen |
11:37 |
|
dananji joined #evergreen |
11:37 |
|
dananji joined #evergreen |
11:45 |
|
vlewis joined #evergreen |
11:48 |
|
dMiller joined #evergreen |
11:51 |
|
chatley joined #evergreen |
11:54 |
|
pmurray_away joined #evergreen |
11:54 |
|
pmurray joined #evergreen |
12:32 |
|
vlewis_ joined #evergreen |
12:42 |
|
julialima joined #evergreen |
12:45 |
|
dananji joined #evergreen |
13:04 |
|
dMiller joined #evergreen |
13:45 |
|
nhilton joined #evergreen |
13:47 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
13:57 |
|
whargrove joined #evergreen |
13:59 |
|
buzzy joined #evergreen |
14:01 |
whargrove |
Hi all, does the SIP2 server for evergreen support checksum (AZ) from the SIP2 spec? |
14:03 |
eeevil |
whargrove: yes, and also disabling checksumming, because some clients just do it "wrong" |
14:04 |
jeff |
whargrove: my general recommendation is to disable SIP checksums unless you're sending your SIP traffic over a serial cable. |
14:05 |
jeff |
whargrove: that said, yes Evergreen + SIPServer support it. There have been... inconsistencies identified in the standard, and I cheered when I saw that SIP3 removes checksums. :-) |
14:06 |
|
StephenGWills joined #evergreen |
14:08 |
Dyrcona |
+1 what jeff says. Some 3M products don't do checksums correctly, and it is their protocol. |
14:09 |
whargrove |
Got it, thanks for the responses |
14:10 |
whargrove |
One ILS vendor we are integrating with requires checksumming ... but we wanted to test it with our evergreen sandbox first |
14:10 |
jeff |
Can you name the vendor so that I can personally mock them? :-) |
14:11 |
Dyrcona |
whargrove: You should ask them where the serial cables are, 'cause TCP has checksumming built in, so checksumming on top of that is redundant. |
14:13 |
whargrove |
jeff: Carl.X |
14:14 |
whargrove |
Dyrcona: I know :/ |
14:17 |
|
akilsdonk_ joined #evergreen |
14:24 |
|
whargrove left #evergreen |
15:51 |
Dyrcona |
Oops. |
15:52 |
Dyrcona |
@later tell whargrove If the client sends checksums, I believe Evergreen turns on checksum mode and will respond with check sums in its responses. |
15:52 |
pinesol_green |
Dyrcona: The operation succeeded. |
15:52 |
Dyrcona |
@later tell whargrove Well, SIPServer, not Evergreen per se. |
15:52 |
pinesol_green |
Dyrcona: The operation succeeded. |
15:53 |
Dyrcona |
Too many distractions. |
16:09 |
|
ldwhalen joined #evergreen |
16:41 |
phasefx |
qa tests passed this time, yay :) |
16:43 |
jeff |
phasefx: yay. did resolv.conf have one or both of those nameservers, or was it a different issue? |
16:44 |
phasefx |
jeff: right issue, different DNS servers |
16:45 |
jeff |
heh |
16:46 |
jeff |
did QTS recently notify customers with open resolvers or something? :-) |
16:46 |
phasefx |
no, it was all our fault; change internally and qa01 is a second class citizen :) |
16:47 |
jeff |
heh |
16:49 |
jeff |
shows how often I use non-lowercase identifiers in postgres... couldn't figure out why certain things weren't being found. |
16:50 |
jeff |
twas because the relation was named temp_Foo and unless I quoted it, it was being folded to temp_foo and not being found. |
16:50 |
jeff |
of course, the error doesn't fold the case, so: |
16:50 |
jeff |
jeff=> \d temp_Foo |
16:50 |
jeff |
Did not find any relation named "temp_Foo". |
16:51 |
jeff |
hrm. maybe part of this specific quirk is limited to temporary tables. |
16:52 |
jeff |
ah, nope. did it to myself again by not quoting when I created my test. |
16:52 |
jeff |
anyway. |
16:53 |
jeff |
> Quoting an identifier also makes it case-sensitive, whereas unquoted names are always folded to lower case. For example, the identifiers FOO, foo, and "foo" are considered the same by PostgreSQL, but "Foo" and "FOO" are different from these three and each other. |
16:57 |
|
tspindler left #evergreen |
17:00 |
|
dreuther_ joined #evergreen |
17:07 |
|
dreuther joined #evergreen |
17:09 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
17:25 |
|
nhilton_ joined #evergreen |
18:19 |
|
StephenGWills_ joined #evergreen |
18:47 |
|
StephenGWills left #evergreen |
19:23 |
|
nhilton joined #evergreen |
23:11 |
|
chatley joined #evergreen |