Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:04 |
|
mnsri joined #evergreen |
00:10 |
|
dcook joined #evergreen |
00:37 |
|
mnsri joined #evergreen |
02:23 |
|
wsmoak joined #evergreen |
03:12 |
|
bshum joined #evergreen |
06:56 |
|
wsmoak joined #evergreen |
06:56 |
|
wsmoak joined #evergreen |
07:08 |
csharp |
@later tell bshum I just installed OpenSRF master on 14.04 and it started fine for me (with OpenSRF config, not Evergreen config in place) |
07:08 |
pinesol_green |
csharp: The operation succeeded. |
07:33 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
07:43 |
bshum |
csharp: Did you do any of the changes that gmcharlt linked to in a paste a few nights ago? |
07:43 |
bshum |
For the apache 2.4 websockets config |
07:44 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
07:44 |
csharp |
bshum: nope - let me apply those too |
07:44 |
bshum |
And srfsh passes the math test? |
07:45 |
csharp |
actually... no |
07:45 |
bshum |
I didn't get any errors on start, but I got no response error from srfsh |
07:46 |
bshum |
I bet if you look at osrfsys.log you'll see some sort of 500 error |
07:46 |
bshum |
I had to crank up my loglevel to 4 to get more details. |
07:46 |
bshum |
It looks like it starts right, but it's actually dead. |
07:49 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
07:49 |
* bshum |
will wander back again a little later. |
07:51 |
csharp |
ah - yeah, now I see it |
07:51 |
csharp |
yes, confirmed |
07:55 |
csharp |
and confirmed before adding gmcharlt's stuff, btw |
08:07 |
csharp |
hmm the only perl mod with the text "OpenSRF::Application::Settings" at all is that module itself |
08:08 |
* csharp |
wishes perl was less opaque to him :-/ |
08:09 |
|
rjackson-isl joined #evergreen |
08:20 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
08:21 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
08:42 |
|
mmorgan joined #evergreen |
08:52 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
08:53 |
|
kmlussier left #evergreen |
09:05 |
|
jwoodard joined #evergreen |
09:07 |
|
tspindler joined #evergreen |
09:12 |
|
Shae joined #evergreen |
09:28 |
|
yboston joined #evergreen |
09:39 |
|
sarabee joined #evergreen |
10:04 |
|
Dyrcona joined #evergreen |
10:08 |
|
krvmga joined #evergreen |
10:08 |
* tsbere |
spins up a trusty VM on masslnc's server to do a test of clean install of opensrf/evergreen master there |
10:09 |
krvmga |
in browse search (eg 2.5) , is there a global option somewhere to tell the system to ignore initial articles? |
10:09 |
krvmga |
(a, an, the) |
10:09 |
krvmga |
for example |
10:12 |
tsbere |
krvmga: Some of that is just reading from the marc |
10:13 |
tsbere |
krvmga: Also, it isn't ignoring specific articles. It is ignoring however many characters the marc said to |
10:13 |
krvmga |
tsbere: yes, i've seen that. unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be working :( |
10:13 |
tsbere |
krvmga: Also, not all interfaces will ignore them, and not all places in marc have the ability to specify how many to ignore.... |
10:14 |
tsbere |
krvmga: Really, even on the marc side it is a crapshoot. Throw in "does this interface use, or even have the ability to see, the information for how many to ignore" and things get wonky. |
10:15 |
krvmga |
*sigh* |
10:26 |
|
mceraso joined #evergreen |
10:39 |
Dyrcona |
Well, turns out you can bless a string ref into a Perl class. However it is not very useful. |
10:46 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
10:51 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
10:51 |
kmlussier |
krvmga: Did you say the browse isn't honoring non-filing indicators? |
10:52 |
kmlussier |
krvmga: I'm wondering if what you're seeing is a result of bug 1321780 where the browse search has listed the 740 field twice. |
10:52 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1321780 in Evergreen "Title browse isn't honoring non-filing characters in 740 field" (affected: 4, heat: 24) [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1321780 |
10:53 |
kmlussier |
Once with the non-filing indicators and once without. |
10:53 |
krvmga |
kmlussier: that might be. the examples that were shown to me had 740s like that |
10:54 |
kmlussier |
OK, then, also see the idea that has been suggested in my comment at https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1321780/comments/2 |
10:54 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1321780 in Evergreen "Title browse isn't honoring non-filing characters in 740 field" (affected: 4, heat: 24) [Medium,Confirmed] |
10:55 |
kmlussier |
My current thinking is that this is a good thing for all title fields. Because, then, the title shows up whether or not the user knows to skip the initial article or not. |
10:55 |
* dbs |
is with kmlussier |
10:58 |
kmlussier |
NOBLE has just recently configured their production system to do this. I don't think their browse search is live yet, but it should be soon. We were talking yesterday about putting their changes into a working branch. That is, if we can get community consensus around it. :) |
11:02 |
|
kmlussier left #evergreen |
11:09 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
11:10 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: I think I know what's going on... looking into it |
11:10 |
kmlussier |
tsbere: Speaking of the masslnc vm, I just received my first request for a Bug Squashing Sandbox, so it looks like at least one will be used. :) |
11:10 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: Cool, let me know what I can do to help out. |
11:10 |
|
mdriscoll joined #evergreen |
11:10 |
|
mllewellyn joined #evergreen |
11:11 |
Dyrcona |
tsbere is looking into it, too. |
11:12 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: I was just barking up the wrong tree, I think I just found the right tree. >_> |
11:14 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: Want to compare notes? Because I got to a point where I know the problem, but don't know how to best fix it. |
11:14 |
gmcharlt |
tsbere: I've only just started looking at it, but thus far my assumption is that it's the patch for 1350457 that's triggering it |
11:15 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: Want file and line number? |
11:15 |
gmcharlt |
yeah |
11:16 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: Application.pm line 562 (I search for "caller's" to grab the comment on the end of the line) - the $self->session looks to be the problem. My tests seem to show that $self isn't actually a ref at all, but I could have written that wrong. |
11:16 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
11:17 |
* tsbere |
isn't sure how that ends up working |
11:18 |
|
asimon joined #evergreen |
11:18 |
gmcharlt |
tsbere: my plan is to poke at that for a bit, but just revert if necessary |
11:18 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: The part that confuses me is $self->session is apparently valid and calls the proper function, but said function dies because $self is a string and not a hashref |
11:18 |
|
ericar joined #evergreen |
11:19 |
* tsbere |
apparently doesn't know enough about perl to debug this |
11:19 |
|
vlewis joined #evergreen |
11:19 |
asimon |
* Is there any way to prevent the email autopopulate in reports? |
11:19 |
tsbere |
asimon: Don't have an email on your user account? |
11:20 |
asimon |
tsbere: Aside from that? |
11:22 |
tsbere |
asimon: I got nothing else for ya right now |
11:22 |
asimon |
tsbere: Yeah, I was afraid of that. TY. |
11:22 |
mmorgan |
asimon: I don't think so, other than removing the email address when you are setting up the report before hitting submit. |
11:26 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: I am wondering if just adding "and ref $self" (or && or whatever) to the "if $meth" would work to fix that line. |
11:30 |
Dyrcona |
Looks like method_lookup is being called as a class method somewhere, but line 562 expects it to be called as an instance method everywhere. |
11:32 |
gmcharlt |
yeah |
11:36 |
gmcharlt |
tsbere: tried tacking on a check on ref($self) per your suggestion; wasn't enough, as it triggered an apparent infinte recursion in perl2JSONObject |
11:41 |
mrpeters |
morning all, is there a planned release date for the new OpenSRF? |
11:42 |
gmcharlt |
mrpeters: alpha today |
11:42 |
mrpeters |
10-4...so probably a few weeks yet |
11:43 |
mrpeters |
just trying to decide if i should roll with current opensrf on 14.04 for 2.7 or wait it out, thanks! |
11:43 |
gmcharlt |
mrpeters: yeah, it will basically be out just before 2.7.0 |
11:43 |
gmcharlt |
as far as what version to use, 2.3.0 is fine *unless* you want to try out the web-based staff client bits that are targetedf for 2.7-beta2 |
11:43 |
mrpeters |
cool, its mostly for testing our GenaSYS stuff so I'll await the alpha, since we're using beta2 for Evergreen |
11:44 |
|
phasefx_ joined #evergreen |
11:44 |
bshum |
Hmm |
11:45 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: So the changes in opensrf_core.xml for things like the loglength and msg_size_warn need to be reflected in the copy for Evergreen too I guess? |
11:45 |
bshum |
(eventually) |
11:45 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: yep, that would be good |
11:45 |
bshum |
Okay |
11:49 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
11:51 |
bshum |
Wow |
11:51 |
bshum |
msg_size_warn is super old |
11:52 |
bshum |
From 2011 |
11:53 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: Where are you getting that infinite recursion? I don't seem to be getting it. |
11:54 |
gmcharlt |
tsbere: introspect opensrf.settings |
11:55 |
tsbere |
gmcharlt: Ahhh. In that case I suspect that is more the fault of the session fallthrough in general, not the adding of the ref($self) check. |
11:57 |
* eeevil |
looks to see if having ->session protect itself from string invocant is enough... |
11:57 |
* tsbere |
sees things actually function, evergreen-wise, with the ref($self) check, but hadn't tried to introspect before that |
11:59 |
|
mrpeters joined #evergreen |
12:00 |
eeevil |
gmcharlt: http://pastebin.com/7470gS0A is what I'm thinking |
12:02 |
gmcharlt |
eeevil: I just tried that in fact -- no dice |
12:02 |
eeevil |
boo |
12:02 |
eeevil |
meh, +1 to revert, then |
12:03 |
eeevil |
have to find the session the hard way at time of need, it seems |
12:05 |
gmcharlt |
yeah |
12:05 |
* gmcharlt |
pushes a revert |
12:06 |
eeevil |
or, remove all string-invocant calls to method_lookup and make that the rule |
12:06 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Galen Charlton] Revert "LP#1350457: Pass caller's session to subrequests called via method_lookup" - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=6ed6f2b> |
12:07 |
eeevil |
oh, but that's much easier said than done, a grep tells me |
12:07 |
gmcharlt |
yep |
12:09 |
gmcharlt |
moving on... my next steps for OpenSRF today are seeing if the CORS support patch works, then writing some release notes and releasing the alph |
12:09 |
gmcharlt |
a |
12:10 |
|
akilsdonk joined #evergreen |
12:10 |
bshum |
I just finished getting the web client squash branch on my test server |
12:11 |
bshum |
I'm trying to figure out what I missed to get it actually functional |
12:11 |
bshum |
And I think whatever I missed is leaving me with broken hold placement / bookbags in the staff client's catalog view. |
12:11 |
bshum |
The main client |
12:11 |
bshum |
*XUL |
12:11 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: I set up a web-based staff client demo server the other day (independent of berick), and I can compare notes if you want |
12:12 |
bshum |
Those were two areas berick specifically mentioned to test and both are not functioning. |
12:12 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: Thanks, I'm definitely in uncharted territory |
12:12 |
bshum |
There's comments on the ticket about installing dependencies for the web client |
12:13 |
bshum |
But I'm not seeing those reflected in the README or any associated files in the root level |
12:13 |
bshum |
I'm checking around to see what I might have missed |
12:14 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: ./Open-ILS/web/js/ui/default/staff/README.install |
12:14 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: Ahh, there we are. |
12:14 |
bshum |
Thanks! |
12:14 |
bshum |
I'll try those :) |
12:14 |
csharp |
<beavis>heh heh... $meth heh heh yeah</beavis> |
12:15 |
gmcharlt |
csharp: for supporting the opensrf.explode service |
12:15 |
csharp |
gmcharlt++ |
12:16 |
|
dbwells joined #evergreen |
12:18 |
eeevil |
gmcharlt: I'll not push for immediate inclusion, but your LP update pointed me at a likely fix |
12:18 |
gmcharlt |
eeevil: great |
12:19 |
eeevil |
there's always next version :) |
12:20 |
bshum |
Well it's only alpha for OpenSRF :) |
12:21 |
bshum |
"set -j to number of CPU cores + 1" |
12:21 |
bshum |
That sounds so harsh |
12:21 |
bshum |
:) |
12:22 |
bshum |
So, for record, what I got without installing the node stuff, etc. with the XUL client is that... |
12:22 |
Dyrcona |
One of them is almost always idle. ;) |
12:22 |
bshum |
Hold placement was in some sort of loop, where it kept taking me to another hold placement screen every time I tried to Submit |
12:22 |
bshum |
Hitting Cancel eventually brought me back to the search results |
12:22 |
bshum |
Equal number to the number of times I hit Submit |
12:23 |
bshum |
And using the bookbag add to temp list took me to another tab, and then the XUL client told me that it couldn't complete due to too many redirects or something |
12:23 |
bshum |
I'm hopeful that installing the web client bits will help resolve those issues... |
12:24 |
bshum |
But I'm flying pretty blind in this :) |
12:25 |
bshum |
Oh and unrelated |
12:25 |
bshum |
I need to figure out why apache2-websockets never wants to start automatically after restarts |
12:25 |
jeff |
oh bah. pre-cats prompt each time on checkout for title/author/etc. |
12:26 |
jeff |
i suspected, but was secretly hoping i was wrong. |
12:27 |
|
jihpringle joined #evergreen |
12:27 |
csharp |
yeah, they can't be re-used - to the chagrin of our circ staff who try to avoid sending books to catalogers to process ;-)_ |
12:27 |
csharp |
and our database quality control staff |
12:28 |
jeff |
yeah. we were hoping for a simple way to create temporary items that didn't re-prompt. |
12:28 |
jeff |
might need to adjust my approach. |
12:30 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: When it says in step 2 to go to the $EVERGREEN_ROOT is that referring to where I git cloned? Or referring actually to where the live files are? |
12:30 |
bshum |
If it's to where I cloned |
12:30 |
bshum |
I assume that this is something I should have done before I make installed everything into place... |
12:30 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: correct |
12:30 |
bshum |
Great. |
12:31 |
gmcharlt |
it's safe enough to run in the live directory |
12:32 |
bshum |
Hmm |
12:32 |
bshum |
Oh, as root, gotcha... for 2.1 |
12:32 |
Dyrcona |
jeff: There is, I believe, a patch for that in master. I'm not certain if it solves your particular problem. |
12:33 |
Dyrcona |
Guess it is in 2.7 also. |
12:33 |
bshum |
Well only for npm install apparently |
12:33 |
bshum |
bower install doesn't like being run with root or sudo |
12:34 |
gmcharlt |
right, running as opensrf is fine |
12:35 |
bshum |
I'm just typing my observations here, but I expect to help put these to helping to improve the instructions at some point. I don't mean to be rambly, just being lazy to take notes elsewhere. :) |
12:38 |
bshum |
Well that's special |
12:38 |
bshum |
"There are processes named 'apache2' running which do not match your pid file which are left untouched in the name of safety, Please review the situation by hand." |
12:38 |
bshum |
Heh |
12:39 |
bshum |
So if I start apache2-websockets before apache2, it doesn't like that. |
12:40 |
csharp |
bshum: thanks for rambling ;-) |
12:41 |
csharp |
I was running into the same issues |
12:41 |
bshum |
Well |
12:41 |
bshum |
I see the web client! |
12:41 |
bshum |
But I can't log into it. |
12:41 |
bshum |
:) |
12:42 |
bshum |
Aha |
12:42 |
bshum |
Websocket error |
12:42 |
bshum |
Lovely |
12:44 |
bshum |
Hmm |
12:46 |
csharp |
yeah - that's as far as I got |
12:46 |
csharp |
I think I was missing something in the config, but I didn't have time to dig deeply |
12:47 |
csharp |
I'm also unclear on the relationship between apache2 and apache2-websockets? |
12:47 |
bshum |
Well the main staff client works better for me right now |
12:47 |
bshum |
Not encountering the issues I noted just a moment ago with holds and bookbags |
12:47 |
bshum |
so that's good |
12:47 |
csharp |
does one replace the other? does one start before the other? how does restarting apache work with websockets involved? etc. |
12:48 |
bshum |
csharp: My guess has been that they work separately from each other. |
12:48 |
bshum |
Since they operate on different ports and such |
12:48 |
csharp |
feels messy |
12:49 |
bshum |
I'm not quite sure why that is yet. |
12:49 |
csharp |
from a sys admin perspective ;-) |
12:49 |
csharp |
once I understand it, we can build init/upstart/systemd scripts to handle it, though |
12:49 |
bshum |
I was going to call it "brittle" |
12:49 |
|
Shae_ joined #evergreen |
12:49 |
bshum |
:) |
12:49 |
csharp |
right |
12:50 |
csharp |
a little like the ruby pieces in acq |
12:50 |
tsbere |
I would prefer we do everything we can to make everything work in a single apache, if possible. >_> |
12:50 |
csharp |
tsbere: +1 |
12:51 |
eeevil |
tsbere: a single 300MB+ per backend apache :) |
12:52 |
bshum |
Oh |
12:52 |
bshum |
It's probably my load balancer |
12:52 |
bshum |
Futzing in the way |
12:52 |
bshum |
Sigh |
12:53 |
* bshum |
tries again once adding the ports for websockets |
12:54 |
bshum |
It lives! |
12:54 |
bshum |
Sorta |
12:55 |
|
buzzy joined #evergreen |
12:59 |
|
buzzy joined #evergreen |
13:00 |
gmcharlt |
so far the CORS patch is looking promising |
13:02 |
bshum |
Hmm |
13:02 |
bshum |
XUL patron search is giving undefined errors |
13:03 |
bshum |
\npatron/search_form.xul\nSyntaxError: JSON.parse: unexpected character\n and such |
13:05 |
bshum |
Yep, and we can't search there |
13:05 |
dbs |
bshum: so that's the new native JSON methods maybe complaining about crappy JSON? |
13:09 |
bshum |
dbs: Not sure really, I just started poking |
13:10 |
* bshum |
pauses a moment to go eat his sandwich |
13:11 |
dbs |
bshum: wild guess on my part, based on recent changes I saw in the commit mail |
13:12 |
bshum |
dbs: Sometimes those turn out correct though :) |
13:22 |
jboyer-isl |
Since lp is being lp, does anyone know if there's a bug about passing malformed xml to fancy_prompt.xul? (volume transfers explode on call numbers with '&' characters) |
13:23 |
jboyer-isl |
I was hoping not to file a dup if there's already something floating around. |
13:23 |
csharp |
that rings a bell, but I don't know about a bug :-/ |
13:29 |
jboyer-isl |
It's a 1-line fix (for volumes, anyway, more bugs may lurk at other access points) I suppose I could just throw a collab branch up and let the dupes fall where they may. |
13:39 |
|
bbqben joined #evergreen |
13:39 |
bshum |
dbs: This native JSON thing is in OpenSRF? Thinking on 6c3b1001c6183b2f633d0f43ccd3d28071c0c48d |
13:39 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Bill Erickson] LP#1316245: JS now uses browser-native JSON routines - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=6c3b100> |
13:40 |
dbs |
bshum: that's what I was thinking |
13:49 |
|
montgoc1 joined #evergreen |
13:52 |
|
jboyer_isl joined #evergreen |
13:53 |
jboyer_isl |
Eww. I underestimated how best to fix that encoding error. encodeURIComponent() is definitely not the correct choice. |
13:54 |
jboyer_isl |
Looks like xml_encode() from server/serial/notes.xul is about to get a promotion. |
13:55 |
tsbere |
jboyer_isl: What did you apply the encodeURIComponent to? |
13:56 |
jboyer-isl |
tsbere, I was trying to make call numbers xml-safe in copy_browser.js, line 914. Currently if you try to transfer a volume with an ampersand you get an ugly XML error instead of a confirmation box. |
13:58 |
|
jboyer-isl joined #evergreen |
13:59 |
tsbere |
jboyer-isl: Have you tried using escape instead of encodeURIComponent? |
13:59 |
jboyer-isl |
Not yet. I was thinking that it was deprecated, but that may be faulty memory on my part. |
13:59 |
tsbere |
Not sure if it will work better or not (I dunno what your "Eww" means, actually...) |
14:00 |
jboyer-isl |
I'm sure it'll work, I just didn't know if it was the best choice. |
14:01 |
bbqben |
Hi all - EOB meeting starting here in just a few minutes |
14:01 |
jboyer-isl |
Well, encodeURIComponent gives you "Transfer volumes J%20FIC%20CALL%20LABEL to library... |
14:01 |
jboyer-isl |
So that's pretty "eww." :) |
14:01 |
tsbere |
ok, then escape isn't gonna help. Nevermind my suggestion. :P |
14:02 |
|
terran joined #evergreen |
14:02 |
jboyer-isl |
:q |
14:02 |
jeff |
Dyrcona: regarding pre-cats: is the patch you had in mind the same as or related to the one for permitting pre-cats to fill holds? |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Bennett Goble] LP#1002028: Cross Origin Resource Sharing for OpenSRF - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=d8dbf0c> |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Galen Charlton] LP#1002028: support CORS for HTTPS - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=bc914bf> |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
[opensrf|Galen Charlton] LP#1002028: set Access-Control-Expose-Headers - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=OpenSRF.git;a=commit;h=e8f7863> |
14:03 |
jeff |
Dyrcona: that was the first thing i thought to look into, good to have confirmation if that's what you had in mind also. :-) |
14:03 |
bbqben |
#startmeeting Evergreen Oversight Board Meeting, 21.08.14 |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting started Thu Aug 21 14:03:33 2014 US/Eastern. The chair is bbqben. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. |
14:03 |
pinesol_green |
The meeting name has been set to 'evergreen_oversight_board_meeting__21_08_14' |
14:03 |
Dyrcona |
Well, yeah. |
14:03 |
bbqben |
#topic introductions |
14:03 |
bbqben |
EOB members, please introduce yourself with #info |
14:04 |
bbqben |
#info bbqben = Ben Hyman, BC Libraries Co-op |
14:04 |
bshum |
#info bshum = Ben Shum, Bibliomation |
14:04 |
graced |
#info graced = Grace Dunbar, Equinox |
14:04 |
montgoc1 |
#info montgoc1 = Chauncey Montgomery, Consortium of Ohio Libraries |
14:04 |
yboston |
#info yboston is Yamil Suarez - Berklee College of Music |
14:05 |
kmlussier |
#info kmlussier is Kathy Lussier, MassLNC |
14:05 |
bbqben |
Hey everyone, happy Thursday! |
14:05 |
csharp |
#info csharp is Chris Sharp, GPLS |
14:05 |
bbqben |
#topic Minutes / Actions from last meeting |
14:06 |
bbqben |
#info http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2014/evergreen.2014-06-19-14.09.html |
14:06 |
bbqben |
I see 4 action items there - not 100% sure all are done |
14:06 |
|
RoganH joined #evergreen |
14:07 |
bbqben |
#4 will be addressed in this agenda... kmlussier, yboston - your bits? |
14:07 |
kmlussier |
#info kmlussier did not put out a 2nd call for conference committee volunteers because shortly after the last meeting, jboyer-isl volunteered to serve as a community rep. |
14:07 |
RoganH |
Apologies for being, late small crisis. |
14:08 |
kmlussier |
jboyer-isl++ |
14:08 |
bbqben |
jboyer-isl++ |
14:08 |
jboyer-isl |
Let |
14:08 |
jboyer-isl |
's see how helpful I am before we get too carried away. ;D |
14:08 |
bbqben |
Welcome, RoganH and hi csharp |
14:09 |
csharp |
hi! |
14:09 |
bbqben |
ok, will follow up with yboston later |
14:09 |
yboston |
I am here |
14:09 |
yboston |
I submitted some links and text to the board list to be sent to the SFC, but I can repackage in all inside a word doc if that would be better. |
14:09 |
bbqben |
hey yboston - perrrfect! |
14:10 |
bbqben |
#topic Evergreen vendor listing and related correspondence received |
14:10 |
RoganH |
Related to this, kmlussier, what was the final status of the Edusys listing? |
14:11 |
kmlussier |
RoganH: Ooh, I forgot about. They never responded to my e-mail, so I'll put out an e-mail to the general list today and remove their listing. |
14:11 |
kmlussier |
Sorry, I got sidetracked after that discussion. |
14:12 |
bbqben |
kmlussier ++ |
14:12 |
RoganH |
'tis OK, you (we all) are busy. |
14:12 |
bbqben |
so, that solves one bit. |
14:12 |
RoganH |
I brought up the original point so I'll restate it a bit. |
14:12 |
RoganH |
We implemented the vendor policy roughly a year ago. |
14:13 |
RoganH |
We've had some community feedback from several vantage points since then and we've said we should live with it a year first before we entertain changes and we are now at that year. |
14:13 |
RoganH |
Sometimes I've wanted to change since I think it would benefit those browsing the entries would be that if we linked directly to descriptions of services. |
14:14 |
RoganH |
(imagine commas where I omitted them there) |
14:14 |
kmlussier |
RoganH: I don't think that's a bad idea, but, in most cases, I also see that providers are listing their services on the support provider page. |
14:15 |
kmlussier |
#link http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=faqs:evergreen_companies |
14:15 |
RoganH |
Sometimes it's buried, I think for convenience we should have a direct link. That might mean two links on a listing but I don't think that's a great hardship. |
14:16 |
RoganH |
It also means that if they change information on their site users can easily see that since it might be more up to date than what they provide us with for their page listing. |
14:16 |
graced |
That could be beneficial to people searching for information so long as the links are kept up to date. |
14:17 |
RoganH |
graced: Agreed. Of course as we saw with Edusys we should probably check occasionally since the whole vendor can disappear. |
14:17 |
graced |
The web team could probably at least take on periodic link checking |
14:18 |
kmlussier |
I try to check occasionally, but the timing varies. |
14:18 |
RoganH |
graced: I would even volunteer to do it. I wouldn't be checking validity of content or anything like that, just whether the links still went to sites and if their product page still had Evergreen services on it (if that part is agreed upon and becomes policy). |
14:18 |
kmlussier |
Usually when I'm adding a new vendor to the page. |
14:19 |
RoganH |
If I checked once a month or so and kmlussier checked when she adds someone that would probably cover it reasonably well I think. |
14:19 |
graced |
Well, I see the value of linking directly to services in addition to a generic company link. But do we want to require it? Or should it be optional? |
14:20 |
yboston |
We can consider adding a note for cumminty memebers to report bad links right from that page (I don't such a note right now) |
14:20 |
montgoc1 |
yboston: good idea |
14:20 |
yboston |
might help catch bad pages / compnaies on the earlier side |
14:20 |
bbqben |
graced right, and anything required will take resources to monitor. Maybe start with suggested and give that a go for a year? |
14:20 |
graced |
bbqben++ I can get behind that. |
14:21 |
RoganH |
If we go with suggested I recommend we ask the vendors to supply us links to those services pages so that we can go ahead and add them. |
14:21 |
kmlussier |
FWIW, I don't think requiring it will take any more resources to monitor than the link back to the page. |
14:22 |
graced |
I'm happy to email current vendors and request the additional services link. |
14:22 |
bbqben |
graced++ |
14:22 |
RoganH |
My preference would be to make it required as I think having them would be highly beneficial. |
14:22 |
graced |
If they want to supply us with more than one for some reason will we accept that? |
14:22 |
kmlussier |
+1 to required |
14:23 |
RoganH |
But, if the consensus is to go with preferred I still think it's a good thing. |
14:23 |
RoganH |
If they're each pages that link to service offerings I don't have an objection to that. |
14:23 |
bbqben |
anyone strongly opposed to required? |
14:23 |
graced |
I'm okay with required. |
14:23 |
montgoc1 |
OK with me. |
14:24 |
bbqben |
no scaly wags here |
14:24 |
bbqben |
:) |
14:24 |
bshum |
Hmm, required but do we want to offer a grace period for existing listed companies to provide us this information? |
14:24 |
kmlussier |
We'll also need to update the policy at http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=faqs:evergreen_companies:listing_policy |
14:24 |
RoganH |
bshum: yes |
14:24 |
bshum |
*the community (not just us specifically) |
14:25 |
RoganH |
I think we should publish the idea to the list before we vote on it. |
14:25 |
RoganH |
Gather feedback from community members and vote next meeting. |
14:25 |
kmlussier |
RoganH: I agree. I was just thinking the same thing. |
14:25 |
bshum |
+1 RoganH's idea |
14:25 |
graced |
+1 |
14:25 |
graced |
I think Rogan just volunteered to write that email.... |
14:25 |
RoganH |
I will do so. |
14:26 |
yboston |
I am always cocnerned about maintaining the same content in two location |
14:26 |
graced |
RoganH++ |
14:26 |
bbqben |
RoganH - willing to dangle the idea on the list for us? |
14:26 |
bbqben |
hah. reading too slow! |
14:26 |
yboston |
so these companies need to maintain the wiki page updated with their services and their own services page? |
14:26 |
yboston |
just playing devil's advocate |
14:26 |
* kmlussier |
expects they're already updating their own services page. |
14:26 |
bbqben |
#action Roganh will draft email to vendors re: service delineation etc |
14:26 |
yboston |
would we want to ask them to only list their services in their own page and not on the wiki? |
14:27 |
montgoc1 |
That may be more efficient for them. |
14:27 |
montgoc1 |
Only one place to update services. |
14:27 |
graced |
Well, I think people going to the wiki might want to know if a certain vendor is a "development only" vendor or a "support" vendor. |
14:27 |
graced |
So I think it's valuable to have that on the wiki. |
14:28 |
yboston |
graced: I agree with you, but just trying to see an alternitive viewpoint. |
14:29 |
graced |
We could just have standard service categories, though. And pare down the amount of info on the page. |
14:29 |
bbqben |
the follow through on required is a concern for me, but lets see what the community input is |
14:29 |
bshum |
Valuable, but perhaps not required. If we require that we have a link to a services page/area, I'd say it's at discretion of company as to how complete their entry appears in the community listing. |
14:29 |
bshum |
The ones who put more effort will naturally shine better in my eyes. (But that's just my personal opinion) |
14:30 |
kmlussier |
I agree with bshum. As it is, it really has been at their discretion as to how they want to describe their services. |
14:30 |
RoganH |
I don't want to judge how complete an entry is, just have something that folks can look at and potential customers can judge themselves once they link through to it. |
14:31 |
bbqben |
other thoughts on this thread before we move to replying to the correspondence received? |
14:31 |
RoganH |
No more from me. |
14:31 |
kmlussier |
bbqben: As far as following through, as it is, I always check the vendor page for their link back to the community. It's just one more step to visit their services page. |
14:32 |
RoganH |
And you should be thanked for that effort. kmlussier++ |
14:32 |
kmlussier |
The only problem I see is if a vendor were to take it down after they were listed. Which would be a bizarre thing to do. |
14:33 |
RoganH |
Then I think it would fall under the same rule as the link back. |
14:33 |
bbqben |
kmlussier++ |
14:33 |
kmlussier |
Do we need to have the larger discussion of how to handle complaints about a vendor? |
14:34 |
graced |
I think that was the next issue up |
14:35 |
bbqben |
yes and no; definitely we should follow up on the complaint with correspondence (compaint received)... |
14:35 |
bbqben |
but I'm looking at our agenda and the time - think we'll need to take the chat away / revisit asap |
14:36 |
RoganH |
Since it's not time critical can we follow up on that on list? |
14:36 |
kmlussier |
+1` |
14:36 |
bbqben |
RoganH totally |
14:36 |
yboston |
+1 |
14:36 |
graced |
+1 |
14:36 |
montgoc1 |
+1 |
14:36 |
bbqben |
#action dealing with complaints about vendors |
14:37 |
bbqben |
ok, moving on ... |
14:37 |
bbqben |
#topic outreach Program for Women (Kathy) |
14:37 |
kmlussier |
#link http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2014-August/000850.html |
14:38 |
bbqben |
Thanks kmlussier - care to walk us through? |
14:39 |
kmlussier |
I would love to see the Evergreen community work with this project, but the big issue is whether we can allocate the funding and if we can find volunteers willing to mentor interns. |
14:39 |
kmlussier |
Is there any interest in using community funds for this program? |
14:41 |
graced |
I certainly have interest but I worry about having good entry points and mentorship - just like GSOC. |
14:41 |
kmlussier |
Yes, I was concerned about the mentoring aspect too. I think we would need to make sure we had good projects and committed mentors before moving forward. |
14:42 |
kmlussier |
But I didn't really want to put those questions out to the community if there wasn't a means for funding our participation either. |
14:43 |
kmlussier |
I also would like to explore the idea of co-mentoring, which was done with GSoC too because committing something like 5 hours a week can be a lot of small organizations. But if mentors shared the responsibility, it might not be so much of a burden. |
14:43 |
gmcharlt |
having multiple mentors would be good, based on GSoC experience |
14:45 |
graced |
kmlussier: I think I'd feel better if we worked backwards - ID some projects that need doing and are accessible and get committed mentors who know that area and then ask for the funding? |
14:45 |
bbqben |
kmlussier re: the $6250 ... |
14:45 |
yboston |
For the record, I have used three seperate MLS students as interns. I ended up spending a huge amount of time training them for what I needed them to do (build test servers, AciiDoc, etc.). Luckily I have saved some of my trainign materials, and would be willing to help mentor |
14:45 |
bbqben |
...is there flexibility in how the funds are applied? |
14:45 |
kmlussier |
Flexibility in what sense? |
14:46 |
graced |
The sponsorship per intern includes $5,500 (USD) stipend, $500 travel allowance, and a $250-500 administrative fee for the GNOME Foundation. |
14:46 |
yboston |
also, in my case Berklee did not have to pay, we went through a local college witn an MLS program, and two out of the three interns were female |
14:46 |
bbqben |
graced - thanks, that explains it |
14:46 |
graced |
:) |
14:47 |
bbqben |
so, seems like general support. kmlussier - care to propose language for a vote? |
14:47 |
kmlussier |
Also, I was told that if we ultimately had two solid projects with promising mentors, there *might* be funding for the project to pick up the expense of the other internship. A strong *might* based on the projects and applicants. |
14:48 |
kmlussier |
Motion to allocate community funds to sponsor one intern through the Outreach Project for Women if we find strong projects and committed mentors? |
14:49 |
kmlussier |
I think we would need to follow up via e-mail after we've had the community discussion just to confirm that everyone is on board with it. |
14:49 |
kmlussier |
Since the deadline is before our next meeting. |
14:49 |
bbqben |
#startvote Motion to allocate community funds to sponsor one intern through the Outreach Project for Women if we find strong projects and committed mentors? Yes, No, Abstain |
14:49 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Motion to allocate community funds to sponsor one intern through the Outreach Project for Women if we find strong projects and committed mentors? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
14:49 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
14:49 |
bshum |
#vote Yes |
14:49 |
montgoc1 |
#vote Yes |
14:49 |
graced |
#vote Yes |
14:49 |
kmlussier |
#vote Yes |
14:49 |
bbqben |
#vote Yes |
14:49 |
RoganH |
#vote yes |
14:49 |
yboston |
#vote yes |
14:50 |
bbqben |
#endvote |
14:50 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Motion to allocate community funds to sponsor one intern through the Outreach Project for Women if we find strong projects and committed mentors?" Results are |
14:50 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): kmlussier, yboston, bbqben, graced, RoganH, montgoc1, bshum |
14:50 |
bbqben |
#action kmlussier follow up with email to community, introducing topic |
14:50 |
kmlussier |
Thanks all! |
14:50 |
bbqben |
kmlussier ++ |
14:50 |
gmcharlt |
kmlussier++ |
14:51 |
bshum |
kmlussier++ |
14:51 |
bbqben |
#Topic SFC update (Emergency Fund & OCLC topics) |
14:51 |
bbqben |
kmlussier and I spoke with Karen S this am briefly... |
14:52 |
bbqben |
Broached the Emergency fund topic in broad strokes and will follow up in a little more detail shortly. Glad to have had the conversation as a start! |
14:53 |
bbqben |
Also gave a heads up re: the OCLC topic. RoganH is going to get this ball rolling with a legal opinion, institutionally; we can determine if the issue scales nicely to"project level" from there, meriting more of SFC's attention, e.g. |
14:53 |
|
collum joined #evergreen |
14:54 |
bbqben |
kmlussier anything to add? |
14:54 |
kmlussier |
Nope |
14:54 |
bbqben |
ok, questions on these pieces? |
14:55 |
bbqben |
#action bbqben update for next meeting on SFC topics |
14:55 |
bbqben |
#Topic Election of a new Secretary |
14:55 |
bbqben |
Any volunteers? |
14:55 |
kmlussier |
Wait! Who's taking minutes? ;) |
14:55 |
graced |
I volunteer csharp! |
14:55 |
bbqben |
haha |
14:55 |
RoganH |
Can we nominate csharp before he's inducted? |
14:56 |
bshum |
Before we do that, should we formally affirm our newest member? |
14:56 |
kmlussier |
We need to rearrange the agenda topics. |
14:57 |
bbqben |
scaly waggery in action |
14:57 |
csharp |
backroom deals are afoot |
14:57 |
bbqben |
We have shamed csharp into dual duties |
14:57 |
RoganH |
csharp: they're not very backroom really |
14:58 |
bbqben |
so, a procedural adjustment here |
14:58 |
csharp |
haha |
14:58 |
csharp |
"the new secretary isn't even on the board!" |
14:58 |
bbqben |
#Topic appointment of a new Board member |
14:59 |
bbqben |
csharp was the runner up in the last STV vote for an EOB conducted by the community. Propose his appointment to replace sborger, given her resignation |
14:59 |
jboyer-isl |
Gentlemen, you can't take notes in here, this is the Secretary's office! |
14:59 |
bbqben |
any discussion? |
15:00 |
* csharp |
fidgets uncomfortably |
15:00 |
bbqben |
#startvote Motion to appoint csharp as an EOB member? Yes, No, Abstain |
15:00 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Motion to appoint csharp as an EOB member? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
15:00 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
15:00 |
kmlussier |
#vote Yes |
15:00 |
bshum |
#vote NO |
15:00 |
montgoc1 |
#vote Yes |
15:00 |
RoganH |
#vote yes |
15:00 |
bshum |
#vote Yes |
15:00 |
bshum |
:) |
15:00 |
csharp |
heh |
15:00 |
bbqben |
#vote Yes |
15:00 |
graced |
#vote Yes |
15:00 |
yboston |
#vote yes |
15:01 |
bbqben |
#endvote |
15:01 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Motion to appoint csharp as an EOB member?" Results are |
15:01 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): kmlussier, yboston, bbqben, graced, RoganH, montgoc1, bshum |
15:01 |
kmlussier |
csharp++ |
15:01 |
csharp |
thanks! |
15:01 |
csharp |
I'm honored, truly |
15:01 |
graced |
congrats csharp! |
15:01 |
gmcharlt |
csharp++ |
15:01 |
bshum |
Welcome aboard |
15:01 |
bshum |
csharp++ |
15:01 |
bbqben |
csharp honored? In that case... |
15:01 |
bbqben |
#startvote Motion to appoint csharp as EOB Secretary? Yes, No, Abstain |
15:01 |
pinesol_green |
Begin voting on: Motion to appoint csharp as EOB Secretary? Valid vote options are Yes, No, Abstain. |
15:01 |
pinesol_green |
Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. |
15:02 |
kmlussier |
Did he accept the nomination? |
15:02 |
csharp |
I accept your nomination - yes - thank you! |
15:02 |
RoganH |
#vote yes |
15:02 |
kmlussier |
#vote Yes |
15:02 |
bbqben |
#vote Yes |
15:02 |
montgoc1 |
#vote Yes |
15:02 |
graced |
#vote Yes |
15:02 |
yboston |
#vote yes |
15:02 |
bshum |
#vote Yes |
15:02 |
bbqben |
#endvote |
15:02 |
pinesol_green |
Voted on "Motion to appoint csharp as EOB Secretary?" Results are |
15:02 |
pinesol_green |
Yes (7): kmlussier, yboston, bbqben, graced, RoganH, montgoc1, bshum |
15:02 |
bbqben |
csharp ++ |
15:02 |
graced |
csharp++ |
15:02 |
csharp |
I gladly accept that too ;-) |
15:02 |
montgoc1 |
csharp++ |
15:03 |
bbqben |
Realize we're running late. Shall we continue? |
15:03 |
kmlussier |
I'm not going anywhere. |
15:03 |
bshum |
What's next? |
15:03 |
montgoc1 |
I can continue. |
15:03 |
yboston |
I can continue |
15:03 |
csharp |
I'm good |
15:03 |
graced |
continue |
15:03 |
bbqben |
#Topic Evergreen community job postings |
15:04 |
bbqben |
montgoc1 proposed a place for EG postings on the website, and there was some discussion on the list. Discussion? |
15:04 |
RoganH |
The web team discussed this yesterday as well. |
15:04 |
kmlussier |
We discussed it at yesterday's web team meeting. |
15:05 |
kmlussier |
RoganH: I win! |
15:05 |
bbqben |
poifect - update from the web team? |
15:05 |
RoganH |
Some idiot offered to add job entries when they're posted. |
15:05 |
kmlussier |
RoganH++ |
15:05 |
gmcharlt |
and we'll be trying out a couple ways to manage the listings |
15:06 |
bbqben |
Excellent - glad to hear it. Will watch for updates |
15:06 |
montgoc1 |
I can help if you need. |
15:06 |
bbqben |
#Topic Evergreen 2.7 Release Manager's Report |
15:06 |
RoganH |
montgoc1: great! |
15:06 |
pmurray |
Any reason not to use an RSS feed from http://jobs.code4lib.org/jobs/Evergreen/ |
15:07 |
* pmurray |
goes back into lurking mode. |
15:07 |
bshum |
#info Ben Shum wrote a blog post about 2.7.0-beta1 at http://evergreen-ils.org/evergreen-2-7-0-beta1-released/ |
15:07 |
bshum |
Big thanks to everyone who participated in development, testing, writing release notes |
15:07 |
bshum |
I think it's the first time we've had such comprehensive coverage of all new features in the notes on first pass. |
15:08 |
bshum |
Later today/tomorrow, we'll make a final call on the web client preview going in (pending further testing) |
15:08 |
csharp |
pmurray: nice - I didn't know about that |
15:08 |
bbqben |
bshum ++ |
15:08 |
bshum |
I expect that we'll get some more work done during the Bug Squashing Day (see http://evergreen-ils.org/evergreen-bug-squashing-day/) |
15:08 |
kmlussier |
bshum++ |
15:08 |
csharp |
bshum++ |
15:08 |
bshum |
And that'll lead us to a better 2.7.0-RC1 if all goes according to timeline |
15:09 |
graced |
As an aside, Equinox will have the public test/demo server for the web based client up by tomorrow. |
15:09 |
yboston |
bshum++ |
15:09 |
RoganH |
graced: yay! |
15:10 |
bbqben |
Wahoo, thanks for the update bshum and graced |
15:10 |
bbqben |
#Topic Financial Report |
15:10 |
bbqben |
gmcharlt ++ |
15:10 |
gmcharlt |
quick note on the numbers |
15:11 |
kmlussier |
Can we reschedule that date for accessing the ledger sometime soon? |
15:11 |
gmcharlt |
they reflect $312.19 for book sales via Lulu |
15:11 |
gmcharlt |
which were mostly earned last year, but were added to the ledger this summer |
15:12 |
gmcharlt |
as well as a $250 donation by graced |
15:12 |
gmcharlt |
kmlussier: yes - I will send out a survey for dates in September |
15:12 |
kmlussier |
gmcharlt: Thanks! |
15:12 |
bbqben |
yboston ++ for the diff log on the financials too |
15:13 |
bbqben |
#Topic Evergreen Conference Report |
15:13 |
yboston |
I am storing the reports in a lcoal git repo, may push it to github at some point |
15:13 |
kmlussier |
buzzy had to leave early, but left me some notes to report. |
15:14 |
kmlussier |
#info the 2015 local conference team has been meeting with the site on details and and still seeking conference committee members. |
15:14 |
kmlussier |
#info the website for the venue, if anyone wants to check it out, is http://www.hoodriverinn.com/ |
15:14 |
kmlussier |
That's all he gave me before he had to run off. |
15:15 |
bbqben |
nice pool! |
15:15 |
montgoc1 |
Nice view. |
15:15 |
* csharp |
wants to go to there |
15:15 |
yboston |
very nice |
15:15 |
bbqben |
Thanks for the update kmlussier |
15:16 |
graced |
kmlussier: do you know if he's seeking local committee members or general community? |
15:16 |
kmlussier |
I don't know. I thought local, but I'll double check with him. |
15:16 |
graced |
Thanks! |
15:16 |
bbqben |
# Topic September teleconference call |
15:17 |
bbqben |
oops #Topic September Teleconference call |
15:17 |
bbqben |
So, basically proposing that our next scheduled meeting be via teleconference rather than IRC |
15:17 |
kmlussier |
Will that work with the oops in there? |
15:17 |
bbqben |
#Topic September Teleconference call |
15:17 |
bbqben |
beats the horse |
15:18 |
bbqben |
18.09.14 @ 11 Pacific |
15:18 |
bbqben |
The call will be recorded |
15:18 |
csharp |
the new secretary can take old school minutes, too |
15:19 |
bbqben |
csharp like, with a pen & paper? Too much! |
15:19 |
csharp |
:-D |
15:19 |
RoganH |
csharp: I think you can use a laptop though you'd get style points for clay tablets |
15:20 |
bbqben |
#action bbqben to send out conference coordinates in advance |
15:20 |
bbqben |
Before we wrap, any other items, thoughts, jokes? |
15:20 |
RoganH |
No jokes shareable in a publicly logged forum. |
15:21 |
bbqben |
Fair enough, thanks all for your time today! |
15:21 |
bbqben |
#endmeeting |
15:21 |
pinesol_green |
Meeting ended Thu Aug 21 15:21:24 2014 US/Eastern. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
15:21 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2014/evergreen.2014-08-21-14.03.html |
15:21 |
pinesol_green |
Minutes (text): http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2014/evergreen.2014-08-21-14.03.txt |
15:21 |
pinesol_green |
Log: http://evergreen-ils.org/meetings/evergreen/2014/evergreen.2014-08-21-14.03.log.html |
15:21 |
csharp |
bbqben++ |
15:21 |
graced |
bbqben++ |
15:21 |
montgoc1 |
bbqben++ |
15:21 |
RoganH |
bbqben++ |
15:21 |
csharp |
eob++ |
15:22 |
yboston |
bbqben++ |
15:22 |
kmlussier |
bbqben++ |
15:22 |
bshum |
bbqben++ |
15:22 |
gmcharlt |
bbqben++ |
15:22 |
bbqben |
stop already! |
15:22 |
bbqben |
sheesh |
15:22 |
kmlussier |
@karma bbqben |
15:22 |
pinesol_green |
kmlussier: Karma for "bbqben" has been increased 24 times and decreased 0 times for a total karma of 24. |
15:22 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: I have a lead on that error you were getting bringing up the patron search form |
15:26 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: this both explains and solves the problem - http://paste.lisp.org/display/143457 |
15:26 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: Aha! |
15:26 |
* bshum |
tests |
15:26 |
gmcharlt |
upshot is that JSON2js in OpenSRF is now also stricter as a result of berick's change |
15:27 |
Dyrcona |
bbqben++ :p |
15:46 |
gmcharlt |
bshum: bug 1359934 |
15:46 |
pinesol_green |
Launchpad bug 1359934 in Evergreen "JavaScript error opening patron search form" (affected: 1, heat: 6) [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1359934 |
15:49 |
|
edoceo joined #evergreen |
15:54 |
pmurray |
bbqben and all: Sorry about barging in on the meeting. Galen's tweet distracted me, so I thought I'd come in and see what the community was doing... |
15:55 |
bbqben |
pmurray no worries at all! gmcharlt can be distracting for all of us ;) |
15:56 |
kmlussier |
pmurray: Ha ha. Maybe we can have gmcharlt tweet at every meeting to get more people to poke their heads in. |
15:56 |
pmurray |
In case it was missed, the tweet was https://twitter.com/gmcharlt/status/502524970052771840 |
16:00 |
bshum |
gmcharlt: Patch looks good and my test server's XUL patron search is happier now. |
16:03 |
bshum |
I'll get it signed and into master as a bug fix |
16:07 |
bshum |
So far, not encountering other errors in the XUL client |
16:11 |
pinesol_green |
[evergreen|Galen Charlton] LP#1359934: prevent error opening patron search form - <http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=Evergreen.git;a=commit;h=646d132> |
16:29 |
|
tspindler left #evergreen |
16:43 |
kmlussier |
Weeee! I just set up my first Sandbox with a working branch loaded. |
16:43 |
kmlussier |
tsbere++ #Making things so easy! |
16:43 |
bshum |
tsbere++ |
16:45 |
kmlussier |
Bmagic++ #Setting up Sandboxes from MOBIUS |
16:46 |
kmlussier |
Now we just need more people to request them. :) |
17:08 |
pinesol_green |
Incoming from qatests: Test Success - http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html <http://testing.evergreen-ils.org/~live/test.html> |
17:11 |
|
mmorgan left #evergreen |
17:14 |
kmlussier |
Hmmm...is there an easy way to figure out what staff/user logins can be used with Concerto? It might be nice to provide that info on a wiki page somewhere. |
17:17 |
|
mdriscoll left #evergreen |
17:24 |
* kmlussier |
should stop testing bug fixes and save it for Bug Squashing Day. |
17:24 |
kmlussier |
Have a nice night everyone! |
18:08 |
|
remingtron_ joined #evergreen |
18:08 |
|
dbwells_ joined #evergreen |
18:21 |
ktomita |
Is the fact that a user is also an OverDrive user stored somewhere in the Evergreen database? |
18:25 |
csharp |
ktomita: nope - it's checked via SIP2 |
18:26 |
ktomita |
csharp: thanks. I didn't think it was in there. |
18:36 |
|
dkyle joined #evergreen |
19:25 |
|
wsmoak joined #evergreen |
20:03 |
|
jboyer_isl joined #evergreen |
20:11 |
|
bbqben joined #evergreen |
21:40 |
|
kmlussier joined #evergreen |
21:52 |
|
boxDbrand joined #evergreen |
21:54 |
boxDbrand |
newbie setup question - the very last step #12 -srfsh login is failing with "Received no data from server" --any suggestions? |
21:55 |
boxDbrand |
also setingstester.pl results with "libdbi postgresql driver not found in shared library path" |
21:57 |
kmlussier |
~troubleshoot |
21:57 |
pinesol_green |
If you're having trouble getting Evergreen to work, please follow this guide for isolating the problem: http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=troubleshooting:checking_for_errors |
21:58 |
kmlussier |
boxDbrand: I can't help with your question, but you might want to check that link. |
21:59 |
kmlussier |
boxDbrand: The channel isn't very active at this hour, so if the link doesn't help or if nobody else is around to help out, you might want to try tomorrow. About 10 to 5 Eastern time is when it's the most active. |
22:39 |
bshum |
boxDbrand: Which version of OpenSRF / Evergreen are you installing? And on which Linix distribution? |
22:40 |
bshum |
*Linux |